On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 05:56:22PM -0400, e Lpe wrote:
> Ok, thanks for the lesson.
> I made a mistake. I apologize.
> I din't saw how as changed Debian distribution and community since 2002.
> It's so far...
> Forget this thread, or mail, call it as you want.
> I will found a solution by myself.
>
On Friday 28 October 2016 22:56:22 e Lpe wrote:
> Ok, thanks for the lesson.
> I made a mistake. I apologize.
> I din't saw how as changed Debian distribution and community since 2002.
> It's so far...
> Forget this thread, or mail, call it as you want.
> I will found a solution by myself.
>
> And
Ok, thanks for the lesson.
I made a mistake. I apologize.
I din't saw how as changed Debian distribution and community since 2002.
It's so far...
Forget this thread, or mail, call it as you want.
I will found a solution by myself.
And thanks to people try to help.
End off.
2016-10-28 14:31 GMT-0
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 07:19:47PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> 4. There is a way to get your error mesaages in English but I have
>forgotten how. Someone will be along in a while to explain how it
>is done.
If you're working from a command shell, you can do:
export LC_ALL=C
and then the rest o
I did not respond to your post because it seemed like too much trouble
to get information from you. Fortunately for you Lisi (bless her heart)
did not ignore it.
e Lpe, you are now going to get a lecture. Sit back and enjoy it. :)
--
" What have you tried?"
nothing yet. The missings dependencies are here : http://dpaste.com/2BVN1S6
I think i can dowload it from debian website and install tem with dpkg but
I affraid to brake my system
2016-10-28 10:53 GMT-04:00 Lisi Reisz :
> On Friday 28 October 2016 02:13:44 e Lpe wrote:
>
On Friday 28 October 2016 02:13:44 e Lpe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> all is in the title.
> I can't install Lightworks on Jessie.
>
> What is the right way to install it ?
What have you tried?
Lisi
Hello,
all is in the title.
I can't install Lightworks on Jessie.
What is the right way to install it ?
Regards
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 02:23:31PM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
> In <20090529013505.ga12...@emurlahn.burrows.local>, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > Adding versioned Provides would affect all the software that tries
> >to process Debian packages and reason about their dependency
In <20090529013505.ga12...@emurlahn.burrows.local>, Daniel Burrows wrote:
>On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:21:38AM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
>> In <20090528153521.ga31...@emurlahn.burrows.local>, Daniel Burrows wrote:
>> >On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 09:02:59AM -0500, "Boyd Stephen
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 08:35 -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 09:02:59AM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
> was heard to say:
> > Isn't that supposed to change in the future (but perhaps not before
> > Squeeze)
> > so that we can have versioned dependencies on virtual packag
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:28:42PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
> Hi debmasters,
>
> I thought I'd give the Webkit based Midori browser
> a try, and ran into a dependency problem.
>
> I've got libwebkit.
>
> ii libwebkit-1.0-2 1.1.7-1 Web
> content engine l
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:21:38AM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
> In <20090528153521.ga31...@emurlahn.burrows.local>, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> >On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 09:02:59AM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
> was heard to say:
> >> Isn't that supposed to change in the fu
In <20090528153521.ga31...@emurlahn.burrows.local>, Daniel Burrows wrote:
>On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 09:02:59AM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
>> Isn't that supposed to change in the future (but perhaps not before
>> Squeeze) so that we can have versioned dependencies on virtual
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 09:02:59AM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
> Isn't that supposed to change in the future (but perhaps not before Squeeze)
> so that we can have versioned dependencies on virtual packages?
Yes. It's been supposed to change in the future for at least t
On 2009-05-28 16:02 +0200, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> In <20090528135056.gb13...@emurlahn.burrows.local>, Daniel Burrows wrote:
>>
>> Also, a request for a package with a version constraint can never
>>be satisfied by another package, even if a Provides relationship
>>exists.
>
> Isn't that
In <20090528135056.gb13...@emurlahn.burrows.local>, Daniel Burrows wrote:
>On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:59:50AM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
>> You have the package "libwebkit-1.0-2" version "1.1.7-1". But, the
>> package "midori" needs the package "libwebkit-1.0-1" version "1
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:59:50AM -0500, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
> You have the package "libwebkit-1.0-2" version "1.1.7-1". But, the package
> "midori" needs the package "libwebkit-1.0-1" version "1.0.1" or greater.
> Package names are only compared for equality; they are
In <20090526222842.ga5...@sprite>, Joel Roth wrote:
>I thought I'd give the Webkit based Midori browser
>a try, and ran into a dependency problem.
>
>I've got libwebkit.
>
>ii libwebkit-1.0-2 1.1.7-1
>ii libwebkit-1.0-common 1.1.7-1
>
>What about Midori:
># ap
On Tue, 26 May 2009 12:28:42 -1000
Joel Roth wrote:
> Hi debmasters,
>
> I thought I'd give the Webkit based Midori browser
> a try, and ran into a dependency problem.
>
> I've got libwebkit.
>
> ii libwebkit-1.0-2 1.1.7-1
> Web content engine library for Gtk+ ii
> libweb
Hi debmasters,
I thought I'd give the Webkit based Midori browser
a try, and ran into a dependency problem.
I've got libwebkit.
ii libwebkit-1.0-2 1.1.7-1 Web
content engine library for Gtk+
ii libwebkit-1.0-common 1.1.7-1
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006 17:14:34 -0400
Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seems like this bug is already reported
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=380757
Aloha,
Thanks for posting the info. I guess it'll be fixed soon.
--
"Infinite Love Is The Only Truth, Everythi
On Monday 04 September 2006 06:50, Dimitar Vukman wrote:
> Aloha,
>
> Here's the situation. I want openoffice from testing or unstable, it
> wants to remove adesklets and I can't install adeskleds because of deps.
>
> What to do? Force it?
Seems like this bug is already reported
http://bugs.debia
> results in nothing. Am I missing something here?
>
> raju
It's not in testing, it's in sarge and sid. But the same question
remains. Adesklets and openoffice from ustable need different versions
of python, adesklets (<< 2.4) && openoffice pn python ( python-uno:
Depends: python (>= 2.4) ).
ht
> What is this adesklets software that you are talking about? On my
> Etch machine
>
> $apt-cache search adesklets
>
> results in nothing. Am I missing something here?
[04:43 PM Mon Sep [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~
$ apt-cache search adesklets
adesklets - interactive Imlib2 console for the X Window Syst
On Monday 04 September 2006 06:50, Dimitar Vukman wrote:
> Aloha,
>
> Here's the situation. I want openoffice from testing or unstable, it
> wants to remove adesklets and I can't install adeskleds because of deps.
>
> What to do? Force it?
>
What is this adesklets software that you are talking abo
Aloha,
Here's the situation. I want openoffice from testing or unstable, it
wants to remove adesklets and I can't install adeskleds because of deps.
What to do? Force it?
$ sudo aptitude install openoffice.org adesklets pyt
Edward Kamau wrote:
> I wanted to install KDE alongside Gnome so I did:
>
> apt-get install KDE
>
> After downloading and unpacking close to 300 packages apt-get quit
> I have tried running apt-get -f which exits withe the following error:
> Unpacking kontact-plugins (from
> .../kontact-plugin
Could someone respond to this I am having the same problem.
-Noah
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:14:01 -0400, Edward Kamau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi
>
> I wanted to install KDE alongside Gnome so I did:
>
> apt-get install KDE
>
> After downloading and unpacking close to 300 packages apt-get qui
hi
I wanted to install KDE alongside Gnome so I did:
apt-get install KDE
After downloading and unpacking close to 300 packages apt-get quit with
the following error:
---
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
kdeaddons: Depends: kontact-plugins (>= 4:3.2.3-2) but it i
Umar Draz wrote:
hi dear members!
i have question about dependencies. I want to install qmail thats
why i need courier-imap and courier-imap-ssl. when i want to install
courier-imap i face dependcey of exim but i don't want to install exim.
so, remove exim if you don't want it to.
there's sev
hi dear members!
i have question about dependencies. I want to install qmail thats why i need courier-imap and courier-imap-ssl. when i want to install courier-imap i face dependcey of exim but i don't want to install exim.
so please help me how i can ignore dependcies is it possible?
tha
Phil Brutsche wrote:
I'll be honest: I wouldn't trust any of that "Enterprise" stuff to run on
any distribution other than the one it was built for: RedHat 6.x.
Thanks to all for the answers. Maybe I'll try to debianize the rpms
and/or adopt the installscript later. But this way seems really
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 10:13:44PM +0100, Tibor D. wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to install a software-package on Debian potato. It's "Novell
> NDS 8.5". The good thing is, that it needs a 2.2-kernel and glibc
> v.2.1.3, exactly what potato comes with. But: I'm unable to install that
> program, beca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> Hi,
> I'm trying to install a software-package on Debian potato. It's "Novell
> NDS 8.5".
Unfortunately, Novell's NDS stuff probably won't run on Debian. Yes, you
can debianize the .rpms,
>I'm trying to install a software-package on Debian potato. It's "Novell
>NDS 8.5". The good thing is, that it needs a 2.2-kernel and glibc
>v.2.1.3, exactly what potato comes with. But: I'm unable to install that
>program, because it's installation is really dirty. On the install-CD,
>there ar
Hi,
I'm trying to install a software-package on Debian potato. It's "Novell
NDS 8.5". The good thing is, that it needs a 2.2-kernel and glibc
v.2.1.3, exactly what potato comes with. But: I'm unable to install that
program, because it's installation is really dirty. On the install-CD,
there ar
Thanks, that did the trick
> I just had this problem, it's a pain but you don't have to rebuild your
> entire system.
> I think it's a bug but it is too low level for me to characterise very well.
>
> Anyway, this should help (it saved me from having to reinstall):
>
> http://lists.debian.org/d
I just had this problem, it's a pain but you don't have to rebuild your entire
system.
I think it's a bug but it is too low level for me to characterize very well.
Anyway, this should help (it saved me from having to reinstall):
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user-0009/msg04260.html
krafty
P
Hi,
I tried installing the kde2 packages from the woody tree into my
potato distribution and it seems to have upgraded the glibc. The
install was faulty otherwise too. Some of the packages couldn't
be configures due to independencies (not sure what failed anymore).
Now I'm trying to get my system
--- Begin Message ---
Try installing through dpkg and see if it gives the same error. If it does then
you could try one of the --force options (I forget which one).
Peter Allen
Brian Morgan wrote:
>
> I'm trying to install gnome from one of it's mirrors, and having some
I'm trying to install gnome from one of it's mirrors, and having some
dependecy problems I can't figure out.
Dselect allows me to select all the required base files, except when I
select the "orbit" package, dselect gives me a dependency error saying that
liborbit0 is required by orbit. The only p
42 matches
Mail list logo
