, and
> > install the resulting .deb on the rest.
> >
>
> That is exactly what I didbut that would not be what a SysAdm would
> want...he/she would want to just select an 'enterprise' kernel from the
> package list.
>
> One has to bear in mind t
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 6:01 PM
> Subject: Enterprise Kernel
>
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > It's been awhile since I last wrote to the list. Anyway, let's get do
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:01:15AM +0800, Patrick Cheong Shu Yang wrote:
>
> I had to re-compile the kernel to map the RAM above 1GB. Are there plans
> to include kernels compiled/built for the enterprise in mind...this
> would surely help in making Debian the choice of distribution when it
> come
Patrick Cheong Shu Yang said:
> Hi all,
> Thoughts anyone?
my most immediate thought is my belief that anyone who runs such
a server should be running a self compiled kernel anyways. every
system I deploy goes with a very custom kernel with many patches
depending on the kind of hardware and what
All,
That is exactly what I didbut that would not be what a SysAdm would
want...he/she would want to just select an 'enterprise' kernel from the
package list.
One has to bear in mind that not all SysAdm know how to re-compile a
kernel...and using kernel-package to do it...:-P
If
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:01:15AM +0800, Patrick Cheong Shu Yang wrote:
>
> I had to re-compile the kernel to map the RAM above 1GB. Are there plans
> to include kernels compiled/built for the enterprise in mind...this
> would surely help in making Debian the choice of distribution when it
> come
Hi all,
It's been awhile since I last wrote to the list. Anyway, let's get down
to it...
I work at a securities firm (securities as in stock market). Most, if
not all, of our backoffice systems run on Linux (some M$, Solaris and
HP-UX). The majority of the Linux installs are RH 7.x whilst the
re
7 matches
Mail list logo
