I tried with newer kernel from backports as you suggested - also
installed the fresh firmware packages too - no change. Weird...
Anyway I report back for linux-image package perhaps.
Thank you Sven!
2017-11-12 20:19 keltezéssel, Sven Hartge írta:
Papp Rudolf Péter wrote:
The problem is i
Papp Rudolf Péter wrote:
> The problem is if I write a file to the mounted ocfs2 fs then add
> extended attributes to it after this if I try to read back it is doesn't
> show any change until read the same file attributes from the other node.
> After if I go back to the original I get the corr
Dear List!
I've a problem with a drbd/ocfs2 dual primary configuration (2 nodes).
The problem is if I write a file to the mounted ocfs2 fs then add
extended attributes to it after this if I try to read back it is doesn't
show any change until read the same file attributes from the other node.
Hi all,
I got this resolved,
the trick when building ramfs as rootfs os is to:
1. Use busybox (symlink all neccessary tools and package all busybox
dependencies with ramfs)
2. bootup into busybox bash, which should be /bin/sh symlinked to /bin/busybox
3. You may get nothing (no stardard ouput
Hi,
I am building a linux os by incorporating in-kernel initramfs, which
also runs as root-filesystem.
The result of this work would be booting/distributing linux with only
one file, which is the kernel + linked in initramfs + rootfs.
I am having a problem booting up the os when everything is link
On Tue, 29 May 2007, Andreas Grabner wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 27.05.2007, 20:22 + schrieb George N. White III:
I'd want to do some serious testing before using XFS in your environment.
Is there a reason you can't use ext3?
No. I want to test it before using it at customer sites. At one cuto
Andreas Grabner wrote:
Hi,
can anybody explain the following to me? It happens in full production
use. Should i change back to ext3 ?
---
kernel BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:57!
[...]
Hi.
I'm having a problem with xfs but it's not a bug of the kernel (i sup
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 08:17:16AM +0200, Andreas Grabner wrote:
>
> Am Sonntag, den 27.05.2007, 20:22 + schrieb George N. White III:
> > I'd want to do some serious testing before using XFS in your environment.
> > Is there a reason you can't use ext3?
> No. I want to test it before using it
Am Sonntag, den 27.05.2007, 20:22 + schrieb George N. White III:
> I'd want to do some serious testing before using XFS in your environment.
> Is there a reason you can't use ext3?
No. I want to test it before using it at customer sites. At one cutomer
the fsck on ext3 takes 2 hours - they ar
On Wed, 23 May 2007, Andreas Grabner wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 22.05.2007, 22:23 -0400 schrieb Greg Folkert:
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 23:39 +, George N. White III wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2007, Greg Folkert wrote:
can anybody explain the following to me? It happens in full production
use. Should
Am Dienstag, den 22.05.2007, 22:23 -0400 schrieb Greg Folkert:
> On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 23:39 +, George N. White III wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 May 2007, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > >>> can anybody explain the following to me? It happens in full production
> > >>> use. Should i change back to ext3
> >
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 23:39 +, George N. White III wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2007, Greg Folkert wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 12:03 -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 03:45:01PM +0200, Andreas Grabner wrote:
> >>
> >>> can anybody explain the following to me? It
On Tue, 22 May 2007, Greg Folkert wrote:
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 12:03 -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 03:45:01PM +0200, Andreas Grabner wrote:
can anybody explain the following to me? It happens in full production
use. Should i change back to ext3 ?
I can't explain
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 12:03 -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 03:45:01PM +0200, Andreas Grabner wrote:
>
> > can anybody explain the following to me? It happens in full production
> > use. Should i change back to ext3 ?
> >
>
> I can't explain it since I've never had a
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 03:45:01PM +0200, Andreas Grabner wrote:
> can anybody explain the following to me? It happens in full production
> use. Should i change back to ext3 ?
>
I can't explain it since I've never had a kernel error and never used
XFS. Not that I'm suggesting that they go toget
Hi,
can anybody explain the following to me? It happens in full production
use. Should i change back to ext3 ?
---
kernel BUG at fs/xfs/support/debug.c:57!
invalid opcode: [#1]
SMP
Modules linked in: nfs ipv6 nfsd exportfs lockd nfs_acl sunrpc appletalk
but
Hello
Vivek Kumar (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> This is regard to my earlier mail that i cannot mount the /dev/hdd1. I
> choose (based on old system) to be reiserfs type filesystem. And at
> the boot time it says cannot file reiserfs module.
> How can I add reiserfs module and mount my disk.
Yo
Hello
Vivek Kumar (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I installed debian woody on my system. The system is booted and
> everything seems to OK but there are 2 issues:
> 1. /usr is 100% full so it cannot install some files during
> installation
You could move something in /usr to it's own partition,
Hi there,
This is regard to my earlier mail that i cannot mount the /dev/hdd1. I
choose (based on old system) to be reiserfs type filesystem. And at the
boot time it says cannot file reiserfs module.
How can I add reiserfs module and mount my disk.
Thanks
--
Vivek Kumar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Hi,
I installed debian woody on my system. The system is booted and
everything seems to OK but there are 2 issues:
1. /usr is 100% full so it cannot install some files during installation
2. I have /dev/hdd . I can see it in /proc/ide/hdd but how can I mount
that. Can i edit and add entry for that
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 02:58:36PM +0200, Frederik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a 20 GB HD, partitioned in several smaller parts, some vfat:
> Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/hda5 1035628677468305552 69% /
> /dev/hda11
Hi,
I have a 20 GB HD, partitioned in several smaller parts, some vfat:
Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda5 1035628677468305552 69% /
/dev/hda11 909112693236169692 81% /home
/dev/hda6 2063504 124764
22 matches
Mail list logo
