On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Seriously! There is no argument that makes this statistic
serious! There is no differential diagnosis...
Rather than just post a snotty remark and leave it at that,
(as I appear to have done) here is something you ought to be
able to sink your fangs i
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Seriously! There is no argument that makes this statistic
serious! There is no differential diagnosis
Please do not throw around psychological/medical terms of
art ("differential diagnosis") in that fashion. It's
embarrassing, as one doesn't know how
I seem to have an issue as well and my cdn error
Scottrocc
roccVegas ent.Inc
> On Feb 13, 2014, at 8:08 AM, "Dave Woyciesjes"
> wrote:
>
>> On 02/12/2014 06:58 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>> On 13/02/14 10:24, lati...@vcn.bc.ca wrote:
>>> Hello List
>>>
>>> I was very alert for almost 14 year
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 11:07 -0500, Dave Woyciesjes wrote:
> On 02/12/2014 06:58 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> > On 13/02/14 10:24, lati...@vcn.bc.ca wrote:
> >> Hello List
> >>
> >> I was very alert for almost 14 years,
> >
> >
> > Great, but I think you're posting to the wrong list.
> > Try trollsr
On 02/12/2014 06:58 PM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 13/02/14 10:24, lati...@vcn.bc.ca wrote:
Hello List
I was very alert for almost 14 years,
Great, but I think you're posting to the wrong list.
Try trollsrus.org or witlingfools.org
HTH
Kind regards
Makes me think of an article I saw y
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:58:48AM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 13/02/14 10:24, lati...@vcn.bc.ca wrote:
> > Hello List
> >
> > I was very alert for almost 14 years,
>
>
> Great, but I think you're posting to the wrong list.
> Try trollsrus.org or witlingfools.org
https://lists.debian.org/
On 13/02/14 20:20, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 12 feb 14, 19:41:00, Erick Ocrospoma wrote:
>>
>> Don't really understand your email, nothing makes sense. This
>> must be considered spam.
>
> You shouldn't reply to spam ;)
Spam?
NSA backdoors, chemical contrails, fluoride pharmacological
consp
On Mi, 12 feb 14, 19:41:00, Erick Ocrospoma wrote:
>
> Don't really understand your email, nothing makes sense. This must be
> considered spam.
You shouldn't reply to spam ;)
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers
2014-02-13 0:24 GMT+01:00 :
> Hello List
>
> I was very alert for almost 14 years, thinking that someone could come
> into Debian distributions, to install some kind of backdoor; but i could
> not imagine that the backdoor has been installed little by little into the
> Debian people, please see, f
>
> [latinfo, are you subscribed to this list? If so we could stop CC'ing
> you]
No, i am not subscribed, but it is not a problem if you CC me. Thanks
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 03:50:33AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 17:55 -0800, lati...@vcn.bc.ca wrote:
>> > Normally in
On 2/13/14, lati...@vcn.bc.ca wrote:
>> On 12 February 2014 18:24, wrote:
>> Don't really understand your email, nothing makes sense. This must be
>> considered spam.
>> Erick.
>
> What worry me, is that usually the decisions are taken with choices, and
> this time there is no choice.
You are
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 10:58 +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> Try trollsrus.org
:D
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1392259005.678.7.camel@archlinux
> On 12 February 2014 18:24, wrote:
>> Hello List
>>
>> I was very alert for almost 14 years, thinking that someone could come
>> into Debian distributions, to install some kind of backdoor; but i could
>> not imagine that the backdoor has been installed little by little into
>> the
>> Debian peo
On 12 February 2014 18:24, wrote:
> Hello List
>
> I was very alert for almost 14 years, thinking that someone could come
> into Debian distributions, to install some kind of backdoor; but i could
> not imagine that the backdoor has been installed little by little into the
> Debian people, please
On 13/02/14 10:24, lati...@vcn.bc.ca wrote:
> Hello List
>
> I was very alert for almost 14 years,
Great, but I think you're posting to the wrong list.
Try trollsrus.org or witlingfools.org
HTH
Kind regards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Hello List
I was very alert for almost 14 years, thinking that someone could come
into Debian distributions, to install some kind of backdoor; but i could
not imagine that the backdoor has been installed little by little into the
Debian people, please see, from
https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/inits
Jeremy MAURO wrote:
> I wonder if someone have successfully create a chroot environment in
> SID? Because I have encountered the following issue:
> # debootstrap --verbose --variant=minbase --arch=amd64 --include
> aptitude sid /var/tmp/TESTING http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/
> ...
> I: Install
Hi everyone,
I wonder if someone have successfully create a chroot environment in
SID? Because I have encountered the following issue:
# debootstrap --verbose --variant=minbase --arch=amd64 --include
aptitude sid /var/tmp/TESTING http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/
I: Retrieving Release
I: Ret
Hi.
Le mercredi 01 septembre 2010 à 17:40 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson
Leighton a écrit :
> i leave you with this: the idea of the "Freedom Box" caused quite a
> stir at debconf2010, but i honestly doubt that, without any experience
> of getting *yourselves* off of the client-server paradigm, there
Hi.
Le mercredi 01 septembre 2010 à 17:40 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson
Leighton a écrit :
>
> * again: ikiwiki or something similar could well be used as the basis
> for a distributed bugtracker.
>
I'd suggest you have a look at the SD tool and the incoming debbugs
support for it developped by C
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Oscar Morante wrote:
> Have you seen this project [1]? It looks like they have been already
> thinking about the git+bittorrent idea.
>
> [1] http://code.google.com/p/gittorrent/
yes. it's effectively shelved. the name "gittorrent" was abandoned
and the name "mi
Have you seen this project [1]? It looks like they have been already
thinking about the git+bittorrent idea.
[1] http://code.google.com/p/gittorrent/
--
Oscar Morante
"Self-education is, I firmly believe, the only kind of education there is."
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
> Just - Wow... thanks!
>
> Hopefully digesting of this tasty post would not cause too much of farting ;-)
:)
> seems might be worth adding (if I am not missing the point), then the
> concept of "derivatives" would then converge finally
I'm glad this was cross posted otherwise I would've missed it. Even if
there are technical hurdles it's an exciting idea and I'm looking
forward to reading the devel mailing list for follow-ups. The point
about eating your own dog food is well made i thought, though whether
there is any interest in
ources to be retargetted to other
>areas which would improve the debian distribution.
>
>mostly that was words, not actual code, and, before getting all upset
>at how little progress has been made (cameron dale's fantastic apt-p2p
>work literally being the only exception )
Just - Wow... thanks!
Hopefully digesting of this tasty post would not cause too much of farting ;-)
seems might be worth adding (if I am not missing the point), then the
concept of "derivatives" would then converge finally to a more
digestible, more manageable, and thus more robust mechanism o
to
> install a Debian distribution onto a computer with a 3.2GHZ Pentium 4
> Prescott (800 FSB), and ASUS P4P800e Deluxe motherboard?
>
> I would have a 250 GB Seagate hard drive. I was thinking of either sarge
> or etch, especially etch since I understand that the beta installer
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 16:29 -0600, Gayle Lee Fairless wrote:
> With a speed of between 1.0 and 1.5 mbs on DSL, how long would it take to
> install a Debian distribution onto a computer with a 3.2GHZ Pentium 4
> Prescott (800 FSB), and ASUS P4P800e Deluxe motherboard?
>
> I woul
With a speed of between 1.0 and 1.5 mbs on DSL, how long would it take to
install a Debian distribution onto a computer with a 3.2GHZ Pentium 4
Prescott (800 FSB), and ASUS P4P800e Deluxe motherboard?
I would have a 250 GB Seagate hard drive. I was thinking of either sarge
or etch, especially
Gilbert, Joseph writes:
> Well, the version number of sendmail in stable (just one example) seems
> to be pretty old - 8.12.3. There are known exploits (buffer overflows,
> etc.)
The fixes were _backported_ to 8.12.3 by Debian security. This closes the
holes without the changes in functionality
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"Gilbert, Joseph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> If you are worried about security and stability issues, install
>> stable. period. This is the most preferred way.
>
> I do not think stable is necessarily the best if you are very concerned
> about se
table being less secure than testing.
Joe
-Original Message-
From: s. keeling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 3:14 PM
To: debian-user
Subject: Re: faq on choosing a debian distribution - draft 1
Incoming from Gilbert, Joseph:
>
> From: John Hasler [ma
Incoming from Gilbert, Joseph:
>
> From: John Hasler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > I do not think stable is necessarily the best if you are very
> > > concerned
> > > about security. Packages with recent security fixes can take time to
> > > make it into stable.
>
> > Stable gets backported s
to make it into woody pretty quickly but this is two examples of key
services that do not appear to be current.
Joe
-Original Message-
From: John Hasler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 11:08 AM
To: debian-user
Subject: Re: faq on choosing a debian distribution
s. keeling writes:
> Fixes go into _unstable_ first. Then (if they're accepted) they go into
> _stable_. Eventually, they trickle down (up?) into _testing_.
New packages (including ones with security fixes from upstream or the
maintainer) go into Unstable and then propagate to Testing. A very f
Joe writes:
> I do not think stable is necessarily the best if you are very concerned
> about security. Packages with recent security fixes can take time to
> make it into stable.
Stable gets backported security fixes very promptly.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Incoming from Gilbert, Joseph:
>
> > If you are worried about security and stability issues,
> > install stable. period.
Correct!
> I do not think stable is necessarily the best if you are very concerned
> about security. Packages with recent security fixes can take time to make
> it into stab
> If you are worried about security and stability issues,
install stable. period.
> This is the most preferred way.
I do not think stable is necessarily the best if you are very concerned
about security. Packages with recent security fixes can take time to make
it into stable. I have found te
about new questions. If you can attach both
question and corresponding answers that would be great.
3) Any other advice?
***
choosing a debian distribution
***
1. How many Debian distributions are there?
Read http://www.debia
/useless?
2) Obviously the set of questions is not a complete list. I would like
to receive suggestions about new questions. If you can attach both
question and corresponding answers that would be great.
3) Any other advice?
***
choosing a debian distribution
questions is not a complete list. I would like
to receive suggestions about new questions. If you can attach both
question and corresponding answers that would be great.
3) Any other advice?
***
choosing a debian distribution
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 03:38:45PM +0100, Santo Caruso wrote:
> Dear Debian,
>
> I'm new italian user of your system.
> I would to distribuite Debian woody to another people but what I find part
> of your packages with non-free software for ask then autorization for
> distribution?
You need to ch
"Santo Caruso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm new italian user of your system.
> I would to distribuite Debian woody to another people but what I find part
> of your packages with non-free software for ask then autorization for
> distribution?
You would have to study the license of each single
Dear Debian,
I'm new italian user of your system.
I would to distribuite Debian woody to another people but what I find part
of your packages with non-free software for ask then autorization for
distribution?
Sincerly,
Santo Caruso
---
Santino "skyweb" Caruso
Membro CS-LUG (Cosenza Linux User G
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 04:22:06PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
> I remember I read after potato was released as stable that Debian would
> start a new concept for the building of the distribution. I haven't heard
> much after that. Does anybody know if there are any plans / discussions
> about thi
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 04:22:06PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
> I remember I read after potato was released as stable that Debian would
> start a new concept for the building of the distibution. I haven't heard
> much after that. Does anybody know if there are any plans / discussions
> about this
I remember I read after potato was released as stable that Debian would
start a new concept for the building of the distibution. I haven't heard
much after that. Does anybody know if there are any plans / discussions
about this? I am asking because if the number of packages in Debian
keeps increasi
> -Original Message-
> From: D-Man [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2001 8:12 PM
> To: Debian-User
> Subject: Re: Debian Distribution
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 08:12:43PM -0400, Scott Henson wrote:
> | I am very intrested in try
On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 08:12:43PM -0400, Scott Henson wrote:
> I am very intrested in trying the debian distribution, but I am having
> trouble with the way debian wants me to get the cd. I really dont feel like
http://cdimage.debian.org/
It was on the download page, of all h
On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 08:12:43PM -0400, Scott Henson wrote:
| I am very intrested in trying the debian distribution, but I am having
| trouble with the way debian wants me to get the cd. I really dont feel like
| spending money on something i could get for free, so i dont want to pay for
| a cd
I am very intrested in trying the debian distribution, but I am having
trouble with the way debian wants me to get the cd. I really dont feel like
spending money on something i could get for free, so i dont want to pay for
a cd set. Also I am having some real trouble with this program that the
Hi!
I'd recomend Storm Linux (http://www.stormix.com). It's a great distribution
based on Debian, with all the packages compatible. The instalation is even
simpler than Mandrake or RedHat, and the plug-and-pray device configuration
is very easy with SAS. It's a really great product.
[]s
Guilhe
>Someone wrote me an e-mail and included an URL to a seller of
>-|"Official" Debian that included free support.
That was
www.libranet.com
They do a debian distro variation for $25, looks interesting, here's a paste
from their 'support' page, where the 'debian users' are mentioned.
>Support
>
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:26:35AM -0500, Holp, John Mr. wrote:
> Debian People,
>
> Someone wrote me an e-mail and included an URL to a seller of
> "Official" Debian that included free support. Please re-send the URL as I
> have lost it.
>
This list is the best free support I hav
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Holp, John Mr. wrote:
-|Debian People,
-|
-| Someone wrote me an e-mail and included an URL to a seller of
-|"Official" Debian that included free support. Please re-send the URL as I
-|have lost it.
-|
-|Thanks,
-|
-|John
-|
Look here: http://www.debian.org/distrib/vendo
* Holp, John Mr. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010108 11:27]:
> Someone wrote me an e-mail and included an URL to a seller of
> "Official" Debian that included free support. Please re-send the URL
> as I have lost it.
http://www.debian.org/consultants/
Debian People,
Someone wrote me an e-mail and included an URL to a seller of
"Official" Debian that included free support. Please re-send the URL as I
have lost it.
Thanks,
John
mikej wrote:
> Hi, my question is simple. When can we expect to see the new Debian
> distribution out. It has already been over a year since the last release.
>
> Any time soon??
>
> Thanks Mike Jennings
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] &
On Fri, 7 Apr 2000, mikej wrote:
> Hi, my question is simple. When can we expect to see the new Debian
> distribution out. It has already been over a year since the last release.
You can visit www.debian.org and see the available releases.
I think on the unstable release, you could g
Hi, my question is simple. When can we expect to see the new Debian
distribution out. It has already been over a year since the last release.
Any time soon??
Thanks Mike Jennings
Friends,
Linux - Debian Distribution was installed in my machine successfully, after
the command above:
boot: linux aha1542=0x134
Thanks,
[ ] Ailton S. A.
From: "Ailton Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: LI
Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: LINUX installation - Debian Distribution
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 14:10:42 -0500
> Interface - Adaptec SCSI, model AHA1540CF/AHA1542CF:
> IRQ 11, DMA 5, ID 7 PORT 134h
>
> Interface - Adaptec SCSI, model AHA1540CF/AHA1542CF:
> IRQ 11, DMA 5, ID 7 PORT 134h
> BIOS Revisao 2.02 Ender. Base DC000h
> FIRMWARE Revisao E.0 Soma Verific 4B81h
> HD ID 0 and PORT 80h
>
Here is something from a previous post that might help:
Friends,
I need assistance for to install a LINUX 2.0.29 at my machine using a Debian
distribution.
Configuration:
Machine - 486DX2, 66MHZ, RAM-16MB and HD-1GB(SEAGATE ST31230N.
Interface - Adaptec SCSI, model AHA1540CF/AHA1542CF:
IRQ 11, DMA 5, ID 7 PORT 134h
BIOS
Hi,
I'm a happy debian user with an old server that i haven't figured until
this weekend
that it was open relayed, and even worse, the version of smail it's
currently using doesn't support relay options, my system is a Debian
1.2, and i really would like to stick on the libc5, the machine is quite
[Well, I fowarded one negative comment. Here is a positive comment that
webmaster recieved - Darren]
I thought Debian was a rag-tag kludge loosely gopped together on the
Internet. After reading reviews of Debian 2.0
and visiting your website, I have to say that I am extremely impressed.
The info
ectly!!
Thanks a lot!
Paul.
>--
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: 13 October 1998 17:46
>To:Moore, Paul
>Cc:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Getting at Debian distribution files
>
>"Moore, Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> write
> An alternative would be to mount the CD on a Windows 95 or NT box on the
> LAN, and pull the packages off the CD via FTP or NFS, but this would
> require a FTP/NFS server for 95 or NT which will handle translation of
> filenames based on TRANS.TBL files - something which I haven't been able
> t
"Moore, Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I'm trying to install Debian on a PC at work. I have the Debian 2.0
| Official CD from CheapBytes, which installed fine on my home PC (which
| has a CD drive).
[snip]
| I have a network connection, so I could get the stuff from the debian
| ftp site direc
milar case (firewall, DHCP leases,
etc., but with a CD on my PC so installation was a tad simpler).
Martin
>From: "Moore, Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'Debian Users'"
>Subject: Getting at Debian distribution files
>Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 16:11:5
Hi,
I'm trying to install Debian on a PC at work. I have the Debian 2.0
Official CD from CheapBytes, which installed fine on my home PC (which
has a CD drive).
The work PC has no CD drive, but it *does* have a network connection.
I have got the install through to the point of running dselect as r
I'm trying to make my PS/2 LiNUX ALiVE
In order to install LiNUX on an MCA(PS/2) system, DRV and RESCUE must be
patched for MCA.
Is the 'Official' distribution take care of the MCA ?
I've found DRV and RESCUE disks to be able to install BASE floppies :)
System is coming to LiFE, but on reboot
On Mon, 17 Nov 1997, Ranty wrote:
> I have an slow link (33.600bps modem) so I can not go around downloading
> too many things, but I have the chance of getting all of it via ethernet, the
> problem is:
> -I have to get it in about 300MB pieces. I mean, I have plenty of room
> in my co
On Mon, 17 Nov 1997, Ranty wrote:
> I have an slow link (33.600bps modem) so I can not go around downloading
> too many things, but I have the chance of getting all of it via ethernet, the
> problem is:
> -I have to get it in about 300MB pieces. I mean, I have plenty of room
> in my co
I have an slow link (33.600bps modem) so I can not go around downloading
too many things, but I have the chance of getting all of it via ethernet, the
problem is:
-I have to get it in about 300MB pieces. I mean, I have plenty of room
in my computer, but the notebook I have to use to
If your motherboard is set up to boot from CD and the "Boot" CD is still
in the drive, it might give out that message. Pop the CD out and see what
happens. If you determine your boot block really is clobbered,
we can tell you how to replace it.
I doubt, at this point, that a virus is to blame.
I installed Debian from the CD-ROM distributed with BOOT magazine. The
computer is a Pentium 200 with 4Gb partitioned into a Win95 half and
Linux partitions. Everything went well until I installed Loadlin to
boot Linux from Win95 Boot prompt (following the instructions in
Loadlin+Win95 mini-HOWT
he release is 1.1.11.
I used dselect to upgrade---a really nice job. Thanks to you all!
Max Hyre
--- Start of forwarded message ---
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 96 17:27:02 EST
From: Max Hyre
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: A couple of problems with November 199
78 matches
Mail list logo
