Re: Extremely High Load

1998-01-03 Thread Shaleh
>From personal experience this is a tad much for one machine. DNS can fill up some memory w/ cache and is a constant hit. Really should be its own 486 or so w/ some memory tossed in. Shell services can be dangerous, and a user could easily peg out a system. We run a shell machine, a dns server,

Re: Extremely High Load

1998-01-03 Thread LeighK
On Sat, 3 Jan 1998, Shaleh wrote: > >From personal experience this is a tad much for one machine. DNS can > fill up some memory w/ cache and is a constant hit. Really should be > its own 486 or so w/ some memory tossed in. Shell services can be > dangerous, and a user could easily peg out a sys

Re: Extremely High Load

1998-01-03 Thread Shaleh
>From personal experience this is a tad much for one machine. DNS can fill up some memory w/ cache and is a constant hit. Really should be its own 486 or so w/ some memory tossed in. Shell services can be dangerous, and a user could easily peg out a system. -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING

Extremely High Load

1998-01-03 Thread LeighK
I'm running a Debian 1.3.1 system and find the machine, when put into our production environment here, after a little while causes the machine's load to rise, and keep on going. It was so bad it got up to 150+ once. At any ratI ran top one time and nothing was using any large amount of CPU, nor was