On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 08:47:57AM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
How do I remove the first default route in this list?
$ sudo ip route list
default dev enp0s25 scope link
default via 192.168.1.1 dev wlo1 proto dhcp metric 600
…
sudo ip route del default dev enp0s25 scope link
Basically write
On 10/4/19, Johann Spies wrote:
> This problem arised recently after an upgrade (running sid)
>
> How do I remove the first default route in this list?
I'd leave both in - that way things should Just Work if either of the
interfaces goes down.
The question then becomes which inter
Johann Spies wrote:
> $ sudo ip route list
> default dev enp0s25 scope link
> default via 192.168.1.1 dev wlo1 proto dhcp metric 600
> 169.254.0.0/16 dev wlo1 scope link metric 1000
Have you tried specifying the device and/or the GW address, to narrow
down which route you want to delete, i.e.:
su
This problem arised recently after an upgrade (running sid)
How do I remove the first default route in this list?
ip route del default
does not do it. When I disable enp0s25 the second line (via 192.168.1.1)
will be the only and correct default route. In that case "ip route del
default&
test/devel routers I have different ethernet configurations.
I wanted to configure NetworkManger to handle wlan0 as my primary
interface for having the the default route.
The behaviour of NetworkManger is that it will always use eth0.
So if I plugin and plugout an ethernet cable NetworkManger
Matt Ventura wrote:
> On 01/23/2015 04:05 AM, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Matt Ventura wrote:
> Well, that confirms my original suspicion. The F5 VPN is throwing its
> default route over the original one, and that's causing traffic to the
> OpenVPN server to try to route ove
00 tun0
Try it with 0.0.0.0 instead of default. I didn't notice that the netmask
was 128.0.0.0 rather than 0.0.0.0. Not sure why it would do that or if
that has some kind of special meaning.
VPN clients normally use two routes as "default" route:
0.0.0.0/128.0.0.0
0.8.0.5255.255.255.255 UGH 1 00 tun0
> Try it with 0.0.0.0 instead of default. I didn't notice that the netmask
> was 128.0.0.0 rather than 0.0.0.0. Not sure why it would do that or if
> that has some kind of special meaning.
VPN clients normally use two route
00 eth0
10.144.0.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH0 00 ppp0
128.0.0.0 10.144.15.100 128.0.0.0 UG1 00 ppp0
134.67.15.3010.8.0.5255.255.255.255 UGH 1 00 tun0
Once at that point, I'm directed[3] (IIUC) to
255.255.255.255 UH0 00 ppp0
128.0.0.0 10.144.15.100 128.0.0.0 UG1 00 ppp0
134.67.15.3010.8.0.5255.255.255.255 UGH 1 00 tun0
Once at that point, I'm directed[3] (IIUC) to delete the default route being
set by
Nick Porter napisał(a):
I'm at a complete loss of how to make this work. The way I understand it
there are three ways to set a default route when the machine boots. 1)
Use DHCP. 2) From the Interfaces file. 3) A script in one of the
if-x.d directorys. I have tried all these and just
225.225.225.0 is not a valid netmask. Your system can't determine if
your gateway and your address are on the same network. Try with
255.255.255.0.
cu.
Nick Porter a écrit :
>I'm at a complete loss of how to make this work. The way I understand it
>there are three ways to set
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 01:54:11PM -, Nick Porter wrote:
> # The primary network interface
> auto eth0
>
> iface eth0 inet static
> address 192.168.0.42
> netmask 225.225.225.0
This is wrong : should be 255.255.255.0
Frank
--
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first pl
I'm at a complete loss of how to make this work. The way I understand it
there are three ways to set a default route when the machine boots. 1)
Use DHCP. 2) From the Interfaces file. 3) A script in one of the
if-x.d directorys. I have tried all these and just don't seem to be
able
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Thank you very much for that - and everyone else that replied. I had not
seen your post before I see others mentioning /etc/network/interfaces,
so edit that. so was not sure what to put for the broadcase, although
since the original ended in .255, I went for that too.
R
Jonathan Colaco wrote:
On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 18:53:15 +, Dr. David Kirkby
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I installed a system on a company network with a fixed IP
(213.78.42.115), but recently bought a small router. The PC will now
have to use the router as the default route, and
42.115), but recently bought a small router. The PC will now
> >have to use the router as the default route, and I will make the IP
> >private.
> >
> >The following commands do what I want
> >
> ># ifconfig eth0 192.168.123.1 netname 255.255.255.0 # set my IP t
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dr. David Kirkby
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Hi,
I installed a system on a company network with a fixed IP
(213.78.42.115), but recently bought a small router. The PC will now
have to use the router as the default route, and I will make the IP
p
"Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But how do I set this to happen automatically? I changed the IP in
> /etc/hosts, and had an attempt at changing /etc/gateways, but clearly
> not successfully, as the routing does work after a reboot - I need to
> type these commands again.
you nee
On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 18:53:15 +, Dr. David Kirkby
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I installed a system on a company network with a fixed IP
> (213.78.42.115), but recently bought a small router. The PC will now
> have to use the router as the default route, and
Hi,
I installed a system on a company network with a fixed IP
(213.78.42.115), but recently bought a small router. The PC will now
have to use the router as the default route, and I will make the IP
private.
The following commands do what I want
# ifconfig eth0 192.168.123.1 netname
Hi fellow users,
Q1 If diaable diald will I be able to accept incoming dialup connections
to my pc/modem. Which package would be used insead to enable this
functionality.
Q2 How to I prevent diald being activated on my pc bootling linux.
thanks
Robert Fernando
John Hasler wrote:
robert fernand
robert fernando writes:
> Do I need to get diald and pppd working together if I want to support
> dial in connections and ppp out to my isp.
You don't need diald at all. Pppd supports demand dialing. Run pppconfig,
go to 'Advanced', and select 'Demand'.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Has
Q1 How do I reconfigure a Debian 3.x system 2.2.20-idepci so that the
default route is not tied to the sl0 / slip device.
eth0 is setup to be connected to a 3c509 ethernert card.
Why do I need to do this.
It appears that having sl0 atached to the default route before doing a
dial up which uses ppp cau
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 02:35:19AM +0100, robert fernando wrote:
> Hi all,
> Q1 How do I reconfigure a Debian 3.x system 2.2.20-idepci so that the
> default route is not tied to the sl0 / slip device.
> eth0 is setup to be connected to a 3c509 ethernert card.
>
> Why do I nee
Hello
robert fernando (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> Andreas Janssen (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
>> robert fernando (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
>>
>>>Q1 How do I reconfigure a Debian 3.x system 2.2.20-idepci so that
>>>the default route is not
(<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
>
>
>>Q1 How do I reconfigure a Debian 3.x system 2.2.20-idepci so that the
>>default route is not tied to the sl0 / slip device.
>>eth0 is setup to be connected to a 3c509 ethernert card.
>>
>>Why do I need to do this.
>&g
Hello
robert fernando (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> Q1 How do I reconfigure a Debian 3.x system 2.2.20-idepci so that the
> default route is not tied to the sl0 / slip device.
> eth0 is setup to be connected to a 3c509 ethernert card.
>
> Why do I need to do this.
> It
Hi all,
Q1 How do I reconfigure a Debian 3.x system 2.2.20-idepci so that the
default route is not tied to the sl0 / slip device.
eth0 is setup to be connected to a 3c509 ethernert card.
Why do I need to do this.
It appears that having sl0 atached to the default route before doing a
dial up
Thanks for your reply.
Matt Foster wrote:
Quoting Jerome BENOIT ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Thanks for your reply: fellowing the below advice
I wrote an adquate script that I put in the directory
/etc/network/if-post-down.d
to set a default route when it is missing:
route add default gw
According to
e to 'man interfaces' for even more help.
Thank you to Greg and Marc.
-Chad-
On Sunday, September 21, 2003, at 12:55 PM, Greg Folkert wrote:
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 12:10, Chad M Stewart wrote:
Where is the proper place in debian to define the default route?
I've
got my own h
* Chad M Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030921 18:10]:
> Where is the proper place in debian to define the default route? I've
> got my own hack, but I'd like to know the 'proper' place.
In the file /etc/network/interfaces with a "gateway"-line.
Chad M Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Where is the proper place in debian to define the default route?
> I've got my own hack, but I'd like to know the 'proper' place.
You probably want a 'gateway' line in /etc/network/interfaces on
exactl
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 12:10, Chad M Stewart wrote:
> Where is the proper place in debian to define the default route? I've
> got my own hack, but I'd like to know the 'proper' place.
/etc/network/interfaces:
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.1.200
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 12:10:23PM -0400, Chad M Stewart wrote:
> Where is the proper place in debian to define the default route? I've
> got my own hack, but I'd like to know the 'proper' place.
Unless you're doing something truly outrageous, there should
Where is the proper place in debian to define the default route? I've
got my own hack, but I'd like to know the 'proper' place.
-Chad-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
one of my machines just lost its default route out of the blue. it's
not hacked, and process accounting shows absolutely no actions on
root's part which could have led to this. so the only real thing i can
think of is an ICMP redirection, and
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0/allow_redirect
that the normal
> startup works?
Check /etc/network/interfaces.
In your eth0 stanza if you have a gateway line remove it.
restart networking (/etc/init.d/networking restart) And you should see that
you now don't have a default route.
It will stay this way after a reboot.
Yours Tony.
/*
*
Hi!
I have a Debian Sid with PPPoE, using two network cards.
My problem is, that I have to do a
"route del default" and then start PPPoE every time I want to connect to
the net. Does anyone have an idea what I have to do so that the normal
startup works?
Tnx
Karl
from there if
> > I were a little less ignorant). Any help would be most appreciated.
>
> Do you have a "gateway" directive within the eth0 stanza in
> /etc/network/interfaces? If so, comment it out. When networking is
> restarted, a default route on eth0 will not be
the lists, experimentation, or the
> man page (although I probably should be able to from there if
> I were a little less ignorant). Any help would be most appreciated.
Do you have a "gateway" directive within the eth0 stanza in
/etc/network/interfaces? If so, comment it out. When ne
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 08:59:43AM -0500, Mike Missett wrote:
> Remove that defaultroute and ppp shoul work."
>
> I think this is what I need to do, my question is, how do I do it?
route del default
--
When we reduce our own liberties to stop terrorism, the terrorists
have already won. - reveri
I seem to be having the same problem as some other people in
the mailing lists, namely, that the defaultroute for ppp is going
to eth0 when that's not my connection. Advising somebody a
week or so ago John Hasler suggested:
"You probably have a defaultroute pointing to eth0 and pppd won't
replace
UG0 00 eth0
I configured my ppp connection with pppconfig, and I have defaultroute
set. However, a default route already exists (it points to the lan gateway).
When I build up a connection using pon it connects, retrieves an
IP and the nameservers, but it does NOT set a new
n /etc back to what they were before (I had a temporary static
> id, different domainname). I tried to understand where wvdial sets (or
> should set) the route but not to avail.
>
> Where do I tell wvdial to automatically set the route ?
I'm not sure you can. pppd should add the
Hello !
I had potato on my machine until recently. To upgrade, I took my
machine to work, edited /etc/networks/interface to use eth0 (instead
of the ppp-link I ordinary use) and upgraded to woody.
Now at home I want to use the ppp-link again. Unfortunately after
wvdial I have to add the ppp-route
I have a Woody system (up-to-date), and isdnutils is set up in the
standard way.
in device.ippp0, the default route is being set, i.e., right after
typing "/etc/init.d/restart", a default route to ippp0 is set.
But when I dial out with "isdnctrl dial ippp0", the default ro
I have a Woody system (up-to-date), and isdnutils is set up in the
standard way.
in device.ippp0, the default route is being set, i.e., right after
typing "/etc/init.d/restart", a default route to ippp0 is set.
But when I dial out with "isdnctrl dial ippp0", the default ro
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 08:42:41PM +1100, Matt Chipman wrote:
> Thanks for all the replies everybody, the problem is still there, and
> whatever route i put in /etc/network/interfaces still doesnt apply at boot.
>
> I am thinking maybe i have to have a package installed that makes the route
> stic
m: "Matt Chipman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2001 11:31 AM
> Subject: default route
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > Just getting used to debian and need to add a default route at boot time.
> i
> > have the route but what file do
relies on?
any ideas?
Thanks
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Chipman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2001 11:31 AM
Subject: default route
> Hi all
>
> Just getting used to debian and need to add a default route at boot time.
i
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 11:31:58AM +1100, Matt Chipman wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Just getting used to debian and need to add a default route at boot time. i
> have the route but what file do i need to add it to?
>
> Currently i add it manually after the machine boots.
>
> Luck
* Matt Chipman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Just getting used to debian and need to add a default route at boot time. i
> have the route but what file do i need to add it to?
Add it in /etc/networks/interface ... (man interfaces)
> Currently i add it man
Hi all
Just getting used to debian and need to add a default route at boot time. i
have the route but what file do i need to add it to?
Currently i add it manually after the machine boots.
Lucky its not windows or i'd have to do it every day at least! :)
thanks
-Matt
an internet address gives me the message "Network is
unreachable". Is this related to the line in mysyslog file where it
says:
Oct 30 16:50:33 overseer pppd[430]: default route ioctl(SIOCADDRT):
Network is unreachable(101)
Oct 30 16:50:33 overseer pppd[430]: Cannot determine ethernet a
That did it!!
I had it all but the "up"
Thanks alot!
Blair
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Armin Joellenbeck wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 06:14:34PM +, Blair M. Cummings wrote:
> > It's not in the same subnet but works when I add a route of .. route add
> > -net 0.0.0.0 netmask 0.0.0.0 dev eth0 m
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 06:14:34PM +, Blair M. Cummings wrote:
> It's not in the same subnet but works when I add a route of .. route add
> -net 0.0.0.0 netmask 0.0.0.0 dev eth0 metric 1.
>
> Thats how I'm able to email you this email (grin)
>
> But I think you are right when it comes to the
It's not in the same subnet but works when I add a route of .. route add
-net 0.0.0.0 netmask 0.0.0.0 dev eth0 metric 1.
Thats how I'm able to email you this email (grin)
But I think you are right when it comes to the interfaces file just asking
for gateway= xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx. I've always had to pu
gt; On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Alberto Brealey wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 03:52:29PM +, Blair M. Cummings wrote:
> > > > I hate to write the list about this but I'm not having much luck with
> > > > keeping a default route after reboot. I was
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 05:55:30PM +, Blair M. Cummings wrote:
> mention. What if the default gateway is in a different subnet? Would that
> make a difference?
gateway has to be on the same subnet, cuz the machine has to know how to get
to that gateway, in order to go elsewhere.
alberto.
0 at 03:52:29PM +, Blair M. Cummings wrote:
> > > I hate to write the list about this but I'm not having much luck with
> > > keeping a default route after reboot. I was able to keep it with a
> >
> > try adding "gateway aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd" at the end
t I'm not having much luck with
> > keeping a default route after reboot. I was able to keep it with a
>
> try adding "gateway aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd" at the end of the iface section for the
> interface where the default route should be. this in /etc/network
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 03:52:29PM +, Blair M. Cummings wrote:
> I hate to write the list about this but I'm not having much luck with
> keeping a default route after reboot. I was able to keep it with a
try adding "gateway aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd" at the end of the iface sect
I hate to write the list about this but I'm not having much luck with
keeping a default route after reboot. I was able to keep it with a
statement in /etc/network/interfaces using route add -net 0.0.0.0 netmask
0.0.0.0 dev eth0 metric 1 under Debian 2.1. With the upgrade to 2.2, this
no l
e ppp-howto I find:
e.van. >
e.van. > If pppd refuses to set up a default route, it is because (quite
e.van. > correctly) it refuses to remove/replace an existing default route.
e.van. >
e.van. > The usual reason that this error occurs is that some distributions set
e.van. > u
-howto I find:
If pppd refuses to set up a default route, it is because (quite
correctly) it refuses to remove/replace an existing default route.
The usual reason that this error occurs is that some distributions set
up a default route via your Ethernet card as opposed to setting up a
Hi all,
I'm putting a firewall/proxy server in for a company on Wednesday that will
have a fixed IP number 212.19.66.nn
They also have a WAN with a default gateway 192.1.1.1
How do I set up the routes for that all internet traffic is routed thru the
Debian firewall I'll install but all traffic t
67 matches
Mail list logo
