On Du, 15 mai 11, 11:41:18, deloptes wrote:
>
> The reason to say this the way I said it, is because already last time I
> migrated dovecot I had many troubles and this is the job of the developers.
> Believe me I know what I am doing (resp. saying). Dealing everyday with
> software developers ...
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> ""sid" is subject to massive changes and in-place library updates. This
> can result in a very "unstable" system which contains packages that
> cannot be installed due to missing libraries, dependencies that cannot
> be fulfilled etc. Use it at your own risk!"
Stan, stop re
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Your demonstrated frustration and cussing clearly demonstrate you are
> NOT a proper candidate for using unstable packages. Do yourself and
> us a favor and stick to stable.
you are not proper candidate to tell me what I should do.
The reason to say this the way I said it
On 5/14/2011 2:25 PM, David Baron wrote:
> Unfortunately, the maintainers changed the configurations to the "more
> modern/recent" conf.d directory script system without providing any script
> for
> transition and NO WARNING for apt-listchanges. To tell us to avoid "unstable"
> is no excuse, e
On 5/14/2011 1:28 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 05/14/2011 11:32 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> On 5/14/2011 6:07 AM, deloptes wrote:
>>
>>> Someone is brainless - but definitely not me!
>>
>> deloptes@>yahoo.com<
>>
>> Nope, definitely not you. ;)
>>
>
> That's pretty rude, and definitely uncalled for
On 2011-05-14 21:25 +0200, David Baron wrote:
> Unfortunately, the maintainers changed the configurations to the "more
> modern/recent" conf.d directory script system without providing any script
> for
> transition and NO WARNING for apt-listchanges. To tell us to avoid "unstable"
> is no excu
On Saturday 10 Iyar 5771 15:26:42 debian-user-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org
wrote:
> > Updating to the Sid version was a catastrophe--flagged all kinds of
> > superseded syntax warning which were flagged as errors when I tried to
> > edit them into the conf file. Commented out, got listening err
On 05/14/2011 11:32 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 5/14/2011 6:07 AM, deloptes wrote:
Someone is brainless - but definitely not me!
deloptes@>yahoo.com<
Nope, definitely not you. ;)
That's pretty rude, and definitely uncalled for on a public list.
--
"Neither the wisest constitution nor the
On 5/14/2011 6:13 AM, deloptes wrote:
> someone is thinking with his/her ass instead
> of his/her head
Your statement could very well be applied to occasional users who
attempt to install unstable software, i.e. yourself.
"sid" is subject to massive changes and in-place library updates. This
can
On 5/14/2011 6:07 AM, deloptes wrote:
> Someone is brainless - but definitely not me!
deloptes@>yahoo.com<
Nope, definitely not you. ;)
--
Stan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arc
Camaleón wrote:
> It's still unclear where the problem is.
Camaleón, it's pretty clear - someone is thinking with his/her ass instead
of his/her head
when you have fixed it let me know - I spent about 2hours now with this
shit, not working and I'm giving up. Even the information on the website
David Baron wrote:
> Updating to the Sid version was a catastrophe--flagged all kinds of
> superseded syntax warning which were flagged as errors when I tried to
> edit them into the conf file. Commented out, got listening errors for
> various 9## ports.
>
> So I downgraded to the testing version
Problems were caused by combination of old conf file and the new conf.d files
which were not removed on downgrade.
I re-upgraded to the Sid packages, taking the new maintainer's conf files when
asked. Then had to configure from scratch. Finally have it working.
1. New and old config files canno
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:36:35 +0300, David Baron wrote:
> On Saturday 26 Nisan 5771 22:59:04 David Baron wrote:
>> > I would start with the usual tests:
>> >
>> > http://wiki.dovecot.org/TestInstallation
>>
>> Process is not running. There is no log entry after those listener
>> errors (995 and
On Saturday 26 Nisan 5771 22:59:04 David Baron wrote:
> On Friday 25 Nisan 5771 16:39:11
> debian-user-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org
>
> wrote:
> > > Updating to the Sid version was a catastrophe--flagged all kinds of
> > > superseded syntax warning which were flagged as errors when I tried to
>
On Friday 25 Nisan 5771 16:39:11 debian-user-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org
wrote:
> > Updating to the Sid version was a catastrophe--flagged all kinds of
> > superseded syntax warning which were flagged as errors when I tried to
> > edit them into the conf file. Commented out, got listening erro
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:29:31 +0300, David Baron wrote:
(please, avoid using html formatted messages)
> Updating to the Sid version was a catastrophe--flagged all kinds of
> superseded syntax warning which were flagged as errors when I tried to
> edit them into the conf file. Commented out, got li
Updating to the Sid version was a catastrophe--flagged all kinds of superseded
syntax warning which were flagged as errors when I tried to edit them into the
conf file. Commented out, got listening errors for various 9## ports.
So I downgraded to the testing version and used a backed up conf fil
18 matches
Mail list logo
