-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Beauregard wrote:
> Oh!! How is it that we are to use amd when the CPU is intel?!!
2 ways:
'ia' stands for Itanium (IIRC), Intel's try at a 64 bit chip.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IA-64
Debian built a distro for both the Intel and AMD 64 bi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> The same way you knew (or didn't) to use i386 (short for: Intel 386) on 32-
> bit AMD processors.
Having been stuck in 32-bit userland since day nought, this has all
thrown me. Is there a good reference link to explain the difference
between these
In <49f0eadb.4070...@sky.com>, Tim Beauregard wrote:
>> You need the "amd64" flavour of Debian.
>
>Oh!! How is it that we are to use amd when the CPU is intel?!!
The same way you knew (or didn't) to use i386 (short for: Intel 386) on 32-
bit AMD processors.
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>> (4x2.83GHz)?
>
> You need the "amd64" flavour of Debian.
Oh!! How is it that we are to use amd when the CPU is intel?!!
Thank you for your advice!
Tim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAknw6tsACgkQsUUd
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 23:19 +0100, Tim Beauregard wrote:
> Its late and this may be a silly question but should I use the ia64
> architecture release to install onto a PC with an Intel Core2 Q9550 CPU
> (4x2.83GHz)?
You need the "amd64" flavour of Debian.
Wolodja
signature.asc
Description: Di
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Its late and this may be a silly question but should I use the ia64
architecture release to install onto a PC with an Intel Core2 Q9550 CPU
(4x2.83GHz)?
The images on http://www.uk.debian.org/distrib/netinst don't work,
however an older i386 i
6 matches
Mail list logo
