-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Fri, 29 Aug 1997, David Wright wrote:
> Having got my debian pine 3.96 working correctly, the university has
> upgraded their IMAP server from a beta version to a production version. The
> effect is that my client can no longer read the inbox correctly. I g
owever, the principal use of this information is for debugging
> > > pine /sessions/ (and the default debug level can be set accordingly).
> >
> > Again, there must be very few people interested on this.
>
> I disagree. The debug feature is a standard Pine behaviour. I was ver
On Thu, 7 Aug 1997, Santiago Vila Doncel wrote:
> > I could see your point about -DDEBUG not being appropriate for a
> > production program if the resultant output was only useful for debugging
> > Pine. However, the principal use of this information is for debugging
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tue, 12 Aug 1997, David Wright wrote:
> > Anyway, since the current Debian pine release (3.96L-3) is source-only and
> > you have to compile it by yourself, you can do whatever changes before
> > compiling.
>
> I thought Debian existed partly to avoid all th
On Thu, 7 Aug 1997, Santiago Vila Doncel wrote:
> But it will still create those ugly .pine-debug files. I could be wrong,
> but the only way to disable creation of these files is by not using DEBUG.
Pine is a mail-reading client, which is frequently being used to connect
to servers over which on
tem. Debian maintainers are not always supposed to read this list.
>
> I could see your point about -DDEBUG not being appropriate for a
> production program if the resultant output was only useful for debugging
> Pine. However, the principal use of this information is for debugging
>
your point about -DDEBUG not being appropriate for a
production program if the resultant output was only useful for debugging
Pine. However, the principal use of this information is for debugging
pine /sessions/ (and the default debug level can be set accordingly).
Having the Debian pine package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 6 Aug 1997, David Wright wrote:
> I seem to recall seeing .pine_debug{1,2,3,4} in my home directory on a
> Debian 1.1 or 1.2 machine, but I never see them now (1.3 stable). If I
> type
>
> pine -d 1
>
> I get the sort of output I might expect from
I seem to recall seeing .pine_debug{1,2,3,4} in my home directory on a
Debian 1.1 or 1.2 machine, but I never see them now (1.3 stable). If I
type
pine -d 1
I get the sort of output I might expect from pine --help. Has pine been
compiled without the debug option? If so, this is not correct,
9 matches
Mail list logo
