On 29/03/2025 04:14, George at Clug wrote:
I do not fully understand "email threading", even after reading up on
it. I don't use email threading, and I do not think my email client
does either.
The message, I am replying to, have these headers, however References
contains single Message-ID (f
On 17/07/2019 08:30, Curt wrote:
As you mentioned GDM, it's possible your settings are being
overridden by 'gsettings'.
To verify that hypothesis:
gsettings get org.gnome.desktop.input-sources xkb-options
Reset if necessary with:
gsettings reset org.gnome.desktop.input-sources xkb-options
On 2019-07-17, David Banks wrote:
> Hi, using Buster, I have my /etc/default/keyboard set up like this:
>
> XKBOPTIONS="pc105"
> XKBLAYOUT="gb"
> XKBOPTIONS="ctrl:nocaps"
> BACKSPACE="guess"
> XKBVARIANT=""
>
> I am using Fluxbox without any configuration. When I launch Fluxb
our is not restricted to gdm, it happens identically in
slim and lightdm as well.
However, this does NOT happen when I remove all display managers and
use startx directly. When using startx, the correct keyboard layout
is used. (No extra setxkbmap call is needed in .xinitrc, either, the
settings from
gt;>> Then ctrl-alt-F1 [F2, etc]; login as richard-work; Then ~$
>>> DISPLAY=:1 startx -- :1# launches your 2nd display manager
>>> session
>>>
>>> Switch between X sessions with ctrl-alt-F7 / F8 keys (for me).
>>
>> startx does indeed
;> session
>>
>> Switch between X sessions with ctrl-alt-F7 / F8 keys (for me).
>
> startx does indeed do it, thanks - though I don't need to specify the
> DISPLAY variable; it just works if I run startx as my other user.
>
> So that proves that it is possible to
PLAY variable; it just works if I run startx as my other user.
So that proves that it is possible to get 2 X servers running.
Next step, ideally, is to also have 2 display managers running -
ideally gdm3, since that's what I've been using, but anything will do.
Preference for some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/19/2014 08:20 AM, Richard Hector wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm wondering if it would help me to have 2 potentially simultaneous
> logins on my computer, one for private use and one for work (I'm working
> from home). That would give me 2 home direct
Hey all,
I'm wondering if it would help me to have 2 potentially simultaneous
logins on my computer, one for private use and one for work (I'm working
from home). That would give me 2 home directories, 2 icedove profiles
etc etc.
To that end, does anyone know if it's possible to have 2 instances
Quoth "Joost Witteveen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 03/04/2008, Sebastian Tennant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> Since I last upgraded my Lenny box, both xdm and gdm silently fail to
>> start at boot time.
>>
>> Actually, something in each of their init scripts fails and they are
>>
On 03/04/2008, Sebastian Tennant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Since I last upgraded my Lenny box, both xdm and gdm silently fail to
> start at boot time.
>
> Actually, something in each of their init scripts fails and they are
> never actually called.
you could type
sh -x /etc/in
Hi list,
Since I last upgraded my Lenny box, both xdm and gdm silently fail to
start at boot time.
Actually, something in each of their init scripts fails and they are
never actually called.
If I run /usr/sbin/gdm directly they both work fine.
I would file a bug report... but against which pack
On 11/29/2004 06:30 PM, Tom Allison wrote:
This may be true, but how do you get this to work if you have a policy
of expiring passwords and have nothing but client systems in place?
Pushing the "joe user" to running a CLI + startx isn't going to be very
successful when you are trying to get acce
Thomas Adam wrote:
--- Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I consider this to be a very bad thing.
Why? This is exactly as it should be. It's a PAM issue which is only
affected when one logs in via login(1). DMs have no concept of this.
This may be true, but how do you get this to work if yo
Thomas Adam wrote:
--- Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I consider this to be a very bad thing.
Why? This is exactly as it should be. It's a PAM issue which is only
affected when one logs in via login(1). DMs have no concept of this.
Alternative Display Managers (not KDM or
--- Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I consider this to be a very bad thing.
Why? This is exactly as it should be. It's a PAM issue which is only
affected when one logs in via login(1). DMs have no concept of this.
> Alternative Display Managers (not KDM or GDM plea
about to expire.
I consider this to be a very bad thing.
Are there alternatives?
Configuration settings in WDM?
Alternative Display Managers (not KDM or GDM please, I use neither)?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 09:10, Kent West wrote:
> Johann Spies wrote:
> > On a sid system:
> >
> > When I use xdm, gdm or kdm the keyboard does not work in the
> > X11-environment. I can't even log in. I can use startx without a
> > problem and everthing is working OK.
> >
>
> I would try "dpkg-
Johann Spies wrote:
On a sid system:
When I use xdm, gdm or kdm the keyboard does not work in the
X11-environment. I can't even log in. I can use startx without a
problem and everthing is working OK.
I would try "dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86" (or is it
"dpkg-reconfigure xserver-common"?) an
On a sid system:
When I use xdm, gdm or kdm the keyboard does not work in the
X11-environment. I can't even log in. I can use startx without a
problem and everthing is working OK.
Any idea what is causing this?
Regards
Johann
--
Johann Spies Telefoon: 021-808 4036
Informasietegnologi
27;s
strictly cheaper than Qt or Gtk2.) I haven't benchmarked this,
though, or compared with other display managers like wdm.
--
David Maze [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~dmaze/
"Theoretical politics is interesting. Politicking should be illegal."
Hi folks,
A simple question: gdm, kdm and xdm: which one uses minimum runtime memory?
Cheers
_
Download Norah Jones, Eminem and more! http://www.msn.com.sg/ringtones/ at
only S$36 including GST
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
on Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 05:50:19PM -0800, Karsten M. Self
(kmself@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
> [This is a re-send. Posted earlier this week with no responses.
> Likewise no updates on my bug reports.]
>
> Keywords: xauth Xauthority wdm xdm gdm kdm MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE Client is
> not authorized to conne
[This is a re-send. Posted earlier this week with no responses.
Likewise no updates on my bug reports.]
Keywords: xauth Xauthority wdm xdm gdm kdm MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE Client is
not authorized to connect to Server
I'm using wdm as a local X display manager under Sid/i386. Following a
recent update
Keywords: xauth Xauthority wdm xdm gdm kdm MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE Client is
not authorized to connect to Server
I'm using wdm as a local X display manager under Sid/i386. Following a
recent update, I'm no longer able to log in as either an unprivileged
user or root.
On properly authenticating to the
--On Saturday, September 29, 2001 03:12:47 PM +0300 Serafim Zanikolas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
What you need is PAM (Pluggable Authentication Module),
a layer between the application (in your case *dm) and the
underlying authentication system.
Depending on the authentication[0] re
On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 11:41:50AM +0200, Martin Maciaszek wrote:
> Is there some way to tell xdm/gdm/${WHATEVER}dm to authenticate against a
> KDC and request a TGT on login?
Hello Martin!
What you need is PAM (Pluggable Authentication Module),
a layer between the application (in your cas
Is there some way to tell xdm/gdm/${WHATEVER}dm to authenticate against a
KDC and request a TGT on login?
Cheers
Martin
pgpmrwrlDaMLt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
on Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 06:22:50PM -0700, Geoffrey Romer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
>
> What's the surgeon-general-approved way of disabling a display-manager (e.g.
> kdm, gdm, xdm)? I know I could just delete the relevant symlinks from
> /etc/rc*.d, but I have a feeling that package upgrades and
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 06:22:50PM -0700, Geoffrey Romer wrote:
> What's the surgeon-general-approved way of disabling a display-manager (e.g.
> kdm, gdm, xdm)? I know I could just delete the relevant symlinks from
> /etc/rc*.d, but I have a feeling that package upgrades and things like that
> will
Even though I've never done it, I think you could remove all the
symlinks in the /etc/rc*.d dirs except for /etc/rc6.d and then it
wouldn't restore them on an upgrade, and the rc6.d is for shutdown. So
it shouldn't do anything wrong leaving that one there. They can be
removed with 'update-r
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 06:22:50PM -0700, Geoffrey Romer wrote:
> What's the surgeon-general-approved way of disabling a display-manager (e.g.
> kdm, gdm, xdm)? I know I could just delete the relevant symlinks from
> /etc/rc*.d, but I have a feeling that package upgrades and things like that
> will
What's the surgeon-general-approved way of disabling a display-manager (e.g.
kdm, gdm, xdm)? I know I could just delete the relevant symlinks from
/etc/rc*.d, but I have a feeling that package upgrades and things like that
will just restore them. I'd prefer not to uninstall the package entirely,
be
33 matches
Mail list logo
