On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Will Trillich wrote:
whether *fsck works or not is a separate issue
but critcal issue if your data is critical
> ext2fs (ext3fs)
sucky e2fsck
> xfs
xfs_check
> jfs
jfs_fsck
add reiserfsck and for guess which fs type
> nfs
not a filesystem
c ya
alvin
--
To UNSUBSC
On Mon, Aug 16 at 02:43PM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:47:10AM -0500, Will Trillich wrote:
> > - is there significant reason to shun reiserfs?
> > - what's the optimal/recommended recovery method?
>
> Best reason to shun it is that when the filesystem inevitably
> goes ba
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:47:10AM -0500, Will Trillich wrote:
> - is there significant reason to shun reiserfs?
> - what's the optimal/recommended recovery method?
Not from me, huh? Best reason to shun it is that when the filesystem
inevitably goes bad (*all* do, not just reiser), the recovery t
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Will Trillich wrote:
> i'd still love to see an informed answer (i.e. not from marc
> wilson) on why reiserfs should be avoided. the instance
> discussed here may not have been recovered using the best means,
> i don't know. but blanket assertions (avoid it) and emotional
>
On Fri, Aug 13 at 08:52PM +0800, Katipo wrote:
> Marc Wilson wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 11:23:28AM -0400, James Herschel wrote:
> >>What should I do next time?
> >
> >Not use reiserfs.
>
> What's wrong with reiserfs?
> I've been running it for three years without a hiccup.
i'd still love
James Herschel wrote:
Why on earth would Reiserfs be in the Kernel for as long as it has if
it wasn't any good?
reiserfs was in the kernel (and supported by other distros) for quite a
while before Red Hat thought it safe to use. Ditto LVM.
I find Knoppix to be a great tool when a system is unb
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 10:41:34AM -0400, James Herschel wrote:
> Why on earth would Reiserfs be in the Kernel for as long as it has if it
> wasn't any good?
Why are all sorts of things in the kernel? Because someone wants them
there.
The userland reisertools suck. Oh, wait, you already found
Why on earth would Reiserfs be in the Kernel for as long as it has if it
wasn't any good?
I find Knoppix to be a great tool when a system is unbootable, and it's
normally not a good idea (very bad) to run an fsck on a mounted partition.
Thanks for your completely useless feedback.
Marc Wilson w
Marc Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 11:23:28AM -0400, James Herschel wrote:
What should I do next time?
Not use reiserfs.
What's wrong with reiserfs?
I've been running it for three years without a hiccup.
Regards,
David.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 11:23:28AM -0400, James Herschel wrote:
> I rebooted my server one day to find that I needed to run reiserfsck.
> So I booted up my trusty copy of Knoppix and ran it. It said that I
> needed to run --rebuild-tree, so I did.
One has to wonder why you felt you needed to b
Hello,
I rebooted my server one day to find that I needed to run reiserfsck.
So I booted up my trusty copy of Knoppix and ran it. It said that I
needed to run --rebuild-tree, so I did.
Problem was that even though all the files were recovered, they were all
recovered to meaningless directorie
11 matches
Mail list logo
