> "ES" == Erik Steffl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ES> if you have enough $$ go with ibm 390 (or whatever the number is)
ES> otherwise try wmware (or other similar product), if you require
ES> completely virtual machines (hw and all) you need a virtual machine, I
ES> guess the
if you have enough $$ go with ibm 390 (or whatever the number is)
otherwise try wmware (or other similar product), if you require
completely virtual machines (hw and all) you need a virtual machine, I
guess there's no way around it, chroot and I suspect jail (I don't know
jail) would not cut it.
> "CC" == Colin Cashman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> No. chroot is not safe enough. I want to create virtual boxes in which
>> I can give root rights to other people and I want to be sure that they
>> can't break other boxes.
>>
>> AGAIK if you have root you can escape c
On Thursday 15 March 2001 08:03, Ilya Martynov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm interested if there is exists some software which allows to
> implement virtual boxes under Linux (something that provide simular
> capabilities as FreeBSD's jails). The only thing I know about is
> user-mode linux kernel. Does any
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 10:15:57AM -0700, Ray Percival wrote:
> Not knowing about *BSD's jails I'm not sure if you want to
> restrict a user to only one part of the filesystem why not use
> chroot?
Because root can break out of a chroot().
Trivially.
It's not related to devices, like some seem
Colin Cashman wrote:
> VSD creates replicas of a working GNU Linux file system and uses this as a
> template for Virtual Servers. The replica files (not the
> entire OS) are 'hardlinked' to the original image, and share the same inode
> as the original file (which saves disk space). Each
> replic
> No. chroot is not safe enough. I want to create virtual boxes in which
> I can give root rights to other people and I want to be sure that they
> can't break other boxes.
>
> AGAIK if you have root you can escape chroot'ed directory. Another
> problems that root can have direct access to devices.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> No. chroot is not safe enough. I want to create virtual boxes in which
> I can give root rights to other people and I want to be sure that they
> can't break other boxes.
The closest Linux
Not knowing about *BSD's jails I'm not sure if you want to
restrict a user to only one part of the filesystem why not use
chroot?
-- Original Message --
From: Ilya Martynov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 15 Mar 2001 17:03:16 +0300
>
>Hi,
>
>I'm interested if the
> "DS" == Dave Sherohman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 05:03:16PM +0300, Ilya Martynov wrote:
>> I'm interested if there is exists some software which allows to
>> implement virtual boxes under Linux (something that provide simular
>> capabilities as F
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 05:03:16PM +0300, Ilya Martynov wrote:
> I'm interested if there is exists some software which allows to
> implement virtual boxes under Linux (something that provide simular
> capabilities as FreeBSD's jails). The only thing I know about is
> user-mode linux kernel. Does an
Hi,
I'm interested if there is exists some software which allows to
implement virtual boxes under Linux (something that provide simular
capabilities as FreeBSD's jails). The only thing I know about is
user-mode linux kernel. Does anybody had experience with it? How
stable is it? Is there any limi
12 matches
Mail list logo
