Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 23:59:33 +0200, steef wrote:
hi list,
gtk-gnutella started today unexpected with very - too - large
fonts. is there a way to manipulate this phenomenon for which i
cannot discover any reason??
Suggestions:
- Check if
xdpyinfo | grep -
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 23:59:33 +0200, steef wrote:
> hi list,
>
> gtk-gnutella started today unexpected with very - too - large
> fonts. is there a way to manipulate this phenomenon for which i
> cannot discover any reason??
Suggestions:
- Check if
xdpyinfo | grep -E 'resol|dimens'
repo
hi list,
gtk-gnutella started today unexpected with very - too - large fonts. is
there a way to manipulate this phenomenon for which i cannot discover
any reason??
hth.,
steef
--
steef van duin
publicist, research-journalist
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.o
hemes > GTK Styles and Fonts > GTK
Fonts, 'Use my KDE fonts in GTK applications' is set.
Does anybody know what is wrong?
Thanks in advance.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 23 December 2003 02:31, Paul William wrote:
> try installing libgdkxft0
>
> On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 12:13, Toshiro wrote:
> > I'm running sid and all the old gtk apps (jpilot for example) have a very
> > ugly set of fonts. Anybody know how to fix the fonts?
Well, you already answered yo
try installing libgdkxft0
On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 12:13, Toshiro wrote:
> I'm running sid and all the old gtk apps (jpilot for example) have a very ugly
> set of fonts. Anybody know how to fix the fonts?
>
> Toshiro.
>
>
> ADSL-Para estar las 24 horas en internet
> http://www.internet.co
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 12:59:41AM -0300, Toshiro wrote:
> On Sunday 21 December 2003 23:28, Julius Plenz wrote:
> > Toshiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'm running sid and all the old gtk apps (jpilot for example) have a very
> > > ugly set of fonts. Anybody know how to fix the fonts?
> >
> >
Toshiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I did what you suggested, but I'm still having the same old and ugly
> fonts, did you do something else in addition to defining GDK_USE_XFT?
Did you do a Xserver-restart or a complete reboot? Additionally, I edited my
~/.gtkrc, now it looks like this: (
On Sunday 21 December 2003 23:28, Julius Plenz wrote:
> Toshiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm running sid and all the old gtk apps (jpilot for example) have a very
> > ugly set of fonts. Anybody know how to fix the fonts?
>
> Well, I just solved this problem: You have to use antialiased-fonts,
Toshiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm running sid and all the old gtk apps (jpilot for example) have a very ugly
> set of fonts. Anybody know how to fix the fonts?
Well, I just solved this problem: You have to use antialiased-fonts, so put
a "export GDK_USE_XFT='1'" in you ~/.bash_profile or
I'm running sid and all the old gtk apps (jpilot for example) have a very ugly
set of fonts. Anybody know how to fix the fonts?
Toshiro.
ADSL-Para estar las 24 horas en internet
http://www.internet.com.uy Tel. 707.42.52
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
Op do 06-11-2003, om 12:18 schreef Robert Story:
> > gnome-control-center, the fonts in gtk apps stay small (I don't know
> > what the default size is, must be 10 or so). So long story short
> > question: How do I make the font size change permanent WITHOUT
> > g
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 07:18:43PM +0800, Robert Story wrote:
>
> > gnome-control-center, the fonts in gtk apps stay small (I don't know
> > what the default size is, must be 10 or so). So long story short
> > question: How do I make the font size change permanent WITHO
> gnome-control-center, the fonts in gtk apps stay small (I don't know
> what the default size is, must be 10 or so). So long story short
> question: How do I make the font size change permanent WITHOUT
> gnome-session? This is also of interest for the gdm login screen...
>
Am Mo, den 27.10.2003 schrieb Joris um 11:53:
> > So long story short
> > question: How do I make the font size change permanent WITHOUT
> > gnome-session? This is also of interest for the gdm login screen...
>
> to load all your gnome settings, you should use gnome-settings-daemon.
> I have rece
> center: As soon as I set all fonts to 14pt there, everything is fine, at
> least as long as I use gnome. But I don't like gnome as a desktop
> environment (I use plain IceWM), and without starting gnome-session or
> gnome-control-center, the fonts in gtk apps stay small (I don
r: As soon as I set all fonts to 14pt there, everything is fine, at
least as long as I use gnome. But I don't like gnome as a desktop
environment (I use plain IceWM), and without starting gnome-session or
gnome-control-center, the fonts in gtk apps stay small (I don't know
what the defaul
You wrote:
> in my case, simply adding to the end of the file:
>
>* {
> font-size: 12pt !important
>}
>
>did the trick.
>
> OTOH, gtk's (1.x) font size is adjustable via the ~/.gtkrc file:
>
>style "smaller-text" {
> font="-*-Charter-Medium-R-Normal--14-*"
>}
I inserted the font line in the d
Hi,
>J. D. Kitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wrote:
>I had a working GNOME install from Woody. I just updated to Sid,
>and everything seemed to go quite nicely, but now in GNOME, or
>rather anything that uses GTK, I see only a bunch of little squares
>where I should be seeing text. Can anyone tell me w
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 10:47:40PM -0400, Hall Stevenson wrote:
> * J. D. Kitch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010903 19:16]:
> > I had a working GNOME install from Woody. I just updated to Sid, and
> > everything seemed to go quite nicely, but now in GNOME, or rather
> > anything that uses GTK, I see only a
> > Note that they provide no left-margin quote marks,
> > nor any indication of where the original message ends,
> > and they leave a blank line or two at the top, implying
> > that your reply should go there (otherwise, why
> > put it there?).
>
> That's a configurable setting in Outlook Express.
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Nathan E Norman wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 04:07:40PM -0600, John Galt wrote:
>> >> * You are not expected to understand this.
>> >> --comment from Unix system 6 source, credited to Lions and Johnson
>> >> Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who: finger m
Ahhh. So the brokenness lies in the lack of quotation definers and the
implicit one line open (BTW, pine/pico leaves two, but angle-brackets
things in pretty well). I just figured that the brokenness was an
artifact of where the cursor gets put, not having dealt with Lookout
(personal reasons, I
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 04:07:40PM -0600, John Galt wrote:
> >> * You are not expected to understand this.
> >> --comment from Unix system 6 source, credited to Lions and Johnson
> >> Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED], that's who: finger me for GPG key
> >
> >Since you're such a fan of
* Craig Dickson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010905 23:53]:
>
> Microsoft's mail clients, on the other hand, give you something like
> this:
>
> ___cut_here___
>
>
> --- Original message --- From: John Galt
>
> Elm predates any microsoft email product... Try to quote stuff in elm,
> the cursor goes to the
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 04:51:20PM -0600, John Galt wrote:
|
| Elm predates any microsoft email product... Try to quote stuff in elm,
| the cursor goes to the beginning of the text.
Don't all editors start with the cursor at the beginning? I used vim
in elm before I now use vim in mutt. Regard
John Galt wrote:
> Elm predates any microsoft email product... Try to quote stuff in elm,
> the cursor goes to the beginning of the text.
Where the cursor starts out is beside the point. What matters is the
structure of the message. Most traditional Internet email clients, such
as elm or mutt, gi
Elm predates any microsoft email product... Try to quote stuff in elm,
the cursor goes to the beginning of the text.
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Bud Rogers wrote:
>On Tuesday 04 September 2001 22:43 pm, Craig Dickson wrote:
>
>> Karsten is using the word as it is commonly used among computer
>> profess
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Nathan E Norman wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 09:34:05PM -0600, John Galt wrote:
>> On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Nathan E Norman wrote:
>>
>> >On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 06:11:03PM -0700, Eric G. Miller wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 03:10:27PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
>> >> >
On Wednesday 05 September 2001 05:45 am, Bud Rogers wrote:
> Except that in this case we're not talking about a practice that was not
> previously common or even not so common.
That's not a double negative, it's a brain fart. I meant to say "We're not
talking about a practice that was previous
Rob Ransbottom wrote:
> If one watches for how misunderstandings occur and expand
> one can write so as to minimize them.
As someone once said, "You sadist! You're asking people to THINK!"
Much as I agree with everything you wrote, I think you're wasting your
breath. Written conversation is not
I agree. See you don't know what part of whose post I agree with.
More in readable order follows.
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 01:53:24PM -0600, John Galt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > In case nobody told you, this is a mailinglist, not usenet.
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 07:27:13PM +0200, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 11:52:27AM -0500, ktb wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 08:48:22AM -0700, Craig Dickson wrote:
> > > Bud Rogers wrote:
> > >
> > > > Except that in this case we're not talking about a practice that was
> >
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 11:52:27AM -0500, ktb wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 08:48:22AM -0700, Craig Dickson wrote:
> > Bud Rogers wrote:
> >
> > > Except that in this case we're not talking about a practice that was
> > > not previously common or even not so common. We're talking about a
> > >
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 10:13:08PM -0600, John Galt wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> >The problem with suggesting prefix responses are suitable in any context
> >is that this leads almost immediately to bad practices:
>
> Yeah, like the free exchange of ideas: can't have that.
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 08:48:22AM -0700, Craig Dickson wrote:
> Bud Rogers wrote:
>
> > Except that in this case we're not talking about a practice that was
> > not previously common or even not so common. We're talking about a
> > practice that was virtually unknown until Microsoft flooded the m
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 09:34:05PM -0600, John Galt wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Nathan E Norman wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 06:11:03PM -0700, Eric G. Miller wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 03:10:27PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> >> > but this practice is strongly deprecated.
>
Bud Rogers wrote:
> Except that in this case we're not talking about a practice that was
> not previously common or even not so common. We're talking about a
> practice that was virtually unknown until Microsoft flooded the market
> with badly broken mail and news clients that make it very difficu
On Tuesday 04 September 2001 22:43 pm, Craig Dickson wrote:
> Karsten is using the word as it is commonly used among computer
> professionals. When some previously-common (or even not so common)
> practice or standard is superseded and no longer recommended, it is said
> to be "deprecated". One of
Karsten and others have already explained the evils of jeopardy-style
quoting, so I won't go into that again. I have some other remarks though.
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 13:53:24 -0600, John Galt wrote:
> In case nobody told you, this is a mailinglist, not usenet.
I'm well aware that debian-user is
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 18:11:03 -0700, Eric G. Miller wrote:
> Webster's Ninth Collegiate Dictionary has this to say...
>
> dep-re-cate 1. to express mild or regretful disapproval of 2.
> DEPRECIATE
The Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary, 5th ed. says "to feel and express
disapproval
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 03:10:27PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 01:53:24PM -0600, John Galt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > In case nobody told you, this is a mailinglist, not usenet.
>
> Wrong, it's both:
>
> news:muc.lists.debian.user
>
> > To be more preci
on Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 06:11:03PM -0700, Eric G. Miller (egm2@jps.net) wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 03:10:27PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
<...>
> > Thanks to poor design of some PC-based mail agents, one will
> > occasionally see the entire quoted message after the response, like
%% Regarding Re: Quoting styles, cont (Was Re: Fonts in GTK);
%% "Eric G. Miller" writes:
>> but this practice is strongly deprecated.
egm>^^^
egm> Hell does that mean?
egm> Webster's Ninth Collegi
You top posted on purpose. Didn't you? Ahh, you rat bastard! ;)
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 09:34:05PM -0600, John Galt wrote:
>
> Well that's the problem, isn't it? Karsten (and yourself, variously)
> isn't really "putting up" with it, now is he?
>
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Nathan E Norman wrote:
>
>
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 08:43:02PM -0700, Craig Dickson wrote:
> Eric G. Miller wrote:
>
> > > but this practice is strongly deprecated.
> >^^^
> >Hell does that mean?
> >
> > Webster's Ninth Collegiate Dictionary has thi
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Karsten M. Self wrote:
>on Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 01:53:24PM -0600, John Galt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>
>> In case nobody told you, this is a mailinglist, not usenet.
>
>Wrong, it's both:
>
>news:muc.lists.debian.user
mail to news gateways notwithstanding
>> To be more
Eric G. Miller wrote:
> > but this practice is strongly deprecated.
>^^^
> Hell does that mean?
>
> Webster's Ninth Collegiate Dictionary has this to say...
>
> dep-re-cate 1. to express mild or regretful disapprov
Well that's the problem, isn't it? Karsten (and yourself, variously)
isn't really "putting up" with it, now is he?
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Nathan E Norman wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 06:11:03PM -0700, Eric G. Miller wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 03:10:27PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
>> >
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 06:11:03PM -0700, Eric G. Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 03:10:27PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > but this practice is strongly deprecated.
>^^^
> Hell does that mean?
>
> Webster's Ni
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 03:10:27PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
[snip]
> From "Email Quotes" in the Jargon File:
> http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/Email-Quotes.html
>
> Most netters view an inclusion as a promise that comment on it will
> immediately follow. The preferre
on Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 01:53:24PM -0600, John Galt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> In case nobody told you, this is a mailinglist, not usenet.
Wrong, it's both:
news:muc.lists.debian.user
> To be more precise, this is a reliable method of ensuring that
> anything you reply to has already
on Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 08:26:35AM -0400, Hall Stevenson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Karsten M. Self (kmself@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
> > Please use postfix response and appropriate quoting
> > style.
>
> What the hell does that mean ?? 'appropriate quoting style' I
> understand, but asking someon
%% "J." Roger Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I had a working GNOME install from Woody. I just updated to Sid,
>> and everything seemed to go quite nicely, but now in GNOME, or
>> rather anything that uses GTK, I see only a bunch of little squares
>> where I should be seeing text. C
In case nobody told you, this is a mailinglist, not usenet. To be more
precise, this is a reliable method of ensuring that anything you reply to
has already been read, thus you shouldn't need to scroll through the
question all of the time to get to the answer. However, for the people
who wish to
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 08:26:35 -0400, Hall Stevenson wrote:
> Now, 'use postfix response' ??
"Reply below the text you're responding to".
To borrow a sig: "Answering above the the original message is called top
posting. Sometimes also called the Jeopardy style. Usenet is Q & A not A &
Q." -- Bo
> > > See locale issues discussed here variously. I
> > > don't know a current fix, but the problem's definitely
> > > been identified.
> >
> > Try changing the character set.
>
> Please use postfix response and appropriate quoting
> style.
What the hell does that mean ?? 'appropriate quoting sty
> -Original Message-
> From: Karsten M. Self [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: dinsdag 4 september 2001 10:25
> To: 'Debian List'
> Subject: Re: Fonts in GTK
>
>
> on Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 09:02:18AM +0200, William Leese
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
on Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 09:02:18AM +0200, William Leese ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> From: Karsten M. Self [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: dinsdag 4 september 2001 0:14
> >
> > on Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 03:03:35PM -0700, J. D. Kitch ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > wrote:
> > > I had a working GNOME inst
Try changing the character set.
-Original Message-
From: Karsten M. Self [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: dinsdag 4 september 2001 0:14
To: Debian List
Subject: Re: Fonts in GTK
on Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 03:03:35PM -0700, J. D. Kitch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I had a working GN
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001 15:03:35 -0700
"J. D. Kitch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had a working GNOME install from Woody. I just updated to Sid,
> and everything seemed to go quite nicely, but now in GNOME, or
> rather anything that uses GTK, I see only a bunch of little squares
> where I should be
* J. D. Kitch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010903 19:16]:
> I had a working GNOME install from Woody. I just updated to Sid, and
> everything seemed to go quite nicely, but now in GNOME, or rather
> anything that uses GTK, I see only a bunch of little squares where I
> should be seeing text. Can anyone tel
on Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 03:03:35PM -0700, J. D. Kitch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I had a working GNOME install from Woody. I just updated to Sid,
> and everything seemed to go quite nicely, but now in GNOME, or
> rather anything that uses GTK, I see only a bunch of little squares
> where I shoul
I had a working GNOME install from Woody. I just updated to Sid,
and everything seemed to go quite nicely, but now in GNOME, or
rather anything that uses GTK, I see only a bunch of little squares
where I should be seeing text. Can anyone tell me what I hosed, and
what I need to do to correct it?
64 matches
Mail list logo
