On Tuesday 05 September 2006 20:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I can not see referecne to my second CPU. The system is a fresh net
> install of Debian Sarge. So I need to do anything special to get the
> second CPU reconzied? What have i done wrong suring the Debian install?
Grab one of the linux
After reading the e-mail regarding issues upgrading cpu, I decided to
check my Dual CPU server to see what /proc/cpuinfo said.
This is what is says:
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 8
model name : Pentium III (Coppermine)
stepping
On Wednesday 06 September 2006 00:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> After reading the e-mail regarding issues upgrading cpu, I decided to
> check my Dual CPU server to see what /proc/cpuinfo said.
>
> This is what is says:
>
> processor : 0
> vendor_id : GenuineIntel
Walter Hoolwerf ha scritto:
the problem (probably) is, that your application isn't smp enabled,
like others said.
this means, that your application is designed to do one task at a
time, like for example, if you'd like to add 7 to 3 and put in in A,
and afterwards like to add 9 to 7 and put
%0,0% 99,4%
cpu000,0%0,0%0,4% 0,0% 0,0%0,0% 99,5%
cpu01 99,0%0,0%0,9% 0,0% 0,0%0,0%0,0%
Is this behaviour right for a dual cpu machine, or there is something
not going right?
Thanks in advance,
MC
the problem (probabl
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 10:34 +0200, Marco Calviani wrote:
> Miquel van Smoorenburg ha scritto:
>
> > You cannot run one program on two CPUs. It's simply not possible.
> >
> >What you can do is split your program up into multiple programs
> >or threads, that you can run simultaneously - in that case
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 09:30 +0200, Marco Calviani wrote:
> Adam Mercer ha scritto:
>
> >On 23/05/05, Marco Calviani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>So, normally, even if i use an SMP kernel if i'm not telling the program
> >>to use both CPU it will continue using only one CPU, right?
> >>
Miquel van Smoorenburg ha scritto:
You cannot run one program on two CPUs. It's simply not possible.
What you can do is split your program up into multiple programs
or threads, that you can run simultaneously - in that case, you
will use more than one CPU. But you need to redesign/rewrite
your
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Marco Calviani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Adam Mercer ha scritto:
>
>>On 23/05/05, Marco Calviani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>So, normally, even if i use an SMP kernel if i'm not telling the program
>>>to use both CPU it will continue using only one CPU,
Adam Mercer ha scritto:
On 23/05/05, Marco Calviani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, normally, even if i use an SMP kernel if i'm not telling the program
to use both CPU it will continue using only one CPU, right?
Yes, if the program isn't written to use both CPUs, it won't.
Cheers
Ad
On 23/05/05, Marco Calviani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, normally, even if i use an SMP kernel if i'm not telling the program
> to use both CPU it will continue using only one CPU, right?
Yes, if the program isn't written to use both CPUs, it won't.
Cheers
Adam
Marco Calviani ha scritto:
So, normally, even if i use an SMP kernel if i'm not telling the
program to use both CPU it will continue using only one CPU, right?
Regards,
MC
By the way i'm using g77 to compile the program i'm running...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
So, normally, even if i use an SMP kernel if i'm not telling the program
to use both CPU it will continue using only one CPU, right?
Regards,
MC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
0,0%1,4% 0,0% 0,0%0,0% 99,4%
>cpu000,0%0,0%0,4% 0,0% 0,0%0,0% 99,5%
>cpu01 99,0%0,0%0,9% 0,0% 0,0%0,0%0,0%
>
> Is this behaviour right for a dual cpu machine, or there is something
> not going right?
,0% 99,5%
cpu01 99,0%0,0%0,9% 0,0% 0,0%0,0%0,0%
Is this behaviour right for a dual cpu machine, or there is something
not going right?
Thanks in advance,
MC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 24-Jun-99 Peter Iannarelli wrote:
> Then explain why xosview version 1.7.1 on potato
> reports the activity of both CPUs.
>
Because people are always getting better at breaking the rules (-:
Then explain why xosview version 1.7.1 on potato
reports the activity of both CPUs.
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On 24-Jun-99 Marcus Johansson wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > We have a HP-UX box with dual cpu's, and the 'top' program shows the status
> > of
> > both cpu's, and even which cpu the pr
On 24-Jun-99 Marcus Johansson wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> We have a HP-UX box with dual cpu's, and the 'top' program shows the status
> of
> both cpu's, and even which cpu the processes are running on. Will the top
> (the
> GNU variant I guess) distributed with Debian 2.1 show anything like that? If
>
Hi!
We have a HP-UX box with dual cpu's, and the 'top' program shows the status of
both cpu's, and even which cpu the processes are running on. Will the top (the
GNU variant I guess) distributed with Debian 2.1 show anything like that? If I
have dual cpu's that is... Or could I recompile top w
19 matches
Mail list logo
