Re: Re: Displayed Image Quality

2005-01-05 Thread John and Holly Klug
on Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:17:40 -0800, Karsten M. Self ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >Online vs. printed appearance can vary greatly. Have you >compared printed output? The printed output is just fine. I tested gimp as well. It also diplays the TIFF's poorly at lower zoom levels compared to the convert

Re: Displayed Image Quality

2004-12-30 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 11:51:59PM -0600, John and Holly Klug ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I recently downloaded Sarge. The appearance of images in gpdf appears > to be quite poor compared to adobe acrobat when the image is viewed at a > lower resolution than originally scanned. There appears

Displayed Image Quality

2004-12-27 Thread John and Holly Klug
I recently downloaded Sarge.  The appearance of images in gpdf appears to be quite poor compared to adobe acrobat when the image is viewed at a lower resolution than originally scanned.  There appears to be some kind of very large grained dithering, which makes the image quite difficult to vi