RE: Debian Compatibility for CISCO UCS Servers

2015-10-12 Thread Dilan Wijesooriya
; 'Noufel Ibrahim'; 'Asanaka Jayakody' Subject: Re: Debian Compatibility for CISCO UCS Servers * Dilan Wijesooriya: > We need to install (bare metal ) Dabian 7 and Dabian 8 for bellow > CISCO Server model (Quantity 2) , can you pls let us know the > compatibility Of

Re: Debian Compatibility for CISCO UCS Servers

2015-10-12 Thread Florian Weimer
provider to self-certify Debian compatibility, ideally before buying their hardware. Regards, Florian

Re: Debian compatibility with US Robotics USR5637 external USB modem

2010-02-27 Thread green
Mark Allums wrote at 2010-02-26 00:06 -0700: > I would like to suggest another option. A router that can accept 3G > cellular internet air cards. I use a Cradlepoint router and a > Pantech USB modem UM175. Works astonishingly well, and you don't > have to teach Debian anything. You just need a

Re: Debian compatibility with US Robotics USR5637 external USB modem

2010-02-27 Thread Mark Allums
On 2/27/2010 1:34 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: Mark Allums put forth on 2/26/2010 1:06 AM: On 2/25/2010 11:09 PM, Peter Tenenbaum wrote: -- partially as an emergency backup for the network, but mainly so that I can run a fax and answering machine app on the computer and get rid of my extremely

Re: Debian compatibility with US Robotics USR5637 external USB modem

2010-02-26 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Mark Allums put forth on 2/26/2010 1:06 AM: > On 2/25/2010 11:09 PM, Peter Tenenbaum wrote: >> -- partially as an emergency backup for the network, >> but mainly so that I can run a fax and answering machine app on the >> computer and get rid of my extremely low-quality answering machine. > I wo

Re: Debian compatibility with US Robotics USR5637 external USB modem

2010-02-26 Thread Celejar
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:09:19 -0800 Peter Tenenbaum wrote: ... > >From what I've seen out there, the US Robotics USR5637 looks like a > promising option: it's a small (almost tiny) external modem which connects > via USB, and purports to have Linux support. My question: has anyone had > any ex

Re: Debian compatibility with US Robotics USR5637 external USB modem

2010-02-26 Thread Camaleón
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:09:19 -0800, Peter Tenenbaum wrote: > I'm getting ready to assemble a computer, and intend to use Debian Linux > as the OS. In addition to everything else I want to have a 56k modem > for the computer -- partially as an emergency backup for the network, > but mainly so that

Re: Debian compatibility with US Robotics USR5637 external USB modem

2010-02-25 Thread Mark Allums
On 2/25/2010 11:09 PM, Peter Tenenbaum wrote: Hi there -- I'm getting ready to assemble a computer, and intend to use Debian Linux as the OS. In addition to everything else I want to have a 56k modem for the computer -- partially as an emergency backup for the network, but mainly so that I can

Re: Debian compatibility with US Robotics USR5637 external USB modem

2010-02-25 Thread Mark Allums
On 2/25/2010 11:09 PM, Peter Tenenbaum wrote: Hi there -- I'm getting ready to assemble a computer, and intend to use Debian Linux as the OS. In addition to everything else I want to have a 56k modem for the computer -- partially as an emergency backup for the network, but mainly so that I can

Debian compatibility with US Robotics USR5637 external USB modem

2010-02-25 Thread Peter Tenenbaum
Hi there -- I'm getting ready to assemble a computer, and intend to use Debian Linux as the OS. In addition to everything else I want to have a 56k modem for the computer -- partially as an emergency backup for the network, but mainly so that I can run a fax and answering machine app on the compu

Debian compatibility: PowerPC MPC875

2006-03-22 Thread Josef Angermeier
Hello sorry, didn't get it for sure: Is Debian already ported for PowerQUICC MPC875 (MPC885 family) ? Thanks Josef -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Debian compatibility with Mac G4 computer, and will it runBlender 3-d modeling software, which runs under Linux?

2003-06-06 Thread Kevin McKinley
On Thu, 05 Jun 2003 12:37:33 -0500 Daniel Fredrickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please respond to the questions in the subject line: Debian compatibility > with Mac G4 computer, and will it run Blender3-d modeling software, which > runs under Linux? (Blender is open sou

Re: Debian compatibility with Mac G4 computer, and will it run Blender 3-d modeling software, which runs under Linux?

2003-06-06 Thread Clive Menzies
On (05/06/03 12:37), Daniel Fredrickson wrote: > Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 12:37:33 -0500 > Subject: Debian compatibility with Mac G4 computer, and will it run > Blender 3-d modeling software, which runs under Linux? > From: Daniel Fredrickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: Debian compatibility with Mac G4 computer, and will it run Blender 3-d modeling software, which runs under Linux?

2003-06-06 Thread Frank Gevaerts
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 09:55:48AM +0100, David Goodenough wrote: > On Thursday 05 June 2003 21:15, Clive Menzies wrote: > > On (05/06/03 12:37), Daniel Fredrickson wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 12:37:33 -0500 > > > Subject: Debian compatibility with Mac G

Debian compatibility with Mac G4 computer, and will it runBlender 3-d modeling software, which runs under Linux?

2003-06-06 Thread Daniel Fredrickson
Please respond to the questions in the subject line: Debian compatibility with Mac G4 computer, and will it run Blender3-d modeling software, which runs under Linux? (Blender is open source and free at www.blender3d.org) Thanks for any advice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Debian compatibility with Mac G4 computer, and will it run Blender 3-d modeling software, which runs under Linux?

2003-06-06 Thread David Goodenough
On Thursday 05 June 2003 21:15, Clive Menzies wrote: > On (05/06/03 12:37), Daniel Fredrickson wrote: > > Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 12:37:33 -0500 > > Subject: Debian compatibility with Mac G4 computer, and will it run > > Blender 3-d modeling software, which runs under Li

Re: Debian compatibility

2001-04-19 Thread D-Man
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 12:22:07PM -0400, Hall Stevenson wrote: | > That "Content-type: text/plain" shows that the message was sent in | > plain text. Any half-*** mailer should allow you to view all message | > headers when you want, so you can see exactly what is going on. | | So Outlook Expres

Re: Debian compatibility

2001-04-19 Thread Andre Berger
* D-Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2001-04-19 17:58 +0200: > PS. Does anyone know how to instruct mutt to view the text/plain part > of a message by default with both text/plain and text/html parts? Here's what I use: auto_view text/html text/enriched application/x-gunzip \ application/po

Re: Debian compatibility

2001-04-19 Thread Hall Stevenson
Thu, 19 Apr 2001 11:47:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 11:47:21 -0400 From: D-Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Debian compatibility Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mail-Followup-To: debian-user@lists.debian.org References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Debian compatibility

2001-04-19 Thread D-Man
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 02:26:35AM -0500, Jason Pepas wrote: | By the way, while on the topic of email formatting, I have noticed that | some of the list seems to prefer correspondence to be sent in plain text | rather than html formatted. Yes. I, for example, use mutt+less to view mail. It does

Re: Debian compatibility

2001-04-19 Thread Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier
Hey there Jason, > By the way, while on the topic of email formatting, I have noticed that > some of the list seems to prefer correspondence to be sent in plain text > rather than html formatted. Yup. > I must admit, I am a relative newbie to Debian, and email is one of the > last bastions hol

Re: Debian compatibility

2001-04-19 Thread Jason Pepas
checking if it actually works. so, is it working? jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] jason.pepas.com - Original Message - From: "Osamu Aoki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Robert Barrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 1:32 AM Subject: Re: Debian co

Re: Debian compatibility

2001-04-19 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 08:45:13PM -0500, Robert Barrett wrote: > > Will Debian Gnu/Linux 2.2 run on compaq pentium III and > AMD Athlon processors free of problems ? > Thank you for your attention to this matter. No problemo senior... But that is about OS and hardware. Debian is RTFM distributi

Debian compatibility

2001-04-18 Thread Robert Barrett
Will Debian Gnu/Linux 2.2 run on compaq pentium III and AMD Athlon processors free of problems ? Thank you for your attention to this matter. Robert r barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Houston, texas FAX 281 4691715

Re: Debian compatibility with MP3 devices

2001-04-18 Thread brian moore
On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 02:17:53PM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote: > "Noah L. Meyerhans" wrote: > > > > Hey all. I am considering purchasing some kind of small portable mp3 > > player, but I don't want to get one that can only download its songs > > from a Windows box. I know that there's kernel suppo

Re: Debian compatibility with MP3 devices

2001-04-15 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 05:54:32PM +0200, Robert Voigt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Sunday 15 April 2001 16:51, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote: > > Hey all. I am considering purchasing some kind of small portable mp3 > > player, but I don't want to get one that can only download its songs > > > > >fr

Re: Debian compatibility with MP3 devices

2001-04-15 Thread Erik Steffl
"Noah L. Meyerhans" wrote: > > Hey all. I am considering purchasing some kind of small portable mp3 > player, but I don't want to get one that can only download its songs > from a Windows box. I know that there's kernel support for a USB link > to a Diamond Rio 500 (and later models?). But it s

Re: Debian compatibility with MP3 devices

2001-04-15 Thread Nate Amsden
"Noah L. Meyerhans" wrote: > > Hey all. I am considering purchasing some kind of small portable mp3 > player, but I don't want to get one that can only download its songs > from a Windows box. I know that there's kernel support for a USB link > to a Diamond Rio 500 (and later models?). But it s

Re: Debian compatibility with MP3 devices

2001-04-15 Thread Mike
Noah L. Meyerhans wrote: > Hey all. I am considering purchasing some kind of small portable mp3 > player, but I don't want to get one that can only download its songs > from a Windows box. I know that there's kernel support for a USB link > to a Diamond Rio 500 (and later models?). But it seems

Re: Debian compatibility with MP3 devices

2001-04-15 Thread Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier
On Sun, 15 Apr 2001, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote: > Hey all. I am considering purchasing some kind of small portable mp3 > player, but I don't want to get one that can only download its songs > from a Windows box. I know that there's kernel support for a USB link > to a Diamond Rio 500 (and later mo

Re: Debian compatibility with MP3 devices

2001-04-15 Thread Robert Voigt
On Sunday 15 April 2001 16:51, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote: > Hey all. I am considering purchasing some kind of small portable mp3 > player, but I don't want to get one that can only download its songs > > >from a Windows box. I know that there's kernel support for a USB link > > to a Diamond Rio 500

Debian compatibility with MP3 devices

2001-04-15 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
Hey all. I am considering purchasing some kind of small portable mp3 player, but I don't want to get one that can only download its songs from a Windows box. I know that there's kernel support for a USB link to a Diamond Rio 500 (and later models?). But it seems like there are better players out

Re: Debian compatibility(?)

2001-01-15 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 03:24:09PM -0800, Xucaen wrote: > > --- "Michael P. Soulier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > think so. Debian requires that > > all packages installed be done through it's > > packaging tools to maintain it's > > database. It also lays things out on the file > > system a l

Re: Debian compatibility(?)

2001-01-15 Thread John Hasler
Michael P. Soulier writes: > think so. Debian requires that all packages installed be done > through it's packaging tools to maintain it's database. Not true. You can install whatever you want in /usr/local and it will work fine. The packaging system just won't know about it. Xucaen writes: > w

Re: Debian compatibility(?)

2001-01-15 Thread Chris Gray
On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > --- "Michael P. Soulier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> think so. Debian requires that >> all packages installed be done through it's >> packaging tools to maintain it's >> database. It also lays things out on the file >> system a little differen

Re: Debian compatibility(?)

2001-01-15 Thread David Z. Maze
Xucaen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: X> "Michael P. Soulier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MPS> think so. Debian requires that all packages installed be done MPS> through it's packaging tools to maintain it's database. It also MPS> lays things out on the file system a little differently (better MP

Debian compatibility(?)

2001-01-15 Thread Xucaen
--- "Michael P. Soulier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > think so. Debian requires that > all packages installed be done through it's > packaging tools to maintain it's > database. It also lays things out on the file > system a little differently > (better than most). what's this?? Does this mean