Re: Exim vs. Win95

1999-07-15 Thread Don Strayer
On Tue, Jul 13, 1999 at 08:38:22PM -0700, George Bonser wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, Don Strayer wrote: > > > > > The message in exim's rejectlog on the gateway says (lightly edited): > > > > 1999-07-13 21:37:05 unqualified sender rejected: \ > > H=system2.sadt.com (system2.sadt.com.1.168.192.

Re: Exim vs. Win95

1999-07-14 Thread Ben Lutgens
On Tue, Jul 13, 1999 at 11:28:06PM -0400, Don Strayer wrote: > > The ...in-addr.arpa business looks fishy, but mail accepted from System > 1 causes a similar-looking mainlog entry: > > 1999-07-13 21:29:34 114Dra-0003WK-00 <= [EMAIL PROTECTED] H=system1.sadt.com \ > (system1.sadt.com.1.168.192.in-

Exim vs. Win95

1999-07-14 Thread Don Strayer
I've just reloaded my gateway machine with Debian 2.1. It was formerly Debian 1.3, so the MTA has changed from smail to exim. Exim refuses to accept mail from a Windows 95 system connected to the gateway. There are two Windows 95 systems connected to the gateway. System 1 can send mail with no pro