-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/17/07 13:51, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:11:18AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 04/17/07 10:23, Kevin Mark wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> my setup uses fetchmail, exim4 and procmail
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:11:18AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/17/07 10:23, Kevin Mark wrote:
> [snip]
> > my setup uses fetchmail, exim4 and procmail. this is my understanding.
> > pop3 server
> > \/
> > fetchmail
> > \/
> > exim4
> >
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 03:26:40PM +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
> Michael Pobega:
> >
> > Well the last thing I need is to get procmail working, if I can't I
> > may end up just abandoning Debian altogether (I'm not threatening it,
> > but it's just really annoying, and I NEED procmail, it's not ev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/17/07 10:23, Kevin Mark wrote:
[snip]
> my setup uses fetchmail, exim4 and procmail. this is my understanding.
> pop3 server
> \/
> fetchmail
> \/
> exim4
> \/
> mail spool
> \/
> exim4
> \/
> procmail
> \/
> ~/Maildir's
Why exim4-
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 06:37:23AM -0400, Michael Pobega wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:32:56AM +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
> Well the last thing I need is to get procmail working, if I can't I
> may end up just abandoning Debian altogether (I'm not threatening it,
> but it's just really annoy
Michael Pobega wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:39:56PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/16/07 18:33, Michael Pobega wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 05:57:05PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Pobega:
>
> Well the last thing I need is to get procmail working, if I can't I
> may end up just abandoning Debian altogether (I'm not threatening it,
> but it's just really annoying, and I NEED procmail, it's not even a
> "nice thing to use", I NEED it).
/me too.
> I really don't get w
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:32:56AM +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
> Michael Pobega:
> > On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:39:56PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >>
> >> Is ssmtp a daemon? Maybe you need to restart it. Have you tried
> >> looking in /var/log/mail.log?
> >
> > There doesn't seem to be a daemo
Michael Pobega:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:39:56PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
>> Is ssmtp a daemon? Maybe you need to restart it. Have you tried
>> looking in /var/log/mail.log?
>
> There doesn't seem to be a daemon for it.
I *think* fetchmail can use any sendmail-compatible binary
(/usr/b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/16/07 18:55, Michael Pobega wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:39:56PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
[snip]
>> Ah, right. Sorry.
>>
>> Is ssmtp a daemon? Maybe you need to restart it. Have you tried
>> looking in /var/log/mail.log?
>>
>
> There
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 04:55:24PM -0700, Jeff D wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Michael Pobega wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 04:39:30PM -0700, Jeff D wrote:
> >>On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Michael Pobega wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:44:25PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Michael Pobega wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 04:39:30PM -0700, Jeff D wrote:
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Michael Pobega wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:44:25PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:26:28PM -0400, Michael Pobega wrote:
I'm having tro
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:39:56PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/16/07 18:33, Michael Pobega wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 05:57:05PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> On 04/16/07
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 04:39:30PM -0700, Jeff D wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Michael Pobega wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:44:25PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >>On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:26:28PM -0400, Michael Pobega wrote:
> >>>I'm having trouble fetching my mail with fetchma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/16/07 18:33, Michael Pobega wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 05:57:05PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 04/16/07 17:26, Michael Pobega wrote:
>>> I'm having trouble fetching my mail with fetc
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Michael Pobega wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:44:25PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:26:28PM -0400, Michael Pobega wrote:
I'm having trouble fetching my mail with fetchmail. All it does it say:
===
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 05:57:05PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/16/07 17:26, Michael Pobega wrote:
> > I'm having trouble fetching my mail with fetchmail. All it does it say:
> >
> > =
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:44:25PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:26:28PM -0400, Michael Pobega wrote:
> > I'm having trouble fetching my mail with fetchmail. All it does it say:
> >
> > ==
> >
> > 9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/16/07 17:26, Michael Pobega wrote:
> I'm having trouble fetching my mail with fetchmail. All it does it say:
>
> ==
>
> 9 messages for [EMAIL PROTECTED] at pop.gmail.com (36283 oct
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:26:28PM -0400, Michael Pobega wrote:
> I'm having trouble fetching my mail with fetchmail. All it does it say:
>
> ==
>
> 9 messages for [EMAIL PROTECTED] at pop.gmail.com (36283 octets).
> reading message
I'm having trouble fetching my mail with fetchmail. All it does it say:
==
9 messages for [EMAIL PROTECTED] at pop.gmail.com (36283 octets).
reading message [EMAIL PROTECTED]@gmail-pop.l.google.com:1 of 9 (2984
octets)..
fetchmail: c
>Latest versions from Sid seem broken:
>1. pid files are not created
>2. EHLO syntax errors so connections not made, fail not fetched
>
>Any information on this? Fix?
Latest upgrade, 3rd in as many days, no better.
The 2nd problem may be due to exim4 which is the smtp server. This was also
recent
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 22:50 +0200, David Baron wrote:
> Latest versions from Sid seem broken:
Since you didn't mention exactly which version that it, I'm guessing
it's v6.3.1-4? (I upgraded on Friday, and it still has version
6.2.5.4-1.
> 1. pid files are not created
> 2. EHLO syntax errors so c
Latest versions from Sid seem broken:
1. pid files are not created
2. EHLO syntax errors so connections not made, fail not fetched
Any information on this? Fix?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thedore Knab, 2002-Jan-29 01:26 -0500:
> Any ideas ?
>
> .fetmailrc
> set no bouncemail
> poll pop.washcoll.edu with proto pop3
> user 'ted.knab' there is 'ted' here
Try designating an 'mda' on your local machine for fetchmail
to hand off the email to.
add to the .fetchmailrc:
mda 'mai
I am perplexed here. Pop seems to be working.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ fetchmail -c
Enter password for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
fetchmail: 5.9.6 querying pop.washcoll.edu (protocol POP3) at Tue Jan 29
01:21:08 2002: poll started
fetchmail: POP3< +OK BlitzMail POP3 Server Ready.
fetchmail: POP3> USER ted.kn
On 01/13/02 01:07:05 -0800, Dmitriy wrote:
> On a retreival of a certain message server drops connection.
>
> You have to go into webmail account (which may be inaccesible for
> around 10 mins or so after attempt), and move all messages to a
> different folder. Then go through all of them until u
On 01/13/02 00:38:08 -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Setup a system-wide /etc/fetchmailrc file. See the stuff at the top of
> /etc/init.d/fetchmail.
I saw the instructions there and placed a system-wide config file
under /etc, but it didn't look like it was working. There was no
feedback when I star
On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 10:11:35PM -0800, Mark Wagnon wrote:
> Hi all-
>
> Well fetchmail seems to be acting up on me here. I'm running 5.9.6-2,
> and haven't figured out how to run it as a system wide daemon yet, so
> I'm still doing the fetchmail -d 300 when I log in. Anyway, for some
> reason i
Mark Wagnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all-
>
> Well fetchmail seems to be acting up on me here. I'm running 5.9.6-2,
> and haven't figured out how to run it as a system wide daemon yet,
Setup a system-wide /etc/fetchmailrc file. See the stuff at the top of
/etc/init.d/fetchmail.
> so I
Hi all-
Well fetchmail seems to be acting up on me here. I'm running 5.9.6-2,
and haven't figured out how to run it as a system wide daemon yet, so
I'm still doing the fetchmail -d 300 when I log in. Anyway, for some
reason it stopped retrieving mail. I killed the process and tried
running it with
[Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 03:03:03AM +0530] Sridhar M.A. :
> should I file a bug report ? How do I go about it ?
This bug might have already been reported. There is this nifty utility
based on Python called as 'reportbug'. It does what it says and helps
you find out whether the 'bug' has al
also sprach D-Man (on Thu, 19 Jul 2001 04:06:17PM -0400):
> telnet provides console access to a port. Sure, telnet is a protocol,
> but the telnet protocol just negotiates terminal capabilities. If
> you're not connecting to telnetd you get no capabilities aside from
> sending a character and rec
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 08:10:24PM +0200, Martin F. Krafft wrote:
| also sprach Joost Kooij (on Thu, 19 Jul 2001 12:25:30PM +0200):
| > telnet 127.0.0.1 25
| >
| > or
| >
| > telnet localhost smtp
|
| or
|
| netstat -lAinet | grep smtp
|
| which is better since it gives a more certain ans
also sprach Joost Kooij (on Thu, 19 Jul 2001 12:25:30PM +0200):
> telnet 127.0.0.1 25
>
> or
>
> telnet localhost smtp
or
netstat -lAinet | grep smtp
which is better since it gives a more certain answer whether the smtp
port is bound to, or not. also, telnet is a protocol, and *if* you
te
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 04:28:54AM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've been having prblems with fetchmail, getting a "SMTP connect failed"
> message.
> Since I read in the fetchmail FAQ that the problem could be that my SMTP
> port listener is down or inaccessible.
Try:
telnet 127.0.0.1 25
also sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED] (on Thu, 19 Jul 2001 04:28:54AM -0300):
> > Can you guide me in writing /etc/hosts in order to enable SMTP?
assuming your hostname is quelquechose, make the first line in your
/etc/hosts file read
127.0.0.1 localhost quelquechose
martin; (greetings
Hi -
I had to repost this via mailing-list, since I found out that when you
post via news, it doesn't get in the mailing list. That is, news is only a sort
of "back up".
Sorry.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi-
>
> I've been having prblems wit
"Matthew Sackman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I would love to know of the details in the .fetchmailrc file of anyone
> who
> is successfully selecting emails for themselves that are part of a
> mailing
> list (or any other information that could help!).
OK Matthew - I subscribe to a number of
Hay all again!
I have a POP3 mail box, into which goes all the mail for the domain
sackman.co.uk. Emails that are for me ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) I want to
download using fetchmail (the mail box is being used as a multi-drop
mailbox). The problem is that using fetchmail's envelope "Received" option
doe
Hmm-- Thanks, I will put fetchpop on the system and check it out next time
fetchmail falls over.
If it works, maybe do some stirring :-))
On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 10:34:41AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
> Russ Pitman wrote:
>
> > I have that problem on a fairly regular basis. My workaroun
On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 10:34:41AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> Unfortunately, there isn't a fetchpop package anymore. I wonder
> when it was removed from the distribution.
Well, here's a strange thing. Not only is fetchpop gone, you can't even
find it in the ML archive.
A Google search t
Russ Pitman wrote:
> I have that problem on a fairly regular basis. My workaround is to
> read the mailbox on the server from netscape and delete all mail with
> "unidentified sender" in the address. These are always empty.
>
> I asked on the fetchmail-friends list if it is possible to te
I have that problem on a fairly regular basis. My workaround is to
read the mailbox on the server from netscape and delete all mail with
"unidentified sender" in the address. These are always empty.
I asked on the fetchmail-friends list if it is possible to tell
fetchmail to disregard th
spirit and confine
> slap pi uphill!| man in the bonds of Hell. -- St. Augustine
>
>
This isn't a solution, but if you supply the -v option to fetchmail, you
will get a very verbose output of the negotiation between your machine
and the server. It has helped me a couple of tim
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 02:25:33PM -0700, Jim Ray wrote:
> I would delete that message manually and see if the problem goes away. I
> have seen certain messages cause this problem but I have never figured out
> why this happens.
>
> jim ray
>
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 07:53:20PM +, Paul Ph
I would delete that message manually and see if the problem goes away. I have
seen certain messages cause this problem but I have never figured out why this
happens.
jim ray
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 07:53:20PM +, Paul Phillips wrote:
> Under debian frozen, kernel 2.2.15.
>
> Somewhere arou
Under debian frozen, kernel 2.2.15.
Somewhere around a week ago, fetchmail started hanging on me. After
fairly thorough investigation I'm still not sure just what changed to
cause this, or even whether it's client side or server; though, I think
it's something on the server, because I didn't chan
On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 09:22:28AM +0200, Gary Richard van Blerk wrote:
> Does this mean that fetchmail is incapable of doing this type of thing
> automatically? As far as I can see, fetchmail will connect to the server
> and
> forward the mail to your server on port 25. If this is the case, why ca
Try this for a solution:
http://www.linuxgazette.com/issue43/stumpel.html
On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 09:22:28AM +0200, Gary Richard van Blerk wrote:
> Does this mean that fetchmail is incapable of doing this type of thing
> automatically? As far as I can see, fetchmail will connect to the server
> an
Does this mean that fetchmail is incapable of doing this type of thing
automatically? As far as I can see, fetchmail will connect to the server
and
forward the mail to your server on port 25. If this is the case, why can't
it keep the original to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] and forward it user xxx. My
server
Lazarus Long wrote:
> On Monday, May 24, 1999 at 17:07:37 -0500, Brian Servis wrote:
> > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > X-UIDL: 750f5ce8b238693f85cd478f9c87c1f0
>
> > > How did you search the archives? Do you have a working URL for this
> > > handy? I just filed a bug against www.debian
On Monday, May 24, 1999 at 17:07:37 -0500, Brian Servis wrote:
> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-UIDL: 750f5ce8b238693f85cd478f9c87c1f0
> > How did you search the archives? Do you have a working URL for this
> > handy? I just filed a bug against www.debian.org since the link from
> > th
*- On 24 May, Lazarus Long wrote about "List archives? was: Re: fetchmail
problems"
> On Thursday, May 20, 1999 at 11:17:01 -0500, Matt Garman wrote:
> > Subject: Re: fetchmail problems
> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > X-UIDL: 685403a47c42011da0b
Subject: Re: fetchmail problems
Date: Thu, May 20, 1999 at 11:17:01AM -0500
In reply to:Matt Garman
Quoting Matt Garman([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Thu, May 20, 1999 at 09:10:03AM -0500, Marc Mongeon wrote:
> > Make sure you have a line like this in your /etc/
On Thursday, May 20, 1999 at 11:17:01 -0500, Matt Garman wrote:
> Subject: Re: fetchmail problems
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-UIDL: 685403a47c42011da0baee50b375ebfe
>
> Also, I read through the fetchmail FAQ, and searched the debian-user
> list archives.
On Sat, 22 May 1999, XRDLAB wrote:
> Hi,
> I upgraded my hamm system to slink. Everything went well. The old
> configurations generated by ppconfig run equally well under the new
> system also. But I am having some trouble with regard to getting the
> mail from my isp. This has happened after upgra
On Thu, May 20, 1999 at 09:10:03AM -0500, Marc Mongeon wrote:
> Make sure you have a line like this in your /etc/exim.conf:
>
> local_domains = localhost
Yup, I have that in my /etc/exim.conf
>
> And one like this in your /etc/hosts:
>
> 127.0.0.1 localhost
Mine actually looks lik
Hello,
I have a fairly fresh slink system, and I get the same fetchmail error msgs.
--David
> -Original Message-
> From: XRDLAB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, May 22, 1999 5:19 AM
> To: Debian Users
> Subject: Fetchmail problems
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
Hi,
I upgraded my hamm system to slink. Everything went well. The old
configurations generated by ppconfig run equally well under the new
system also. But I am having some trouble with regard to getting the
mail from my isp. This has happened after upgrading to slink. When I
do a fetchmail, I get
On 20-May-99 Matt Garman wrote:
> Also -- I'm running Exim, and have been for quite a while. I did a
> little snooping on DejaNews, and folks usually say that sendmail needs
> to be running... I don't have a sendmail process, but does exim
> create one anyway?
I am not running Sendmail, just E
Hello:
I've had fetchmail working beautifully for a while now. Out of
nowhwere, having done nothing to my system, fetchmail suddenly is
broken! Here is my ~/.fetchmailrc
poll students.uiuc.edu
proto imap
user
pass
no flush
fetchall
smtp localhost
And when I try to execute fetchmail -v, I get
Well I decided to install qmail upon suggestions from various people. I
got the package source and compiled the .debs fine. Then, upon reading
the docs, I found out that the "Maildir" format is preferred. So I set
out to get that working in Pine. No go. I search the UW pages for info
and see m
On Sat, 7 Mar 1998, George Bonser wrote:
>
> Yeah, this is a problem with the kernel. It does not allow enough open
> files for a server that is busy.
hmmm, i only noticed this since i upgraded from sendmail 8.8.8-X to the
8.8.8-9. I didnt think my system would be classified as busy... a pentium
Is this familiar to anyone?
reading message 116 of 204 (2361 bytes) .popclient: SMTP error: 451 Can't
create transcript file xfWAA00603: Too many open files in system
popclient: SMTP error: 451 Can't open /dev/null: Too many open files in
system
popclient: SMTP transaction error while fetching fro
65 matches
Mail list logo
