Re: Dual Boot Problems

2001-12-11 Thread dman
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 07:19:33PM -0800, Anthony Lau wrote: ... | I guess, both Linux and Windows likes to have their boot drive as | drive 1 (0x80). What you are doing is fiddling with the partition type in the partition table. If you make your linux partition a "hidden" partition, then window

Re: Dual Boot Problems

2001-12-11 Thread Arnout Bruinsma
According to Roderick W.Smith's "The Multi-Boot Configuration Handbook": Both DOS and Windows9x must boot from a primary partition on the first physical disk or from a floppy disk.although the most basic components of DOS and Windows9x must boot from C: , it is possible to install the bulk of b

Re: Dual Boot Problems

2001-12-10 Thread Anthony Lau
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 02:11:14PM +0100, Erik Andreas Fjogstad Brandstadmoen wrote: > David Raeker-Jordan, > > other=/dev/hda1 > > label=win > > table=/dev/hda > > > > other=/dev/hdb1 > > label=winbak > > map-drive = 0x80 > > to = 0x81 > > map-dri

Re: Dual Boot Problems

2001-12-10 Thread Erik Andreas Fjogstad Brandstadmoen
David Raeker-Jordan, > other=/dev/hda1 > label=win > table=/dev/hda > > other=/dev/hdb1 > label=winbak > map-drive = 0x80 > to = 0x81 > map-drive = 0x81 > to = 0x80 > table=/dev/hdb But, does this work if you _don't_ have a copy of

Re: Dual Boot Problems

2001-12-10 Thread David Raeker-Jordan
Alec wrote: > > Anyways, I configured lilo to point to the Windows partition like this: > / > other=/dev/hdd1 > label=Windows > table=/dev/hdd > > ran lilo. No errors. > But when I try to boot into Windows, it says "Loading Windows" and gets stuck.

Re: Dual Boot Problems

2001-12-09 Thread Carel Fellinger
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 03:12:23PM -0500, dman wrote: > On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 03:03:31PM -0500, Alec wrote: ... > > Could it be that the Windows boot loader gets confused somehow? > > Yes, very. Windows will only boot if it is on the master disk of the > primary controller. I recommend making

Re: Dual Boot Problems

2001-12-09 Thread dman
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 03:31:46PM -0500, Alec wrote: | On Sunday 09 December 2001 03:12 pm, dman wrote: | > On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 03:03:31PM -0500, Alec wrote: ... | > | Could it be that the Windows boot loader gets confused somehow? | > | > Yes, very. Windows will only boot if it is on the mas

Re: Dual Boot Problems

2001-12-09 Thread ben
On Sunday 09 December 2001 12:31 pm, Alec wrote: > On Sunday 09 December 2001 03:12 pm, dman wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 03:03:31PM -0500, Alec wrote: [snip] > IDE A: Windows HD (Master), CDRW (Slave) > IDE B: Linux HD (Master) > that's the way mine works.

Re: Dual Boot Problems

2001-12-09 Thread ben
On Sunday 09 December 2001 12:03 pm, Alec wrote: > Hi > > I'm wondering if anyone can help me with the following problem: > > I have 2 HDs, and I just had Win98 installed on the slave HD. I had to > physically disconnect the master HD to do it, because I was using the CDs > that originally came wit

Re: Dual Boot Problems

2001-12-09 Thread Alec
On Sunday 09 December 2001 03:12 pm, dman wrote: > On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 03:03:31PM -0500, Alec wrote: > | I have 2 HDs, and I just had Win98 installed on the slave HD. > > ... > > | But when I try to boot into Windows, it says "Loading Windows" and gets > | stuck. The only way I can boot into Wi

Re: Dual Boot Problems

2001-12-09 Thread dman
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 03:03:31PM -0500, Alec wrote: | I have 2 HDs, and I just had Win98 installed on the slave HD. ... | But when I try to boot into Windows, it says "Loading Windows" and gets stuck. | The only way I can boot into Windows is by again physically disconnecting the | master HD. W

Dual Boot Problems

2001-12-09 Thread Alec
Hi I'm wondering if anyone can help me with the following problem: I have 2 HDs, and I just had Win98 installed on the slave HD. I had to physically disconnect the master HD to do it, because I was using the CDs that originally came with the computer and I didn't want them to overwrite my Linu