Re: Debian security support for older versions

2003-03-01 Thread Svenn Are Bjerkem
On Saturday 01 March 2003 22:44, Nathan E Norman wrote: > I don't think you could have chosen a worse analogy. Read the thread again. I was replying to Paul Johnson who could not understand that people can need security support for more than three years. To you I would say that Moores law relate

Re: Debian security support for older versions

2003-03-01 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 12:59:11PM +0100, Svenn Are Bjerkem wrote: > On Friday 28 February 2003 11:26, Paul Johnson wrote: > > Why is obscelesence somehow a surprise to people? > > Because you don't expect your vacuum cleaner to > need a new hose every 3 years... ? I don't think you could have ch

Re: Debian security support for older versions

2003-03-01 Thread Svenn Are Bjerkem
On Saturday 01 March 2003 16:07, Paul Johnson wrote: > Software != household appliances They are placed next to each other in many stores. Now even grocery stores offer PC's. Milk, eggs and XP2003 ... Darwin says: Adopt or die. Svenn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: Debian security support for older versions

2003-03-01 Thread Paul Johnson
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 12:59:11PM +0100, Svenn Are Bjerkem wrote: > > Why is obscelesence somehow a surprise to people? > > Because you don't expect your vacuum cleaner to > need a new hose every 3 years... ? Software != household appliances -- .''`. Baloo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :p

Re: Debian security support for older versions

2003-03-01 Thread Svenn Are Bjerkem
On Friday 28 February 2003 11:26, Paul Johnson wrote: > Why is obscelesence somehow a surprise to people? Because you don't expect your vacuum cleaner to need a new hose every 3 years... ? Svenn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E

Re: Debian security support for older versions

2003-02-28 Thread Alvin Oga
hi ya On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Johann Spies wrote: > The article "New Linux support policies are ominous" by Jon Lasser, > Security Focus Online at > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/61/29330.html is disturbing. It not a issue at all ... one usually doesnt pay redhat's $50K/yr support or $300

Re: Debian security support for older versions

2003-02-28 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 11:48:28AM +0200, Johann Spies wrote: > The article "New Linux support policies are ominous" by Jon Lasser, > Security Focus Online at > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/61/29330.html is disturbing. It > highlights new support policies from Mandrake and Redhat that is ba

Re: Debian security support for older versions

2003-02-28 Thread Paul Johnson
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 11:48:28AM +0200, Johann Spies wrote: > The article "New Linux support policies are ominous" by Jon Lasser, > Security Focus Online at > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/61/29330.html is disturbing. It Not really. Is it really too much to ask that you go download free

Re: Debian security support for older versions

2003-02-28 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 11:48:28AM +0200, Johann Spies wrote: > What exactly is Debian's policy regarding security support for older > versions? I know there is still support for potato, but for how long? http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce-0302/msg00010.html > What are the opinions

Debian security support for older versions

2003-02-28 Thread Johann Spies
The article "New Linux support policies are ominous" by Jon Lasser, Security Focus Online at http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/61/29330.html is disturbing. It highlights new support policies from Mandrake and Redhat that is bad for the reputation of Linux in the industry. There is also a refere