> From: David Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ...
> No, I can only guess at what's going on. The first few lines of
> the document source are (wrapped arbitrarily):
>
> Slashdot:News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.
>
>
..
>
> Those colours are a recipe for disaster, I'd say.
> ...
> Is that a r
Hi
I always use lynx for slashdot, and it works fine. I don't think I get
junk mail because of it, but it's hard to tell.
Regards
--
Rob Murray
Quoting Onno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >I frequently see references to Slashdot here, and when I point my
> >browser at them, the page is always rendered in grey/dark grey on
> >black. Am I doing something wrong?
>
> The background should be white maybe you changed your prefs???
Gosh, I wish the
On Sat, Oct 30, 1999 at 10:44:54AM -0400, Paul McHale wrote:
> This was my mistake. There is a link on the openBSD site to "ports". This
> link is to the xBSD general repository which I mistakenly thought was the
> openBSD repository. The ProFTP program is part of the general repository.
> Sorry
...
-paul
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Gregan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 1999 7:54 AM
To: debian-user
Subject: Re: Debian Linux vs BSD
On Thu, Oct 28, 1999 at 01:30:19PM -0400, Paul McHale wrote:
> There is one question. They announce openBSD ships with a secure
On Thu, Oct 28, 1999 at 01:30:19PM -0400, Paul McHale wrote:
> There is one question. They announce openBSD ships with a secure
> version of ProFTP. The version appears to be older than the bug
> version(s). Is there something inherently different about BSD that it
> was not affected by the bug
>I frequently see references to Slashdot here, and when I point my
>browser at them, the page is always rendered in grey/dark grey on
>black. Am I doing something wrong?
The background should be white maybe you changed your prefs???
>My usual workaround is (because I run netscrape with -insta
t;?
> >
> >thanks again,
> >
> >-paul
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Onno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Thursday, October 28, 1999 7:58 AM
> >To: Paul McHale
> >Cc: debian-user
> >Subject: Re: Debian Linux vs BSD
> &g
On Fri, Oct 29, 1999 at 03:57:58PM +, David Wright wrote:
> I frequently see references to Slashdot here, and when I point my
> browser at them, the page is always rendered in grey/dark grey on
> black. Am I doing something wrong?
>
> My usual workaround is (because I run netscrape with -insta
Quoting Onno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
[...]
> >In order:
> >
> >http://www.daemonnews.org/199909/freebsd.html
> >
> >http://slashdot.org/askslashdot/99/10/17/2317202.shtml
> >
> >http://slashdot.org/search.pl?topic=bsd
> >
> >Let me know what you think of it,
I frequently see references to Slashdot he
rsion appears to be older than the bug version(s). Is there
something inherently different about BSD that it was not affected by the bug
?
thanks again,
-paul
-Original Message-
From: Onno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 1999 7:58 AM
To: Paul McHale
Cc: debian-user
Su
Re: Debian Linux vs BSD
>Anyone know any differences between FreeBSD and (debian) Linux? I
currently
>am using debian and am pretty happy with it. My ISP uses FreeBSD. The
>Linux newsletter mentioned the super secure version of BSD called OpenBSD.
>Has anyone worked with eithe
Anyone know any differences between FreeBSD and (debian) Linux? I currently
am using debian and am pretty happy with it. My ISP uses FreeBSD. The
Linux newsletter mentioned the super secure version of BSD called OpenBSD.
Has anyone worked with either of these ? Are they comparable to Debian
Hi,
Anyone know any differences between FreeBSD and (debian) Linux? I currently
am using debian and am pretty happy with it. My ISP uses FreeBSD. The
Linux newsletter mentioned the super secure version of BSD called OpenBSD.
Has anyone worked with either of these ? Are they comparable to Debia
14 matches
Mail list logo
