Documentation for NetworkManager 1.30.0 -- Where?

2025-04-05 Thread Richard Owlett
/disabling WiFi. To ask in intelligently I must be familiar with the documentation. Where do I find it? TIA

Re: Documentation for NetworkManager 1.30.0 -- Where?

2025-04-05 Thread Richard Owlett
iguration of Firefox has no apparent problem with it. However that page has no link to operation documentation. Any suggestions and thanks for trying. On 4/2/25 06:41, Richard Owlett wrote: I am running Debian 12.8 with MATE 1.26.0 . When right-clicking on the Network Manager icon's &quo

CLARIFICATION -- Re: Documentation for NetworkManager 1.30.0 -- Where?

2025-04-03 Thread Richard Owlett
error. I have questions about enabling/disabling WiFi. I was approaching my underlying situation from an inappropriate direction. Time and referenced documentation [especially Joe's to manpage nmcli] jogged my thought process. My situation really concerns information channels not individ

Re: Documentation for NetworkManager 1.30.0 -- Where?

2025-04-03 Thread mick.crane
On 2025-04-03 01:57, Charles Curley wrote: On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 05:34:35 +0800 Bret Busby wrote: The version of the applet in my taskbar, shows as 1.24.0 (copyrighted to Red Hat,and I believe that I have not used Red hat, since v6.0), from the About item in the menu, running on Mate Synaptic sh

Re: Documentation for NetworkManager 1.30.0 -- Where?

2025-04-02 Thread Charles Curley
On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 05:34:35 +0800 Bret Busby wrote: > The version of the applet in my taskbar, shows as 1.24.0 (copyrighted > to Red Hat,and I believe that I have not used Red hat, since v6.0), > from the About item in the menu, running on Mate > > Synaptic shows my version of Network Manager, a

Re: Documentation for NetworkManager 1.30.0 -- Where?

2025-04-02 Thread Bret Busby
On 3/4/25 04:00, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote: Richard Owlett wrote: I am running Debian 12.8 with MATE 1.26.0 . When right-clicking on the Network Manager icon's "About" button it identifies itself as version 1.30.0 . I've also just noticed that NM 1.30 belongs on an older release of Deb

Re: Documentation for NetworkManager 1.30.0 -- Where?

2025-04-02 Thread debian-user
Richard Owlett wrote: > I am running Debian 12.8 with MATE 1.26.0 . > When right-clicking on the Network Manager icon's "About" button it > identifies itself as version 1.30.0 . I've also just noticed that NM 1.30 belongs on an older release of Debian than 12.

Re: Documentation for NetworkManager 1.30.0 -- Where?

2025-04-02 Thread Bret Busby
error. I have questions about enabling/disabling WiFi. To ask in intelligently I must be familiar with the documentation. Where do I find it? TIA Two things that you might want to try. 1. Ask the questions here. 2. view https://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/plucky/en/man8/NetworkManager.8.html

Re: Documentation for NetworkManager 1.30.0 -- Where?

2025-04-02 Thread debian-user
a 404 error. I think the link should have been to https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/NetworkManager Which points out the page is retired. Perhaps a better starting point is https://networkmanager.dev/docs/api/latest/ which says: "The end users NetworkManager should instead refer to respec

Re: Documentation for NetworkManager 1.30.0 -- Where?

2025-04-02 Thread Peter Ehlert
//www.gnome.org/projects/NetworkManager/ which results in a 404 error. I have questions about enabling/disabling WiFi. To ask in intelligently I must be familiar with the documentation. Where do I find it? TIA

Tardy Thank-you [Re: Kate editor documentation as downloadable HTML file(s)?]

2025-02-02 Thread Richard Owlett
On 12/4/24 3:13 PM, David wrote: On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 at 12:22, Richard Owlett wrote: I find HTML formatted documentation much more usable than PDF. A fine manual at https://docs.kde.org/stable5/en/kate/kate/index.html . [...] 2. Is there a script that would download it to a specific

Re: Kate editor documentation as downloadable HTML file(s)?

2024-12-04 Thread Dan Ritter
Bitfox wrote: > > after downloading, is it possible to convert all html files into a single > pdf? any tool in linux to do that? Thanks. Yes, pandoc is packaged and can do that easily. -dsr-

Re: Kate editor documentation as downloadable HTML file(s)?

2024-12-04 Thread Bitfox
On 2024-12-04 20:11, Michel Verdier wrote: On 2024-12-04, Richard Owlett wrote: I find HTML formatted documentation much more usable than PDF. A fine manual at https://docs.kde.org/stable5/en/kate/kate/index.html . Two questions: 1. Has someone packaged it as a downloadable file? 2. Is

Re: Kate editor documentation as downloadable HTML file(s)?

2024-12-04 Thread David
On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 at 12:22, Richard Owlett wrote: > > I find HTML formatted documentation much more usable than PDF. > A fine manual at https://docs.kde.org/stable5/en/kate/kate/index.html . [...] >2. Is there a script that would download it to a specific local > direct

Re: Kate editor documentation as downloadable HTML file(s)?

2024-12-04 Thread David Wright
t I have. Get idea that I like it ;} > > > > > > I find HTML formatted documentation much more usable than PDF. > > > A fine manual at https://docs.kde.org/stable5/en/kate/kate/index.html . > > > > > > Two questions: > > > 1. Has someone package

Re: Kate editor documentation as downloadable HTML file(s)?

2024-12-04 Thread Richard Owlett
On 12/4/24 12:17 PM, Xiyue Deng wrote: Richard Owlett writes: I recently discovered Kate. One might think its design goals were how I work and a specific personal project I have. Get idea that I like it ;} I find HTML formatted documentation much more usable than PDF. A fine manual at https

Re: Kate editor documentation as downloadable HTML file(s)?

2024-12-04 Thread Xiyue Deng
Richard Owlett writes: > I recently discovered Kate. One might think its design goals were how I > work and a specific personal project I have. Get idea that I like it ;} > > I find HTML formatted documentation much more usable than PDF. > A fine manual at https://docs.kde.org/

Re: Kate editor documentation as downloadable HTML file(s)?

2024-12-04 Thread Max Nikulin
On 04/12/2024 22:46, Richard Owlett wrote: On 12/4/24 9:20 AM, Max Nikulin wrote: On 04/12/2024 18:27, Richard Owlett wrote: A fine manual at https://docs.kde.org/stable5/en/kate/kate/index.html . Is it different from docs available in khelpcenter? To what URL do you refer? I mean local h

Re: Kate editor documentation as downloadable HTML file(s)?

2024-12-04 Thread David Wright
On Wed 04 Dec 2024 at 09:00:06 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote: > On 12/4/24 6:11 AM, Michel Verdier wrote: > > On 2024-12-04, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > > > I find HTML formatted documentation much more usable than PDF. > > > A fine manual at https://docs.kde.or

Re: Kate editor documentation as downloadable HTML file(s)?

2024-12-04 Thread Richard Owlett
On 12/4/24 9:20 AM, Max Nikulin wrote: On 04/12/2024 18:27, Richard Owlett wrote: I find HTML formatted documentation much more usable than PDF. A fine manual at https://docs.kde.org/stable5/en/kate/kate/index.html . Two questions:    1. Has someone packaged it as a downloadable file? Is it

Re: Kate editor documentation as downloadable HTML file(s)?

2024-12-04 Thread Max Nikulin
On 04/12/2024 18:27, Richard Owlett wrote: I find HTML formatted documentation much more usable than PDF. A fine manual at https://docs.kde.org/stable5/en/kate/kate/index.html . Two questions:   1. Has someone packaged it as a downloadable file? Is it different from docs available in

Re: Kate editor documentation as downloadable HTML file(s)?

2024-12-04 Thread Richard Owlett
On 12/4/24 6:11 AM, Michel Verdier wrote: On 2024-12-04, Richard Owlett wrote: I find HTML formatted documentation much more usable than PDF. A fine manual at https://docs.kde.org/stable5/en/kate/kate/index.html . Two questions: 1. Has someone packaged it as a downloadable file? 2. Is

Re: Kate editor documentation as downloadable HTML file(s)?

2024-12-04 Thread Richard Owlett
On 12/4/24 6:06 AM, poc...@homemail.com wrote: Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2024 at 6:27 AM From: "Richard Owlett" To: "debian-user" Subject: Kate editor documentation as downloadable HTML file(s)? I recently discovered Kate. One might think its design goals were how I

Re: Kate editor documentation as downloadable HTML file(s)?

2024-12-04 Thread Michel Verdier
On 2024-12-04, Richard Owlett wrote: > I find HTML formatted documentation much more usable than PDF. > A fine manual at https://docs.kde.org/stable5/en/kate/kate/index.html . > > Two questions: > 1. Has someone packaged it as a downloadable file? > 2. Is there a script that

Re: Kate editor documentation as downloadable HTML file(s)?

2024-12-04 Thread pocket
> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2024 at 6:27 AM > From: "Richard Owlett" > To: "debian-user" > Subject: Kate editor documentation as downloadable HTML file(s)? > > I recently discovered Kate. One might think its design goals were how I > work and a s

Kate editor documentation as downloadable HTML file(s)?

2024-12-04 Thread Richard Owlett
I recently discovered Kate. One might think its design goals were how I work and a specific personal project I have. Get idea that I like it ;} I find HTML formatted documentation much more usable than PDF. A fine manual at https://docs.kde.org/stable5/en/kate/kate/index.html . Two questions

Re: Finding/creating Debian documentation for an unserved audience

2024-09-27 Thread Richard Owlett
On 09/26/2024 09:42 PM, David Wright wrote: On Mon 23 Sep 2024 at 06:31:21 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote: A primary deficiency of Debian documentation is lack of indexes [despite having file titles of form index.html ]. [q.v. https://differencesfinder.com/index-vs-table-of-contents-key

Re: Finding/creating Debian documentation for an unserved audience

2024-09-26 Thread David Wright
On Mon 23 Sep 2024 at 06:31:21 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote: > A primary deficiency of Debian documentation is lack of indexes > [despite having file titles of form index.html ]. > [q.v. > https://differencesfinder.com/index-vs-table-of-contents-key-differences-explained/ > ] AIU

boot Debian Gnome, Debian KDE, and Mate, XFCE (was: Re: Finding/creating Debian documentation for an unserved audience)

2024-09-24 Thread Max Nikulin
On 25/09/2024 04:52, George at Clug wrote: An other example would be to boot Debian Gnome, Debian KDE, and Debian Mate, Debian XFCE. What issues you have faced trying to install multiple desktop environment to the same Debian installation? Display managers allow to select session type before

Re: Finding/creating Debian documentation for an unserved audience

2024-09-24 Thread George at Clug
On Tuesday, 24-09-2024 at 19:40 Richard Owlett wrote: > On 09/24/2024 03:42 AM, Michel Verdier wrote: > > On 2024-09-23, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > >> *A* current question is how to install a "dual-boot" or "multi-boot" > >> system. Debian users make a strong distinction between the two. > >

Re: Finding/creating Debian documentation for an unserved audience

2024-09-24 Thread Joe
On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 04:40:10 -0500 Richard Owlett wrote: > On 09/24/2024 03:42 AM, Michel Verdier wrote: > > On 2024-09-23, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > >> *A* current question is how to install a "dual-boot" or > >> "multi-boot" system. Debian users make a strong distinction > >> between the t

Re: Finding/creating Debian documentation for an unserved audience

2024-09-24 Thread Richard Owlett
On 09/24/2024 03:42 AM, Michel Verdier wrote: On 2024-09-23, Richard Owlett wrote: *A* current question is how to install a "dual-boot" or "multi-boot" system. Debian users make a strong distinction between the two. I have never heard of such a distinction. Could you provide your sources ?

Re: Finding/creating Debian documentation for an unserved audience

2024-09-24 Thread Michel Verdier
On 2024-09-23, Richard Owlett wrote: > *A* current question is how to install a "dual-boot" or "multi-boot" > system. Debian users make a strong distinction between the two. I have never heard of such a distinction. Could you provide your sources ?

Finding/creating Debian documentation for an unserved audience

2024-09-23 Thread Richard Owlett
at he was clinically ADHD. After only a few weeks I thought I was "looking in a mirror". Referral to a psychologist resulted in receiving a tentative diagnosis of being ADHD myself (didn't meet all criteria due to age). I do hyper-focus and can be easily distracted. A primary defic

Re: DEBIAN documentation: which 64 bit processors run current release?

2024-08-29 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
> > > Architecture:    i686 > > > > > Model name:    Pentium(R) Dual-Core  CPU  E5300  @ 2.60GHz > > > > > > > > > > Will the OS linked to by https://www.debian.org/ run on all three? > > > > > [For historical reasons I cu

Re: DEBIAN documentation: which 64 bit processors run current release?

2024-08-29 Thread debian-user
pu architecture > > field doesn't tell you what kind of cpu you're running. Instead, it > > tells you the architecture of the system on which lscpu is running, > > and more specifically, what architecture the *kernel* is built > > for. > > DEBIAN docum

Re: DEBIAN documentation: which 64 bit processors run current release?

2024-08-29 Thread Michael Stone
28/2024 09:07 PM, Michael Stone wrote: On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 09:10:21AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: Did the documentation tell you to run lscpu and do something with the architecture field? No *GRIN* But is one of reasons I asked. Over a half century of real real world experience suggested l

Re: DEBIAN documentation: which 64 bit processors run current release?

2024-08-29 Thread Richard Owlett
of these CPUs should run Debian amd64. Weak point there is the word "should". Based on *your* background. I was looking for documentation that *does not* assume the reader has some unspecified expertise. Did the documentation tell you to run lscpu and do something with the architectu

Re: DEBIAN documentation: which 64 bit processors run current release?

2024-08-28 Thread Michael Stone
TOPIC: I explicitly asked for *DEBIAN DOCUMENTATION*. and https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/30774/intel-celeron-processor-540-1m-cache-1-86-ghz-533-mhz-fsb.html says that the M540 also has that, so will also run amd64. OFF-TOPIC: I explicitly asked for *DEBIAN DOCUMENT

Re: DEBIAN documentation: which 64 bit processors run current release?

2024-08-27 Thread Stanislav Vlasov
вт, 27 авг. 2024 г. в 21:26, Richard Owlett : > > I'm looking for for where *Debian* documents which processors support > current Debian release. > https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/ch02s01.en.html """ 2.1.2. CPU Support Both AMD64 and Intel 64 processors are supported. """ Debian is n

Re: DEBIAN documentation: which 64 bit processors run current release?

2024-08-27 Thread debian-user
have three machines whose processors are 64 bit capable. > > > > To add to Dan's reply: > > https://www.debian.org/ports/ > > No mention of i686 nor x86_64. > > > https://www.debian.org/ports/amd64/ > > No mention of i686 nor x86_64. I agree that

Re: DEBIAN documentation: which 64 bit processors run current release?

2024-08-27 Thread Dan Ritter
00/intel-pentium-processor-e5300-2m-cache-2-60-ghz-800-mhz-fsb.html > > says that the e5300 has the 64 bit instruction set, so it will > > also run the amd64 release. > > OFF-TOPIC: I explicitly asked for *DEBIAN DOCUMENTATION*. I gave you the Debian docs. It tells you what yo

Re: DEBIAN documentation: which 64 bit processors run current release?

2024-08-27 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 11:16 AM Richard Owlett wrote: > > I'm looking for for where *Debian* documents which processors support > current Debian release. > I have three machines whose processors are 64 bit capable. > Processors ident

Re: DEBIAN documentation: which 64 bit processors run current release?

2024-08-27 Thread Dan Purgert
On Aug 27, 2024, Richard Owlett wrote: > I'm looking for for where *Debian* documents which processors support > current Debian release. > > I have three machines whose processors are 64 bit capable. > Processors identified by running lscpu: > > Machine 1: > Architecture: i686 > Model name: Int

Re: DEBIAN documentation: which 64 bit processors run current release?

2024-08-27 Thread Richard Owlett
debian.org/ports/ No mention of i686 nor x86_64. https://www.debian.org/ports/amd64/ No mention of i686 nor x86_64. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64 Not Debian documentation. Though x86_64 is mentioned in footnotes there is none to indicate that i686 can run Debian 64 bit software (only

Re: DEBIAN documentation: which 64 bit processors run current release?

2024-08-27 Thread Richard Owlett
wish to run *64 bit*. will tell you that the difference is whether the CPU has the amd64 (also called x86_64) instruction set. So machine 2 with the t7300 will definitely run the amd64 release. Next you need to look at the manufacturer's documentation. In this case, Intel: https://ark

Re: DEBIAN documentation: which 64 bit processors run current release?

2024-08-27 Thread Stefan Monnier
> Will the OS linked to by https://www.debian.org/ run on all three? Yes, on all three, both using the i386 (which is being phased out) or the amd64 ports. Stefan

Re: DEBIAN documentation: which 64 bit processors run current release?

2024-08-27 Thread David
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 at 13:06, Richard Owlett wrote: > I'm looking for for where *Debian* documents which processors support > current Debian release. > > I have three machines whose processors are 64 bit capable. To add to Dan's reply: https://www.debian.org/ports/ https://www.debian.org/ports/a

Re: DEBIAN documentation: which 64 bit processors run current release?

2024-08-27 Thread Dan Ritter
hether the CPU has the amd64 (also called x86_64) instruction set. So machine 2 with the t7300 will definitely run the amd64 release. Next you need to look at the manufacturer's documentation. In this case, Intel: https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/35300/intel-pentium-processo

DEBIAN documentation: which 64 bit processors run current release?

2024-08-27 Thread Richard Owlett
I'm looking for for where *Debian* documents which processors support current Debian release. I have three machines whose processors are 64 bit capable. Processors identified by running lscpu: Machine 1: Architecture: i686 Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU M 540 @ 2.53GHz Machi

Documentation improvement (optical and USB install media)

2024-06-18 Thread Dan Ritter
been about documentation changes, to make it more clear how to use the existing images. -dsr-

I think we can't disappear ifenslave documentation just yet (Was Re: Inclusive terminology (instead of master/slave) for network bonding/LACP)

2024-02-24 Thread Andy Smith
Hello, On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 10:52:17PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > If anyone wants to remove the references to ifenslave and > substitute others, that's entirely fine. I really don't think in this specific case it would be a good idea to remove all mention of ifenslave because: - The cu

Re: Documentation for KVM/QEMU?

2023-11-09 Thread Anders Andersson
g was, Virtualbox the slowest and both Aqemu and VirtManager > faster. > The latter two are were looking both even fast. > > However, virt-manger IMHO still is not very user friendly, especially for > beginners, and also its documentation is not much at the moment. But > please &g

Re: Documentation for KVM/QEMU?

2023-11-06 Thread Hans
are were looking both even fast. However, virt-manger IMHO still is not very user friendly, especially for beginners, and also its documentation is not much at the moment. But please be respectfull (or is considerately the correct idiom?): virtmanager is rather new and has not many people

Re: Documentation for KVM/QEMU?

2023-11-06 Thread Stanislav Vlasov
2023-11-06 12:45 GMT+05:00, Michael Kjörling <2695bd53d...@ewoof.net>: > The three biggest differences I have run across (I used VirtualBox > before): > > 1. Storage pools for disk images. With VirtualBox, you can put a disk > image file anywhere. With KVM, they go into one of a defined set of > po

Re: Documentation for KVM/QEMU?

2023-11-05 Thread Michael Kjörling
On 6 Nov 2023 01:58 -0500, from noloa...@gmail.com (Jeffrey Walton): > QEMU/KVM is mostly like Virtual Box. If you know Virtual Box, then you > have most of what you need for QEMU/KVM. I agree. Although _some_ terminology differs, and naturally things are organized somewhat differently in the UI,

Re: Documentation for KVM/QEMU? [Re: How to get VMware Player going on Debian 12 bookworm]

2023-11-05 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 1:36 AM Rick Thomas wrote: > > Can anyone recommend good documentation on KVM/QEMU that would allow me to > get up to speed on it quickly? I don't know if or where good documentation exists. Sorry about that. QEMU/KVM is mostly like Virtual Box. If you kn

Documentation for KVM/QEMU? [Re: How to get VMware Player going on Debian 12 bookworm]

2023-11-05 Thread Rick Thomas
Can anyone recommend good documentation on KVM/QEMU that would allow me to get up to speed on it quickly? Thanks! Rick On Sun, Nov 5, 2023, at 4:33 AM, Michael Kjörling wrote: > On 5 Nov 2023 10:56 +0100, from andr...@xss.co.at (Andreas Haumer): >>> PPS: If VMware isn't a g

Re: RFP: deadEarth RPG documentation - free and open RPG game

2023-06-28 Thread Stefan Monnier
> :https://web.archive.org/web/20021211104811/http://www.deadearth.com/index.pl/legal > * License : License GNU Free Documentation License v1.1 or any later > version, no invariant sections or front and back text > Programming Lang: unknown > Description : tabletop rpg g

Re: RFP: deadEarth RPG documentation - free and open RPG game

2023-06-28 Thread Emanuel Berg
Joshua Allen wrote: > deadEarth is a free and open TTRPG game for use in real > life or online Never heard of but sounds interesting, as technology, and maybe even as a game. Is it TT as in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabletop_Simulator ? -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.o

Re: RFP: deadEarth RPG documentation - free and open RPG game

2023-06-28 Thread Patrick Wiseman
ps://web.archive.org/web/20021211104811/http://www.deadearth.com/index.pl/legal > * License : License GNU Free Documentation License v1.1 or any later > version, no invariant sections or front and back text > Programming Lang: unknown > Description : tabletop rpg game &

RFP: deadEarth RPG documentation - free and open RPG game

2023-06-28 Thread Joshua Allen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: deadearth Version : second edition Upstream Contact:i...@thegamecrafter.com * URL :https://web.archive.org/web/20021211104811/http://www.deadearth.com/index.pl/legal * License : License GNU Free Documentation

Re: ID problem: "the nouveau driver" (was: nvidia package wrong documentation?)

2023-03-23 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2023-03-23 13:38:05 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > It could be the exhibition of ignorance represented by the above > quote leads triagers and developers to ignore many problem reports. > There is no such thing as "the nouveau driver" in Debian: This is not true. From old Xorg logs: [194415.365]

Re: ID problem: "the nouveau driver" (was: nvidia package wrong documentation?)

2023-03-23 Thread Felix Miata
Vincent Lefevre composed on 2023-03-23 14:48 (UTC+0100): > On 2023-03-22 10:50:30 +0100, Hans wrote: >> Oh, before someone tells: I do NOT want to use nouveau! > Though I would prefer free software, nouveau is not usable for me, > in particular with my laptop. Remember... > https://lists.debi

Re: nvidia package wrong documentation?

2023-03-23 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2023-03-22 10:50:30 +0100, Hans wrote: > What I believe is, that the documentation from NVidia might be wrong > and Nvidia told wrong, to say 390xx is for NVS4200. I don't know for your case, but there are inconsistencies in the Nvidia pages. For instance, for Quadro K610M, the 470.

Re: nvidia package wrong documentation?

2023-03-22 Thread David Wright
r: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core > Processor Family > Integrated Gra > phics Controller (rev 09) > 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GF119M [Quadro NVS > 4200M] (rev a1) > --- snap --- > > The documentation requires the nvidia-legacy-*390xx* driv

nvidia package wrong documentation?

2023-03-22 Thread Hans
Controller (rev 09) 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GF119M [Quadro NVS 4200M] (rev a1) --- snap --- The documentation requires the nvidia-legacy-*390xx* driver to use, but as hard as I try, this will not work. However, what is working is the driver nvidia-legacy-*340xx.* (I am

Re: Openbox documentation.

2023-01-30 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 09:42:49AM -0800, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > me@computer:/home/me# head -n 4 /etc/xdg/openbox/rc.xml > > > > > How would rc.xml be available to edit before Openbox is installed? The > writer had a time machine? On install of a new version, is what I would assume it me

Openbox documentation.

2023-01-30 Thread peter
me@computer:/home/me# head -n 4 /etc/xdg/openbox/rc.xml How would rc.xml be available to edit before Openbox is installed? The writer had a time machine? Thx,... P. - mobile: +1 778 951 5147 VoIP: +1 604 670 0140 https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/User:PeterEas

documentation for x-gvfs-* options

2022-10-03 Thread Mário Barbosa
Hello, Does anyone here have a good pointer at where all the x-gvfs-* fstab options are documented (i.e., listed, and their respective meanings explained). I've been chasing my tail for hours with a combination of `man`, `apropos`, `strings`, ` --help`, search engines, etc, and still can't fi

Re: Looking for documentation package

2022-05-03 Thread juh
Am Tue, May 03, 2022 at 04:17:57PM -0700 schrieb Gary L. Roach: > I have been looking for a documentation system that would allow me to write > cursive paragraphs with math formulas interspersed and then have the > formulas solved. Some examples that almost do what I want is Sage, Oct

Re: Looking for documentation package

2022-05-03 Thread David
On Tue, 3 May 2022 17:44:16 -0700 David Christensen wrote: > On 5/3/22 16:17, Gary L. Roach wrote: > > I have been looking for a documentation system that would allow me to > > write cursive paragraphs with math formulas interspersed and then have > > the formulas solve

Re: Looking for documentation package

2022-05-03 Thread David Christensen
On 5/3/22 16:17, Gary L. Roach wrote: I have been looking for a documentation system that would allow me to write cursive paragraphs with math formulas interspersed and then have the formulas solved. Some examples that almost do what I want is Sage, Octave and Cantor (with the proper backend

Re: Looking for documentation package

2022-05-03 Thread John Conover
Gary L. Roach writes: > I have been looking for a documentation system that would allow me to > write cursive paragraphs with math formulas interspersed and then have > the formulas solved. Some examples that almost do what I want is Sage, > Octave and Cantor (with the proper back

Looking for documentation package

2022-05-03 Thread Gary L. Roach
I have been looking for a documentation system that would allow me to write cursive paragraphs with math formulas interspersed and then have the formulas solved. Some examples that almost do what I want is Sage, Octave and Cantor (with the proper backend). So far all seem to be missing the

Documentation reference: [WAS Re: Peak load handling by Debian repository servers ????]

2021-12-26 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
provided a > > > particular package? > > > > > > I have a problem that could be explained by different users receiving > > > packages from different servers. My web searches and other posts have been > > > futile. I need backgro

APT Sources.list Line Format for Security Updates - Documentation Discrepancy

2021-07-12 Thread Gregory McPherran
Hi, This shows the new security line form as: DebianBullseye - Debian Wiki deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security main This shows the new security line form as: sourc

Re: documentation for sddm-greeter

2020-07-28 Thread Andrew Cater
nall wrote: > Folks, > > I put my email on the list because I was hoping that someone knew of > documentation which Google had missed. I also had read the items provided > by Google at ArchLinux and the other sites. > > After reading your replies, I put sddm on another of my m

Re: documentation for sddm-greeter

2020-07-27 Thread tom arnall
Folks, I put my email on the list because I was hoping that someone knew of documentation which Google had missed. I also had read the items provided by Google at ArchLinux and the other sites. After reading your replies, I put sddm on another of my machines, which is running Stretch. The result

Re: documentation for sddm-greeter

2020-07-27 Thread Tixy
> avatars. Also, the man page for sddm-greeter in Debian says at the end 'The full documentation for sddm is available at https://github.com/sddm/sddm'. However, that documentation looks more empty than 'full' :-( -- Tixy

Re: documentation for sddm-greeter

2020-07-27 Thread Tixy
On Mon, 2020-07-27 at 01:54 -0700, tom arnall wrote: > is there any? > > the issue i'm dealing with is creating avatars on the login screen. > i'm running debian buster with the LXQt desktop., And the hits from Googling 'sddm avatar' aren't any good? The top 3 hits in Google gives me the Arch wi

documentation for sddm-greeter

2020-07-27 Thread tom arnall
is there any? the issue i'm dealing with is creating avatars on the login screen. i'm running debian buster with the LXQt desktop.,

Contributing to Debian documentation [was: Debian is testing Discourse]

2020-04-24 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Jo, 23 apr 20, 23:42:35, Marco Möller wrote: > Admittedly, I (by now) never volunteered to report a bug in the > documentation or even write a patch, because I am afraid to introduce > another mistake and then becoming bashed by the real experts, or even worse > my mistakes stayi

Re: Documentation for gufw message "UFW AUDIT"

2020-03-24 Thread songbird
C.T.F. Jansen wrote: > Greetings, > > Where is documentation that describes the messages from gufw or ufw please. > > Of particular interest are lines in syslog and journalctl output with > > UFW AUDIT > > in them. What does this mean ?

Documentation for gufw message "UFW AUDIT"

2020-03-24 Thread C.T.F. Jansen
Greetings, Where is documentation that describes the messages from gufw or ufw please. Of particular interest are lines in syslog and journalctl output with UFW AUDIT in them. What does this mean ? There are queries on the Ubuntu forums but no usable answer

Re: Local search broken for documentation of numpy, matplotlib

2020-02-24 Thread Raj Kiran Grandhi
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 8:23 PM Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > I suggest to check the changelogs (upstream and Debian-specific, > whichever applies to the delta between the version you had before and > the version you now installed from sid) to see if the issue is > _knowingly_ fixed - becaue if not t

Re: Local search broken for documentation of numpy, matplotlib

2020-02-24 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
[ replying via mailinglist, assuming private reply was accidental ] Quoting Raj Kiran Grandhi (2020-02-24 15:33:26) > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 1:02 PM Jonas Smedegaard > wrote: > > > > Sounds like a bug, probably in one of the packages suggested by > > doc-base: > > > > $ apt-cache show doc-base

Re: Local search broken for documentation of numpy, matplotlib

2020-02-23 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
nerating any results. This is an issue for me as my primary work > computer has no internet access. Google search indicates it could be > an issue with the document generation tool, sphinx, that is used to > generate the documentation. > > Is there any workaround to get the search funct

Local search broken for documentation of numpy, matplotlib

2020-02-23 Thread Raj Kiran Grandhi
internet access. Google search indicates it could be an issue with the document generation tool, sphinx, that is used to generate the documentation. Is there any workaround to get the search functionality back? Thanks, Raj Kiran

Re: Atril documentation problems

2019-03-03 Thread Brian
On Sun 03 Mar 2019 at 07:39:16 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 03/03/2019 03:18 AM, Curt wrote: > > On 2019-03-03, Curt wrote: > > > On 2019-02-28, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > > > > > > I don't know how to approach my problem. > > > > > > > > My desktop is MATE. I believe the display manager

Re: Atril documentation problems

2019-03-03 Thread Richard Owlett
On 03/03/2019 03:18 AM, Curt wrote: On 2019-03-03, Curt wrote: On 2019-02-28, Richard Owlett wrote: I don't know how to approach my problem. My desktop is MATE. I believe the display manager is lightdm. I used Synaptic to look for "adapta-gtk-theme" without success [my sources.list contain

Re: Atril documentation problems

2019-03-03 Thread Curt
On 2019-03-03, Curt wrote: > On 2019-02-28, Richard Owlett wrote: >> >> I don't know how to approach my problem. >> >> My desktop is MATE. I believe the display manager is lightdm. >> >> I used Synaptic to look for "adapta-gtk-theme" without success >> [my sources.list contains >> "deb http://d

Re: Atril documentation problems

2019-03-03 Thread Curt
On 2019-02-28, Richard Owlett wrote: > > I don't know how to approach my problem. > > My desktop is MATE. I believe the display manager is lightdm. > > I used Synaptic to look for "adapta-gtk-theme" without success > [my sources.list contains > "deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ stretch main con

Re: Atril documentation problems

2019-02-28 Thread Brian
On Thu 28 Feb 2019 at 15:14:52 -0600, David Wright wrote: > On Thu 28 Feb 2019 at 20:23:46 (+), Brian wrote: > > On Thu 28 Feb 2019 at 11:15:05 -0600, David Wright wrote: > > > > [Verocious snipping but the subject under discussion is the xpdf pdf reader] > > > > > Eh? You can bind keystroke

Re: Atril documentation problems

2019-02-28 Thread David Wright
On Thu 28 Feb 2019 at 19:46:03 (+), Brian wrote: > On Thu 28 Feb 2019 at 18:52:36 -, Curt wrote: > > On 2019-02-28, Brian wrote: > > > > > > Pressing 'o' brings up the file browser here, but navigating away from > > > > the > > >> > current directory requires modifying the 'Filter', whic

Re: Atril documentation problems

2019-02-28 Thread David Wright
On Thu 28 Feb 2019 at 20:23:46 (+), Brian wrote: > On Thu 28 Feb 2019 at 11:15:05 -0600, David Wright wrote: > > [Verocious snipping but the subject under discussion is the xpdf pdf reader] > > > Eh? You can bind keystrokes to a large number of commands (there are > > defaults configured). Si

Re: Atril documentation problems

2019-02-28 Thread Brian
On Thu 28 Feb 2019 at 11:15:05 -0600, David Wright wrote: [Verocious snipping but the subject under discussion is the xpdf pdf reader] > Eh? You can bind keystrokes to a large number of commands (there are > defaults configured). Similarly it supports myriad-buttoned mice which > you can configur

Re: Atril documentation problems

2019-02-28 Thread Brian
On Thu 28 Feb 2019 at 18:52:36 -, Curt wrote: > On 2019-02-28, Brian wrote: > > > > Pressing 'o' brings up the file browser here, but navigating away from the > >> > current directory requires modifying the 'Filter', which ain't exactly > >> > convenient in the modern sense. > >> > >> That'

Re: Atril documentation problems

2019-02-28 Thread Curt
On 2019-02-28, Brian wrote: > > Pressing 'o' brings up the file browser here, but navigating away from the >> > current directory requires modifying the 'Filter', which ain't exactly >> > convenient in the modern sense. >> >> That's for o, which just gives you the current directory. Try pressing

Re: Atril documentation problems

2019-02-28 Thread Alexander V. Makartsev
On 28.02.2019 21:51, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 02/28/2019 06:48 AM, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote: >> On 28.02.2019 17:25, Richard Owlett wrote: >>> On 02/27/2019 02:51 PM, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote: On 27.02.2019 22:56, Richard Owlett wrote: > I've tried the Atril man page and F1 from

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >