Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue, 7 Jan 1997, Richard Jones wrote:
> >
> > Yup, I think that maybe my original message wasn't too clear. What I
> > was trying to get at was, when a new upstream release is made and this
> > filters down the stream to a Debian package, will the Debia
On Tue, 7 Jan 1997, Richard Jones wrote:
> > Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > That said, you are referring to the new source package format, which has
> > many nice features, most notably the one you referred to.
> > First, not all packages have been converted to the new source format,
Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue, 7 Jan 1997, Richard Jones wrote:
>
> >
> > Hiya, i thought I saw someone mention that upgrades to existing
> > packages were available via diffs to the source. Thus allowing the download
> > of just the diff rather than the entire .orig source ( a
Richard Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hiya, i thought I saw someone mention that upgrades to existing
> packages were available via diffs to the source.
debian/doc/source-unpack.txt on any mirror.
Guy
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROT
On Tue, 7 Jan 1997, Richard Jones wrote:
>
> Hiya, i thought I saw someone mention that upgrades to existing
> packages were available via diffs to the source. Thus allowing the download
> of just the diff rather than the entire .orig source ( assuming of
> course you have the source to the orig
Hiya, i thought I saw someone mention that upgrades to existing
packages were available via diffs to the source. Thus allowing the download of
just the diff rather than the entire .orig source ( assuming of course you have
the source to the original package online). Now I checked out the FAQ a
6 matches
Mail list logo
