Hi to all
I've got a problem with the bluetooth file transfer, my Jessie linux box
denies accepting files via BT, and I don't know why: sysconfig log
doesn't return any error.
The local service config dialog related to file transfer from the
bluetooth-applet is empty, and it shoul
Hi, I transfer the photos off my mobile using bluetooth on wheezy and
I'm trying to do the same on jessie and having some difficulty.
Under wheezy, things are simple:
1)
# /usr/sbin/hciconfig hci0 piscan
makes the laptop discoverable.
2)
$ bluetooth-agent 1234
sets a passkey to connect to the la
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 22:48:25 -0500
Maureen L Thomas wrote:
> If I understand you correctly then I only back up data, not the
> system. You have an excellent point and although I have never, so far
> at least, had a large problem losing my system or data I do see the
> advantage to doing just what
On 02/28/2015 07:07 AM, David Wright wrote:
I don't know how to "have a look around. If everything looks good,
proceed with using the computer." Not a clue.
I call that the "smoke test" -- boot, log in, start some terminals, run
some commands, start some applications, play some games, start t
Quoting David Christensen (dpchr...@holgerdanske.com):
> Verifying the image by wiping the system drive and then restoring the image:
>
> 1. Wipe the system drive using your tool of choice (such as the
> drive manufacturer's bootable utility disc).
>
> 2. Perform imaging steps 1 through 7, abov
On 02/27/2015 07:48 PM, Maureen L Thomas wrote:
If I understand you correctly then I only back up data, not the system.
You have an excellent point and although I have never, so far at least,
had a large problem losing my system or data I do see the advantage to
doing just what you have said. I
If I understand you correctly then I only back up data, not the system.
You have an excellent point and although I have never, so far at least,
had a large problem losing my system or data I do see the advantage to
doing just what you have said. I will be buying the book you suggested
and hop
On 02/26/2015 07:46 PM, Maureen L Thomas wrote:
[Why] back up a new install?
1. To integrate the machine into your backup procedures and make sure
it is being backed up correctly, so that you can trust it with your data
moving forward.
2. To have a baseline to compare changes to.
3. To
Hi.
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:55:04 -0500
Celejar wrote:
> > > > Wouldn't you need a crossover cable to do that?
> > > >
> > > > Unless they installed really braindead 15-years old NICs at both
> > > > laptops - no, one does not need crossover cable.
> > > > Although, given the existence of some
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:29:21 +0300
Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:48:52 -0500
> Celejar wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:44:19 +0300
> > Reco wrote:
> >
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 08:37:30 -0800
> > > Pete Ley wrote:
> > >
> > > > Wouldn't you need a cros
On 02/27/2015 12:49 AM, Paul E Condon wrote:
On 20150226_2246-0500, Maureen L Thomas wrote:
On 02/26/2015 09:55 PM, David Christensen wrote:
On 02/25/2015 11:06 PM, Maureen L Thomas wrote:
I bought a new Toshiba lap top and want to copy the files from my old
Toshiba lap top to the new one. T
Hi.
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:48:52 -0500
Celejar wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:44:19 +0300
> Reco wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 08:37:30 -0800
> > Pete Ley wrote:
> >
> > > Wouldn't you need a crossover cable to do that?
> >
> > Unless they installed really braindead 15-ye
On 20150226_2246-0500, Maureen L Thomas wrote:
>
> On 02/26/2015 09:55 PM, David Christensen wrote:
> >On 02/25/2015 11:06 PM, Maureen L Thomas wrote:
> >>I bought a new Toshiba lap top and want to copy the files from my old
> >>Toshiba lap top to the new one. They both have Debian, the latest
>
On 02/26/2015 09:55 PM, David Christensen wrote:
On 02/25/2015 11:06 PM, Maureen L Thomas wrote:
I bought a new Toshiba lap top and want to copy the files from my old
Toshiba lap top to the new one. They both have Debian, the latest
version, so can I just hook up usb to usb and copy that way?
On 02/25/2015 11:06 PM, Maureen L Thomas wrote:
I bought a new Toshiba lap top and want to copy the files from my old
Toshiba lap top to the new one. They both have Debian, the latest
version, so can I just hook up usb to usb and copy that way? If so would
I need a certain command to do it?
Just
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:44:19 +0300
Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 08:37:30 -0800
> Pete Ley wrote:
>
> > Wouldn't you need a crossover cable to do that?
>
> Unless they installed really braindead 15-years old NICs at both
> laptops - no, one does not need crossover cable.
> Althou
Hi.
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 13:04:14 -0600
David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Reco (recovery...@gmail.com):
> > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 08:07:46AM -0300, Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
> > > On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:57:39 +0100
> > > Jochen Spieker wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Why not just connect directly RJ45 to RJ4
Quoting Reco (recovery...@gmail.com):
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 08:07:46AM -0300, Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:57:39 +0100
> > Jochen Spieker wrote:
> >
> > > > Why not just connect directly RJ45 to RJ45 ?
> >
> > > The only reason I didn't mention that possibility is that
Quoting Maureen L Thomas (silverorbspin...@tampabay.rr.com):
> I bought a new Toshiba lap top and want to copy the files from my
> old Toshiba lap top to the new one. They both have Debian, the
> latest version, so can I just hook up usb to usb and copy that way?
> If so would I need a certain com
On 02/26/2015 11:37 AM, Pete Ley wrote:
Wouldn't you need a crossover cable to do that?
Not if he's on a LAN and goes thru a router.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015, Pete Ley wrote:
> Wouldn't you need a crossover cable to do that?
Any relatively modern piece of networking kit (and almost anything that
can do 1000bT) will auto-sense, so no crossover cable is needed.
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
It ca
Hi.
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 08:37:30 -0800
Pete Ley wrote:
> Wouldn't you need a crossover cable to do that?
Unless they installed really braindead 15-years old NICs at both
laptops - no, one does not need crossover cable.
Although, given the existence of some horrible companies like D-Link,
Trend
Wouldn't you need a crossover cable to do that?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87a900vdbp@enterprise.sectorq.net
Hi.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 08:07:46AM -0300, Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:57:39 +0100
> Jochen Spieker wrote:
>
> > >> If you have a home router or a switch with at least two Ethernet ports,
> > >> then the easiest way is probably to install openssh-server on one of the
> > >
On 2015-02-26, Floris wrote:
>>
> An other solution is take the old hard drive out of the laptop and
> put it in the new one. One downside, you must have a spare slot
> or replace the optical drive with the hard disk.
>
> Success,
>
> floris
>
>
Or for the less mechnically-inclined, seeing that b
Op Thu, 26 Feb 2015 08:06:46 +0100 schreef Maureen L Thomas
:
I bought a new Toshiba lap top and want to copy the files from my old
Toshiba lap top to the new one. They both have Debian, the latest
version, so can I just hook up usb to usb and copy that way? If so would
I need a certain
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:57:39 +0100
Jochen Spieker wrote:
> >> If you have a home router or a switch with at least two Ethernet ports,
> >> then the easiest way is probably to install openssh-server on one of the
> >> two laptops and use scp or rsync from the other laptop.
> > Why not just conn
On Thursday, February 26, 2015 at 1:00:04 PM UTC+5:30, Maureen L Thomas wrote:
> I bought a new Toshiba lap top and want to copy the files from my old
> Toshiba lap top to the new one. They both have Debian, the latest
> version, so can I just hook up usb to usb and copy that way? If so would
>
> Jochen Spieker wrote:
>
>> If you have a home router or a switch with at least two Ethernet ports,
>> then the easiest way is probably to install openssh-server on one of the
>> two laptops and use scp or rsync from the other laptop.
>
> Why not just connect directly RJ45 to RJ45 ?
The only r
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 10:24:57 +0100
Jochen Spieker wrote:
> If you have a home router or a switch with at least two Ethernet ports,
> then the easiest way is probably to install openssh-server on one of the
> two laptops and use scp or rsync from the other laptop.
Why not just connect directly RJ
Maureen L Thomas:
>
> I bought a new Toshiba lap top and want to copy the files from my old
> Toshiba lap top to the new one. They both have Debian, the latest version,
> so can I just hook up usb to usb and copy that way?
No, that won't work. USB uses a master/slave model and both of your
laptop
I bought a new Toshiba lap top and want to copy the files from my old
Toshiba lap top to the new one. They both have Debian, the latest
version, so can I just hook up usb to usb and copy that way? If so would
I need a certain command to do it?
Just a thought to make it easier since the old on
On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 11:26:50AM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
> debian-user:
>
> I would like to transfer files between Debian Wheezy Xfce computers
> (i386 and amd64) and iOS devices (iPod, iPad, iPhone).
>
>
>
>
> When I touch "Trust", there is activity in the icons in the
> upper-right
On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 11:26:50AM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
> debian-user:
>
> I would like to transfer files between Debian Wheezy Xfce computers (i386
> and amd64) and iOS devices (iPod, iPad, iPhone).
>
>
> On Debian, I have installed:
>
> libimobiledevice-utils
>
I haven't had an
debian-user:
I would like to transfer files between Debian Wheezy Xfce computers
(i386 and amd64) and iOS devices (iPod, iPad, iPhone).
On Debian, I have installed:
libimobiledevice-utils
When I connect the charging cable between an iPad Mini (Model A1489) and
a USB 2.0 port on a Debi
On Jun 2, 2012 7:51 AM, "Aubrey Raech" wrote:
> Any and all advice/recommendations are appreciated!
You could have a look at retroshare and tonido.
Both are not in Debian repositories.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun 03 Jun 2012 at 02:28:43 -0700, Aubrey Raech wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 21:07:15 -0400
> Miles Fidelman wrote:
>
> > here's another interesting one:
> > http://www.home.unix-ag.org/simon/woof.html
> >
> > From the description:
> >
> > ---
> > Woof (Web Offer One File) tries a diff
On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 22:51:12 -0700, Aubrey Raech wrote:
> Sometimes I have the need to send files that are too large for email to
> a friend directly (such as recordings of music I am working on, or
> similar projects). I'm wondering if there is a program that I could use
> for direct transfer, ho
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 02:31:02AM -0700, Aubrey Raech wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 15:16:19 +0100
> Chris Davies wrote:
>
> > 7. Use rsync (over ssh) or sftp to copy the files. Remember to tell
> > them to use port 10022 (or whatever you decided in #1) instead of the
> > default port 22.
>
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 08:41:40AM +0100, Chris Davies wrote:
> Rob Owens wrote:
> > I agree with using ssh, but I'd configure it to force sftp upon login
> > like this:
>
> I figured I'd frighten the OP if I added too much complexity.
>
Fair enough!
>
> > It's simpler to just AllowUsers user1
Aubrey Raech wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 21:07:15 -0400
Miles Fidelman wrote:
here's another interesting one:
http://www.home.unix-ag.org/simon/woof.html
Woof is excellent! Woof's also in the debian package repositories, as
is fex (from your previous message). Thank you for finding these, tr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 08:41:40 +0100
Chris Davies wrote:
> Rob Owens wrote:
> > I agree with using ssh, but I'd configure it to force sftp upon
> > login like this:
>
> I figured I'd frighten the OP if I added too much complexity.
Yes. :-/
>
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 18:24:22 -0500
"Christofer C. Bell" wrote:
[snip]
>
> That said, there have been a number of suggestions towards modifying
> the OP's requirements and I'm interested in seeing the reasoning
> behind the requirements themselves.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 15:16:19 +0100
Chris Davies wrote:
> Aubrey Raech wrote:
> > Sometimes I have the need to send files that are too large for
> > email to a friend directly [...]
>
> > 1. Not a proper server (http, ftp)
> > 2. No usernames? (scp,
On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 18:10:53 +0300
Mika Suomalainen wrote:
> On 02.06.2012 09:21, Aubrey Raech wrote:
> > On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 08:08:44 +0200
> > Tom Rausner wrote:
> >
> >> Dropbox ?
> >
> > Ah, and avoiding third-party servers was also a hopeful :-/ I'd
> > prefer not to have my files "out the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 20:28:22 +0100
Brian wrote:
> On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 09:34:55 -0500, green wrote:
>
> > Brian, you seem to be assuming that the router has a public IP (on
> > the WAN side), which is often not true. Unfortunately, many ISPs
> > pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 23:16:09 +0100
Brian wrote:
> On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 15:27:15 -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>
> > Brian wrote:
> >
> > I guess it depends on which packages you tell the installer to
> > load. One of the options is "web server," but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 02 Jun 2012 21:07:15 -0400
Miles Fidelman wrote:
> here's another interesting one:
> http://www.home.unix-ag.org/simon/woof.html
>
> From the description:
>
> ---
> Woof (Web Offer One File) tries a different approach. It assumes that
Brian wrote:
> ssh is a waste of time and effort in the circumstances as we know them.
I wasn't suggesting ssh as an application. I was recommending ssh as
a transport, on which one would layer an application such as WinSCP
or FileZilla.
But others are already making this point so I'll sit back
Rob Owens wrote:
> I agree with using ssh, but I'd configure it to force sftp upon login
> like this:
I figured I'd frighten the OP if I added too much complexity.
> It's simpler to just AllowUsers user1 user2 user3
Fair point in the circumstances.
>> 6. Make sure that your password, and yo
Ahoj,
Dňa Sat, 2 Jun 2012 18:24:22 -0500 "Christofer C. Bell"
napísal:
> The point, however, is that there is no file transfer method that
> meets her requirements.
>
> 1. No dedicated server (no web, no sftp, no ftp, NFS, Samba, etc).
> 2. No usernames/logins (no sf
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 03:16:19PM +0100, Chris Davies wrote:
> Aubrey Raech wrote:
> > Sometimes I have the need to send files that are too large for email to
> > a friend directly [...]
>
> > 1. Not a proper server (http, ftp)
> > 2. No usernames? (scp, rsync)
> > 3. Preferably does not require
here's another interesting one:
http://www.home.unix-ag.org/simon/woof.html
From the description:
---
Woof (Web Offer One File) tries a different approach. It assumes that
everybody has a web-browser or a commandline web-client installed. Woof
is a small simple stupid webserver that can ea
use.
The point, however, is that there is no file transfer method that
meets her requirements.
1. No dedicated server (no web, no sftp, no ftp, NFS, Samba, etc).
2. No usernames/logins (no sftp, scp, no ftp, etc, see above)
3. No chat protocols (no IM, no IRC)
4. No external 3rd party service (drop
Brian wrote:
On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 22:48:57 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Sb, 02 iun 12, 18:12:03, Brian wrote:
There appears to be no advantage in using sshd in this situation. The
idea of having to guide her through configuring a router and using ssh
(on a Windows machine, incidentally) do
se out of the box not only in Debian but any modern Linux/Unix.
*Everything else* requires effort to setup and use.
The point, however, is that there is no file transfer method that
meets her requirements.
1. No dedicated server (no web, no sftp, no ftp, NFS, Samba, etc).
2. No usernames/logins (n
On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 22:48:57 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Sb, 02 iun 12, 18:12:03, Brian wrote:
> >
> > There appears to be no advantage in using sshd in this situation. The
> > idea of having to guide her through configuring a router and using ssh
> > (on a Windows machine, incidentally)
On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 15:27:15 -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Brian wrote:
>
> I guess it depends on which packages you tell the installer to load.
> One of the options is "web server," but I haven't set up a desktop
> installation lately (all my Debian is server-side), so I'm not really
>
On Sb, 02 iun 12, 18:12:03, Brian wrote:
>
> There appears to be no advantage in using sshd in this situation. The
> idea of having to guide her through configuring a router and using ssh
> (on a Windows machine, incidentally) doesn't bear thinking about for one
> thing.
1. Why would the client h
On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 09:34:55 -0500, green wrote:
> Brian, you seem to be assuming that the router has a public IP (on the WAN
> side), which is often not true. Unfortunately, many ISPs provide their
> customers with only private/local IPs behind NAT; inbound connections are
> therefore not p
Brian wrote:
On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 09:14:12 -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Aubrey Raech wrote:
1. Not a proper server (http, ftp)
Pretty much all modern o/s's come with both a web server and ftp
pre-installed. It's a matter of turning them on, and configuring them
(if your target is running a
t static. However, if the user sits behind a
> > NAT or something similar that blocks incoming connections, a third
> > party certainly is required (such as a file transfer proxy for XMPP).
>
> Port forwarding?
...a possible but less viable option when NAT happens at the ISP router
Brian wrote at 2012-06-02 08:13 -0500:
> On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 12:41:22 +0200, Claudius Hubig wrote:
> > Do you have a have public IP address (either IPv4 or IPv6)? If
> > that is not the case, you will need a third party in order to
> > establish the connection.
>
> A third party is not required.
On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 09:14:12 -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Aubrey Raech wrote:
>>
>> 1. Not a proper server (http, ftp)
>
> Pretty much all modern o/s's come with both a web server and ftp
> pre-installed. It's a matter of turning them on, and configuring them
> (if your target is running
ng similar that blocks incoming connections, a third
> party certainly is required (such as a file transfer proxy for XMPP).
Port forwarding?
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtop
On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 15:16:19 +0100, Chris Davies wrote:
> Yes. A "proper" server (http, ftp, ssh) would satisfy this requirement
> but you've excluded those with #1, #2. If your PCs can have Internet
> facing ports configured, I'd go for ssh/rsync every time.
I have a similar, if not exactly th
Miles Fidelman wrote:
Aubrey Raech wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Debian users!
Sometimes I have the need to send files that are too large for email to
a friend directly (such as recordings of music I am working on, or
similar projects). I'm wondering if there is a
Aubrey Raech wrote:
> Sometimes I have the need to send files that are too large for email to
> a friend directly [...]
> 1. Not a proper server (http, ftp)
> 2. No usernames? (scp, rsync)
> 3. Preferably does not require a chat protocol (XMPP, IRC's DCC)
> - From what I can find it seems like X
On 02.06.2012 09:21, Aubrey Raech wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 08:08:44 +0200
> Tom Rausner wrote:
>
>> Dropbox ?
>
> Ah, and avoiding third-party servers was also a hopeful :-/ I'd prefer
> not to have my files "out there" on the web... more of a direct
> person-to-person transfer.
>
> I've als
even if it is not static. However, if the user sits behind a
NAT or something similar that blocks incoming connections, a third
party certainly is required (such as a file transfer proxy for XMPP).
Lacking more information from the OP, speculation is all I can do,
though.
Best regards,
Claudius
-
Aubrey Raech wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Debian users!
Sometimes I have the need to send files that are too large for email to
a friend directly (such as recordings of music I am working on, or
similar projects). I'm wondering if there is a program that I could us
On Sat 02 Jun 2012 at 12:41:22 +0200, Claudius Hubig wrote:
> Aubrey Raech wrote:
> >
> > Any and all advice/recommendations are appreciated!
>
> Do you have a have public IP address (either IPv4 or IPv6)? If
> that is not the case, you will need a third party in order to
> establish the connec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello Aubrey,
Aubrey Raech wrote:
> 1. Not a proper server (http, ftp)
> 2. No usernames? (scp, rsync)
> 3. Preferably does not require a chat protocol (XMPP, IRC's DCC)
>
> - From what I can find it seems like XMPP would probably be the best bet
On Fri 01 Jun 2012 at 22:51:12 -0700, Aubrey Raech wrote:
> Sometimes I have the need to send files that are too large for email to
> a friend directly (such as recordings of music I am working on, or
> similar projects). I'm wondering if there is a program that I could use
> for direct transfer,
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 07:08:44AM BST, Tom Rausner wrote:
> Dropbox ?
OP explicitly mentioned "direct" so it rules Dropbox out.
Dropbox is closed source and only works on Intel-compatible platform
so it rules it out for me for example.
nc (netcat) is what the user is looking for.
Cheers,
--
rj
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 08:08:44 +0200
Tom Rausner wrote:
> Dropbox ?
Ah, and avoiding third-party servers was also a hopeful :-/ I'd prefer
not to have my files "out there" on the web... more of a direct
person-to-person transfer.
I've also considered
Dropbox ?
On Jun 2, 2012 7:51 AM, "Aubrey Raech" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello Debian users!
>
> Sometimes I have the need to send files that are too large for email to
> a friend directly (such as recordings of music I am working on, or
> similar projects). I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Debian users!
Sometimes I have the need to send files that are too large for email to
a friend directly (such as recordings of music I am working on, or
similar projects). I'm wondering if there is a program that I could use
for direct transfer,
On Jo, 08 mar 12, 17:25:53, Stayvoid wrote:
> Hello.
>
> "... Give users a restricted shell such as scponly or rssh. These
> shells restrict the commands available to the users so that they are
> not provided any remote execution privileges."
> Is it really necessary?
Do you (plan to) have users
Hello.
"... Give users a restricted shell such as scponly or rssh. These
shells restrict the commands available to the users so that they are
not provided any remote execution privileges."
Is it really necessary?
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch-sec-services.en.html
Che
Daniel Barclay wrote:
> H.S. wrote:
>> ...
>> When I copy files from a flash memory (inserted in a USB card reader) to
>> my Testing desktop, I notice that the filenames are upper case and the
>> time stamp of the transferred files is the time they were transferred
>> and not when they were origina
H.S. wrote:
...
When I copy files from a flash memory (inserted in a USB card reader) to
my Testing desktop, I notice that the filenames are upper case and the
time stamp of the transferred files is the time they were transferred
and not when they were originally created.
How do I avoid these an
Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 28 May 2010 12:50:15 -0400, H.S. wrote:
>
>> When I copy files from a flash memory (inserted in a USB card reader) to
>> my Testing desktop, I notice that the filenames are upper case and the
>> time stamp of the transferred files is the time they were transferred
>> and
On Fri, 28 May 2010 12:50:15 -0400, H.S. wrote:
> When I copy files from a flash memory (inserted in a USB card reader) to
> my Testing desktop, I notice that the filenames are upper case and the
> time stamp of the transferred files is the time they were transferred
> and not when they were origi
Hello.
When I copy files from a flash memory (inserted in a USB card reader) to
my Testing desktop, I notice that the filenames are upper case and the
time stamp of the transferred files is the time they were transferred
and not when they were originally created.
How do I avoid these and get lowe
H.S. wrote:
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> In , H.S. wrote:
>>> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
If the Content-Length is correct, it is a problem client-side. If the
Content-Length is incorrect, it is a problem server-side.
>>> I gave it a shot myself with my own machine using Iceape b
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:36:19PM -0400, H.S. wrote:
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > In , H.S. wrote:
> >> I have a large data tar file of 4.4 GB. I have made it available over
> >> https to be downloaded by the recipient. This is on a Debian Sid, 2.6.26
[snip]
> > If the Content-Length is c
Rob Starling wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 01:27:27PM -0400, H.S. wrote:
>> Well, I split the tar file to smaller chunks of 680M each (using the
>> split command).
>> $> split -d -b 680M /tmp/datafile.tar datfile
> ...
>
> just be sure that the * expands to the names of the files in the
> righ
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 01:27:27PM -0400, H.S. wrote:
> Well, I split the tar file to smaller chunks of 680M each (using the
> split command).
> $> split -d -b 680M /tmp/datafile.tar datfile
...
> The only problem is that the remote user uses Windows and will need a
> method to join them together
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> In , H.S. wrote:
>> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>>>
>>> If the Content-Length is correct, it is a problem client-side. If the
>>> Content-Length is incorrect, it is a problem server-side.
>> I gave it a shot myself with my own machine using Iceape browser and I
>>
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> In , H.S. wrote:
>> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>>>
>>> If the Content-Length is correct, it is a problem client-side. If the
>>> Content-Length is incorrect, it is a problem server-side.
>> I gave it a shot myself with my own machine using Iceape browser and I
>>
In , H.S. wrote:
>Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> In , H.S. wrote:
>>> I have a large data tar file of 4.4 GB. I have made it available over
>>> https to be downloaded by the recipient. This is on a Debian Sid,
>>> 2.6.26 kernel and the partition is ext3.
>>>
>>> When the remote user clicks on tha
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> In , H.S. wrote:
>> I have a large data tar file of 4.4 GB. I have made it available over
>> https to be downloaded by the recipient. This is on a Debian Sid, 2.6.26
>> kernel and the partition is ext3.
>>
>> When the remote user clicks on that download link, his bro
In , H.S. wrote:
>I have a large data tar file of 4.4 GB. I have made it available over
>https to be downloaded by the recipient. This is on a Debian Sid, 2.6.26
>kernel and the partition is ext3.
>
>When the remote user clicks on that download link, his browser is
>showing the file size to be only
Hello,
I have a large data tar file of 4.4 GB. I have made it available over
https to be downloaded by the recipient. This is on a Debian Sid, 2.6.26
kernel and the partition is ext3.
When the remote user clicks on that download link, his browser is
showing the file size to be only around 130 MB.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/20/07 09:48, Bob Cox wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 11/19/07 16:06, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>>> Ron Johnson wrote:
On 11/18/07 22:19, hce wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use scp to tr
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 11/19/07 16:06, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> On 11/18/07 22:19, hce wrote:
Hi,
I use scp to transfer a file, it displayed 50 KB/s. Does that mean 50
Kbit/s or 50 Kbyte/s?
>>>
>>> B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/19/07 16:06, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 11/18/07 22:19, hce wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I use scp to transfer a file, it displayed 50 KB/s. Does that mean 50
>>> Kbit/s or 5
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 04:06:51PM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 11/18/07 22:19, hce wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I use scp to transfer a file, it displayed 50 KB/s. Does that mean 50
>>> Kbit/s or 50 Kbyte/s?
>>
>> Byte
>>
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/18/07 22:19, hce wrote:
Hi,
I use scp to transfer a file, it displayed 50 KB/s. Does that mean 50
Kbit/s or 50 Kbyte/s?
Byte
bit
Hm,hmm... Let's see... Ron? What does that mean?
Hugo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
