Hi,
I created a RAID1 array of two physical HDD's with chunk size of 64KiB
under Debian "wheezy". As a next step, I would like to create a
file-system(ext3 or ext4) to this RAID1 array using mke2fs utility.
Questions:
1) Should I use physical HDD sector size(512B in case of my
On 11/09/2013 04:09 AM, darkestkhan wrote:
> Funny thing (actually not so) - my optic drive is dead. But why do I
> have to reboot
> into recovery mode? System itself works correctly - /boot is on sda2
> and everything
> else is on LVM at sda3
If I understand you correctly that you can boot and us
On 2013-11-09, darkestkhan wrote:
> I created ext3 on sda1 (using mke2fs -j) and it worked for last 20 days.
> But after tiday reboot it stopped working - if it would be bad entry in fstab
> I would still be able to mount it by hand, but I can't. I have some data
> on it that I
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> If you have your original debian net-inst dvd, it's probably time to
> put the dvd into the drive then reboot the computer into rescue mode.
Funny thing (actually not so) - my optic drive is dead. But why do I
have to reboot
into recovery mod
t and check those log files since they'll
provide warnings. If you can get smartd-utils to e-mail you so much the
better.
On Sat, 9 Nov 2013, darkestkhan wrote:
> I created ext3 on sda1 (using mke2fs -j) and it worked for last 20 days.
> But after tiday reboot it stopped working - if
I created ext3 on sda1 (using mke2fs -j) and it worked for last 20 days.
But after tiday reboot it stopped working - if it would be bad entry in fstab
I would still be able to mount it by hand, but I can't. I have some data
on it that I would rather not lose (I don't have enough spa
On Thursday 23 May 2013 09:15:29 Andrei Hristow wrote:
Could you perhaps send this again legibly, i.e. with plain text and in the
body of the email?
Thanks.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list
Jim Pazarena:
>
> I have an EXT3 which is not journaled.
> I would like to enable it.
You appear to be a little bit confused. Ext3 is always journalled. Ext3
without a journal is ext2. By default, ext3 only writes filesystem
metadata to the journal, not file content. If you want
Le 19/06/2012 07:43, Jim Pazarena a écrit :
I have an EXT3 which is not journaled.
I would like to enable it.
So I can modify the entry in fstab to read "data=journal",
but I am unsure what command is required on the live system
to 'convert' the EXT3 to journaling.
On 06/19/2012 07:43 AM, Jim Pazarena wrote:
I have an EXT3 which is not journaled.
I would like to enable it.
So I can modify the entry in fstab to read "data=journal",
but I am unsure what command is required on the live system
to 'convert' the EXT3 to journaling.
I have an EXT3 which is not journaled.
I would like to enable it.
So I can modify the entry in fstab to read "data=journal",
but I am unsure what command is required on the live system
to 'convert' the EXT3 to journaling.
Suggestions would be appreciated.
--
Jim Pazarena
On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 15:36 +0200, Claudius Hubig wrote:
> Hello Hans-J.,
>
> "Hans-J. Ullrich" wrote:
> > On my new drive I chose ext4 (with luks encryption) for as far as I read,
> > most
> > people are using ext4 instead of ext3 on ssd drives.
>
Hello Hans-J.,
"Hans-J. Ullrich" wrote:
> On my new drive I chose ext4 (with luks encryption) for as far as I read,
> most
> people are using ext4 instead of ext3 on ssd drives.
> Is this really recommended?
ext4 provides shorter recovery/file system check times, whic
Hi list,
I am now a proud user of a ssd drive. As I cloned my system (which was
installed 5 years ago) to the drive, the filesystem on the source drive is
ext3.
On my new drive I chose ext4 (with luks encryption) for as far as I read, most
people are using ext4 instead of ext3 on ssd drives
Stefan:
I'm afraid you can't use dd for this because as far as I know dd(1)
reads and writes one block at a time and in case new position for file
system overlaps with the present one, using dd you will start
overwriting the end of the file system with the readings from the
start of the file syste
> thanks for replies! Is it possible to "slide" partition using the
> tools included with e2fsprogs package as well?
The e2fsprogs tools only deal with the needs specific to
ext[234] partitions. Sliding a partition can be done for any partition
you like with `dd'.
Stefan
--
To UNSUBS
n Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 10:50:27PM +, Martin T wrote:
>> I have a 500GB((131072000*4096)/1024^3) ext3 filesystem:
>>
> [cut]
>>
>> Is it possible to make partition smaller starting from the beginning?
>> If yes, do I need to somehow start file system from the
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 10:50:27PM +, Martin T wrote:
> I have a 500GB((131072000*4096)/1024^3) ext3 filesystem:
>
[cut]
>
> Is it possible to make partition smaller starting from the beginning?
> If yes, do I need to somehow start file system from the end of the
> partit
Martin T:
>
> Is it possible to make partition smaller starting from the beginning?
No.
> If yes, do I need to somehow start file system from the end of the
> partition?
AFAIK that's not possible. The solution for your problem (which involves
initial reformatting) is LVM.
J.
--
There is no ju
I have a 500GB((131072000*4096)/1024^3) ext3 filesystem:
root@debian:~#dumpe2fs /dev/sda9 | egrep "Block count|Block size"
dumpe2fs 1.41.12 (17-May-2010)
Block count: 131072000
Block size: 4096
root@debian:~#
..on a 904GB((1953523711-56924160)*512)/(1024^3)
Mitchell Laks writes:
> Rashi:/home/mlaks# fdisk /dev/sdd
Better use fdisk -luc as suggested in the warning.
> Rashi:/home/mlaks# mkfs.ext3 /dev/sdd1
mkfs -t ext3 ...
> Rashi:/home/mlaks# mount -t ext2 /dev/sdd1 /mnt
What do you expect when you explicitly mount the FS as ext2?
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 08:18:41 -0400, Mitchell Laks wrote:
> Has anyone seen something like this?
> Here is the log of creating an ext3 partition on a device and lack of
> recognition as ext3 just ext2. very strange.
(...)
Safely remove the USB drive and connect it again.
Is
Has anyone seen something like this?
Here is the log of creating an ext3 partition on a device and lack of
recognition as ext3 just ext2. very strange.
Rashi:/home/mlaks# fdisk /dev/sdd
Device contains neither a valid DOS partition table, nor Sun, SGI or OSF
disklabel
Building a new DOS
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Joao Ferreira Gmail
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> can I somehow join 2 ext3 partitions ?
>
> /dev/sda6 28G 15G 12G 56% /media/armazem
> /dev/sda7 19G 8.2G 9.3G 47% /media/despensa
>
> they both contain data.
>
> thx
> Jo
Joao Ferreira Gmail writes:
> Hello,
>
> can I somehow join 2 ext3 partitions ?
>
> /dev/sda6 28G 15G 12G 56% /media/armazem
> /dev/sda7 19G 8.2G 9.3G 47% /media/despensa
>
> they both contain data.
Make a backup of all partitions on the device and
On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 00:02 +1000, CaT wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 02:45:15PM +0100, Joao Ferreira Gmail wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > can I somehow join 2 ext3 partitions ?
> >
> > /dev/sda6 28G 15G 12G 56% /media/armazem
> > /dev/sda7
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 02:45:15PM +0100, Joao Ferreira Gmail wrote:
> Hello,
>
> can I somehow join 2 ext3 partitions ?
>
> /dev/sda6 28G 15G 12G 56% /media/armazem
> /dev/sda7 19G 8.2G 9.3G 47% /media/despensa
>
> they both contain data.
It's
Hello,
can I somehow join 2 ext3 partitions ?
/dev/sda6 28G 15G 12G 56% /media/armazem
/dev/sda7 19G 8.2G 9.3G 47% /media/despensa
they both contain data.
thx
Joao
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Hello Karl, hello everybody,
thank you Karl for this script.
Am So Mai 22 2011 schrieb Karl Vogel:
> >> On 19/05/11 17:01, Hartmut Niemann wrote:
> H> It often takes very long time (20s) to mkdir on an ext3 drive
>
>
>Try this version of mkdir earlier in your PATH
On Thu, 19 May 2011, Hartmut Niemann wrote:
I observe that it often takes very long time (20s) to mkdir on an ext3 drive,
especially the first directory.
What could the reason be?
I used to have that problem. I never figured out the cause, but it
disappeared when I upgraded from kernel
>> On 19/05/11 17:01, Hartmut Niemann wrote:
H> It often takes very long time (20s) to mkdir on an ext3 drive
>> Am Fr Mai 20 2011 schrieb Karl Vogel:
K> What does "strace mkdir /some/directory" show?
>> On Fri, 20 May 2011 08:38:41 +0200, said:
H> $ s
Am Fr Mai 20 2011 schrieb Karl Vogel:
> >> On 19/05/11 17:01, Hartmut Niemann wrote:
>
> H> It often takes very long time (20s) to mkdir on an ext3 drive
>
>What does "strace mkdir /some/directory" show?
>
>
$ strace mkdir two
execve("/bin/mkdir
>> On 19/05/11 17:01, Hartmut Niemann wrote:
H> It often takes very long time (20s) to mkdir on an ext3 drive
What does "strace mkdir /some/directory" show?
--
Karl Vogel I don't speak for the USAF or my company
Q: What lies on the bottom of t
Am Do Mai 19 2011 schrieb Tom Grace:
> On 19/05/11 17:01, Hartmut Niemann wrote:
> > I observe that it often takes very long time (20s) to mkdir on an ext3
> > drive,
> > especially the first directory.
> > What could the reason be?
> If this is a data drive, has i
On 19/05/11 17:01, Hartmut Niemann wrote:
I observe that it often takes very long time (20s) to mkdir on an ext3 drive,
especially the first directory.
What could the reason be?
If this is a data drive, has it been spun down to save power ?
Do other operations like reading a non-cached file
Hi,
I observe that it often takes very long time (20s) to mkdir on an ext3 drive,
especially the first directory.
What could the reason be?
$ time mkdir hello
real0m22.325s
user0m0.000s
sys 0m0.132s
If system time is less than a second, what is eating the other 22 seconds?
This
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Todd A. Jacobs
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Dan wrote:
>> I didn't know that the inodes would take so much space.
>> Ext4 would be a better option?
>> I chose Ext3 because it is older and it should be more stable
>&g
On 03/23/2011 02:44 AM, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Dan wrote:
I didn't know that the inodes would take so much space.
Ext4 would be a better option?
I chose Ext3 because it is older and it should be more stable
therefore better for a server. Moreover I am goi
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Dan wrote:
> I didn't know that the inodes would take so much space.
> Ext4 would be a better option?
> I chose Ext3 because it is older and it should be more stable
> therefore better for a server. Moreover I am going to use ecryptfs on
> t
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Karl Vogel wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 22 March 2011 02:42:36 pm Dan wrote:
>
> D> I am using the netinst to install Debian. I have one hard drive of 160GB
> D> and 2 hard drives of 2TB. Each hard drive has a ext3 partition for the
> D> wh
>> On Tuesday 22 March 2011 02:42:36 pm Dan wrote:
D> I am using the netinst to install Debian. I have one hard drive of 160GB
D> and 2 hard drives of 2TB. Each hard drive has a ext3 partition for the
D> whole drive. I used ext3 instead of ext4, because that is the default
D>
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Greg Madden wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday 22 March 2011 02:42:36 pm Dan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am using the netinst to install Debian. I have one hard drive of
>> 160GB and 2 hard drives of 2TB. Each hard drive has a ext3 partition
&g
On Tuesday 22 March 2011 02:42:36 pm Dan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using the netinst to install Debian. I have one hard drive of
> 160GB and 2 hard drives of 2TB. Each hard drive has a ext3 partition
> for the whole drive. I used ext3 instead of ext4, because that is the
> defaul
Hi,
I am using the netinst to install Debian. I have one hard drive of
160GB and 2 hard drives of 2TB. Each hard drive has a ext3 partition
for the whole drive. I used ext3 instead of ext4, because that is the
default value in Squeeze.
The netinst is creating the ext3 partitions but it is taking
On Sat, 05 Mar 2011 08:25:55 +0900, J.Hwan.Kim wrote:
> When I copied a file with Korean name, the file system might be broken.
> The size of copied file is displayed as Tera bytes. My filesystem is
> ETX3.
> How can I recover the filesystem of ETX3?
How did you reach the concluison that your fil
On 03/04/2011 05:25 PM, J.Hwan.Kim wrote:
Hi, everyone
When I copied a file with Korean name, the file system might be broken.
The size of copied file is displayed as Tera bytes.
My filesystem is ETX3.
How can I recover the filesystem of ETX3?
Have you dismounted the partition and run fsck on
Hi, everyone
When I copied a file with Korean name, the file system might be broken.
The size of copied file is displayed as Tera bytes.
My filesystem is ETX3.
How can I recover the filesystem of ETX3?
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
J.Hwan Kim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...
scan only resulted in a "lost+found is missing, would you
like to create it?" (I must say I answered yes, this was dumb).
Well, has anyone heard of an entire ext3 fs becoming blank?
It seems the fs tree was corrupted at its root somehow, but I know my
files are still there. Photorec an
Camaleón writes:
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:38:23 +, Csanyi Pal wrote:
>
>> Camaleón writes:
>>
>>> Then try with another tools like fdisk or sfdisk, to discard a problem
>>> with cfdisk. You can even try to run "cfdisk" from any LiveCD of your
>>> choice (systemrescuecd is a good one) and che
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:38:23 +, Csanyi Pal wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
>
>> Then try with another tools like fdisk or sfdisk, to discard a problem
>> with cfdisk. You can even try to run "cfdisk" from any LiveCD of your
>> choice (systemrescuecd is a good one) and check if it works from there.
Camaleón writes:
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:46:14 +, Csanyi Pal wrote:
>>> What is your goal for running cfdisk, what do you want to do?
>>
>> Nothing special, just to see partitions on sdb with cfdisk.
>
> Then try with another tools like fdisk or sfdisk, to discard a problem
> with cfdisk.
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:46:14 +, Csanyi Pal wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
>
>> On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:51:46 +, Csanyi Pal wrote:
>>
>>> I think that that I can run cfdisk on /dev/sda, but can't run cfdisk
>>> on /dev/sdb where those ext3 filesystems a
Camaleón writes:
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:51:46 +, Csanyi Pal wrote:
>
>> I think that that I can run cfdisk on /dev/sda, but can't run cfdisk on
>> /dev/sdb where those ext3 filesystems are, so mybe this is not an UUID
>> issue but a partition problem.
>
>
that I can't reach partitions of
>>> Debian Squeeze from Debian SID.
>>
>> Quite strange.
>
> I think that that I can run cfdisk on /dev/sda, but can't run cfdisk on
> /dev/sdb where those ext3 filesystems are, so mybe this is not an UUID
> issue but a par
>
> Quite strange.
I think that that I can run cfdisk on /dev/sda, but can't run cfdisk on
/dev/sdb where those ext3 filesystems are, so mybe this is not an UUID
issue but a partition problem.
I have run on /dev/sdb long time ago Gparted, and after that I installed
the Debian Squeeze
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 07:08:31 +, Csanyi Pal wrote:
(...)
> Debian Squeeze uses UUID's to mount it's partitions, but Debian SID
> didn't so I think that cause that that I can't reach partitions of
> Debian Squeeze from Debian SID.
Quite strange.
> How can I convert the way system reach parti
Hi,
I just have installed Debian SID with linux kernel 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1
SMP.
I installed it following http://io.debian.net/~tar/gnustep/install.txt
I have on my PC Box two SCSI hard disks: sda and sdb.
Debian SID is on /dev/sda3 and
the previously installed Debian GNU/Linux Squeeze is on
/dev/s
Josef Huber wrote:
> Yes, that's quite annoying: I had a similar problem once, because of
> hibernation with lenny and xp. Later I had to find out that if you use
> only Linux-OSs, the problem occurs as well. Why there isn't any warning
> with the file system not being saved correctly - I would re
Frank put forth on 9/14/2010 12:17 PM:
> Further to this problem (I'm getting tired of re-booting)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony
--
Stan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Ar
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:17:35 -0400 (EDT), Frank wrote:
>
> Further to this problem (I'm getting tired of re-booting)...I have
> tried copying mail in SYlpheed from Ubuntu (sda3) to Squeeze (sda2)
> several times..with and without manually unmounting sda2 before
> rebooting. If I unmount sda2 befo
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:45:52 -0400
Frank wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:39:17 -0400 (EDT)
> Stephen Powell wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:51:12 -0400 (EDT), Frank wrote:
> > > One thing I noticed...in Ubuntu's fstab, sda2 is referred to as
> > > "/dev/sda2" while the Ubuntu partition is r
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:01:08 -0400
Paul Cartwright wrote:
>
> >Ubuntu is using the graphical logon/logoff so I can't see what's
> > going on, but yes the shutdown is clean. I **assume** the file system
> > is being unmounted, but I'd have to disable graphics to see for sure.
>
> I think i
o output, try wipefs (from package util-linux) to
> > see if there are any residual file system signatures that may
> > be confusing udev/blkid. But the first thing to try is manually
> > umounting the file system in Ubuntu before shutdown.
>
> Skip the blkid cache with
>
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:39:17 -0400 (EDT)
Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:51:12 -0400 (EDT), Frank wrote:
> > One thing I noticed...in Ubuntu's fstab, sda2 is referred to as
> > "/dev/sda2" while the Ubuntu partition is referenced by the UUID..I
> > wonder if this is a problem ?
>
udev/blkid. But the first thing to try is manually
> umounting the file system in Ubuntu before shutdown.
Skip the blkid cache with
blkid -c /dev/null /dev/sda2
Is sda3 ext3 or ext4?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:51:12 -0400 (EDT), Frank wrote:
> One thing I noticed...in Ubuntu's fstab, sda2 is referred to as
> "/dev/sda2" while the Ubuntu partition is referenced by the UUID..I
> wonder if this is a problem ?
You said Ubuntu both times. Which is Debian and which is Ubuntu?
It should
know that!
Josef Huber
Betreff:
Re: ext3 file system
Von:
Stephen Powell
Datum:
Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:41:32 -0400 (EDT)
An:
debian-user@lists.debian.org
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:28:26 -0400 (EDT), Frank wrote:
>
> I have been having (minor?) proble
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:41:32 -0400 (EDT)
Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:28:26 -0400 (EDT), Frank wrote:
> >
> > I have been having (minor?) problems with the ext3 file systems on my
> > machine. I have Ubuntu installed on /dev/sda3, with Squeeze on
&
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:28:26 -0400 (EDT), Frank wrote:
>
> I have been having (minor?) problems with the ext3 file systems on my
> machine. I have Ubuntu installed on /dev/sda3, with Squeeze on
> /dev/sda2. Nearly everytime I go into Ubuntu, then back to Squeeze,
> the fi
I have been having (minor?) problems with the ext3 file systems on my
machine. I have Ubuntu installed on /dev/sda3, with Squeeze on
/dev/sda2. Nearly everytime I go into Ubuntu, then back to Squeeze,
the file system check recovers the journal, and finds 8 or 10 orphaned
nodes. It seems to happen
Hi,
I have been looking at windows apps to read/write ext3 partitions. Odd
reasons comes up frequently enough that having a ntfs "scratch" partition
doesn't resolve, when I have to be booted into XP--such as getting the
address to the latest stream I subscribed to.
None seem
Charles Kroeger wrote:
My question is if the hard drive is reformatted with the ext4 file system and I
re-install that 'image' [ext3 file system] will the data be corrupted?
This doesn't really help, I'll assume you just want to convert your ext3
filesystem (saved in an
> Siju George :
>since ext4 also has a limit
No, ext4 has not this limit.
The wikipedia article [1] is wrong.
Read [2]:
Right now the maximum possible number of sub directories contained in a
single directory in Ext3 is 32000. Ext4 breaks that limit and allows a
unlimited number
* Frederic Robert [100603 22:12 +]
> Hello,
>
> During the installation, Debian Testing, there is an error message "The ext3
> file system creation in partition #3 of IDE1 master (hda) failed.
What tells the output of the respective bluescreen?
Elimar
--
We all kn
Hello,
During the installation, Debian Testing, there is an error message "The ext3
file system creation in partition #3 of IDE1 master (hda) failed.
--
Frederic Robert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 02:15:21PM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> and the proof is in the pudding ;-)
Actually, the etymology of that phrase is really interesting, because if you
think about it, unless it's an alcoholised pudding, there's no proof. The full
saying is: "The proof of the pudding i
On 04/26/2010 07:58 AM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 07:17:22AM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
>
>> In English the slash is understood to mean "or". There is no limit of
>> 32000 files or folders under a folder in ext3.
>>
>> There is a limi
On Seg, 26 Abr 2010, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 07:17:22AM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
This limit is rarely encountered in practice because it is so much more
efficient to use multiple directory levels, e.g.:
parent-
a-
able
alf
b-
beta
bravo
Hmm... what happ
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 07:17:22AM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> In English the slash is understood to mean "or". There is no limit of
> 32000 files or folders under a folder in ext3.
>
> There is a limit of 31998 directories under a directory. This is caused by
> the e
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Siju George wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ext3 can have only 32000 files/folders under a folder and I hit that limit.
>
Hi,
Sorry for the ambiguity.
by files/folders I meant the number of objects inside a directory.
But Mike showed there is no such limit for f
Mike Bird wrote:
On Fri April 23 2010 21:13:27 Siju George wrote:
ext3 can have only 32000 files/folders under a folder and I hit that limit.
Which file system can I use to over come it?
I am planning for JFS
Does anybody has any recommendations?
There is no such limit. ext3 can handle as
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:58:17 -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> On Sat April 24 2010 07:30:33 Camaleón wrote:
>> And wasn't *that* the limit the OP was asking about or I misunderstood
>> something? :-?
>
> OP wrote: "ext3 can have only 32000 files/folders under a folder and
On Sat April 24 2010 07:30:33 Camaleón wrote:
> And wasn't *that* the limit the OP was asking about or I misunderstood
> something? :-?
OP wrote: "ext3 can have only 32000 files/folders under a folder and I
hit that limit."
As I demonstrated, ext3 can have 5 files in
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 15:24:04 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> On Saturday 24 April 2010 15:00:37 Camaleón wrote:
>> Well, I admit my English is not the very best it could be, but for sure
>> the OP concern was "32000 files/folders under a folder" and if I read
>> ^^
I know. Also in Spanish :-)
> There is no limit of 32000 files or folders under a folder in ext3.
Uh? :-?
> There is a limit of 31998 directories under a directory.
Uh? :-?
And "directory = folder", isnt't it?
> This is caused by the ext3 hard link count limit
On Saturday 24 April 2010 15:00:37 Camaleón wrote:
> Well, I admit my English is not the very best it could be, but for sure
> the OP concern was "32000 files/folders under a folder" and if I read
> ^^
> that in a correctly manner, it says somethi
ner, it says something about *folders under a
> folder*... I hope "subdirectories = folders" is still valid.
Hi Camaleón,
In English the slash is understood to mean "or". There is no limit of
32000 files or folders under a folder in ext3.
There is a limit of 31998 director
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 13:46:45 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> On Saturday 24 April 2010 09:16:46 Camaleón wrote:
>> Note that "The max number of subdirectories in one directory is fixed
>> to 32000."
>>
>> ¹ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ext3
>
> The article to wh
On Saturday 24 April 2010 09:16:46 Camaleón wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 03:03:57 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On 04/23/2010 11:13 PM, Siju George wrote:
> >> ext3 can have only 32000 files/folders under a folder and I hit that
> >> limit. Which file system can
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 09:43:27AM +0530, Siju George wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ext3 can have only 32000 files/folders under a folder and I hit that limit.
> Which file system can I use to over come it?
> I am planning for JFS
>
> Does anybody has any recommendations?
You are sta
Siju George put forth on 4/23/2010 11:13 PM:
> Hi,
>
> ext3 can have only 32000 files/folders under a folder and I hit that limit.
> Which file system can I use to over come it?
> I am planning for JFS
>
> Does anybody has any recommendations?
It's odd that you'r
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 03:03:57 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 04/23/2010 11:13 PM, Siju George wrote:
>> ext3 can have only 32000 files/folders under a folder and I hit that
>> limit. Which file system can I use to over come it? I am planning for
>> JFS
>>
>> Doe
On 04/23/2010 11:13 PM, Siju George wrote:
Hi,
ext3 can have only 32000 files/folders under a folder and I hit that limit.
Which file system can I use to over come it?
I am planning for JFS
Does anybody has any recommendations?
Since Mike Bird has demonstrated your erroneous claim, plz show
On Fri April 23 2010 21:13:27 Siju George wrote:
> ext3 can have only 32000 files/folders under a folder and I hit that limit.
> Which file system can I use to over come it?
> I am planning for JFS
>
> Does anybody has any recommendations?
There is no such limit. ext3 can handl
> Siju George :
>Hi,
>ext3 can have only 32000 files/folders under a folder and I hit that
>limit. Which file system can I use to over come it?
>I am planning for JFS
>Does anybody has any recommendations?
ext4 is unlimited.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ext4 is wrong in the sec
Hi,
ext3 can have only 32000 files/folders under a folder and I hit that limit.
Which file system can I use to over come it?
I am planning for JFS
Does anybody has any recommendations?
Thanks
--Siju
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 09:53:00PM +, Bhasker C V wrote:
> Bhasker C V wrote:
> >Bhasker C V wrote:
[ 41 lines sniped]
> hardware issue ... please ignore...
Could you please trim your replies on this list.
--
Chris.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
d filesystem accounting information: done
This filesystem will be automatically checked every 25 mounts or
180 days, whichever comes first. Use tune2fs -c or -i to override.
$ sudo e2fsck -f -C0 /dev/mapper/cryptvol
e2fsck 1.41.2 (02-Oct-2008)
Superblock has an invalid ext3 journal (inode 8).
Clear?
>&g
mation: done
This filesystem will be automatically checked every 25 mounts or
180 days, whichever comes first. Use tune2fs -c or -i to override.
$ sudo e2fsck -f -C0 /dev/mapper/cryptvol
e2fsck 1.41.2 (02-Oct-2008)
Superblock has an invalid ext3 journal (inode 8).
Clear?
>>>>
on etc
1 - 100 of 1483 matches
Mail list logo
