Re: Figuring out Why Standards are there.

2006-05-23 Thread Clive Menzies
On (23/05/06 11:33), Ron Johnson wrote: > When making such a short reply to such a long post, please snip out > the bulk of the original email. Ouch! Apologies. Regards Clive -- www.clivemenzies.co.uk ... ...strategies for business -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a sub

Re: Figuring out Why Standards are there.

2006-05-23 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Clive Menzies wrote: > On (22/05/06 11:38), Greg Folkert wrote: >> On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 03:32 -0700, formless void wrote: >>> I finally found that W3C has got >>> >>> User Agent Accessibility Guidelines at >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-USERAGENT/ >

Re: Figuring out Why Standards are there.

2006-05-23 Thread Jon Dowland
At 1148332367 past the epoch, Clive Menzies wrote: > On (22/05/06 11:38), Greg Folkert wrote: > Great answer! !grep '^>'|wc -l 120 !wc -l 194 > 62% :( Please trim your quotes. -- Jon Dowland http://alcopop.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E

Re: Figuring out Why Standards are there.

2006-05-22 Thread Clive Menzies
On (22/05/06 11:38), Greg Folkert wrote: > On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 03:32 -0700, formless void wrote: > > I finally found that W3C has got > > > > User Agent Accessibility Guidelines at > > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-USERAGENT/ > > > > Now my question is how authenticative W3C is? > > What do yo

Figuring out Why Standards are there.

2006-05-22 Thread Greg Folkert
On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 03:32 -0700, formless void wrote: > I finally found that W3C has got > > User Agent Accessibility Guidelines at > > http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-USERAGENT/ > > Now my question is how authenticative W3C is? What do you mean by "authenticative"? Do you mean au·thor·i·ta·tive?