March 21, 2007 12:40 PM
> To: Erik Cummings
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Installation - deselect "standard" task ???
>
> Erik Cummings wrote:
> > - 'ps' output from the period of hung install below.
> > - on a whim
> -Original Message-
> From: Joey Hess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 12:40 PM
> To: Erik Cummings
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Installation - deselect "standard" task ???
>
> Erik Cummings wrote:
> &
adn't actually chosen all the right things and partitioned correctly!
> - Wonder at this point, whether it's better to kill the apt
> preconfigure perl process, or to deselect standard???
> - And what should be reported to bugs?
It's actually entirely safe to kil
> -Original Message-
> From: Joey Hess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 12:48 PM
> To: Erik Cummings
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Installation - deselect "standard" task ???
>
> Erik Cummings wrote:
> >
Erik Cummings wrote:
> - "Hang" in this incident refers to a system which is completely
> responsive (can switch to other vtty's and travel the system), but which
> NEVER moves forward in the install process.
>
> - "Never" in this incident refers to a time period of between 5
> minut
> -Original Message-
> From: Joey Hess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 12:27 PM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Installation - deselect "standard" task ???
>
> Erik Cummings wrote:
> > - I've tr
Erik Cummings wrote:
> - I've tried 3 different mirrors, and no difference. Hangs in
> the same spot every time (after retrieving 82 of 82 files...).
> Also, our internet is blazingly fast...without making ya'll
> jealous, the download of all 82 files takes about 3 minutes.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 11:12:57PM -0700, Erik Cummings wrote:
> Alright - I've asked (and am pursuing) a different problem about my install
> not completing if I have any tasks selected (lots of "mirror" problem
> references, but I have tried 3 different mirrors about 6-7 times each!).
>
> The
Solved/Workaround, but information inline below:
>
> Erik Cummings wrote:
> > Alright - I've asked (and am pursuing) a different problem about my
> install not completing if I have any tasks selected (lots of "mirror"
> problem references, but I have tried 3 different mirrors about 6-7 times
> ea
using the hang though.
Thanks.
Erik
> -Original Message-
> From: Curt Howland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 5:50 AM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Cc: Erik Cummings
> Subject: Re: Installation - deselect "standard" task ???
&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 05:36, "Erik Cummings"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> I've installed a few additional packages (part of my "standard"
> load) and things are running fine. I've got no broken
> dependencies, etc...
>
> BUT - I'm havin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Erik Cummings wrote:
> Alright - I've asked (and am pursuing) a different problem about my install
> not completing if I have any tasks selected (lots of "mirror" problem
> references, but I have tried 3 different mirrors about 6-7 times each!).
>
>
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 11:12:57PM -0700, Erik Cummings wrote:
> Alright - I've asked (and am pursuing) a different problem about my install
> not completing if I have any tasks selected (lots of "mirror" problem
> references, but I have tried 3 different mirrors about 6-7 times each!).
>
> The
Alright - I've asked (and am pursuing) a different problem about my install not
completing if I have any tasks selected (lots of "mirror" problem references,
but I have tried 3 different mirrors about 6-7 times each!).
The workaround is if I do NOT select the "standard" task and complete the
in
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 11:19:50PM -0500, Chuck Payne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to update a couple packages, I don't want to update
> everything and when I do like
>
> apt-get upgrade calmd
>
> I get a list of some 400 other pacakges that will be ugprade and I don't
> want that.
> [...]
Hi
Chuck Payne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to update a couple packages, I don't want to update
> everything and when I do like
>
> apt-get upgrade calmd
>
> I get a list of some 400 other pacakges that will be ugprade and I don't
> want that.
>
apt-get upgrade will upgrade all packages, try apt-
on't
> want that.
>
> I was told I could do it with deselect, but I don't see how.
>
> Please, some help.
>
If your system wants to upgrade 400 packages, it has a reason. I'd say
that calmd has newer dependencies. This leads me to believe that
Hi,
I am trying to update a couple packages, I don't want to update
everything and when I do like
apt-get upgrade calmd
I get a list of some 400 other pacakges that will be ugprade and I don't
want that.
I was told I could do it with deselect, but I don't see how.
Pl
Scott wrote:
Greetings:
I'm obviously new at dselect. I got through it OK on an install but
on a restart, I'm fuzzy. I went to choose sources (wanted to add a
CDROM set).
The dselect for beginners document says to use multi_cd for an access
method. My dselect has no such option. Should it? Ho
Greetings:
I'm obviously new at dselect. I got through it OK on an install but
on a restart, I'm fuzzy. I went to choose sources (wanted to add a
CDROM set).
The dselect for beginners document says to use multi_cd for an access
method. My dselect has no such option. Should it? How do I get i
We have a internal Debain mirror in our institute.
When I try to perform the operations
Update
Install
The following error message is displayed.
apt-config: relocation error: /usr/lib/libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5.so.3.3: symbol
_ZNSt9basic_iosIcSt11char_traitsIcEE4initEPSt15basic_streambufIcS1_E,
versio
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 03:20:23PM +0530, Manish wrote:
> We have a internal Debain mirror in our institute.
> When I try to perform the operations
>
> Update
> Install
>
> The following error message is displayed.
>
> apt-config: relocation error: /usr/lib/libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5.so.3.3: symbol
>
Subject: Re: Yet another apt/deselect question
Date: Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 02:13:24PM -0500
In reply to:Colin Watson
Quoting Colin Watson([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 11:19:45AM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
> > You didn't update the dselect available
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 11:19:45AM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote:
> You didn't update the dselect available list tho, only apt-get's. try
> doing your update like this apt-get update && dselect update, which
> updates both lists.
No need; just run 'dselect update', which does 'apt-get update' itself
a
this far, the rest is easy.
Just don't spazz out on us now, all you have to do is click the send
button.
Good luck,
John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:19 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Yet
fucking take me off your mailing list, im sick of getting these fucking
emails!
Subject: Yet another apt/deselect question
Date: Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 10:43:23PM -0700
In reply to:Paul Mackinney
Quoting Paul Mackinney([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I keep getting the same pattern of behavior from apt and dselect, but I
> can't quite figure out what'
David Roundy muttered:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 08:54:24AM +0300, Martin Fluch wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Paul Mackinney wrote:
> >
> > > My questions are:
> > > 1. Why do the unresolved dependancies prevent apt from
> > > updating other packages that have nothing to do with
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 08:54:24AM +0300, Martin Fluch wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Paul Mackinney wrote:
>
> > My questions are:
> > 1. Why do the unresolved dependancies prevent apt from
> > updating other packages that have nothing to do with these?
>
> apt-get will tell you why, if
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Paul Mackinney wrote:
> My questions are:
> 1. Why do the unresolved dependancies prevent apt from
> updating other packages that have nothing to do with these?
apt-get will tell you why, if you force it to install it with
apt-get install
> 2. Why isn't smbfs
I keep getting the same pattern of behavior from apt and dselect, but I
can't quite figure out what's happening. Can someone explain what's
going on?
I'm running Woody. When I apt-get update; apt-get install, I always get
the following message:
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remo
e, with kernel 2.4.5. Aptitude shows many more packages
> > > >than deselect .
> > >
> > > Have you run 'dselect update' recently, or have you just been using
> > > 'apt-get update'?
> >
> > Yep , I have done that and do so r
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001 at 12:52:35 -0500, Balbir Thomas wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 05:57:37PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Balbir Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >I am using ustable, with kernel 2.4.5. Aptitude shows many more packages
> > >than
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 05:57:37PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Balbir Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I am using ustable, with kernel 2.4.5. Aptitude shows many more packages
> >than deselect .
>
> Have you run 'dselect update' recently, or have you jus
Balbir Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am using ustable, with kernel 2.4.5. Aptitude shows many more packages
>than deselect .
Have you run 'dselect update' recently, or have you just been using
'apt-get update'?
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
I am using ustable, with kernel 2.4.5. Aptitude shows many more packages
than deselect . Moreover while deselect shows no broken dependencies
aptitude shows that some installed packages are broken ("iB" in red).
I am perplexed by this. Any ideas what may be going wrong ? Which
shoul
Look on the debian.org site under documentation. Or if you can't find it there
try a search on google. I'd suggest not putting a whole lot on with dselect
(I don't like it much), then use one of the apt-get front ends (like gnome-apt)
to do your installs.
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 10:16:18AM -0800,
The Installing Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 for Intel x86, Chapter 3,
para.3.2, page 15
states "Besides this document, you'll need the cfdisk
(cfdisk.txt) manual page, the
fdisk (fdisk.txt) manual page, the dselect Tutorial (dselect
-beginner), and the Linux
Hardware Compatibility HOWTO."
I can't find th
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 07:04:57PM -0700, Stan Kaufman wrote:
> Once the basic Debian system is installed from floppies and the rest of
> the system is to be installed via dselect over the Internet, how does
> one do this securely? It seems like all manner of mischief could occur
> to the box durin
Once the basic Debian system is installed from floppies and the rest of
the system is to be installed via dselect over the Internet, how does
one do this securely? It seems like all manner of mischief could occur
to the box during the download and install processes before one can
configure ipchains
Fellow Users,
Apologies if this post ends up in the wrong list. First time in 18 months
of Linuxaholism that I have had to seek group therapy.
In the wee hours over the last six weeks, I have downloaded SLINK from
ftp.aarnet.edu.au in an effort to save bandwidth over the numerous installs
I plan
On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, Aaron Solochek wrote:
> Ok, I tried to install mpeg123, and gqmpeg. Since I am running potato,
> when I went to dselect this stuff (2 days ago) it ran into problem
> becuase it couldn't find gnotepad. Now everything seems messed up and
> I have no idea how to fix these depend
Ok, I tried to install mpeg123, and gqmpeg. Since I am running potato,
when I went to dselect this stuff (2 days ago) it ran into problem
becuase it couldn't find gnotepad. Now everything seems messed up and
I have no idea how to fix these dependancy problems. In the past these
types of problems
dselect NOT deselect, sorry...
John
__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Hey guys.
Can someone please point me to some hand-holding dselect documentation? I did
want to "remove" sendmail in favor of a
newbie-friendlier package, but it removed mc instead. (which I installed with
dpkg). Also, the "intro" to mc on the download
page said you could call its editor by
Subject: help with deselect
Date: Sat, Jan 16, 1999 at 10:23:55PM -0600
In reply to:Tony
Quoting Tony([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> Hi,
>
> It's me again, trying desperately to learn Linux...
>
> I am trying to use dselect to install some packages into my
Hi,
It's me again, trying desperately to learn Linux...
I am trying to use dselect to install some packages into my new install of
Debian.. but every time I try to start installing, I get the message:
"Packages yet to be unpacked:
304 in : vim gnushogi xphoon pwgen tcl8.0 tk8.0 libpaperg...
d
Thanks to the two posters. It was the revision. I tried it once but
make-kpkg kept failing. I kept forgetting to use --revision instead of
-revision. No problems now.
Thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Nathan E Norman wrote:
>
> : On Wed, 27 Jan 1
Can't install anything using dselect error message =
/usr/lib/perl5/Debian/DpkgFtp.pm line 81, chunk 16.
Anyone know how to fix this??
thanks Babs
Thanks,
Babs, Your Got.Net PC Tech...
http://we.got.net
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
Having same problem here...
whats the matter with the FTP sites???
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
package
package-name versionxx.x is being replaced with package-namexx.y.
Is this behaviour a consequence of also using apt with deselect? Is
the deselect selection criteria overriding the apt-get dist-upgrade function?
My sources.list file reads:
deb http://ftp1.us.debian.org/debian
On Thu, 16 Jul 1998, Russ Cook wrote:
: using Apt. Apt tells me that over 50 packages are being held back. It
: doesn't
: tell me why. What does this mean? I assume that "held back" means "not
: going to download", but it doesn't tell me if it is because of conflicts,
: non-selection,
Greetings All,
I have a question regarding the Apt method of access under deselect.
I am running Hamm, and periodically try to upgrade my system under deselect
using Apt. Apt tells me that over 50 packages are being held back. It
doesn't
tell me why. What does this mean? I assume
It seems that dselect searches just the package names, is this correct? Is
there a way to get dselect to search other fields such as the short and/or long
descriptions?
--
http://benham.net/index.html
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C
"Young, Ed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanx for the fast replies.
>
> I'd like to have two emacsen if possible or one that will fit the bill for
> both purposes. The machine I'm working on upgrading is going to be an
> experimental Amateur radio packet machine and is somewhat minimalist. (48
ow it is catagorized as "obsolete" meaning it is not part of the
> current distrubution.
>
> I'm certain that there must be a way to fix emacs in hamm. Is it by using
> Deselect, and just selecting it for upgrade? (a loathsome download
> nightmare).
Probably the safe
e to try it as long as it will coexist with GNU Emacs.
Any comments or caveats or experiences here?
My priorities:
Emacs (of some variety)
X
AX25Utils.
I also need to be able to compile and do some code development.
Thanx,
Ed
> Subject: Re: autoup.sh + deselect broke emacs
>
>
atagorized as "obsolete" meaning it is not part of the
> current distrubution.
>
> I'm certain that there must be a way to fix emacs in hamm. Is it by using
> Deselect, and just selecting it for upgrade? (a loathsome download
> nightmare).
On a 28.8k modem it doesn't t
I'm certain that there must be a way to fix emacs in hamm. Is it by using
Deselect, and just selecting it for upgrade? (a loathsome download
nightmare).
Perhaps I should get a clue on the use of dpkg or apt since it seems most on
this list avoid deselect in favor of dpkg if only one packag
On Wed, 8 Jul 1998, Edward J. Young wrote:
>
>
> I should mention that in the deselect screen, there are headings for
> packages that are headed as "obsolete", one being emacs. Does this mean
> what I think: that emacs 19.34.? is now obsolete because I've upgrade
clean install. i had to abandon dselect and use
dpkg to remove emacs, then ftp'd xemacs packages and used dpkg to
install them.
best--c
On Wed, 8 Jul 1998, Edward J. Young wrote:
>
>
> I should mention that in the deselect screen, there are headings for
> packages that are he
I should mention that in the deselect screen, there are headings for
packages that are headed as "obsolete", one being emacs. Does this mean
what I think: that emacs 19.34.? is now obsolete because I've upgraded
around it and now it needs upgrading too? Probobly.
There are some
I have upgraded from 1.3.1 to hamm with some difficulty, but feel like
I'm getting there. My latest problem is that when invoking emacs from a
console, I get "segmentation fault", and no emacs.
I don't believe that emacs was upgraded during the deselect process so I
suspec
*-Christopher Barry ( 4 Jul)
| Type 'dselect' at the prompt.
|
| Jonathan Bruce wrote:
|
| > How do I run deselect after installing Linux?
|
|
Also, you might want to read the Dselect Beginners guide:
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/bo/main/disks-i386/current/dselect.beginn
Type 'dselect' at the prompt.
Jonathan Bruce wrote:
> How do I run deselect after installing Linux?
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
How do I run deselect after installing
Linux?
t; which supports http is quite
> fast."?
>
> I'm pretty confused about quit a bit of stuff. Was deselect upgraded in the
> autoup.sh session to now use apt? Or do I need to add it...??
> Still not sure what the apt method is. I've got alot of docs on this upgra
t; Thanx again,
>
> Ed
>
No its not dangerous to let dselect do what it wants just potentially
tedious, if you have to babysit a few hours of unnecessary downloading.
deselect will try to pick stuff that you might not need on your system.
Some of this stuff (like emacs) is
frozen via ftp. I believe the errors are normal as the script
> breaks things and then proceeds to fix them. So I think that part went OK.
Yes that sounds normal.
>
> My question is:
> Now I need to run deselect and upgrade the rest of my packages. I've been
> followi
;?
I'm pretty confused about quit a bit of stuff. Was deselect upgraded in the
autoup.sh session to now use apt? Or do I need to add it...??
Still not sure what the apt method is. I've got alot of docs on this upgrade
but still haven't figured that out. I see that it is the command line met
ts.debian.org
> Subject: Re: ran autoup, need deselect clarification
>
> On Thu, 2 Jul 1998, Young, Ed wrote:
>
> >
> > I ran the autoup.sh script on my 1.3.1 system and used the option of
> having
> > the files in the current directory. The script went along
frozen via ftp. I believe the errors are normal as the script
> breaks things and then proceeds to fix them. So I think that part went OK.
>
> My question is:
> Now I need to run deselect and upgrade the rest of my packages. I've been
> following this list and I believe
On Thu, 2 Jul 1998, Young, Ed wrote:
>
> I ran deselect to ftp.debian.org to do a dry run on the upgrade after
> running autoup.sh and could not get connected. I passed all the other info
> and after choosing directory /debian
> and
> dists/frozen/main dists/frozen/non-free di
I ran deselect to ftp.debian.org to do a dry run on the upgrade after
running autoup.sh and could not get connected. I passed all the other info
and after choosing directory /debian
and
dists/frozen/main dists/frozen/non-free dists/frozen/contrib
the deselect session kept telling me it couldn&#
breaks things and then proceeds to fix them. So I think that part went OK.
My question is:
Now I need to run deselect and upgrade the rest of my packages. I've been
following this list and I believe that I need to choose:
directory /debian
and get:
dists/frozen/main dists/frozen/non-free
hi
Deselect will exit on error that it cannot find the file vmlinuz.old in
the base dir. The file shows on a ls. you can mv to a new name. and back
but you cant cp it or open it with ae.
This effectively stops me from installing most of the packages.
what is wrong here and how can I correct it
On Tue, 19 May 1998, Eddie Seymour wrote:
> When running "dselect" in the "install-upgrade" function, the
> installer scans down the software list and when it gets to:
> "Skipping deselected package hello"
> "Skipping deselected package ical"
> it hangs up and refuses to doanything or let you brea
When running "dselect" in the "install-upgrade" function, the
installer scans down the software list and when it gets to:
"Skipping deselected package hello"
"Skipping deselected package ical"
it hangs up and refuses to doanything or let you break out of the
program. This fault is repeatable every
On Wed, 3 Dec 1997, Albert Hurd wrote:
> I just booted my floppy to do another fresh install of 1.3.1. When I choose
> Access from the menu, I get--
>unable to open/create access method lockfile: permission denied
>
> Could anyone tell me what gives, and how to proceed.
> Any help would b
I just booted my floppy to do another fresh install of 1.3.1. When I choose
Access from the menu, I get--
unable to open/create access method lockfile: permission denied
Could anyone tell me what gives, and how to proceed.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Albert Hurd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Mon, 19 May 1997, Christian Hudon wrote:
> On May 19, Bob Nielsen wrote
> > Recently I have started getting the following message when running
> > dselect:
> >
> > perl: warning: Setting locale failed for the categories:
> > LC_CTYPE LC_COLLATE
> > perl: warning: Please check that your
On May 19, Bob Nielsen wrote
> Recently I have started getting the following message when running
> dselect:
>
> perl: warning: Setting locale failed for the categories:
> LC_CTYPE LC_COLLATE
> perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
> LC_ALL = (unset),
> LC_
Recently I have started getting the following message when running
dselect:
perl: warning: Setting locale failed for the categories:
LC_CTYPE LC_COLLATE
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
LC_ALL = (unset),
LC_CTYPE = (unset),
LC_COLLATE = (unset)
On Fri, May 09, 1997 at 06:16:49PM -0600, G.V.Livingston II wrote:
> I know the ZIP drive mounts properly with "-tmsdos" so I'm not sure what
> fs it 'really' has on it. I'm going to test mounting it with "-tvfat"
> tonight. I do have vfat support in linux but my original problem stems
> fro
e over there. So I guess I'd really rather know how to set up the
'Packages' files and run deselect from a directory structure totally
inconsistent with the original Debian mirrors.
On 9 May 97 at 17:53, Rick Jones wrote:
>
> Did you put VFAT in the kernel so dselect ca
Did you put VFAT in the kernel so dselect can read the partition
correctly?
On Fri, 9 May 1997, G.V.Livingston II wrote:
> If I plan to use the deselect program to install packages from a
> mounted MSDOS partition (mounted at /e) and I have the packages in
> /e/linux/stable,
If I plan to use the deselect program to install packages from a
mounted MSDOS partition (mounted at /e) and I have the packages in
/e/linux/stable, /e/linux/contrib, & /e/linux/non-free should I edit the
'Packages" files to refelect the new path information? Or will desel
> 1) Deselect keeps showing me that the kernel-source-
> 2.0.6.deb is available (after repeated Packages updates).
> Of course it won't download because it's not there.
The mirror sites have been messed up by networking problems,
and files are missing. The networking proble
First - my apologies to all those working so hard
on the bleeding edge, for questions relating to an
old version.
1) Deselect keeps showing me that the kernel-source-
2.0.6.deb is available (after repeated Packages updates).
Of course it won't download because it's not there.
I
On Sun, 17 Nov 1996 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > One solution would be to hade an "unhold" feature, which sets the status
> > according to the currently-installed status.
> I don't understand this. The 'default' behavior of dpkg-ftp is to _ask_
> the user if they want to get all of the new/updat
> > > >My only complaint is that it autoinstalls updated packages. There have
> > > >been a number of times that I wanted to grab one new package via ftp
> > > >install, and came up with 10 megs of updated packages.
>
> > > Here, here...I second this. I know you can confirm what to get but
> > >
--
This message was distributed manually by [EMAIL PROTECTED] after the list
initially failed to distribute it.
On 15 Nov 1996, Andy Guy wrote:
> Brian K Servis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> > Paul Christenson writes:
> > >
> > >On Wed, 13 Nov 1996, Mark Carroll wrote:
> > >
> > >My only complaint is that it autoinstalls updated packages. There have
> > >been a number of times that I wanted to grab o
Brian K Servis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Paul Christenson writes:
> >
> >On Wed, 13 Nov 1996, Mark Carroll wrote:
> >
> >My only complaint is that it autoinstalls updated packages. There have
> >been a number of times that I wanted to grab one new package via ftp
> >install, and came up with
Paul Christenson writes:
>
>On Wed, 13 Nov 1996, Mark Carroll wrote:
>
>My only complaint is that it autoinstalls updated packages. There have
>been a number of times that I wanted to grab one new package via ftp
>install, and came up with 10 megs of updated packages. (Not bad at work,
>but can b
95 matches
Mail list logo
