On 10/17/2012 8:18 AM, richie.jf@foxconn.com wrote:
First off, I own a couple of your socket AM3 M61PMP-K motherboards. The
CPU temp doesn't report correctly, which is not critical. Besides that
they work great and I'm pleased with them.
> When we install Debian Etch(Kern
Dear,
When we install Debian Etch(Kernel 2.6.24) on Intel Ivy Bridge platform, it
pop out warning message: "no mount CD-ROM can be found". If we install this
OS with Sandy Bridge platform, it works fine. but now, we need update to
Ivy Bridge platform. we are facing this proble
Thanks!
For alsa driver to work in etch(kernel 2.6) the two modules below are needed:
snd-sb16 isapnp=0
snd-mixer-oss
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
> Long Wind wrote:
>
>> but in etch (kernel 2.6), oss driver works
>> I pass noisapnp kernel option
Long Wind wrote:
> but in etch (kernel 2.6), oss driver works
> I pass noisapnp kernel option during boot
> but alsa does not work
do you have snd-oss loaded - just post
lsmod | grep snd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &qu
I have used sb16 since kernel 2.0
It still works with both oss and alsa in sarge(kernel 2.4):
oss:
isa-pnp isapnp_disable=1
sound
uart401
sb io=0x220 irq=5 dma=1 dma16=5
alsa:
isa-pnp isapnp_disable=1
snd-sb16 isapnp=0
but in etch (kernel 2.6), oss driver works
I pass noisapnp kernel option
On 2009-09-02 08:07 +0200, Greg Madden wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 September 2009, Greg Madden wrote:
>> I have a Lenny box running the 2.6.18 kernel. I have the following
>> sources added to the Lenny ones:
>>
>> deb http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/ etch main contrib
>> deb http://security.debian.org
On Tuesday 01 September 2009, Greg Madden wrote:
> I have a Lenny box running the 2.6.18 kernel. I have the following
> sources added to the Lenny ones:
>
> deb http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/ etch main contrib
> deb http://security.debian.org/ etch/updates main contrib.
>
> This gives me kernel
I have a Lenny box running the 2.6.18 kernel. I have the following sources
added to the Lenny ones:
deb http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/ etch main contrib
deb http://security.debian.org/ etch/updates main contrib.
This gives me kernel version: 2.6.18-5.
At "http://packages.debian.org/etch";
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 08:44:51PM +0800, D Bray wrote:
> The following is a record of a problem we had here with a debian Etch Security
> Update that we performed on 26 Aug. 2008. It has now been resolved.
>
> The culprit seems to have been the
> linux-image-2.6.18-5-686_2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch6_i38
The following is a response which I received off-list. With
permission, I have pasted it below so that it gets recorded && within
its rightful thread.
DB
> Hi DB,
>
> I have this very same issue as you wonderfully described on the Debian
Thanks.
(By necessity, the following makes assumptions ab
On 09/29/2008 07:44 AM, D Bray wrote:
The following is a record of a problem we had here with a debian Etch Security
Update that we performed on 26 Aug. 2008. It has now been resolved.
The culprit seems to have been the
linux-image-2.6.18-5-686_2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch6_i386.deb kernel
package. Howe
The following is a record of a problem we had here with a debian Etch Security
Update that we performed on 26 Aug. 2008. It has now been resolved.
The culprit seems to have been the
linux-image-2.6.18-5-686_2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch6_i386.deb kernel
package. However, there seems to be no maintainer for
On Wed,16.Jul.08, 17:09:16, michael wrote:
> I'm at 2.6.18-6-686 and believe I need > 2.6.19 for pata_marvell module
> support. I'm wondering how often the Etch kernel is updated? Thanks, M
If I understand correctly, the etch-and-a-half kernel (2.6.24) should be
available
>> I'm at 2.6.18-6-686 and believe I need > 2.6.19 for pata_marvell module
> > >> support. I'm wondering how often the Etch kernel is updated? Thanks, M
> > >
> > >
> > > Etch is current stable release and its kernel receive only security
> &g
hael wrote:
> > >> I'm at 2.6.18-6-686 and believe I need > 2.6.19 for pata_marvell
> > >> module support. I'm wondering how often the Etch kernel is
> > >> updated? Thanks, M
> > >
> > >
> > > Etch is current stable releas
t; >> support. I'm wondering how often the Etch kernel is updated? Thanks, M
> >
> >
> > Etch is current stable release and its kernel receive only security
> > updates. You can (at least)
> >
> > 1) use testing
> > 2) wait for new release (Len
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2008-07-16 18:22, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> michael wrote:
>> I'm at 2.6.18-6-686 and believe I need > 2.6.19 for pata_marvell module
>> support. I'm wondering how often the Etch kernel is updated? Thanks, M
&g
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:22:21 +0300
"Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> michael wrote:
> > I'm at 2.6.18-6-686 and believe I need > 2.6.19 for pata_marvell module
> > support. I&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> Eugene V. Lyubimkin escreveu:
>> Etch is current stable release and its kernel receive only security
>> updates. You can (at least)
>>
>> 1) use testing
>> 2) wait for new release (Lenny)
>> 3) use Etch system but newer ke
Eugene V. Lyubimkin escreveu:
Etch is current stable release and its kernel receive only security
updates. You can (at least)
1) use testing
2) wait for new release (Lenny)
3) use Etch system but newer kernel picked from testing
4) See if there is a backported kernel for etch at
http://www.b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
michael wrote:
> I'm at 2.6.18-6-686 and believe I need > 2.6.19 for pata_marvell module
> support. I'm wondering how often the Etch kernel is updated? Thanks, M
>
>
Etch is current stable release and its kernel receive o
I'm at 2.6.18-6-686 and believe I need > 2.6.19 for pata_marvell module
support. I'm wondering how often the Etch kernel is updated? Thanks, M
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
also sprach Murat Ugur EMINOGLU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.05.04.1144 +0100]:
> i compiled kernel on debian etch (two times). But i have a same problem
>
> No raid arrays. No Lvm
You have not provided any details, such as the configuration and
command line used, so we can't really help you.
> ALER
Dear all,
i compiled kernel on debian etch (two times). But i have a same problem
No raid arrays. No Lvm
compiled 2.6.21 , 2.6.25 same problem
Begin: Assembling all Md arrays
mdadm : No array found in config file on automatically
failure : failed to assemble all arrays
Check root=bootarg cat
Hi list,
i'd like to use non-pae domU kernel images (ie for netbsd) on an etch
xen setup, and non-pae xen kernel images are not provided anymore.
What is the proper way to build a non-pae xen kernel image package from
2.6 debian sources ?
thanks in advance
xavier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Saturday 24 March 2007 19:05, mike wrote:
> Thanks in advance for any help. I have googled until I'm tired; cannot seem
> to locate the correct answer.
>
> I have a Debian etch running kernel-2.6.20.3 on a new Intel core 2 duo
> machine. I built the kernel for a core 2 duo, and it's turning up a
Thanks in advance for any help. I have googled until I'm tired; cannot seem to
locate the correct answer.
I have a Debian etch running kernel-2.6.20.3 on a new Intel core 2 duo
machine. I built the kernel for a core 2 duo, and it's turning up as an
AMD64, which I have other problems with, but t
Here is the scoop from Xen Development regarding AMD.
Thanks, Ted
PS: I will change ADMIN to something else as soon as I can.
Hello Ted,
2. Are there any recent Xen binaries that integrate well with Debian?
There seems to be little to no activity on the Debian-User list.with
only one or two pe
pgrade to a 2.6 kernel
later as a separate project.
So, it appears that I should first upgrade from the
current Sarge 2.4.27 kernel to a 2.4 Etch kernel, then
from the 2.4 Etch kernel to a 2.6 Etch kernel.
The problem I face is that a 2.4 kernel does not work
on the new motherboard. So does t
Amit Joshi wrote:
On Sunday 12 November 2006 19:29, Colin wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hope that's true and that they stay with a 2.6.17 kernel...
Why not a 2.6.18 kernel?
Again, Sarge was released when there were 2.6 kernel versions lying around.
But the Debian developers decided to inclu
On Monday 13 November 2006 02:21, Dave Ewart wrote:
> On Sunday, 12.11.2006 at 23:32 +0530, Amit Joshi wrote:
> > For example, the Sarge CDs provide the 2.6.8 (tagged as unstable)
> > kernel.
>
> I didn't think the Sarge 2.6 kernel was technically 'unstable' - the
> installer gave two options: 2.4
Hi,
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 12:00:30 +0200, ccostin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> What version of kernel will have Debian Etch ?
I think the current thinking is to go with 2.6.18.
manoj
--
For people who like that kind of book, that is the kind of book they
will like.
Manoj Srivast
On 11/12/06, Dave Ewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday, 12.11.2006 at 23:32 +0530, Amit Joshi wrote:
> For example, the Sarge CDs provide the 2.6.8 (tagged as unstable)
> kernel.
I didn't think the Sarge 2.6 kernel was technically 'unstable' - the
installer gave two options: 2.4 or 2.6; a
On Sunday, 12.11.2006 at 23:32 +0530, Amit Joshi wrote:
> For example, the Sarge CDs provide the 2.6.8 (tagged as unstable)
> kernel.
I didn't think the Sarge 2.6 kernel was technically 'unstable' - the
installer gave two options: 2.4 or 2.6; although 2.4 was the default,
there was certainly nev
Amit Joshi wrote:
On Sunday 12 November 2006 19:29, Colin wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hope that's true and that they stay with a 2.6.17 kernel...
Why not a 2.6.18 kernel?
If the OP wants to know what kernel will be shipped with the Official Release
of Debian Etch, then
On Sunday 12 November 2006 19:29, Colin wrote:
> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> > Hope that's true and that they stay with a 2.6.17 kernel...
>
> Why not a 2.6.18 kernel?
If the OP wants to know what kernel will be shipped with the Official Release
of Debian Etch, then I think its gonna be the 2.6.17 K
Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Nicolas Pillot wrote:
| >2006/11/12, ccostin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| >>What version of kernel will have Debian Etch ?
| >kernel-image-2.6.17-2 methinks
|
| Hope that's true and that they stay with a 2.6.17 kernel...
|
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hope that's true and that they stay with a 2.6.17 kernel...
Why not a 2.6.18 kernel?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nicolas Pillot wrote:
2006/11/12, ccostin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
What version of kernel will have Debian Etch ?
kernel-image-2.6.17-2 methinks
Hope that's true and that they stay with a 2.6.17 kernel...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
2006/11/12, ccostin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
What version of kernel will have Debian Etch ?
kernel-image-2.6.17-2 methinks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What version of kernel will have Debian Etch ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cameron L. Spitzer wrote:
[This message has also been posted to linux.debian.user.]
I've installed etch with default kernel on a laptop
with APM BIOS but no ACPI. It runs a lot hotter
than it did with my customized kernel on sarge.
I added "apm=on" to the boot options to get apm -s
to work.
Stil
[This message has also been posted to linux.debian.user.]
I've installed etch with default kernel on a laptop
with APM BIOS but no ACPI. It runs a lot hotter
than it did with my customized kernel on sarge.
I added "apm=on" to the boot options to get apm -s
to work.
Still got heat and battery life
steef wrote:
hi list,
what trouble can i expect - if any - when i put a (etch) 2.6.17.x.y
kernel in the standard sarge distro to be able to use udma on my (new)
asus am2 motherboard??
than you all in advance,
regards,
steef
If you get the deb package it wont install AFAICT due to the
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 03:05:35PM +0200, Maarten Verwijs wrote:
>
> Hi Steef,
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 02:11:40PM +0200, steef wrote:
> > what trouble can i expect - if any - when i put a (etch) 2.6.17.x.y
> > kernel in the standard sarge distro to be able to use udma on my (new)
> > a
Hi Steef,
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 02:11:40PM +0200, steef wrote:
> what trouble can i expect - if any - when i put a (etch) 2.6.17.x.y
> kernel in the standard sarge distro to be able to use udma on my (new)
> asus am2 motherboard??
>
You'd be better off at backports.org.
They have recent
hi list,
what trouble can i expect - if any - when i put a (etch) 2.6.17.x.y
kernel in the standard sarge distro to be able to use udma on my (new)
asus am2 motherboard??
than you all in advance,
regards,
steef
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 07:46:27AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 02:36:07PM +0100, Anton Piatek wrote:
> > Digby Tarvin wrote:
> >
> > >I have searched the web and several books, and all of the instructions
> > >say to obtain the kernel with an 'apt-get install kern
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 02:36:07PM +0100, Anton Piatek wrote:
> Digby Tarvin wrote:
>
> >I have searched the web and several books, and all of the instructions
> >say to obtain the kernel with an 'apt-get install kernel-tree', and I
> >am sure that 2-3 months ago with Sarge I used
> > apt-get
Digby Tarvin wrote:
>I have searched the web and several books, and all of the instructions
>say to obtain the kernel with an 'apt-get install kernel-tree', and I
>am sure that 2-3 months ago with Sarge I used
> apt-get install kernel-tree-2.6.8
>but on Etch this package does not seem to exi
On (29/04/06 18:17), Digby Tarvin wrote:
> I am nearly ready to start customizing my 2.6 kernel for my hardware, but
> before I do that I would like to confirm my kernel build procedure by
> first reproducing what was left by the installer...
>
> I have searched the web and several books, and all
I am nearly ready to start customizing my 2.6 kernel for my hardware, but
before I do that I would like to confirm my kernel build procedure by
first reproducing what was left by the installer...
I have searched the web and several books, and all of the instructions
say to obtain the kernel with a
52 matches
Mail list logo
