On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Bruce Perens wrote:
> I advised Joel to look over the licenses of the individual programs in
> non-free, and decide what he could legally include. I don't know if he'll
> have space.
Since there has been discussion of splitting up non-free, how about
creating a 'non-dist' for
Actually, it looks as if "contrib" made it onto the CD, but non-free did
not.
Bruce
--
Bruce Perens K6BP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key.
PGP fingerprint = 88 6A 15 D0 65 D4 A3 A6 1F 89 6A 76 95 24 87 B3
--
This message was delayed because the list mail
I think the license should be placed in the archive next to the package
so that it is easy to read.
Regarding InfoMagic, I think this time he only has one CD for Debian,
and thus some stuff like "contrib" and "non-free" might not make it on
to the CD.
Thanks
Bruce
--
Bruce Perens
On Mon, 9 Dec 1996, Adam Shand wrote:
> >What I would like to see added to non-free (more than stable/unstable) is
> >the copyright files for each package, already unpacked, so the packages
> >don't need to be unpacked to be investigated. This would make it a lot
> >less work determining which pac
On Mon, 9 Dec 1996, Bruce Perens wrote:
> Regarding InfoMagic, I think this time he only has one CD for Debian,
> and thus some stuff like "contrib" and "non-free" might not make it on
> to the CD.
>
Hmm, the last InfoMagic Developer's Resource had only room for Debian on
not even a whole disk. I
I advised Joel to look over the licenses of the individual programs in
non-free, and decide what he could legally include. I don't know if he'll
have space.
Thanks
Bruce
--
Bruce Perens K6BP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key.
PGP fingerprint = 88 6A
>What I would like to see added to non-free (more than stable/unstable) is
>the copyright files for each package, already unpacked, so the packages
>don't need to be unpacked to be investigated. This would make it a lot
>less work determining which packages might be included under various
>circumst
On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Shaya Potter wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Dale Scheetz wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Shaya Potter wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Karl Ferguson wrote:
> > >
> > > > The whole idea for the "non-free" area is that it belongs to programs
> > > > with
> > > > difficult
Hi Paul, You wrote:
Paul>
Paul> On Sat, 7 Dec 1996, Bruce Perens wrote:
Paul> Please advice Joel Goldberger to include the
Paul> non-free stuff as well because lots of people -- like me ;-) --
Paul> *do* need this software. I already wrote him a message asking
Paul> to do so but your word may
On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Karl Ferguson wrote:
> The whole idea for the "non-free" area is that it belongs to programs with
> difficult copyright notices such as it's not to be distributed etc. I
> seriously doubt that any CD manufacturer will include it on a distributed CD
> because it may well break
Hi Shaya, You wrote:
Shaya>
Shaya> On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Karl Ferguson wrote:
Shaya>
Shaya> This isn't exactly true. A package
Shaya> can go into non-free if commercial use is not allowed. A CD
Shaya> manufacturer can then put the package on the CD if they make a
Shaya> notice that commercial
On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Shaya Potter wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Karl Ferguson wrote:
> >
> > > The whole idea for the "non-free" area is that it belongs to programs with
> > > difficult copyright notices such as it's not to be distributed etc. I
> > >
On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Shaya Potter wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Karl Ferguson wrote:
>
> > The whole idea for the "non-free" area is that it belongs to programs with
> > difficult copyright notices such as it's not to be distributed etc. I
> > seriously doubt that any CD manufacturer will include
On Sun, 8 Dec 1996, Karl Ferguson wrote:
> At 03:09 PM 12/8/96 +0100, Paul Seelig wrote:
> >Please advice Joel Goldberger to include the non-free stuff as well
> >because lots of people -- like me ;-) -- *do* need this software. I
> >already wrote him a message asking to do so but your word may ha
On Sat, 7 Dec 1996, Bruce Perens wrote:
> They will have a real Debian 1.2 release on their CD. It's authorized.
> They've been holding off mastering the CD until I give the go-ahead.
> I will be sending them a list of MD5 checksums tomorrow morning just
> to be sure they get all of the files righ
From: David Welton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Debian - Latest "stable" release (Debian GNU/Linux 1.2)
They will have a real Debian 1.2 release on their CD. It's authorized.
They've been holding off mastering the CD until I give the go-ahead.
I will be sending them a list of MD5 checksums tomorrow morn
According to the Infomagic Web Page for the new 6 CD set:
IM>Mirror date: 1st week of December
Yet, it also states:
IM>* Debian - Latest "stable" release (Debian GNU/Linux 1.2)
So, what I'm wondering is if they are just going to mirror what they found
in the past week on the ftp site? That's
17 matches
Mail list logo
