On Sun 09 Feb 2025 at 17:48:53 (-0500), Thomas George wrote:
> I can no longer receive emails at debianl...@mailfence.com. I tried to
> cancel this online but had no way to receive and complete the
> conformation.
>
> If possible please change my subscription to
> debian-u...@debian.list.org to po
I can no longer receive emails at debianl...@mailfence.com. I tried to
cancel this online but had no way to receive and complete the conformation.
If possible please change my subscription to debian-u...@debian.list.org
to postbox.t...@gmail.com. Any future correspondence must use this address.
On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 1:32 AM john doe wrote:
>
> On 3/11/23 06:14, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> >
> > I receive bounces when using the debian-users list (see below). I'd
> > like to get the bad email address removed from the list.
> >
> > I want to co
On 3/11/23 06:14, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I receive bounces when using the debian-users list (see below). I'd
like to get the bad email address removed from the list.
I want to contact the list admin, but I cannot find a contact at [1] or [2].
How do we contact the list
Hi Everyone,
I receive bounces when using the debian-users list (see below). I'd
like to get the bad email address removed from the list.
I want to contact the list admin, but I cannot find a contact at [1] or [2].
How do we contact the list admin?
Thanks in advance.
[1]
nature etc.
So we should choose a email address which at least has no "p=reject"
in their DKIM policy.
I am sorry for the typos. What I meant is DMARC, not DKIM. :)
This list does not modify the contents, except for adding List-* headers.
So as long as these are not part of the si
. SPF fail (for the From: address in header) - this will 100% happen
regardless list server implements SRS or not.
2. DKIM fail (for header address as well) - this will most probably
happen since some list servers change the message content by adding a
signature etc.
So we should choose a email add
in header) - this will 100% happen
regardless list server implements SRS or not.
2. DKIM fail (for header address as well) - this will most probably
happen since some list servers change the message content by adding a
signature etc.
So we should choose a email address which at least has no
On Tue 17 May 2022 at 13:52:03 (-0300), Chris Mitchell wrote:
> Also note that you very much do *not* need to run your own MTA to
> achieve the goal of an address you own and can move from provider to
> provider.
Very much agree. And with a good choice of provider, you may not
want or need to.
>
On Tue, 17 May 2022 12:22:48 -0400
Edwin Zimmerman wrote:
> > If you can't get a static IP address for your home computer,
> > consider running your mail server on a cheap VPS (Virtual Private
> > Server). This may be cheaper than a static IP address for your
> > home, depending on your ISP.
> >
rhkra...@gmail.com writes:
> Thanks to all who replied!
>
> I'll need to think over what I want to do.
That is true. Email stuff is not easy always.
> I guess if I want to run a local MTA, I'd need either a static IP address
> (along with a domain) or I'm guessing I could use one of those servi
>
>
> Don't host your email on just any old cheap VPS. Many VPS providers have
> bad reputations for not policing spam senders, and as a consequence large
> email services like gmail often block whole ip ranges that belong to these
> VPS providers.
>
At least make sure the IP address isn't blackli
On 5/17/22 07:43, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 07:29:51AM -0400, Edwin Zimmerman wrote:
>> I would not recommend running an MTA on a dynamic IP address. I can
>> absolutely guarantee you that emails sent from such a system will not reach
>> the recipient. Most email servers bloc
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 07:29:51AM -0400, Edwin Zimmerman wrote:
> I would not recommend running an MTA on a dynamic IP address. I can
> absolutely guarantee you that emails sent from such a system will not reach
> the recipient. Most email servers block emails from MTAs with dynamic IP
> address
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 12:20:52PM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> On 2022-05-17 01:44, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Thanks to all who replied!
> >
> > I'll need to think over what I want to do.
> >
> > I guess if I want to run a local MTA, I'd need either a static IP
> > address
> > (along with a do
>
> I would not recommend running an MTA on a dynamic IP address. I can
> absolutely guarantee you that emails sent from such a system will not reach
> the recipient.
>
+1.
You also need SPF (DNS record that lists IP addresses allowed to send
emails from a certain domain) which isn't easy if you
> I'm guessing I could use one of those services (and
> software) that lets you use a dynamic IP address (by doing something like
> updating you if your IP address changes.
I would not recommend running an MTA on a dynamic IP address. I can absolutely
guarantee you that emails sent from such
On 2022-05-17 01:44, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks to all who replied!
I'll need to think over what I want to do.
I guess if I want to run a local MTA, I'd need either a static IP
address
(along with a domain) or I'm guessing I could use one of those services
(and
software) that lets you u
Thanks to all who replied!
I'll need to think over what I want to do.
I guess if I want to run a local MTA, I'd need either a static IP address
(along with a domain) or I'm guessing I could use one of those services (and
software) that lets you use a dynamic IP address (by doing something like
On Monday, May 16, 2022 07:11:47 AM Stella Ashburne wrote:
> Excuse me, how is the original post "Permanent email address?" relevant to
> this mailing list?
I should have marked it OT.
Stella Ashburne writes:
> Excuse me, how is the original post "Permanent email address?"
> relevant to this mailing list?
>
(Maybe) it is considered a off-topic. So no problem, i think.
Sincerely, Linux fan Byung-Hee
--
^고맙습니다 _和合團結_ 감사합니다_^))//
Excuse me, how is the original post "Permanent email address?" relevant to this
mailing list?
On 2022-05-15, John Hasler wrote:
>
>> I think the only way to avoid this is not to let your incoming email
>> sit in anyone else's server i.e. to run an MTA.
>
> My incoming mail never sits in Pobox's server for more than one minute.
A minute seems sufficient.
> But it's a store and forward sys
On 16/05/22 05:11, Dan Ritter wrote:
I note that nobody owns rhkramer.org:
$ host rhkramer.org
Host rhkramer.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
NXDOMAIN means no such domain.
Not quite. It doesn't mean no-one owns it; it just means (IIRC) there's
no A or record for that domain. www.rhkramer.org
On Sun, 15 May 2022 16:48 -0400, pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote:
> On Sun, 15 May 2022 18:25 +0100, Brian wrote:
> >
> > Keep the gmail address and just forward from there to an address
> > ypu control.
>
> If you know how to have gmail forward to some other address, I'd love
> to know how. I could
Joe writes:
> The OP makes mention of mail 'going through' Google. I believe these
> days anyone who handles your email has reserved themselves the right to
> read that email and use any data in it as it thinks fit.
In the case of free providers such as Gmail of course they do, and they
say so. W
On 16/05/2022 02:29, Roger Price wrote:
On Sun, 15 May 2022, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to have an email address that will be permanent, ... (And
that gets my email out of google's control / reach.)
Spend the money, get your own domain, it's worth it. Roger
👍
This i
" / choose "Forwarding and POP/IMAP" tab and
under the Forwarding section, "Add a forwarding address", choose
"Forward a copy of incoming mail to" and set the desired email address.
You can also choose to "delete Gmail's copy". You will need to re
writes:
> [...]
>
>> I'm not exactly sure what you're trying to do, but take a look at Protonmail:
>>
>> https://protonmail.com
>
> Quite a few things I dislike there:
>
> - browser based
> - end encryption and decryption in the browser
>(of all things!)
>
+1; Me too!
So Protonmail should
On Sun, 15 May 2022 18:25:50 +0100
Brian wrote:
>
> Keep the gmail address and just forward from there to an address
> ypu control.
>
If you know how to have gmail forward to some other address, I'd love
to know how. I could avoid having to fetch directly from Google.
Paul
--
Paul M. Foster
n, May 15, 2022 at 10:08:57AM -0400,rhkra...@gmail.com
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >> My understanding is that the (only?) way to do get such a
> > > >> permanent address is to have my own domain and assign an email
> > > >> address in th
[...]
> I'm not exactly sure what you're trying to do, but take a look at Protonmail:
>
> https://protonmail.com
Quite a few things I dislike there:
- browser based
- end encryption and decryption in the browser
(of all things!)
- reinventing part of the mail infrastructure
(at least,
On 2022-05-15, wrote:
>
> I have a gmail account as well, and I use either fetchmail or
> Claws-Mail to pick up my gmail messages. Unfortunately, some of my
This belies and debunks thread # 58.
; >> My understanding is that the (only?) way to do get such a
> > >> permanent address is to have my own domain and assign an email
> > >> address in that domain to me?
> > > If you have to be in control over sending and receiving e-mail
> > > yo
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> My understanding is that the (only?) way to do get such a permanent address
> is
> to have my own domain and assign an email address in that domain to me?
Correct.
Find a domain that is currently unclaimed. Pay $8-15/year to a
domain registrar to estab
On Sun 15 May 2022 at 12:59:55 -0400, pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote:
> On Sun, 15 May 2022 10:08:57 -0400
> rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > I would like to have an email address that will be permanent, in
> > that, for example, I can move it from provider to provider as I
&
On Sun, 15 May 2022 10:08:57 -0400
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> I would like to have an email address that will be permanent, in
> that, for example, I can move it from provider to provider as I
> desire or need (if, for example, a provider goes out of business).
> (And that gets my
ess is to have my own domain and assign an email
> >> address in that domain to me?
> > If you have to be in control over sending and receiving e-mail
> > you'll need your own MTA. That implies a domain you control.
>
> No. The OP wants control over their mail ad
rhkra...@gmail.com schrieb:
> My understanding is that the (only?) way to do get such a permanent address
> is
> to have my own domain and assign an email address in that domain to me?
That is correct.
> Also, iiuc, I cannot move my gmail address to some other provider?
Of course not.
-thh
15.05.22, 16:31 +0200, Reco:
On Sun, May 15, 2022 at 10:08:57AM -0400,rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
My understanding is that the (only?) way to do get such a permanent address is
to have my own domain and assign an email address in that domain to me?
If you have to be in control over sending
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
--- Original Message ---
On Sunday, May 15th, 2022 at 8:08 AM, wrote:
> I would like to have an email address that will be permanent, in that, for
> example, I can move it from provider to provider as I desire or need (i
Hi.
On Sun, May 15, 2022 at 10:08:57AM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> My understanding is that the (only?) way to do get such a permanent address
> is
> to have my own domain and assign an email address in that domain to me?
If you have to be in control over sending and re
On Sun, 15 May 2022, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to have an email address that will be permanent, ... (And that
gets my email out of google's control / reach.)
Spend the money, get your own domain, it's worth it. Roger
rhkramer writes:
> My understanding is that the (only?) way to do get such a permanent
> address is to have my own domain and assign an email address in that
> domain to me?
Got to pobox.com, open an account, and follow instructions. Many
(including me) prefer use different organiza
I would like to have an email address that will be permanent, in that, for
example, I can move it from provider to provider as I desire or need (if, for
example, a provider goes out of business). (And that gets my email out of
google's control / reach.)
(Aside: this is not specifical
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 07:47:51AM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 10:47:01AM +0100, Floris wrote:
> > Op Tue, 05 Dec 2017 10:39:07 +0100 schreef Norton Caterq1qb
> > :
> >
> > > Thank you
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPad
> >
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 10:47:01AM +0100, Floris wrote:
> Op Tue, 05 Dec 2017 10:39:07 +0100 schreef Norton Caterq1qb
> :
>
> > Thank you
> >
> > Sent from my iPad
> >
>
> Please read:
> https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#subunsub
>
He is probably not subscribed, but receiving spam with forg
Op Tue, 05 Dec 2017 10:39:07 +0100 schreef Norton Caterq1qb
:
Thank you
Sent from my iPad
Please read:
https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#subunsub
Thank you
Sent from my iPad
After upgrading Debian to 9, the little brother database no longer
searches the actual email addresses, only the "name" field in the
lbdb/m_inmail.utf-8 file.
Any ideas?
ted RFC2822, which obsoleted RFC822),
> > > the from field is defined as:
> > >
> > > from= "From:" mailbox-list CRLF
> > > mailbox-list= (mailbox *("," mailbox)) / obs-mbox-list
> > > mailbox = na
quot;," mailbox)) / obs-mbox-list
> > mailbox = name-addr / addr-spec
> > name-addr = [display-name] angle-addr
> > angle-addr = [CFWS] "<" addr-spec ">" [CFWS] /
> > obs-angle-addr
>
= "From:" mailbox-list CRLF
> mailbox-list= (mailbox *("," mailbox)) / obs-mbox-list
> mailbox = name-addr / addr-spec
> name-addr = [display-name] angle-addr
> angle-addr = [CFWS] "<" addr-spec ">&quo
angle-addr
obs-mbox-list = *([CFWS] ",") mailbox *("," [mailbox / CFWS])
(addr-spec is an email address). So, the simplest parsing of that line
is as a single mailbox where display-name is EFA (That is, display-name
is actually ' "EFA" ', but the sp
is a single space at this EOL, so malformed as to cause sieve to
spit the dummy with an error?
2)
The dodgiest "To:" line I have literally ever seen, as follows:
To:
Notice the colon, AND the semi colon, in this "email address".
Again gmail passed it right through.
I can
Andre Müller wrote:
> can't make a constitution.
you don't have constitution but Grundgesetz, which is meant to function as a
constitution. I tried to find out for couple of months , but there is only
the 2+4 Vertrag and it is not conclusive. So it is not clear to me ... and
not only to me.
It do
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> I don't think you want to go there (especially when the above mentioned
> Reichsbürger have been caught hoarding weapons and when one of them has
> already shot a cop dead.
A common mistake is to deduce from one event or single person, which does
not mean I agree with th
I apologize for feeding the trolls, you may say I have a soft spot for
strays.
to...@tuxteam.de:
> No. You don't define truth as "arithmetic means between realities", unless
> you've convinced yourself the deviations follow a normal distribution.
I liked this part better than any practical advise
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 09:26:47AM +0100, deloptes wrote:
> Michael Lange wrote:
>
> > Oops, I guess I picked the wrong English word, I guess it should rather
> > read "deny the legal existence..."
>
> You know Germany is still occupied by the USA [.
Good morning,
I do not want to fire up a new discussion in a mailing list for a operating
system. I want to clarify some things.
So if you're not interested, then don't answer, don't read it.
@deloptes, this is a good point. To have only on view, you never can say
what is behind you.
Germany is
Michael Lange wrote:
> Oops, I guess I picked the wrong English word, I guess it should rather
> read "deny the legal existence..."
You know Germany is still occupied by the USA as there is no legal document
for the opposite. I am not sure who is living in the real world - you or
they. IMO the tr
On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 00:42:34 +0100
Michael Lange wrote:
> referred to as "Reichsbürger", who, as a common base, neglect the legal
> existence of the Federal Republic of Germany and declare their own
Oops, I guess I picked the wrong English word, I guess it should rather
read "deny the legal exis
On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 18:07:13 +
Andre Müller wrote:
> You can get more information on our page:
> http://verfassunggebende-versammlung.org (of course it's in german)
Hahaha, I wish you guys a lot of fun in your parallel universe! ;-)
And a word to all non-german users here: apparently Andre
GiaThnYgeia:
> Yes but do you want equality? You give me half of your Euros I'll give
> you have of my Uruguayan pesetas. Then there will be no war, no reason
> for war. If you want to be free but you want the army to enforce
> maximum inequality go to Trump's land. It is the most freedom you
Andre Müller:
> Our destination is, that all people can live their life in freedom without
> supporting war against other countries. People never want to have war.
Yes but do you want equality? You give me half of your Euros I'll give
you have of my Uruguayan pesetas. Then there will be no war,
Lisi Reisz:
> On Friday 17 February 2017 09:43:16 Stephen Powell wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017, at 04:30, Andre Müller wrote:
>>> I'm sick of it and many
>>> people in whole
>>> Europe also.
>>
>> And as for the United States, do we not have the best Congress money can
>> buy?
>
> No. But you
Nicolas George schrieb am Fr., 17. Feb. 2017 um 13:24 Uhr:
> Le nonidi 29 pluviôse, an CCXXV, Andre Müller a écrit :
> > The day comes closer, that we remove all politicians and do our own
> > constitution.
>
> And your own constitution will need politicians of its own to work. And
> they too, af
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 10:25:41AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> That may be true, but I am driven to quote Benjamin Franklin here,
> with "Democracy is a very bad form of government, but all the others are
> so much worse."
You're thinking of Winston Churchill: "Indeed, it has been said that
dem
On Friday 17 February 2017 07:17:21 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 17 February 2017 09:43:16 Stephen Powell wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017, at 04:30, Andre Müller wrote:
> > > The day comes closer, that we remove all politicians and do our
> > > own constitution.
> > > This is the only way to chan
What is this pseuds-corner spam fritter stuff?
MF
On 17 February 2017 at 12:05, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le nonidi 29 pluviôse, an CCXXV, Andre Müller a écrit :
> > The day comes closer, that we remove all politicians and do our own
> > constitution.
>
> And your own constitution will need poli
Le nonidi 29 pluviôse, an CCXXV, Andre Müller a écrit :
> The day comes closer, that we remove all politicians and do our own
> constitution.
And your own constitution will need politicians of its own to work. And
they too, after the first few decades, will be corrupt, because "power
attracts the
On Friday 17 February 2017 09:43:16 Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017, at 04:30, Andre Müller wrote:
> > The day comes closer, that we remove all politicians and do our own
> > constitution.
> > This is the only way to change the whole system. I'm sick of it and many
> > people in whole
Andre Müller 께서 쓰시길,
《記事 全文
에서》:
> [...]
> Fuck politicians, die in pain, burn in hell!
I did send my letter with all my spiritual energy. If he(Munich Mayor)
do not do rethink, i am willing to go airport, indeed..
Sincerely,
Byung-Hee from South Korea
--
^고맙습니다 _地平天成_ 감사합니다_^))//
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017, at 04:30, Andre Müller wrote:
>
> The day comes closer, that we remove all politicians and do our own
> constitution.
> This is the only way to change the whole system. I'm sick of it and many
> people in whole
> Europe also.
And as for the United States, do we not have the
sad news: "Linux Pioneer Munich Makes
> Huge Step Towards Returning to Windows.". I do not want this story. I
> will send him (Munich Mayor) my message. At Munich City sites, i did
> fail to search Mayor's email address.
>
> Windows10 is evil.
>
> Respect,
> B
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 13:17:06 -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
> On 07/24/2012 12:32 PM, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>>> https://www.pbs.dk/eu/servver/done/nets-Acc990755
>>>
>>>
>>
>> While the above URI seems legitime, the content of the message is a bit
>> fuzzy as it requests f
On 07/24/2012 12:32 PM, Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 11:05:07 -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
On 07/24/2012 10:00 AM, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
OTOH, I find TB's ratio of false possitives for "scam" to be very low.
Greetings,
I too received a message marked as "scam" by icedove recently but
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 11:05:07 -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
> On 07/24/2012 10:00 AM, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> OTOH, I find TB's ratio of false possitives for "scam" to be very low.
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>>
> I too received a message marked as "scam" by icedove recently but it was
> not from a googlemai
On 07/24/2012 10:00 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 20:44:46 +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
Icedove always shows warning "This message might be scam" when the
sender is using @google.com address.
You really meant "scam" and not spam", right? I ask because they are two
different things
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 20:44:46 +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
> Icedove always shows warning "This message might be scam" when the
> sender is using @google.com address.
You really meant "scam" and not spam", right? I ask because they are two
different things treated differently from Icedove.
> I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
Icedove always shows warning "This message might be scam" when the
sender is using @google.com address.
Is this intended behaviour, does anyone else see this too and should I
report a bug?
If you are looking for emails, which are sent from @go
Zach writes:
> What does it take to get an @debian.org email address?
Chris writes:
> Lots of ?!?!?
Nobody has that much money.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@
Lots of ?!?!?
Sent from my HTC.
- Reply message -
From: "Zach Crownover"
Date: Tue, Jul 17, 2012 1:03 pm
Subject: Email Address
To:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What does it take to get an @debian.org email address?
Zach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE---
Zach Crownover wrote:
> What does it take to get an @debian.org email address?
An @debian.org address is available to any Debian Developer. Some DDs
use those addresses to show their involvement with the project while
some use their normal email address.
Here is a good place to start read
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What does it take to get an @debian.org email address?
Zach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQBajuAAoJEFmqxihjvTUgq68H
Is there any automatic way to have the sender's email address
> > > > changed depending on whether or not the mail is going to a list?
> > >>
> >
> > > In my mutt configuration file I have:
> > > send-hook . 'unmy_hdr From:'
> &
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:20:11AM -0700, Mike McClain wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:29:04AM +, Brian wrote:
> > On Thu 24 Mar 2011 at 14:53:29 -0700, Mike McClain wrote:
> >
> > > Is there any automatic way to have the sender's email address
> > &g
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 07:47:46AM +, kuLa wrote:
> On 24/03/11 21:53, Mike McClain wrote:
> > Is there any automatic way to have the sender's email address
> > changed depending on whether or not the mail is going to a list?
> I would suggest to check 'rewrit
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:29:04AM +, Brian wrote:
> On Thu 24 Mar 2011 at 14:53:29 -0700, Mike McClain wrote:
>
> > Is there any automatic way to have the sender's email address
> > changed depending on whether or not the mail is going to a list?
>>
> In m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24/03/11 21:53, Mike McClain wrote:
> Is there any automatic way to have the sender's email address
> changed depending on whether or not the mail is going to a list?
> I try to use one address for lists which get published wo
On Thu 24 Mar 2011 at 14:53:29 -0700, Mike McClain wrote:
> Is there any automatic way to have the sender's email address
> changed depending on whether or not the mail is going to a list?
> I try to use one address for lists which get published world wide
> and another for b
Is there any automatic way to have the sender's email address
changed depending on whether or not the mail is going to a list?
I try to use one address for lists which get published world wide
and another for business that only goes to a select few. I've a tiny
script to change the
On 06/12/2010 01:15 AM, Aaron Toponce wrote:
On 6/11/2010 6:44 PM, Joe Prince wrote:
I have new email address and wish to cancel the old number. My old
address was beaujo...@gmail.com. My new address is drjp...@gmail.com.
My name is Dr. Joseph Prince and I do not want any mail from the old
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/c46d0134-9a26-4de3-9710-35a5d52ec...@gmail.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
On 6/11/2010 6:44 PM, Joe Prince wrote:
> I have new email address and wish to cancel the old number. My old
> address was beaujo...@gmail.com. My new address is drjp...@gmail.com.
> My name is Dr. Joseph Prince and I do not want any mail from the old
> address nor do I want old m
I have new email address and wish to cancel the old number. My old
address was beaujo...@gmail.com. My new address is
drjp...@gmail.com. My name is Dr. Joseph Prince and I do not want
any mail from the old address nor do I want old mail. Please help me
rid that address completely
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Bengt Samuelsson wrote:
Hi,
I need some support for this soft-raid system.
I am running it as RAID5 with 4 samsung spinpoint 500G SATA300 tot 1.3T
byte
And it runs in http://sm7jqb.dnsalias.com
I use mdadm sytem in a Debian
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 12:08:16PM +0100, Peter Teunissen wrote:
>
> On 10-feb-2008, at 3:08, Alex Samad wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I want to set up an email address where for my domain, were users can
>> send spam
>> emails to and they will be added to the spa
On 10-feb-2008, at 3:08, Alex Samad wrote:
Hi
I want to set up an email address where for my domain, were users
can send spam
emails to and they will be added to the spam DB.
I use exim and spamassassin. All my spam processing gets done as user
spamassassin, so I thought I could just
Hi
I want to set up an email address where for my domain, were users can send spam
emails to and they will be added to the spam DB.
I use exim and spamassassin. All my spam processing gets done as user
spamassassin, so I thought I could just process all mails sent to spamassassin
as spam with a
1 - 100 of 202 matches
Mail list logo
