> Now, on the other hand...if people simply do not care to learn
> the sytem and
> want to be 'up-and-running quick' then RH and their tools are good.
This worked for me to a point. Redhat was up and running quickly, but then
fell apart when something wouldn't work from the GUI based admin tools.
I agree. Just recently installed Stormix at home and as far as I can tell it
IS Debian, so I'm not sure exactly what it is supposed to be hiding. Stormix
installation is fast and straightforward. I only have a couple of gripes.
Serial mice work during installation but after reboot gpm is pointing t
On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 01:38:17PM -0500, William Jensen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> An advantage of a "steep learning curve" is two-fold. Number one you get a
> nice confidence boost from the effort it took to learn something new and
> challenging. Second is you actually understand what the
William Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> An advantage of a "steep learning curve" is two-fold. Number one you
> get a
> nice confidence boost from the effort it took to learn something new
> and
> challenging. Second is you actually understand what the system is
> doing.
> For example, if
On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 05:37:49PM +0100, Phillip Deackes wrote:
> "Ray Percival" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you have been using FreeBSD I would just get Debian and for the
> > same money you would spend on Storm get a good Debian book. Storm
> > hides to much to really learn from IMO.
>
>
"Ray Percival" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you have been using FreeBSD I would just get Debian and for the
> same money you would spend on Storm get a good Debian book. Storm
> hides to much to really learn from IMO.
Maybe you could elucidate and tell us what exactly Storm Linux hides? I
have
Well i used Stormix for a few months before i installed
Debian potato. I used the free d/l from Stormix so i haven't
seen their documentation. Basically i started with Stormix
before Debian because i assumed the Stormix install would
be easier.
When i installed Debian potato from th
If you have been using FreeBSD I would just get Debian and for the same money
you would spend on Storm get a good Debian book. Storm hides to much to really
learn from IMO.
-- Original Message --
From: "Christopher W. Aiken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 05:01:49PM -0400 or thereabouts, Christopher W. Aiken
wrote:
> I currently use FreeBSD 4.1. I have played with RH, MD,
> SuSE, and Caldera in the past. I like learning new things
> and thought that I would like to try Debian.
>
> As I understand it, Stormix is based on
I currently use FreeBSD 4.1. I have played with RH, MD,
SuSE, and Caldera in the past. I like learning new things
and thought that I would like to try Debian.
As I understand it, Stormix is based on Debian.
Other than different "system installers" and Stormix
has a "graphical" boot screen, are
10 matches
Mail list logo
