Aug 14, 2018, 2:30 PM by delop...@gmail.com:
> > but why you don't run it in VM or VBox or extract, or use unetbootin?
>
Yes, eventually I installed unetbootin and got it working with it. Thanks to
everyone who responded.
Le 14/08/2018 à 15:31, local10 a écrit :
The goal here is to create an sd card containg a bootable windows 7 image, I
need to test something quick in windows. The iso file is a windows 7 image.
What kind of Windows 7 image ? An installation DVD image ? AFAIK these
ISO images are not hybrid
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018, local10 wrote:
> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 08:44:26
> From: local10
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: ISO file to sd card: Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition
> table
> Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 12:44:40 + (UTC)
>
local10 wrote:
> The goal here is to create an sd card containg a bootable windows 7 image,
> I need to test something quick in windows. The iso file is a windows 7
> image.
is it live windows7 - I have heard rumors that such thing exists?
Is it recovery disk?
but why you don't run it in VM or
local10 (2018-08-14):
> The goal here is to create an sd card containg a bootable windows 7
> image, I need to test something quick in windows. The iso file is a
> windows 7 image.
Then I suspect you would have more luck asking people familiar with
windows.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
sign
Aug 14, 2018, 8:47 AM by geo...@nsup.org:
> > You can try to mount /dev/sdb itself.
>
Yes, you're right, I can mount it on /dev/sdb.
> > But you are probably doing something wrong in the first place. What is your
> > endgame?
>
The goal here is to create an sd card containg a bootable windows 7
perblock on
> /dev/sdb1) and fdisk says "Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid
> partition table". That's kind of strange as I can mount and read
> /tmp/winfile.iso and it seems to be in good order.
That is perfectly normal, an ISO file is an ISO-9660 filesystem image,
i
12 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x0000
Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
On 07/04/2014 11:58 AM, Guillermo Hernandez wrote:
hi,
you should use de option "n" to create a new partition.
Regards,
Guillermo
The easiest partitioner I know of is gparted. You can download a
bootable disk with gparted on it.
* Perform actions with partitions such as:
o create or d
hi,
you should use de option "n" to create a new partition.
Regards,Guillermo
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi writes:
> lee wrote:
>
> There are some warnings when I tried to use fdisk to create a new empty DOS
> partition table. Do you know how to eliminate the warning?
>
> $fdisk -v
> fdisk (util-linux 2.20.1)
>
> $sudo fdisk /dev/sdb
> Device contains neither a valid DOS partiti
On Mi, 19 sep 12, 23:28:37, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
>
> Warning: invalid flag 0x of partition table 4 will be corrected by
> w(rite)
Have a look in the syslog for any errors during the create. Make sure
the drive has sufficient power. Try partitioning it from a different
computer. You
I once had an USB stick with a broken controller and couldn't partitioning
it anymore. It was brand new, gets broken at the day when I used it the
first time. It was warranted and I got another USB stick.
Perhaps your drive isn't broken, but one cannot rule out the possibility
that it's def
: 512 bytes / 512 bytes
>> Disk identifier: 0x
>>
>> Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
>
> That is to be expected for a new disk. IIRC, fdisk (or was that
> cfdisk?) has an option to start over with an empty partition table.
>
> Depe
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 00:27 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
>> /dev/sdb: unrecognised disk label
>
>> 2) Is "msdos" a valid option to choose for this hard drive?
>
> Yes it is.
>
> Is there some output if you run
>
> # parted /dev/sdb
> mklabel msdos
>
So, I did
$s
On 9/18/2012 4:46 PM, lee wrote:
Andrei POPESCU writes:
On Ma, 18 sep 12, 19:24:45, lee wrote:
2) Is "msdos" a valid option to choose for this hard drive?
Is "msdos" a useful partition type for you? Try "Linux", and if it
works, you can try to change it to msdos.
Partition *table*, not
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:46 PM, lee wrote:
> Andrei POPESCU writes:
>> On Ma, 18 sep 12, 19:24:45, lee wrote:
>>>
>>> > 2) Is "msdos" a valid option to choose for this hard drive?
>>>
>>> Is "msdos" a useful partition type for you? Try "Linux", and if it
>>> works, you can try to change it to m
Andrei POPESCU writes:
> On Ma, 18 sep 12, 19:24:45, lee wrote:
>>
>> > 2) Is "msdos" a valid option to choose for this hard drive?
>>
>> Is "msdos" a useful partition type for you? Try "Linux", and if it
>> works, you can try to change it to msdos.
>
> Partition *table*, not *type* ;)
Are yo
On Ma, 18 sep 12, 19:24:45, lee wrote:
>
> > 2) Is "msdos" a valid option to choose for this hard drive?
>
> Is "msdos" a useful partition type for you? Try "Linux", and if it
> works, you can try to change it to msdos.
Partition *table*, not *type* ;)
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discuss
750156372992 bytes
> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 91201 cylinders, total 1465149166 sectors
> Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
> Disk identifier: 0x0000
>
> D
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 00:27 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> /dev/sdb: unrecognised disk label
> 2) Is "msdos" a valid option to choose for this hard drive?
Yes it is.
Is there some output if you run
# parted /dev/sdb
mklabel msdos
?
Regards,
Ralf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
ers, total 1465149166 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x0000
Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
When I tried gparted, it gives the follow
22 matches
Mail list logo
