[FIXED] Re: Firefox equivalent of SeaMonkey's pref.js

2019-12-20 Thread Richard Owlett
On 12/19/2019 04:05 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: On 20/12/2019 10:52, Richard Owlett wrote: As I date from Netscape era I much prefer SeaMonkey. However when I did a reasonably default install of Debian 9.8 I got Firefox 60.5.0esr . Due to *OPERATOR ERROR*, I mangled a preference. On the mozill

Re: Firefox equivalent of SeaMonkey's pref.js

2019-12-20 Thread tomas
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 11:05:17AM +1300, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > On 20/12/2019 10:52, Richard Owlett wrote: > >As I date from Netscape era I much prefer SeaMonkey. > >However when I did a reasonably default install of Debian 9.8 I got > >Firefox 60.5.0esr . > >Due to *OPERATOR ERROR*, I mangle

Re: Firefox equivalent of SeaMonkey's pref.js

2019-12-20 Thread Alexander V. Makartsev
On 20.12.2019 02:52, Richard Owlett wrote: > As I date from Netscape era I much prefer SeaMonkey. > However when I did a reasonably default install of Debian 9.8 I got > Firefox 60.5.0esr . > > Due to *OPERATOR ERROR*, I mangled a preference. > On the mozilla.general list I was told to edit pref.js

Re: Firefox equivalent of SeaMonkey's pref.js

2019-12-19 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
On 20/12/2019 10:52, Richard Owlett wrote: As I date from Netscape era I much prefer SeaMonkey. However when I did a reasonably default install of Debian 9.8 I got Firefox 60.5.0esr . Due to *OPERATOR ERROR*, I mangled a preference. On the mozilla.general list I was told to edit pref.js . For Sea

Firefox equivalent of SeaMonkey's pref.js

2019-12-19 Thread Richard Owlett
As I date from Netscape era I much prefer SeaMonkey. However when I did a reasonably default install of Debian 9.8 I got Firefox 60.5.0esr . Due to *OPERATOR ERROR*, I mangled a preference. On the mozilla.general list I was told to edit pref.js . For SeaMonkey I have no problem. For Firefox whe