side is saying "mount SERVER:/share/$1 as
/home/$1" using NFS.
> But now the login as "admin" does not work any more, since
> it tries to mount SERVER:/share/admin -> Is it possible to exclude
> a user from automounting?
>
> Probably the simplest method is to en
;ve not
mentioned that explicitly.
But now the login as "admin" does not work any more, since
it tries to mount SERVER:/share/admin -> Is it possible to exclude
a user from automounting?
Probably the simplest method is to ensure that "admin"'s home directory
isn&
hello debian-users,
I configured autofs for /home:
* -fstype=nfs,rw,soft,bg,intr SERVER:/share/&
But now the login as "admin" does not work any more, since
it tries to mount SERVER:/share/admin -> Is it possible to exclude
a user from automounting?
The workaround [1] I us
Am Mittwoch, 1. Juli 2020, 13:49:02 CEST schrieb gru...@mailfence.com:
I believe, the best way is just to deinstall package "linux-image-amd64".
So you can let debian the actual debian kernel installed, but it won't
overwrite and renew the actual kernels at upgrade/full-upgrade.
This has the adv
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 01:22:29PM +0200, gru...@mailfence.com wrote:
i build my kernels
how can i tell apt to never install a kernel when i upgrade
Remove all Debian kernel packages, including and most especially
the metapackages such as "linux-image-
On 2020-07-01 at 07:22, gru...@mailfence.com wrote:
> i build my kernels
> how can i tell apt to never install a kernel when i upgrade
There are probably other ways, but my first stab at it would be to just
remove all the installed kernel packages.
Something like
$ apt-get remove $(dpkg -l linu
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 01:22:29PM +0200, gru...@mailfence.com wrote:
> i build my kernels
> how can i tell apt to never install a kernel when i upgrade
Remove all Debian kernel packages, including and most especially
the metapackages such as "linux-image-amd64".
i build my kernels
how can i tell apt to never install a kernel when i upgrade
On Thursday 16 August 2018 12:46:30 cyaiplexys wrote:
> On 08/16/2018 11:21 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 11:19:29AM -0400, cyaiplexys wrote:
> >> I actually have several accounts which I want to back up but not
> >> include all the dot files. It would be too much to go into
On 08/16/2018 11:21 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 11:19:29AM -0400, cyaiplexys wrote:
I actually have several accounts which I want to back up but not include all
the dot files. It would be too much to go into each account and run a
script. I would like to do it from one accou
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 04:37:47PM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
> $ find /home/me/dirToARchive -print -depth | grep -v -x -f
> paths-to-exclude.txt | cpio -o -H ustar | gz > archive.tar.gz
>
> cpio takes a list of filenames to archive on stdin, so we use find to list
> what we want, then filter that
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 10:40:14AM -0400, cyaiplexys wrote:
I'm trying to make a gzipped tarball. I want to exclude only a certain
list of dot files but NOT ALL dot files (in other words tar the other
dot files not on the list).
I have (this is just an example):
tar -czf archive.tgz /ho
On 08/16/2018 11:21 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 11:19:29AM -0400, cyaiplexys wrote:
I actually have several accounts which I want to back up but not include all
the dot files. It would be too much to go into each account and run a
script. I would like to do it from one accou
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 11:19:29AM -0400, cyaiplexys wrote:
> I actually have several accounts which I want to back up but not include all
> the dot files. It would be too much to go into each account and run a
> script. I would like to do it from one account.
Then do it from /home.
Or do it from
On 08/16/2018 10:45 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 10:40:14AM -0400, cyaiplexys wrote:
tar -czf archive.tgz /home/me/dirToARchive/.
--exclude=/home/me/dirToARchive/.mysetuptemp
--exclude=/home/me/dirToARchive/.myotherdotfile
--exclude=/home/me/dirToARchive/.anotherdotfile
I
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 10:40:14AM -0400, cyaiplexys wrote:
> tar -czf archive.tgz /home/me/dirToARchive/.
> --exclude=/home/me/dirToARchive/.mysetuptemp
> --exclude=/home/me/dirToARchive/.myotherdotfile
> --exclude=/home/me/dirToARchive/.anotherdotfile
>
> I found it doesn
I'm trying to make a gzipped tarball. I want to exclude only a certain
list of dot files but NOT ALL dot files (in other words tar the other
dot files not on the list).
I have (this is just an example):
tar -czf archive.tgz /home/me/dirToARchive/.
--exclude=/home/me/dirToARchive/.mysetu
ith high quality Information, target approach, fueling
> business and much more
>
>
>
> We do provide other technology users like SAP, NetSuite, TIBCO, Workday
> and many more.
>
>
>
> Let me know what you decide!
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Katie Ralston
>
>
>
> To OPT-OUT reply "Exclude" out in subject line
On Lu, 21 mar 11, 18:19:07, Matt wrote:
> Have worked mostly with CentOS. In CentOS we frequently use 'yum
> update' to keep the server up to date. For packages that we do not
> want updated we add them to exclude in yum.conf. Is there anything
> like exclude for apt-get i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 22/03/2011 00:20, Matt a écrit :
> Have worked mostly with CentOS. In CentOS we frequently use 'yum
> update' to keep the server up to date. For packages that we do not
> want updated we add them to exclude in yum.conf. Is th
Have worked mostly with CentOS. In CentOS we frequently use 'yum
update' to keep the server up to date. For packages that we do not
want updated we add them to exclude in yum.conf. Is there anything
like exclude for apt-get in Debian?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:52:56 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 23/09/10 16:17, Camaleón wrote:
>>> Which remembers me - When I was doing a bit of a search last night I
>>> came across comments to the effect that gdm-setup(?) functionality
>>> "will" become part of the new Gnome shell.
>
> Acces
On 23/09/10 16:17, Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 17:33:41 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>
>> On 22/09/10 17:04, Camaleón wrote:
>
>>> That remebembers me... there used to be a GUI app to handle that (in
>>> gdm 2.x) that one could launch with "gksu /usr/sbin/gdmsetup" but the
>>> same app
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 17:33:41 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 22/09/10 17:04, Camaleón wrote:
>> That remebembers me... there used to be a GUI app to handle that (in
>> gdm 2.x) that one could launch with "gksu /usr/sbin/gdmsetup" but the
>> same app under gdm3 lacks for many of its features (in
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:54 AM, Lisi wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 September 2010 08:33:41 Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> Which remembers me
>
> Scott,
>
> That's not fair. :-(
>
> Lisi
Yes, to which I would add that even though Scott's command of the
English language is far superior, or so I am given to u
On Wednesday 22 September 2010 08:33:41 Scott Ferguson wrote:
> Which remembers me
Scott,
That's not fair. :-(
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/
t you want the front-end (greeter) not the daemon but - see
>>> disclaimer :-)
>>>
>>> schema is "possibly" similar to 2.2, see:-
>>> http://live.gnome.org/GDM/2.22/Configuration
>>>
>> Thanks! That website gave me the syntax I neede
t - see
>> disclaimer :-)
>>
>> schema is "possibly" similar to 2.2, see:-
>> http://live.gnome.org/GDM/2.22/Configuration
>>
> Thanks! That website gave me the syntax I needed. All I had to do was
> make /etc/gdm3/daemon.conf look like this:
>
> [greeter]
&
>From Scott Ferguson's "signature lines":
> *In case you never receive this mail, please notify me immediately*
I got a good laugh over that, but believe it or not that mentality does exist
in some people's minds. Back in the mid nineties, I worked for a company that
used IBM's "OfficeVision" as
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 01:18:21AM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 22/09/10 00:10, Rob Owens wrote:
> > I'm having trouble figuring out how to configure gdm3. I want to
> > exclude certain usernames from the login screen.
> >
> > /usr/share/gdm/gdm.schemas has
On 22/09/10 00:10, Rob Owens wrote:
> I'm having trouble figuring out how to configure gdm3. I want to
> exclude certain usernames from the login screen.
>
> /usr/share/gdm/gdm.schemas has a "greeter/Exclude" section, but is that
> really where I should add my
I'm having trouble figuring out how to configure gdm3. I want to
exclude certain usernames from the login screen.
/usr/share/gdm/gdm.schemas has a "greeter/Exclude" section, but is that
really where I should add my usernames to? I was expecting something in
/etc. Maybe it go
> Yes it is possible for dpkg, apt and aptitude. The description is in
> the Debian FAQ:
>
> http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-pkg_basics.en.html#s-puttingonhold
>
> HTH
> -- David
Thank you.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
At Sat, 13 Feb 2010 08:18:27 + (UTC),
Huub wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On RedHat/Fedora, I can exclude packages from being updated like this:
> "yum --exclude -y upgrade".
> Can someone please tell me (or provide a link to it) if this is also
> possible with apt-get.
On Saturday 13 February 2010 09:18:27 Huub wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On RedHat/Fedora, I can exclude packages from being updated like this:
> "yum --exclude -y upgrade".
> Can someone please tell me (or provide a link to it) if this is also
> possible with apt-get. Reading t
Hi,
On RedHat/Fedora, I can exclude packages from being updated like this:
"yum --exclude -y upgrade".
Can someone please tell me (or provide a link to it) if this is also
possible with apt-get. Reading the apt-get manpage, I didn't find an
equality.
Thank you.
--
To UNSUBS
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 03:19:03PM -0700, qing zhao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> Is there a way that I can exclude some package version in package
> dependency list. I understand that the current relationships between
> packages are: <<, <=, =, >= and >&
On 10/08/2007 05:19 PM, qing zhao wrote:
In debian/control file:
Is there a way that I can exclude some package version in package
dependency list. I understand that the current relationships between
packages are: <<, <=, =, >= and >> for strictly earlier, earlier or
eq
In debian/control file:
Is there a way that I can exclude some package version in package
dependency list. I understand that the current relationships between
packages are: <<, <=, =, >= and >> for strictly earlier, earlier or
equal, exactly equal, later or equal and strictly l
ring an apt-get dist-uprade.
> > How do i specify the exclude list ?
> >
> Someone, sorry I forget who, on this list posted the a few years ago.
> It's what I use.
>
> ~# less bin/dhold
Ethan Benson was the author, IIRC.
-André
--
May as well be hung for a sheep as a
w do i specify the exclude list ?
>
> thanks
Someone, sorry I forget who, on this list posted the a few years ago.
It's what I use.
~# less bin/dhold
---
#! /bin/sh
PRG=`basename $0`
if [ `id -u` != 0 ] ; then
echo "you're not root, go away."
exit 1
e
tried on the apt-get manual. But could not get to my requirement.
> > I have some of the packages in my deb box which i do not want to
> > upgrade/remove/uninstall during an apt-get dist-uprade.
> > How do i specify the exclude list ?
>
> You need to put such packages in
On 6/27/07, Bhasker C V <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I tried on the apt-get manual. But could not get to my requirement.
I have some of the packages in my deb box which i do not want to
upgrade/remove/uninstall during an apt-get dist-uprade.
How do i specify the exclude list ?
Hi all,
I tried on the apt-get manual. But could not get to my requirement.
I have some of the packages in my deb box which i do not want to
upgrade/remove/uninstall during an apt-get dist-uprade.
How do i specify the exclude list ?
thanks
--
Bhasker C V
Registered Linux user: #306349
Magnus Pedersen wrote:
> Chuck Payne wrote:
> >Ok, what is happen is cpanel doesn't care that postfix is install, it
> >replaces every time with exim every time it does it own update. I was
> >hoping that there was a way to stop cpanel from replacing postfix by
> >editing one of the apt conf fil
Chuck Payne wrote:
Ok, what is happen is cpanel doesn't care that postfix is install, it
replaces every time with exim every time it does it own update. I was
hoping that there was a way to stop cpanel from replacing postfix by
editing one of the apt conf files. That what going on guys. I am no
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 01:35:19AM -0400, Chuck Payne wrote:
> >>Chuck Payne wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>I got a problem, I am using cpanel it keeps replacing postfix with exim.
> >>>I like to know what is the simplest way to tell apt-get not to install
> >>>exim. I have try to google, but
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 12:45:26AM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
Chuck Payne wrote:
Hi,
I got a problem, I am using cpanel it keeps replacing postfix with exim.
I like to know what is the simplest way to tell apt-get not to install
exim. I have tr
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 12:45:26AM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
> Chuck Payne wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I got a problem, I am using cpanel it keeps replacing postfix with exim.
> > I like to know what is the simplest way to tell apt-get not to install
> > exim. I have try to google, but mo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck Payne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got a problem, I am using cpanel it keeps replacing postfix with exim.
> I like to know what is the simplest way to tell apt-get not to install
> exim. I have try to google, but most of the stuff I am reading makes it
>
Hi,
I got a problem, I am using cpanel it keeps replacing postfix with exim.
I like to know what is the simplest way to tell apt-get not to install
exim. I have try to google, but most of the stuff I am reading makes it
sound like you can't tell apt-get not to install app.
Payne
--
To UNSU
On Thu, 31 May 2007 21:28:55 -0400
Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 06:22:47PM -0700, Serena Cantor wrote:
> > i'm happy to learn etch include mplayer
> > so i install etch, only to use mplayer
> > only to learn mencoder is not included
> >
> > Why?
>
> Wh
mencoder is part of mplayer, it can encode a/v files
--- Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 06:22:47PM -0700, Serena Cantor wrote:
> > i'm happy to learn etch include mplayer
> > so i install etch, only to use mplayer
> > only to learn mencoder is not include
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:28:55PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 06:22:47PM -0700, Serena Cantor wrote:
> > i'm happy to learn etch include mplayer
> > so i install etch, only to use mplayer
> > only to learn mencoder is not included
> >
> > Why?
>
> What is mencoder
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 06:22:47PM -0700, Serena Cantor wrote:
> i'm happy to learn etch include mplayer
> so i install etch, only to use mplayer
> only to learn mencoder is not included
>
> Why?
What is mencoder?
It may not be possible to be part of debian but it may be on
debian-multimedia.org
i'm happy to learn etch include mplayer
so i install etch, only to use mplayer
only to learn mencoder is not included
Why?
Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
http://
I'm not subscribed, keep me in CC.
I noticed that the --exclude option was depreciated. I have a need to keep
lo up. What is the recommended way of doing this? Something like "pre-down
/bin/false" ?
I would like to know the opinions from others about not deconfiguring the
net
Cem Kamil Külekçi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've patched postfix with quota and installed. But whenever I try to
> upgrade other programs apt-get wants to upgrade postfix too. I want to
> exclude postfix from upgrade, I've tried apt pin preferences but
> couldn't mak
Cem Kamil Külekçi a écrit :
Hi,
I've patched postfix with quota and installed. But whenever I try to
upgrade other programs apt-get wants to upgrade postfix too. I want to
exclude postfix from upgrade, I've tried apt pin preferences but
couldn't make it. Anyone have a sample
Hi,
I've patched postfix with quota and installed. But whenever I try to
upgrade other programs apt-get wants to upgrade postfix too. I want to
exclude postfix from upgrade, I've tried apt pin preferences but
couldn't make it. Anyone have a sample config?
thanks
Cem
nclude certain directories
and exclude others.
I was wondering, can I just specify / as the source and specify the dirs
that I want to include and leave everything out? (This would simplify my
command line of rsync.)
I have tried this as the excludes file (with source / in rsync comman
I have seen on the net that for some laptops using pcmcia that special
configuration changes must be made in the inclusion or exclusion of port
and/or memory addresses in the config.opts file. I however cannot find
a recipe that will work in my case. Is there some tool that can be used
to find ou
#x27;s configuration script returned error(1) during
doing do-install-real.
Package: fontconfig
Category: truetype
Installing Font: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Code2000.ttf
Installing ID: Code2000-Regular
Defoma has set this font as 'exclude' to keep it from being installed.
You
At 01 Oct 2003 14:47:58 +0200,
JG wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Put the package on "hold". Select your package on dselect or aptitude
> and press "=" to put it on hold. Or
>
> $ echo pptp-client hold | dpkg --set-selections
>
> This will keep the package at the current version (unless you
> intentionally ins
Hi all,
Happily back on debian again and with it more questions...:)
Question: Is there a way to tell apt to never upgrade a certain package?
while upgrading everything
else?
Details:
I have to use pptp-client to connect to my adsl provider. This in itself is
not a problem,
but the only versi
t a mirror for i386 Woody,
> > should make a nice 4.2 GB mirror, how do I exclude the rest
> > of the about 80 GB?:
I've been using a collection of Perl scripts for a while now to maintain
my Sid mirror. It should be relatively trivial to convert it for Woody.
(Just look for inst
Monday, September 08, 2003 1:50 AM "Arnt Karlsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ..in my mirror I like main, non-US, non-free and contrib for
> Woody/3.0r1. So I try to script a mirror for i386 Woody,
> should make a nice 4.2 GB mirror, how do I exclud
Hi,
..in my mirror I like main, non-US, non-free and contrib for
Woody/3.0r1. So I try to script a mirror for i386 Woody,
should make a nice 4.2 GB mirror, how do I exclude the rest
of the about 80 GB?:
..the non-US is reasonable: du -sh debian* ...
17G debian
119Mdebian-non-US
Markus Grunwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried for example
> ...
> **/kdetoys/eyesapplet*
> **/kdebase-crypto/kdm-krb*
> **/kdeutils/kab*
> **/kdegames/kabalone*
> **/kdesdk/kapptemplate*
> ...
The version of apt-move in testing still uses the old archive layout.
That means you need to use
Hi !
I'd like to bild my own little Debian mirror using apt-move. The way to do this
is clear, but I have trouble with the .exclude file.
I took several looks at the included example but I dont get how to exclude all
kde directories.
I tried for example
...
**/kdetoys/eyesapplet*
**/kd
Hello,
I have a directory that I have in cvs and I would like to make a dpkg from
said directory, but I would like to exclude the CVS directories from the
dpkg. Is this possible?
Thankyou for your time in advance.
Andrew
On 23 Dec 2000, Colin Watson wrote:
> Anthony Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >How can you use find to exclude more than one directory?
> >
> >I have:
> > find /home/ac/ -path '/home/ac/.netscape' -prune -o -print
> >
> >This exclu
Anthony Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>How can you use find to exclude more than one directory?
>
>I have:
> find /home/ac/ -path '/home/ac/.netscape' -prune -o -print
>
>This excludes ~/.netscape but I can't add any more directories to this
>
How can you use find to exclude more than one directory?
I have:
find /home/ac/ -path '/home/ac/.netscape' -prune -o -print
This excludes ~/.netscape but I can't add any more directories to this
list. Is it possible to do so?
Anthony
--
Anthony Campbell - running L
lways did this before was to log in as root, cd to /, and
> >execute a command such as this:
> >
> ># tar --same-owner -czpvf /home/ftp/pub/backups/main.tgz --exclude=proc/*
> >--exclude=tmp/* --exclude=home/ftp/pub/* *
>
> [snip]
>
> >My proble
Tar did change the exclude semantics between slink and potato:
Patterns containing / now exclude only file names whose prefix match.
>From tar info:
A PATTERN containing `/' excludes a name if an initial subsequence
of the name's components matches PATTERN; a PATTERN without `
id this before was to log in as root, cd to /, and
>execute a command such as this:
>
># tar --same-owner -czpvf /home/ftp/pub/backups/main.tgz --exclude=proc/*
>--exclude=tmp/* --exclude=home/ftp/pub/* *
[snip]
>My problem is that the --exclude command no longer works the way it u
ner -czpvf /home/ftp/pub/backups/main.tgz --exclude=proc/*
--exclude=tmp/* --exclude=home/ftp/pub/* *
This would create a tarball in my ftp space, without including any of the
dynamic/garbage info in /proc or in /tmp. It also wouldn't include all
the various files in /home/ftp/pub, espec
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 07:25:40AM +, Jim Breton wrote:
> > I can't say whether anything has changed at any point; but, I think you
> > want to use something like the following:
> >
> > cd / && tar Sczvf /syjet/debmain.tgz --exclude tmp --exclude pro
> May I ask why the behavior of the --exclude command has changed? Can
> someone suggest a remedy for my situation?
Yes, --exclude has changed indeed (between slink and potato), see
/usr/share/doc/tar/NEWS.gz:
version 1.13.6 - Paul Eggert, 1999-08-11.
* An --exclude pattern containing
ng command:
# tar --same-owner -czpvf /syjet/debmain.tgz --exclude=tmp/*
--exclude=proc/* --exclude=syjet/* *
This would create an image on my syjet without including the junk in /tmp
or /proc, or the new image itself. I have done this far too many times to
count over the past 2 or 3 years, and it
Nils wrote,
> try
>
> tar -zcv -f hawktar980603 . -X 'News*' -X 'www*' -X 'Office40*'
>
> (the quoting is to keep the shell from globbing '*')
ack, I think I see. News isn't treated the same wauy as it would if listed as
a regular file, so only News/ is omitted, but News/abc and the like don'
nfo page,
>
> tar -zcv -f hawktar980603 . -X News -X www -X Office40
>
> should tar the local directory to the new file hawktar980603 save for the
> directories News, www, and Office40
>
> however, it cheerfully includes all of these. I get the same results with an
> -
ws, www, and Office40
according tot he man page -X is the same as --exclude-from so this should
not work
> however, it cheerfully includes all of these. I get the same results with an
> --exclude-from exfiles, where exfiles lists these? am I missing somethign?
I dunno...I never really g
d tar the local directory to the new file hawktar980603 save for the
directories News, www, and Office40
however, it cheerfully includes all of these. I get the same results with an
--exclude-from exfiles, where exfiles lists these? am I missing somethign?
rick
--
These opinions will not be
On Tue, 26 May 1998, Rick Macdonald wrote:
> This fails:
>
> tar --exclude=xxx -zcvf test.tar *
>
> But this works:
>
> tar --exclude=xxx -zcvf test.tar ./
>
> Go figure.
Have you compared absolute and relative path names? The shell expands *
to a full path name.
Admaster Communications <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm running Debian GNU/Linux 1.3 and I've tried many permutations of
>
>
> tar -zcvf test.tar * --exclude=leave_me_out.txt
>
> The file I ask to be excluded is reliably INcluded!! What is the correc
Ed Cogburn wrote:
> > > |> tar -zcvf test.tar * --exclude=leave_me_out.txt
> > Seems to be broken here too.
> >
>
> Ditto here. Note to previous thread respondant. The *order* of
> arguments
> makes *no* difference. This still fails:
>
>
of
> > |>
> > |>
> > |> tar -zcvf test.tar * --exclude=leave_me_out.txt
> >
> > Change the 'c' with a 'x'. 'c' is to create a tar file. 'x' to extract.
> >
> > Look at "man tar".
>
> He is
On Mon, May 25, 1998 at 08:20:43AM +, Bart Maerten wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Admaster Communications)
> writes:
> |> I'm running Debian GNU/Linux 1.3 and I've tried many permutations of
> |>
> |>
> |> t
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Admaster Communications)
writes:
|> I'm running Debian GNU/Linux 1.3 and I've tried many permutations of
|>
|>
|> tar -zcvf test.tar * --exclude=leave_me_out.txt
Change the 'c' with a 'x'.
Admaster Communications wrote:
> I'm running Debian GNU/Linux 1.3 and I've tried many permutations of
>
> tar -zcvf test.tar * --exclude=leave_me_out.txt
>
> The file I ask to be excluded is reliably INcluded!! What is the correct
> syntax???
Try:
tar --exclude=lea
I'm running Debian GNU/Linux 1.3 on a 486 clone and I've tried many
permutations of
tar -zcvf test.tar * --exclude=leave_me_out.txt
The file I ask to be excluded is reliably INcluded. Is my syntax wrong?
Please help.
Looking forward to the guidance that comes from experience...
I'm running Debian GNU/Linux 1.3 and I've tried many permutations of
tar -zcvf test.tar * --exclude=leave_me_out.txt
The file I ask to be excluded is reliably INcluded!! What is the correct
syntax???
Thanks.
Adam Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Casper BodenCummins wrote:
>
> Lazaro Salem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >The -print flag is not really needed as is executed by default.
>
> This isn't true of all systems. If you want portability, include the
> -print.
I believe that POSIX.2 mandates -print as the default. Can someone who
On Thu, 12 Sep 1996 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Certainly it would be nice to have something like:
> $ find . -type !d
> to match files which are not directories, but I don't know if something
> like that is possible for find. So if can take your question and rephrase
> it:
>
> Is ther
> "LS" == Lazaro Salem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
LS> Is there any kind of "logical not" affecting a flag in find?
LS> Something similar to the `grep -v regexp' as opposed to `grep
LS> regexp'.
There is. Try find . ! -type d etc. See the section on operators in
the gnu find man page.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
:
: Certainly it would be nice to have something like:
: $ find . -type !d
find ! -type d
or depending on your shell
find \! -type d
Heiko
--
email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp : A1 7D F6 7B 69 73 48 35 E1 DE 21 A7
Carlos Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm trying to search for unused files, but I want to exclude a
>directory from the search. I tried
>
>cd /scratch && find . -atime +7 -path ./var -prune -o -print
>
>but it doesn't work. Any clues?
Move the
Lazaro Salem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The -print flag is not really needed as is executed by default.
This isn't true of all systems. If you want portability, include the
-print.
>Certainly it would be nice to have something like:
> $ find . -type !d
> to match files which are not directori
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
