On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 03:06:06AM +0100 or thereabouts, Pigeon wrote:
[...]
> There is another issue that I can see with flash (and please correct
> me if I'm not accurate :-) ) which is the monolithic, binary nature of
> the files - in fact this leads to two issues:
You're quite right -- It'
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 09:09:27AM -0400, S.D.A. wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 08:54:09AM -0400 or thereabouts, Michael Marsh wrote:
> > That's true -- I wasn't aware of that. However, that doesn't address
> > the issue that some people don't run Flash for one reason or another.
> > Most of us
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 08:19:27AM -0400, S.D.A. wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 07:54:13PM -0400 or thereabouts, Michael Marsh wrote:
> > On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 18:43:07 -0400, Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Well, the most obvious is flashblock.
> >
> > I don't think that's what Pigeon
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 12:54:39PM -0700 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson wrote:
> <#secure method=pgp mode=sign>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> "S.D.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > BTW Flash technology is OPEN Source, it's NOT proprietary. Too much is said
> > that's not
<#secure method=pgp mode=sign>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"S.D.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW Flash technology is OPEN Source, it's NOT proprietary. Too much is said
> that's not accurate regarding Flash.
You're going to have to back that up. Last I checked, Macromedia
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 02:39:13PM +0100 or thereabouts, Stephen Tait wrote:
> At 14:09 20/09/2004, you wrote:
> >BTW Flash technology is OPEN Source, it's NOT proprietary. Too much is said
> >that's not accurate regarding Flash.
>
> I was under the impression that flash is open source in the same
At 14:09 20/09/2004, you wrote:
BTW Flash technology is OPEN Source, it's NOT proprietary. Too much is said
that's not accurate regarding Flash.
I was under the impression that flash is open source in the same way as
PDF; the format is open, but the big-time applications (FlashMX, Acrobat)
are ve
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 08:19:27AM -0400, S.D.A. wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 07:54:13PM -0400 or thereabouts, Michael Marsh wrote:
> > On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 18:43:07 -0400, Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Well, the most obvious is flashblock.
> >
> > I don't think that's what Pigeon
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 08:54:09AM -0400 or thereabouts, Michael Marsh wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:19:27 -0400, S.D.A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 07:54:13PM -0400 or thereabouts, Michael Marsh wrote:
> > > I don't think that's what Pigeon had in mind, useful though i
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:19:27 -0400, S.D.A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 07:54:13PM -0400 or thereabouts, Michael Marsh wrote:
> > I don't think that's what Pigeon had in mind, useful though it is.
> > I think what he(?) meant was something that extracts the navigation
> > UR
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 07:54:13PM -0400 or thereabouts, Michael Marsh wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 18:43:07 -0400, Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, the most obvious is flashblock.
>
> I don't think that's what Pigeon had in mind, useful though it is.
> I think what he(?) meant was s
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 08:18:01PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 07:54:13PM -0400, Michael Marsh wrote:
> ...
>
> > I think what he(?)
(yes) :-)
> > meant was something that extracts the navigation
> > URLs within a flash animation so that the site is navigable. For
> > exa
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 06:43:07PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 11:09:29PM +0100, Pigeon wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 10:58:59PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
>
> > > Well, there's a Mozilla extension that does that, anyway.
> >
> > What's it called? I was googling for such a
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 07:54:13PM -0400, Michael Marsh wrote:
...
> I think what he(?) meant was something that extracts the navigation
> URLs within a flash animation so that the site is navigable. For
> example, many sites have a flash-based homepage with no non-flash
> links presented, so if
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 18:43:07 -0400, Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, the most obvious is flashblock.
I don't think that's what Pigeon had in mind, useful though it is.
I think what he(?) meant was something that extracts the navigation
URLs within a flash animation so that the site is
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 11:09:29PM +0100, Pigeon wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 10:58:59PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> > Well, there's a Mozilla extension that does that, anyway.
>
> What's it called? I was googling for such a thing a few days ago
> without any luck, and I've looked through the "
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 10:58:59PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 10:47:00PM -0400, Travis Crump wrote:
> > Pigeon wrote:
>
> > >It would be useful if there was a flash plugin that did nothing but
> > >extract URLs and present them in clickable form, so you could still
> > >navi
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 10:47:00PM -0400, Travis Crump wrote:
> Pigeon wrote:
> >It would be useful if there was a flash plugin that did nothing but
> >extract URLs and present them in clickable form, so you could still
> >navigate web sites that have the above problem but are spared all the
> >mu
Pigeon wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 07:41:32AM -0700, Zachary Rizer wrote:
If you are using flash, I must warn
you to only use it to make movies or games, NEVER for
navigation, as it is not a highly accessible
technology. Please, stay away from it for web design.
Well said.
It would be useful i
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 07:41:32AM -0700, Zachary Rizer wrote:
> If you are using flash, I must warn
> you to only use it to make movies or games, NEVER for
> navigation, as it is not a highly accessible
> technology. Please, stay away from it for web design.
Well said.
It would be useful if the
Check this
http://f4l.sourceforge.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just to back up Zachary's most excellent point on accessibility, here
is my favorite article on how to create "accessible" flash content:
http://www.webaim.org/techniques/flash/
I think you'll find that Zachary is correct. Flash is for
advertising, kiosk, and limited web use where accessibility
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 07:41:32AM -0700, Zachary Rizer wrote:
> You could also learn MING. There was also a recent
> story about a replacement for MING; check slashdot, I
> don't remember exactly, because I didn't pay much
> attention to it. If you are using flash, I must warn
> you to only us
--- Andrea Vettorello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 09:09:27 -0500, Kent West
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Miguel Griffa wrote:
> >
> > >Hi all
> > >I was wandering how easy is to develop flash
> on debian, are there
> > >any tools? official or not... I'm quite new to
>
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 09:09:27 -0500, Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Miguel Griffa wrote:
>
> >Hi all
> >I was wandering how easy is to develop flash on debian, are there
> >any tools? official or not... I'm quite new to flash world, and old on
> >java and c world, but I never had contac
Miguel Griffa wrote:
Hi all
I was wandering how easy is to develop flash on debian, are there
any tools? official or not... I'm quite new to flash world, and old on
java and c world, but I never had contact with flash beyond .swf
before. Thanks for any advice
OpenOffice.org (Drawing / Present
Hi all
I was wandering how easy is to develop flash on debian, are there
any tools? official or not... I'm quite new to flash world, and old on
java and c world, but I never had contact with flash beyond .swf
before. Thanks for any advice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
27 matches
Mail list logo
