On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 05:39:32PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>
> Updating of RedHat/Fedora machines are the HELL.
> This is WHY I am dedicated "Debian GNU/Linux Consultant".
>
Actually, if you are fortunate enough to have a homogeneous environment
(or mostly so), Red Hat can be handled very
Am 2006-12-13 09:28:52, schrieb Ken Hu:
> Our company choose RedHat(before) and CentOS(now) as our main web server
> just because the availability of the hardware drivers.
>
> Usually we use IBM's PC servers with hardware raid and we can only get
> the driver of the raid controller card for RHEL
Am 2006-12-12 23:38:35, schrieb Justin Hartman:
> Forgive me if I am posting this to the wrong list but I am not sure
> where this kind of a email would be posted to. That said, I am
> interested to find out people's perspective on running Debian stable
> as a web server in a production environment
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 12:43:53AM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
>
> I guess you missed my point.
>
> The point is, the setup for the webserver stuff and the modules to be
> loaded by it... and the bind configuration and the configurations it
> uses. The "split config" setups in Exim and Apache and
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 21:00 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 08:53:37PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 18:54 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > >>
> > >> cPanel and Plesk plus others have support for the stable versions of
> > >> Debian (cPanel eve
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 08:53:37PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 18:54 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> >>
> >> cPanel and Plesk plus others have support for the stable versions of
> >> Debian (cPanel even still supports Woody, though that is changed
> >> shortly)
> >>
> >T
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 18:54 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>>
>> cPanel and Plesk plus others have support for the stable versions of
>> Debian (cPanel even still supports Woody, though that is changed
>> shortly)
>>
>There is also webmin, which keeps up quite nicely even with Sid, IIRC.
Webmi
On 12/12/06, Justin Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sure you're wrong. Debian was showed as #1 in the web servers that
> publishes the distribution info by Netcraft some time ago (nothing
> more than 1 or 2 years ago).
I'm sure I am and I was really making this statement based on my own
Our company choose RedHat(before) and CentOS(now) as our main web server
just because the availability of the hardware drivers.
Usually we use IBM's PC servers with hardware raid and we can only get
the driver of the raid controller card for RHEL .
If anyone can shed some light on me to let me k
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 06:01:01PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
>
> cPanel and Plesk plus others have support for the stable versions of
> Debian (cPanel even still supports Woody, though that is changed
> shortly)
>
There is also webmin, which keeps up quite nicely even with Sid, IIRC.
>
> Etch
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 12:03:39AM +0200, Justin Hartman wrote:
>
> >Actually, we're working very hard to polish our next release (Etch)
> >and i suggest you give it a try.
>
> Honestly I really want to give Debian a try as one of my production
> servers. I don't know how difficult it will be to
a web server in a production environment.
>
Well, this is from about a year ago, but it appears that people really
like Debian as a web server platform:
http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2005/12/05/strong_growth_for_debian.html
> I have noticed that Red Hat, Suse, CentOS, Fedora, etc. appea
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 23:38 +0200, Justin Hartman wrote:
> I own two dedicated web servers and they run Red Hat and CentOS but
> what makes them different to Debian? I have done a lot of reading and
> research on Debian and my impression of, particularly stable is that
> it is one of the most relia
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 00:03 +0200, Justin Hartman wrote:
> > I'm sure you're wrong. Debian was showed as #1 in the web servers that
> > publishes the distribution info by Netcraft some time ago (nothing
> > more than 1 or 2 years ago).
>
> I'm sure I am and I was really making this statement based
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:03:39 +0200
"Justin Hartman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm sure you're wrong. Debian was showed as #1 in the web servers
> > that publishes the distribution info by Netcraft some time ago
> > (nothing more than 1 or 2 years
Justin Hartman writes:
> I own two dedicated web servers and they run Red Hat and CentOS but what
> makes them different to Debian?
Marketing.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm sure you're wrong. Debian was showed as #1 in the web servers that
publishes the distribution info by Netcraft some time ago (nothing
more than 1 or 2 years ago).
I'm sure I am and I was really making this statement based on my own
perception more than any hard facts. I think what may be cau
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 23:38 +0200, Justin Hartman wrote:
> I have noticed that Red Hat, Suse, CentOS, Fedora, etc. appear to
> dominate the web server market as the backend powering most production
> servers and I'm wondering why Debian doesn't feature?
I haven't seen any numbers on this for a whi
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:38:35 +0200
"Justin Hartman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Forgive me if I am posting this to the wrong list but I am not
> sure where this kind of a email would be posted to. That said, I
> am interested to find out people's perspective on running Debian
> stable as a web se
On 12/12/06, Justin Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Forgive me if I am posting this to the wrong list but I am not sure
where this kind of a email would be posted to. That said, I am
interested to find out people's perspective on running Debian stable
as a web server in a production environmen
Forgive me if I am posting this to the wrong list but I am not sure
where this kind of a email would be posted to. That said, I am
interested to find out people's perspective on running Debian stable
as a web server in a production environment.
I have noticed that Red Hat, Suse, CentOS, Fedora, e
21 matches
Mail list logo
