-- deFreese, Barry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Wednesday, 12 March 2003, 02:00 PM -0800):
> > -Original Message-
> > From: csj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 1:55 PM
> > To: Debian User
> > Subject: Direct cable connecti
On 12 Mar 2003 17:23:08 -0600
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If there are any network techs in your local LUG, one could make a
> patch cable for you for the cost of parts plus a 6-pack of good beer.
A six-pack?! *Good* beer?!
These British network techs must be pretty expensive! :)
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 15:59:05 -0800
"deFreese, Barry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Careful with this if you try it yourself because it is not a 1 to 1
> crossover. Ethernet only uses ping 2,3,4, and 6 so you need to cross 2 to
> 4, 3 to 6, 4 to 2, and 6 to 3.
Not a problem.
Your Honor, I'd like
arief_mulya wrote:
Normal UTP:
connect pin
1 - 1
2 - 2
3 - 3
6 - 6
Twisted / Cross UTP:
connect pin
1 - 3
2 - 6
3 - 1
6 - 2
Good luck.
Best Regards,
arief_mulya
After seeing this, I realized that arief is correct. I earlier said it
uses pins 2,3,4 and 6 and he is correct, it is 1,2,3 an
Dear,
matt zagrabelny wrote:
In Windows I recall something called Direct Cable Connection that
allowed you to link two computers thru the parallel port. The
GNU/Linux version of this appears to be PLIP (which I tried and
failed at many many moons ago).
Failed?
Can you tell me why?
I used to use
> In Windows I recall something called Direct Cable Connection that
> allowed you to link two computers thru the parallel port. The
> GNU/Linux version of this appears to be PLIP (which I tried and
> failed at many many moons ago).
>
> So, is there a more modern way to "hot
On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 21:36, Pigeon wrote:
> I don't think USB to USB is possible, as both PCs would want to be the
> controller, which is not allowed. I think.
USB to USB networking. Its in the kernel source, though I have never
used it. Might be kinda cool to use sometime though.
--
Scott He
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 05:12:51AM +0800, csj wrote:
> In Windows I recall something called Direct Cable Connection that
> allowed you to link two computers thru the parallel port. The
> GNU/Linux version of this appears to be PLIP (which I tried and
> failed at many many moons ago).
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 04:50:16PM -0800, deFreese, Barry wrote:
> > Hey, that gives me an idea. How about a cable with two heads
> > on one end,
> > one being a crossover? Or would that introduce noise?
> >
>
> It will work but it won't be "certified" for 100Mbit... :-)
now thats an even better
> -Original Message-
> From: Kent West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 4:41 PM
> To: Debian User
> Subject: Re: X-over cables [was Direct cable connection]
>
>
> >
> >
> Hey, that gives me an idea. How about a cable with t
deFreese, Barry wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Hugh Saunders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 2:50 PM
To: Debian User
Subject: X-over cables [was Direct cable connection]
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 05:00:46PM -0500, Mike Dresser wrote:
So, is there a more
Hugh Saunders wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 06:29:28PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 22:34:02 +
Hugh Saunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
on the subject of crossover cables, do you know where you can get
adapters that go on the end of normal patch cables to conver
"Hugh Saunders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> on the subject of crossover cables, do you know where you can get
> adapters that go on the end of normal patch cables to convert them
> to crossover?
>
> The reason i ask is because i only want to carry one network cable in
> laptop bag but would be
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 3:45 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: X-over cables [was Direct cable connection]
>
>
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 22:34:02 +
> Hugh Saunder
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 06:29:28PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 22:34:02 +
> Hugh Saunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > on the subject of crossover cables, do you know where you can get
> > adapters that go on the end of normal patch cables to convert them
> > to c
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 02:59:23PM -0800, deFreese, Barry wrote:
> It's somewhat pointless to have an adapter I would think since you are still
> going to need the male RJ-45 end on both ends. If you going to carry and
> adapter and a cable isn't just as easy to carry two cables? If you really
>
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 22:34:02 +
Hugh Saunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on the subject of crossover cables, do you know where you can get
> adapters that go on the end of normal patch cables to convert them
> to crossover?
>
> The reason i ask is because i only want to carry one network ca
On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 16:34, Hugh Saunders wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 05:00:46PM -0500, Mike Dresser wrote:
> > > So, is there a more modern way to "hotwire" two boxes without the
> > > use of routers or extra file systems? Is it possible to do a
> > > straight USB to USB or NIC to NIC connec
> -Original Message-
> From: Hugh Saunders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 2:50 PM
> To: Debian User
> Subject: X-over cables [was Direct cable connection]
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 05:00:46PM -0500, Mike Dresser wrote:
> > &g
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 05:00:46PM -0500, Mike Dresser wrote:
> > So, is there a more modern way to "hotwire" two boxes without the
> > use of routers or extra file systems? Is it possible to do a
> > straight USB to USB or NIC to NIC connection?
>
> There's something called an ethernet crossover
> -Original Message-
> From: csj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 1:55 PM
> To: Debian User
> Subject: Direct cable connection
>
>
> In Windows I recall something called Direct Cable Connection that
> allowed you to link two compu
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, csj wrote:
> In Windows I recall something called Direct Cable Connection that
> allowed you to link two computers thru the parallel port. The
> GNU/Linux version of this appears to be PLIP (which I tried and
> failed at many many moons ago).
>
> So, is t
In Windows I recall something called Direct Cable Connection that
allowed you to link two computers thru the parallel port. The
GNU/Linux version of this appears to be PLIP (which I tried and
failed at many many moons ago).
So, is there a more modern way to "hotwire" two boxes without
23 matches
Mail list logo
