In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Albert Claret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>As strange as it seems, Infomagic has decided to (for some reason) not
>include Debian in their June Linux Developer's Resource 4 CD-set. In their
>website, http://www.infomagic.com/catalog2.htm#linux, they state that
>the
Pollywog wrote:
>
> On 13-Jun-99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Infomagic should put Debian back on their CDs, but its useless to put
> > so little care into the quality of the product. I guess they figured
> > Debian users aren't real customers. I *used* to be. Not anymore.
> > Hope someone f
David Teague wrote:
> Several have written as WCurry has that
>
> > Infomagic should put Debian back on their CDs, but its useless to put
> > so little care into the quality of the product. I guess they figured
> > Debian users aren't real customers. I *used* to be. Not anymore.
> > Hope someone
On Mon, Jun 14, 1999 at 10:31:35 -0400, David Teague wrote:
> Isn't InfoMagic the outfit who has historically delivered broken or out of
> date Debian stuff on their CDs?
Yes.
> Didn't they put the broken "1.0" on their CD without bothering to check
> the appropriateness with the organization?
T
On Mon, Jun 14, 1999 at 13:10:13 -, Pollywog wrote:
> Is there something magical about Infomagic CD's?
The only thing magical about them (besides having broken or out of date
Debian packages just about every other set) is that they're widely available
in book stores here in Europe.
> I under
Pollywog wrote:
>
> On 13-Jun-99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Infomagic should put Debian back on their CDs, but its useless to put
> > so little care into the quality of the product. I guess they figured
> > Debian users aren't real customers. I *used* to be. Not anymore.
> > Hope someone f
Several have written as WCurry has that
> Infomagic should put Debian back on their CDs, but its useless to put
> so little care into the quality of the product. I guess they figured
> Debian users aren't real customers. I *used* to be. Not anymore.
> Hope someone from Infomagic reads this thre
On 13-Jun-99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Infomagic should put Debian back on their CDs, but its useless to put
> so little care into the quality of the product. I guess they figured
> Debian users aren't real customers. I *used* to be. Not anymore.
> Hope someone from Infomagic reads this thre
As mentioned below, Infomagic put 1.3.1 on the CDs because they couldn't
wait for 2.0. It was really a hassle because they still sent out the
first set (at least) with packaging stating that 2.0 was in the collection.
I took it to my folks' house to load on their new computer 2 weeks after buying
On Sun, Jun 13, 1999 at 11:53:28AM +0200, Albert Claret wrote:
>
> As strange as it seems, Infomagic has decided to (for some reason) not
> include Debian in their June Linux Developer's Resource 4 CD-set. In their
> website, http://www.infomagic.com/catalog2.htm#linux, they state that
> these CDs
As strange as it seems, Infomagic has decided to (for some reason) not
include Debian in their June Linux Developer's Resource 4 CD-set. In their
website, http://www.infomagic.com/catalog2.htm#linux, they state that
these CDs include Red Hat 6.0, SuSe 6.1, Slackware 4.0 and (for the first
time) Ca
11 matches
Mail list logo
