.
I'm guessing these fonts are provided OOTB on Windows and Mac, and it
would be nice to provide the same on Debian. At least the
ttf-ancient-fonts package provides this, but I'm not sure where to file
a bug for it to be installed by default.
Which package pulls in the default fonts f
Hello,
in the KDE font settings I can see the font names "Serif" and "Sans Serif".
Are these really links to other fonts? And if so, how can find out which ones
and how is it possible to change them?
Best regards,
Torquil Sørensen
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 11:50:00AM -0600, Cameron Matheson wrote:
> This is a really un-optimal solution, but if you edit your
> /etc/fonts/fonts.conf, you can change the order that fonts are
> preferred (just search for the tags). Move the fonts that
> are more readable nearer to the top. Unfor
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 01:46:45PM -0400, Derek Martin wrote:
> I'm using the debian installer to do an automated install of a bunch
> of workstations. We have various users who speak non-English
> languages, so I installed every font package I could.
>
> Problem:
>
> I myself speak Korean
Hi Folks,
What I did:
I'm using the debian installer to do an automated install of a bunch
of workstations. We have various users who speak non-English
languages, so I installed every font package I could.
Problem:
I myself speak Korean (albeit badly). After installing all the fonts,
two unde
look like this include xedit and eximon.
I tried my luck with some search engines, but didn't find anything relevant.
How do I set the default fonts to be used for those applications?
Thanks for your time :-)
--
Got Backup?
Jabber: Shadowdancer at jabber.fsinf.de
pgpHyCov23P1p.pgp
D
I'm running ImageJ (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/) using Sun's J2SE
v 1.4.2, installed from j2sdk-1.4.2-nb-3.5-bin-linux.bin. When I
start the application, the font used for the menu bar is big
enough that the menu items don't all fit in the window. Can
anyone suggest a way to change the default fo
On Tuesday 05 Aug 2003 20:13, Michael A. Miller wrote:
> I'm running ImageJ (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/) using Sun's J2SE
> v 1.4.2, installed from j2sdk-1.4.2-nb-3.5-bin-linux.bin. When I
> start the application, the font used for the menu bar is big
> enough that the menu items don't all fit in
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 06:18:51PM -0500, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
> Lloyd Zusman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >
> > [ ... ]
> >
> > Files: $HOME/.gtkrc-kde
> > /usr/share/gnome/gtkrc
> > /usr/share/themes/Default/gtk-2.0-key/gtkrc
> > /usr/share/themes/Default/gtk-2.0/g
Lloyd Zusman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [ ... ]
>
> Files: $HOME/.gtkrc-kde
> /usr/share/gnome/gtkrc
> /usr/share/themes/Default/gtk-2.0-key/gtkrc
> /usr/share/themes/Default/gtk-2.0/gtkrc
> /usr/share/themes/Default/gtk/gtkrc
> /etc/gtk/gtkrc.en
Travis Crump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Lloyd Zusman wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps I didn't make my original question clear. Many X apps,
>> including mozilla (which is NOT a gtk app)
>
> Mozilla has its own widget layer[xul] to allow for easy cross-platform
> development, but the xul widgets thems
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 04:44:09PM -0500, Travis Crump wrote:
> Lloyd Zusman wrote:
> >
> >Perhaps I didn't make my original question clear. Many X apps,
> >including mozilla (which is NOT a gtk app)
>
> Mozilla has its own widget layer[xul] to allow for easy cross-platform
> development, but
Lloyd Zusman wrote:
Perhaps I didn't make my original question clear. Many X apps,
including mozilla (which is NOT a gtk app)
Mozilla has its own widget layer[xul] to allow for easy cross-platform
development, but the xul widgets themselves are implemented with gtk for
the default X builds[
Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 11:25:33PM -0500, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
>>
>> [ ... ]
>>
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> For example, mozilla (version 1.0.0) comes up with that default font on
>> its menu bar. I've looked in app-defaults and in the various X startup
>> files, but I
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 11:25:33PM -0500, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
> I'm running woody with kde. I've used the kde control panel to specify
> the fonts I'd like to use, and these settings indeed work for various
> kde objects, for window manager decorations, etc.
Correct. The default font an app uses
I'm running woody with kde. I've used the kde control panel to specify
the fonts I'd like to use, and these settings indeed work for various
kde objects, for window manager decorations, etc.
However, many X applications come up with a default font that I don't
like, and I want to change it. Howe
on Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 10:54:28AM -0700, Jeffrey W. Baker ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> I installed a fresh Debian on a new PC and it has a problem that I haven't
> noticed with my other installs. The default fonts in many applications
> are WAY too small. For instance, the toolt
I installed a fresh Debian on a new PC and it has a problem that I haven't
noticed with my other installs. The default fonts in many applications
are WAY too small. For instance, the tooltips in sawfish are an
unreadable blur. In Motif applications, the fonts are all 6pt which is
entirel
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 08:58:30PM -0500, John Patton wrote:
> I've recently upgraded from potato to testing, including the
> switch to Xfree86 version 4. Everything is great except that
> the default font size for many applications (like netscape
> and ddd) is now rather huge. I use 800 x 600 scre
I've recently upgraded from potato to testing, including the
switch to Xfree86 version 4. Everything is great except that
the default font size for many applications (like netscape
and ddd) is now rather huge. I use 800 x 600 screen size,
and specify 75 dpi in my xservers file (the actual dpi is
mo
On Sat, May 27, 2000 at 11:07:17AM +0800, Alex Kwan wrote:
> Hi! Eric,
>
> It was because after I have installed X window 3.3.6 on my
> laptop, (not yet install any Window Manager and Application),
> I found that the fonts of xterm is big and ugly (titlle of the xterm
> window and display what I t
> On Sat, May 27, 2000 at 11:07:17AM +0800, Alex Kwan wrote:
> > Hi! Eric,
> >
> > It was because after I have installed X window 3.3.6 on my
> > laptop, (not yet install any Window Manager and Application),
> > I found that the fonts of xterm is big and ugly (titlle of the xterm
> > window and di
On Sat, May 27, 2000 at 11:07:17AM +0800, Alex Kwan wrote:
> Hi! Eric,
>
> It was because after I have installed X window 3.3.6 on my
> laptop, (not yet install any Window Manager and Application),
> I found that the fonts of xterm is big and ugly (titlle of the xterm
> window and display what I t
-
From: Eric G . Miller
To:
Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2000 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: Default Fonts of X Window
On Sat, May 27, 2000 at 08:54:37AM +0800, Alex Kwan wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is the default Fonts of X Window setting by the
> first line of FontPath of /etc/XF68Config?
>
No
On Sat, May 27, 2000 at 08:54:37AM +0800, Alex Kwan wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is the default Fonts of X Window setting by the
> first line of FontPath of /etc/XF68Config?
>
Not sure what you mean by "default". However, I believe X will give
preference to the first version of a
Hi!
Is the default Fonts of X Window setting by the
first line of FontPath of /etc/XF68Config?
Thanks
On Sat, 16 Jan 1999 at 02:39:32 +, Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I installed xfstt from slink tonight, as I'm getting sick of the same
> problem. It went fine, and fixed all the web pages I was having trouble
> with regularly (I knew I could use that Windows license for something).
On Thu, Jan 14, 1999 at 08:49:54AM +0100, Thomas Adams wrote:
> Strange, on my hamm box installing xfstt was a pretty eventful job. First,
> there is no FAQ.gz. Maybe it is in the slink but I can't install that to a
> hamm box, can I? Then there is a problem with starting xfstt. It looks like
On Thu, Jan 14, 1999 at 08:49:54AM +0100, Thomas Adams wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 1999 at 12:35:30AM -0700, Dave Thayer wrote:
>
> > It was a pretty uneventful installation, but read /usr/doc/xfstt/FAQ.gz.
>
> Strange, on my hamm box installing xfstt was a pretty eventful job. First,
> there is
On Thu, Jan 14, 1999 at 08:37:46AM +0100, Thomas Adams wrote:
> navigate w/o seeing graphics or frames (and lynx' frames handling sucks IMHO)
Sure, but can you give an example of how it could be implemented better?
I don't like it much either but I can't see much alternative.
Hamish
--
Hamish
On Wed, Jan 13, 1999 at 01:26:09PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> Does this happen with all web pages? I haven't used Netscape on a Debian
No, some pages displayed fine, but not all. I wasn't able to find a pattern.
> system (Lynx is your friend), but on other systems I've tried Netscape 4.05
Yes,
On Wed, Jan 13, 1999 at 12:35:30AM -0700, Dave Thayer wrote:
> It was a pretty uneventful installation, but read /usr/doc/xfstt/FAQ.gz.
Strange, on my hamm box installing xfstt was a pretty eventful job. First,
there is no FAQ.gz. Maybe it is in the slink but I can't install that to a
hamm box,
On Wed, Jan 13, 1999 at 12:29:46AM -0800, Mark Wagnon wrote:
>
> Dave Thayer wrote:
> >
> > It was a pretty uneventful installation, but read /usr/doc/xfstt/FAQ.gz.
> > In particular there are some details regarding choosing font size for
> > netscape. What I did, in a nutshell, was
> >
> > -Se
Anthony Campbell wrote:
>
> On 12 Jan 1999q, Dave Thayer wrote:
> >
> > In Windows you have TrueType fonts which display much more nicely than
> > X fonts, especially on a lower res screen. I installed xfstt from slink
> > which vastly improved Netscape on my 640x480 laptop screen.
> >
> > your pa
On Tue, Jan 12, 1999 at 09:42:37PM +0100, Thomas Adams wrote:
> On two different hamm computers with different video cards and monitors I
> installed Netscape 4.05 with the install script.
> On both of these systems I can hardly read the web pages because the default
> fonts are t
On 12 Jan 1999q, Dave Thayer wrote:
>
> In Windows you have TrueType fonts which display much more nicely than
> X fonts, especially on a lower res screen. I installed xfstt from slink
> which vastly improved Netscape on my 640x480 laptop screen.
>
> your pal dave
>
> --
> Dave Thayer
> Denver
Dave Thayer wrote:
>
> It was a pretty uneventful installation, but read /usr/doc/xfstt/FAQ.gz.
> In particular there are some details regarding choosing font size for
> netscape. What I did, in a nutshell, was
>
> -Set up symlinks from /dosc/windows/fonts to
> /usr/share/fonts/truetype/winfon
On Tue, Jan 12, 1999 at 09:37:49PM -0800, Mark Wagnon wrote:
>
> Dave Thayer wrote:
> >
> > In Windows you have TrueType fonts which display much more nicely than
> > X fonts, especially on a lower res screen. I installed xfstt from slink
> > which vastly improved Netscape on my 640x480 laptop sc
Dave Thayer wrote:
>
> In Windows you have TrueType fonts which display much more nicely than
> X fonts, especially on a lower res screen. I installed xfstt from slink
> which vastly improved Netscape on my 640x480 laptop screen.
>
I decided to try a fresh look for X and install xfstt. Is there
On Tue, Jan 12, 1999 at 09:42:37PM +0100, Thomas Adams wrote:
>
> On two different hamm computers with different video cards and monitors I
> installed Netscape 4.05 with the install script.
>
> On both of these systems I can hardly read the web pages because the default
> f
On two different hamm computers with different video cards and monitors I
installed Netscape 4.05 with the install script.
On both of these systems I can hardly read the web pages because the default
fonts are too small. On the same computers and monitors, a Windows Netscape
displays fine. Why
Glad you were able to figure out what to do. I figured if you were
reasonably competent (and I'm not) my hint may have been of some help.
Just bought a copy of AX3.1. I plan to upgrade to XFree 3.3 late this
week. If AX3.1 breaks I'll let you know what Xi support's official
position is. :)
Kevin wrote:
>Guys, I've seen the answer to this recently. Don't know how current the
>archive is--so you may not be able to search it for the exact answer.
>
>AccelX can't do compressed fonts (.gz I think). XFree has apparently
^^ That's true, .Z it handles
Guys, I've seen the answer to this recently. Don't know how current the
archive is--so you may not be able to search it for the exact answer.
AccelX can't do compressed fonts (.gz I think). XFree has apparently
decided to start compressing them. There is a workaround and it
involves something
Matthew wrote:
>hello,
>
>i just updated my system (dselect) and several x-related files were
>updated, including xbase, vga & svga servers, fonts, etc. i am using
>xinside's AcceleratedX with a Matrox Mystique video card.
>
Same here, AccelX 2.1 and Matrox Millenium for the record...
>since i
hello,
i just updated my system (dselect) and several x-related files were
updated, including xbase, vga & svga servers, fonts, etc. i am using
xinside's AcceleratedX with a Matrox Mystique video card.
since i updated, when i attempt startx, i get the following error
messages:
failed to set def
Obviously I had my small cap on when I wrote earlier; I now have corrected my
return address.
--
Gary
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
47 matches
Mail list logo
