Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..a return favor could be Rajkumar advicing us of the url of his
study, and about when it is to be ready, at least I am curious
of his findings, and I think more of us are. ;-)
Most definitely :) I will only be happy to share the results!
raj
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 08:36:37PM +0530, Rajkumar S wrote:
> I know that debian do not follow fixed time lines. but is their any
> rough time frame as to how much time an OS is supported, ie bugs fixes
> are available? Any such policy documents?
Bu
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:07:28 -0500,
Adam Garside <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 08:36:37PM +0530, Rajkumar S wrote:
> > I know that debian do not follow fixed time lines. but is their any
> > rough time frame as to how much time an OS is supp
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 08:36:37PM +0530, Rajkumar S wrote:
> I know that debian do not follow fixed time lines. but is their any
> rough time frame as to how much time an OS is supported, ie bugs fixes
> are available? Any such policy documents?
The following url might prove helpful:
http://ww
Hi,
I am doing a comparative study of support times and policies of various
OS. Windows and RHEL has their policies, including the dates of releases
and eol, listed at
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/lifecycle/default.mspx
http://www.redhat.com/apps/support/errata/rhlas_errata_policy.html
I kn
5 matches
Mail list logo
