EXT2-fs error

2003-12-08 Thread Robin Gerard
Hello, after my box crashed and when I booted the machine agai I got the message: ... ext3 No journal on filesystem on ide0(3, 4) mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev2/root2, or too many mounted file system. however fsck said that '/dev/hda4' is clean and I can use

Re: RAID & EXT2-fs error

2003-01-24 Thread Christophe TROESTLER
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, John Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am copying & pasting their post: > > > I've written a doc on how to install a Debian with root file system over > LVM and RAID. > > If it's of any interest it can be found at this URL: > http://www.midhgard.it/docs/index_en.htm

Re: RAID & EXT2-fs error

2003-01-22 Thread John Schmidt
On Tuesday 21 January 2003 11:31 pm, Michael Kahle wrote: > > I am trying to install a Debian testing box with root on RAID > > 1 following the instructions given at > > http://karaolides.com/computing/HOWTO/lvmraid/ > > I am working on setting up a system with this configuration. I > decided to w

RE: RAID & EXT2-fs error

2003-01-21 Thread Michael Kahle
> When I ran vgcreate it seamed to work fine. However it lists > the MAX LV Size as being 255.99GB. This does not make sense > with my configuration. I have 5 SCSI disk partitions in a > RAID5 array. Each partition is 36446.22mb. My math shows I > should have a MAX LV size of being 145784.8

RE: RAID & EXT2-fs error

2003-01-21 Thread Michael Kahle
> I am trying to install a Debian testing box with root on RAID > 1 following the instructions given at > http://karaolides.com/computing/HOWTO/lvmraid/ I am working on setting up a system with this configuration. I decided to work step by step with this howto to get my system running. Thanks

RAID & EXT2-fs error

2003-01-21 Thread Christophe TROESTLER
clue! :-( ): kernel: EXT2-fs error (device md(9,1)): ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory #487195: rec_len is smaller than minimal - offset=0, inode=0, rec_len=0, name_len=0 No need to say, after that the system goes berzek and most of the commands stop working. However, if I reboot, the pro

EXT2-fs error

2000-02-23 Thread Igor Mozetic
I found the following in /var/log/kern.log: kernel: EXT2-fs error (device ide0(3,4)): ext2_readdir: bad entry in directory #198657: rec_len is too small for name_len - offset=868, inode=198683, rec_len=32, name_len=56 kernel: EXT2-fs error (device ide0(3,4)): ext2_readdir: bad entry in

Re: HELP: EXT2-fs error

1999-05-18 Thread Bob Billson
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 04:23:41PM +1000, Rob wrote: > Have you run fsck on the partition? Its probably the best place to start > with disk problems. Yes, that was one of the first things I did. The partition came up clean.

Re: HELP: EXT2-fs error

1999-05-18 Thread Rob
> I'm running a full Potato system (2.2.9 kernel). Tonight, for the first > time, I got an error I've never seen before in the 4 years I've been running > Linux full-time. I'm hoping this is bug in Potato and not something more > serious with my system. [snip] > 3,69 is the /dev/hdb5 partition

HELP: EXT2-fs error

1999-05-18 Thread Bob Billson
d up when Debian was doing it's nightly housekeeping in /etc/cron.daily ... EXT2-fs error (device ide0(3,69)): ext2_readdir: directory #4148 contains a hole at offset 1024 EXT2-fs error (device ide0(3,69)): ext2_readdir: directory #4148 contains a hole at offset 2048 EXT2-fs error (device

EXT2-fs error

1998-11-04 Thread S Lim
and load the data from my backup tape. But I got these error messages: EXT-fs error (device 03:41) ext2_readdir: bad entry in directory EXT2-fs error (device 03:02): ext2_find_entry: bad entry in directory #4179: rec_len is smaller than minimal - offset=616, inode=0, rec_len=0, name_len=0 EXT2-fs