Hi guys,
Thank you all for answering my question about the meaning of "#!/bin/bash".
I've learned so much from following threads on this list.
Greetings, Manon.
On Tue, 8 May 2007 11:02:13 -0700
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 09:30:00AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 May 2007 11:04:02 +0300
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrei Popescu) wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 08:27:45PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> >
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 09:30:00AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Tue, 8 May 2007 11:04:02 +0300
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrei Popescu) wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 08:27:45PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> >
> > > Minor nit: in Debian, '/bin/sh' is a symlink to bash; I don't know what
> > > it is on
On Tue, 8 May 2007 11:04:02 +0300
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrei Popescu) wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 08:27:45PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
>
> > Minor nit: in Debian, '/bin/sh' is a symlink to bash; I don't know what
> > it is on other systems. So IIUC, when you write '#!/bin/sh', you aren't
> > real
On Mon, 7 May 2007 17:34:18 -0700
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 08:27:45PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 May 2007 16:10:24 -0700
> > Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 11:04:02PM +0200, Sjoerd Hiems
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 08:27:45PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> Minor nit: in Debian, '/bin/sh' is a symlink to bash; I don't know what
> it is on other systems. So IIUC, when you write '#!/bin/sh', you aren't
> really specifying a shell, but are rather saying 'use the standard
> shell'.
Which can be
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 08:27:45PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Mon, 7 May 2007 16:10:24 -0700
> Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 11:04:02PM +0200, Sjoerd Hiemstra wrote:
> > > Manon Metten wrote:
> > > > BTW: what's the first line "#!/bin/bash" in the s
On Mon, 7 May 2007 16:10:24 -0700
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 11:04:02PM +0200, Sjoerd Hiemstra wrote:
> > Manon Metten wrote:
> > > BTW: what's the first line "#!/bin/bash" in the script for?
> >
> > It is not really necessary, but it has some advan
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 11:04:02PM +0200, Sjoerd Hiemstra wrote:
> Manon Metten wrote:
> > BTW: what's the first line "#!/bin/bash" in the script for?
>
> It is not really necessary, but it has some advantages.
> The 'file' command will recognize the file as a script, there are
> certain other pro
Manon Metten wrote:
> BTW: what's the first line "#!/bin/bash" in the script for?
It is not really necessary, but it has some advantages.
The 'file' command will recognize the file as a script, there are
certain other programs (emacs?) that will treat it as such and
here is where my limited kn
Hi Sjoerd,
On 5/7/07, you wrote:
> The following works fine for KDE:
> > 11:16:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ more .kde/Autostart/unclutter
> > #!/bin/bash
> > /usr/bin/unclutter
It works fine, but how do I supply some args like: -idle 1 -keystroke?
'-idle 1' lets the cursor disappear after 1 se
Manon Metten wrote:
> Hi Johannes,
>
> On 5/4/07, about unclutter you wrote:
>
> The following works fine for KDE:
> >
> > 11:16:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ more .kde/Autostart/unclutter
> > #!/bin/bash
> > /usr/bin/unclutter
> >
> > $ chmod u+x .kde/Autostart/unclutter
>
> It works fine, but how do I
Hi Johannes,
On 5/4/07, about unclutter you wrote:
The following works fine for KDE:
11:16:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ more .kde/Autostart/unclutter
#!/bin/bash
/usr/bin/unclutter
$ chmod u+x .kde/Autostart/unclutter
I did the following:
$ cd ~/.kde/Autostart
$ nano unclutter (and entered "#!/b
On Friday 04 May 2007 19:18, Johannes Wiedersich shared this with us all:
>--} The following works fine for KDE:
>--}
>--} 11:16:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ more .kde/Autostart/unclutter
>--} #!/bin/bash
>--} /usr/bin/unclutter
>--}
>--} $ chmod u+x .kde/Autostart/unclutter
>--}
>--} HTH someone ;-D
>--}
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Russell L. Harris wrote:
> * Tyler Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070503 08:21]:
>
>> I was wondering if it would be possible to configure the mouse pointer
>> to disappear when not in use. I know I can just move it out of the way
>> into a corner somewhe
15 matches
Mail list logo
