On Sun, 3 May 2015 19:01:15 -0700 (PDT)
Leslie Rhorer wrote:
> Ah! Excellent. 'Sounds like 'nofail' it is. So I change 'defaults'
> to 'defaults, nofail' for the RAID array entry and run
No space, so "defaults,nofail". Which is probably what you meant :)
Petter
--
"I'm ionized"
"Are you su
Ah! Excellent. 'Sounds like 'nofail' it is. So I change 'defaults' to
'defaults, nofail' for the RAID array entry and run `update-initramfs -u`,
correct?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debi
On 03/05/15 21:26, Leslie Rhorer wrote:
I am having a persistent problem. I have an array system that is
having problems. Obviously, that needs to get fixed, but it is
taking quite some time to find the root cause. In the meantime, the
array is not bootable, so it is not needed during the init
I am having a persistent problem. I have an array system that is having
problems. Obviously, that needs to get fixed, but it is taking quite some time
to find the root cause. In the meantime, the array is not bootable, so it is
not needed during the initrd phase of the startup. Previously, t
4 matches
Mail list logo