On Sunday 15 February 2009 18:06:55 Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> But why do I need to make an explicit
> snapshot of the system if all debian packages already contain the
> necessary information?
This information is tool-specific. It doesn't belong in the package. One
Debian tool, debsums, does occas
"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." writes:
> On Sunday 15 February 2009 13:06:29 Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> I expected that it would be pretty easy to spot these modifications.
>> So I did exactly the above and then tried to "detect" my changes.
>>
>> I first looked for any additional packages that might help
On Sunday 15 February 2009 13:06:29 Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> I expected that it would be pretty easy to spot these modifications.
> So I did exactly the above and then tried to "detect" my changes.
>
> I first looked for any additional packages that might help me with
> this and installed (and config
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:06:29 -0500
Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently though about the least sophisticated way to introduce a
> backdoor into a system if a already had a root shell. My naive
> approach would be to
>
> a) create a setuid root shell somewhere in the fs,
>
> or
>
> b
Hello,
I recently though about the least sophisticated way to introduce a
backdoor into a system if a already had a root shell. My naive
approach would be to
a) create a setuid root shell somewhere in the fs,
or
b) modify an existing setuid binary to grant me root access
(e.g. when invoce
5 matches
Mail list logo
