kj writes:
> Either ways vim.tiny to me is as frustrating as nvi, It's the first
> thing I remove after an install and replace with vim.basic
No need to remove vim-tiny. Whatever vi clone you have most recently
installed will be linked to /usr/bin/vi (you can change the link with
the update-alter
In <4a82e547.3050...@koffiejunkie.za.net>, kj wrote:
>Anyway, my post was not meant to be a debate about vi - just an example
>of something I'd like more information on.
Smaller, fewer dependencies. Both factors make the basic install faster and
make replacing the default take less time for user
Teemu Likonen wrote:
I don't know about your system but Vim has been the default since Debian
Etch.
Since I don't have it on my system anymore, I couldn't check :) John
Hasler corrected me: vim.tiny, not nvi. Either ways vim.tiny to me is
as frustrating as nvi, It's the first thing I remove
On 2009-08-12 13:11 (+0100), kj wrote:
> I don't know and there are many other choices I wonder about. It would
> be nice if there was a page somewhere discussing the choices of
> default packages, and reasons thereof. For example, why old vi (nvi?)
> over vim.
I don't know about your system but V
kj wrote:
> I don't know and there are many other choices I wonder about. It
> would be nice if there was a page somewhere discussing the choices of
> default packages, and reasons thereof. For example, why old vi (nvi?)
> over vim.
In Sid vim-tiny is "Priority: important" which I assume is what
kj wrote:
I don't know and there are many other choices I wonder about. It would
be nice if there was a page somewhere discussing the choices of default
packages, and reasons thereof. For example, why old vi (nvi?) over vim.
--kj
Agree.. the vi-vim gizzy would go on forever however.. lol
I don't know and there are many other choices I wonder about. It would
be nice if there was a page somewhere discussing the choices of default
packages, and reasons thereof. For example, why old vi (nvi?) over vim.
--kj
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oli D wrote:
> In short, I'm wondering why dhclient is still the default considering this
> bug/caveat and possibly if it possible to use dhcpcd as the default DHCP
> client
> on a Debian [Lenny] machine?
Just install dhcpcd (an
Hi,
As the title says, is there any reason why Debian uses dhclient as its default
DHCP client rather than dhcpcd? Are there any issue with dhcpcd I'm unaware of?
I'd really like to know, because as of now I'm having troubles with dhclient as
it refuses to register its hostname to
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 01:50:56AM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 02:14:11PM -0500, Mike Kuhar
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > What is Debian's default DHCP client, pump, dhcp-client or dhcpcd?
> AFAIK, pump. Though you can install others via apt
, November 25, 2001 4:51 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Default DHCP client
on Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 02:14:11PM -0500, Mike Kuhar ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
>
> What is Debian's default DHCP client, pump, dhcp-client or dhcpcd?
AFAIK, pump. Though you can install others
on Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 02:14:11PM -0500, Mike Kuhar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> What is Debian's default DHCP client, pump, dhcp-client or dhcpcd?
AFAIK, pump. Though you can install others via apt as you wish, or from
other sources if you really want.
To search for DCHP relat
What is Debian's default DHCP client, pump, dhcp-client or dhcpcd?
Thank you. -mk
On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 10:56:28PM +1000, Andrew Nesbit wrote:
> What is the default DHCP client with Debian? Is it dhclient or dhcpcd?
It was pump in potato, but will be dhcp-client in woody.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is the default DHCP client with Debian? Is it dhclient or dhcpcd?
TIA
-Andrew
15 matches
Mail list logo
