Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
>
> I tried searching the mailing list archives as well as google for this
> but did not find any concrete answer.
>
> Here at work they have allowed me to use Linux ;) . Anyways,
> I am using debian exclusively and try to use Free Software applications
> wherever I can
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:44:52 -0500
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/14/08 21:20, Chris Burkhardt wrote:
> > Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
> >> In comparison to a colleague's acrobat reader on windows, his
> >> acrobat reader performs a
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:17:51 +0800 (WST)
Bret Busby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I tried searching the mailing list archives as well as google for
> > this but did not find any concrete answer.
> >
> > Here at work they have allowed me
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:35:29 +0300
Arthur A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark Neidorff wrote:
> > On Monday 14 July 2008 10:20 pm, Chris Burkhardt wrote:
> >> Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
> >>> In comparison to a colleague's acrobat reader on windows, his
> >>> acrobat reader performs a lot faster.
>
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:20:30 -0600
Chris Burkhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
> > In comparison to a colleague's acrobat reader on windows, his
> > acrobat reader performs a lot faster.
>
> Are your machines comparable processor- and RAM-wise?
>
> (sorry for not answe
Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
After doing some research, I decided to try to compile the latest the
XPDF from source (3.02, the one I have is from etch repos @ ver 3.01).
Based on the new features/bug fixed list, there are a lot of changes
that help fix the performance issue described above. Howeve
Mark Neidorff wrote:
On Monday 14 July 2008 10:20 pm, Chris Burkhardt wrote:
Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
In comparison to a colleague's acrobat reader on windows, his acrobat
reader performs a lot faster.
Are your machines comparable processor- and RAM-wise?
(sorry for not answering your actual
On Monday 14 July 2008 10:20 pm, Chris Burkhardt wrote:
> Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
> > In comparison to a colleague's acrobat reader on windows, his acrobat
> > reader performs a lot faster.
>
> Are your machines comparable processor- and RAM-wise?
>
> (sorry for not answering your actual question
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
I tried searching the mailing list archives as well as google for this
but did not find any concrete answer.
Here at work they have allowed me to use Linux ;) . Anyways,
I am using debian exclusively and try to use Free Software applications
wher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/14/08 21:20, Chris Burkhardt wrote:
> Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
>> In comparison to a colleague's acrobat reader on windows, his acrobat
>> reader performs a lot faster.
>
> Are your machines comparable processor- and RAM-wise?
>
> (sorry for n
Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
In comparison to a colleague's acrobat reader on windows, his acrobat
reader performs a lot faster.
Are your machines comparable processor- and RAM-wise?
(sorry for not answering your actual question)
- chris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
I tried searching the mailing list archives as well as google for this
but did not find any concrete answer.
Here at work they have allowed me to use Linux ;) . Anyways,
I am using debian exclusively and try to use Free Software applications
wherever I can. Based on my research the fastest PDF vi
12 matches
Mail list logo
