Re: Emacs on non-X machine

1999-04-15 Thread John Pearson
On %M 0, Navindra Umanee wrote > Montreal Wed Apr 14 14:26:23 1999 > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe you can't install Emacs on a > Debian system without first install X?! That's quite a showstopper. > Is it a bug? > You're wrong, and no. You need xlib6g, but you don't need a complete

Re: Emacs on non-X machine

1999-04-15 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Apr 14, 1999 at 03:26:11PM -0400, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote: > On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, Navindra Umanee wrote: > > Hmmm, according to > > http://www.debian.org/Packages/stable/editors/emacs20.html emacs20 > > does depend on xlib which depends on xfree86-common. > According to dselect it doesn't

Re: Emacs on non-X machine

1999-04-14 Thread Navindra Umanee
Montreal Wed Apr 14 15:44:38 1999 Noah L. Meyerhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, Navindra Umanee wrote: > > > Hmmm, according to > > http://www.debian.org/Packages/stable/editors/emacs20.html emacs20 > > does depend on xlib which depend

Re: Emacs on non-X machine

1999-04-14 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, Navindra Umanee wrote: > Hmmm, according to > http://www.debian.org/Packages/stable/editors/emacs20.html emacs20 > does depend on xlib which depends on xfree86-common. According to dselect it doesn't. The Depends line I showed you was copi

Re: Emacs on non-X machine

1999-04-14 Thread Navindra Umanee
Montreal Wed Apr 14 15:36:19 1999 Noah L. Meyerhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, Navindra Umanee wrote: > > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe you can't install Emacs on a > > Debian system without first install X?! That's quite

Re: Emacs on non-X machine

1999-04-14 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, Navindra Umanee wrote: > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe you can't install Emacs on a > Debian system without first install X?! That's quite a showstopper. > Is it a bug? > Install emacs 20, not 19...version 19 does seem to depend

Re: Emacs on non-X machine

1999-04-14 Thread Navindra Umanee
Montreal Wed Apr 14 15:10:50 1999 Small, Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems to be running n mine and I don't have X working yet. It is just > text mode Emacs, but then again, it isn't much uglier than the graphics mode > one I have running on my NT box Didn't you have to install xlib a

RE: Emacs on non-X machine

1999-04-14 Thread Small, Bradley
1999 2:28 PM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Emacs on non-X machine Montreal Wed Apr 14 14:26:23 1999 Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe you can't install Emacs on a Debian system without first install X?! That's quite a showstopper. Is it a bug? -N. [Cc

Emacs on non-X machine

1999-04-14 Thread Navindra Umanee
Montreal Wed Apr 14 14:26:23 1999 Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe you can't install Emacs on a Debian system without first install X?! That's quite a showstopper. Is it a bug? -N. [Cc's are always appreciated] -- "These download files are in Microsoft Word 6.0 format. After unzipping,