Hi,
The debian kernel compile problem has been solved.The details can be
found under the title.
Thank you for your help, regards you ti
Hi Franko,
uname -a
Linux lilike2008 6.1.119-*fah109* #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sun Jan 5
13:01:59 CET 2025 x86_64 GNU/Linux
the problem was solved quickly and efficiently based on your instructions
SOLVED, SOLVED and SOLVED!
Thank you very much for your efforts
Yes, I am waiting for th
Istvan,
I suspect you've got a bad memory chip. Try running a memory test.
regards.
chris
On 1/4/25 20:58, Istvan Toth wrote:
Hi Marko,
thank you for your detailed and thorough advice.
I implemented them, everything ran without errors. But unfortunately the
error persists,
Building module:
> Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2025 at 7:12 PM
> From: "Jeffrey Walton"
> To: poc...@homemail.com
> Cc: "debian-user"
> Subject: Re: debian kernel compiler
>
> On Sat, Jan 4, 2025 at 4:17 PM wrote:
> >
> > > Sent: Saturday, January 0
On Sat, Jan 4, 2025 at 4:17 PM wrote:
>
> > Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2025 at 11:54 AM
> > From: "Lee"
> > To: "Franco Martelli"
> > Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: Re: debian kernel compiler
> >
> > On Sat, Jan
On 04/01/25 at 17:54, Lee wrote:
On Sat, Jan 4, 2025 at 7:52 AM Franco Martelli wrote:
On 02/01/25 at 12:53, Istvan Toth wrote:
amd 5700G cpu
If you are new to kernel compiling maybe you don't know that you can
optimize the kernel for your specific CPU architecture, if you are using
the GCC
Hi Marko,
thank you for your detailed and thorough advice.
I implemented them, everything ran without errors. But unfortunately the
error persists,
Building module:
Cleaning build area...
env NV_VERBOSE=1 make -j16 modules
KERNEL_UNAME=6.1.119-fah105..(bad exit status: 2)
Erro
> Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2025 at 11:54 AM
> From: "Lee"
> To: "Franco Martelli"
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: debian kernel compiler
>
> On Sat, Jan 4, 2025 at 7:52 AM Franco Martelli wrote:
> >
> > On 02/0
On Sat, Jan 4, 2025 at 7:52 AM Franco Martelli wrote:
>
> On 02/01/25 at 12:53, Istvan Toth wrote:
> > amd 5700G cpu
>
> If you are new to kernel compiling maybe you don't know that you can
> optimize the kernel for your specific CPU architecture, if you are using
> the GCC compiler:
>
> first make
On 02/01/25 at 12:53, Istvan Toth wrote:
amd 5700G cpu
If you are new to kernel compiling maybe you don't know that you can
optimize the kernel for your specific CPU architecture, if you are using
the GCC compiler:
first make a backup copy of the Makefile:
$ cd linux-source-6.1
$ cp arch/x8
Hi Thomas,
Okay, I'll try, but since December 26th there hasn't been a good
compiler, even though I compile 5-6 times
a day, waiting for the "messiah". I'm using the suggested 2>&1 | tee -i
"$HOME"/make_deb_pkg_log_90.
Regards, you ti
On 1/2/25 21:40, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
It would be interes
Hi,
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 20:12:09 +0100, Istvan Toth wrote:
> > I am attaching the nvidia make.log.I made the fah79 image deb package
> > myself. It also included - linux-headers-6.1.119-fah79_6.1.119-1_amd64.deb
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> The log is quite large. I'm surprised the mailing list
Hello Thomas,
every time it's about newly built packages, because the .config file
that I usually
consider to be correct has not been able to compile properly.
Regards
Hi,
Istvan Toth wrote:
> when installing
> the image the build module does not run during the short-term (30-40 minute)
> compiler runtime (I attach it).
> [...]
> ~/kernel$ sudo dpkg -i linux-image-6.1.119-fah79_6.1.119-1_amd64.deb
I might have misunderstood your problem description.
I thought t
ms: autoinstall for kernel: 6.1.119-fah79 failed!
I would look in /var/lib/dkms/nvidia-current/535.216.01/build/make.log
as it says.
I don't believe linux-image-6.1.119-fah79_6.1.119-1_amd64.deb is a
Debian kernel package. If you got this from a third-party source, or
if you built it yours
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for your advice, no, there is no message, it seems that the
header and image deb packages (header and image) are downloaded
correctly. However, when dpkg -i extracts the header there is no
problem, but when installing the image the build module does not run
during the short-t
Hi,
Istvan Toth wrote:
> Most
> times, about 100 times so far, the compiler ran at 40 minutes, but then it
> does not compile the nvidia-current 183.216.01 or the 535.183.01 module.
> Because of this, there will be no /boot/initrd.img file, the boot will not
> start.
This would match a prematurel
Hi,
Happy New Year.Bookworm 12.08, amd 5700G cpu, ASUS ROG STRIX B550-A
GAMING mobo, want to compile custom kernel, based on `The Debian
Administrator's Handbook/8.10. Compiling a Kernel`. The compiler runs in
two parts. Most times, about 100 times so far, the compiler ran at 40
minutes, but
opped 1 overruns 0 frame 0
> > TX packets 1634521866 bytes 2220475762246 (2.0 TiB)
> > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
>
>
> I did missed "LOWER_UP", then I noticed that `ifconfig` is used. More
> on that later. Bac
Hi Groeten,
The IP address is already assigned to this interface
device eno5np0.
Please find my reply mail below.
Thanks,
Balaji
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 20:39, Balaji G wrote:
> Hi Geert,
>
> >>> During `ip link set down dev eno5np0` and `ip link set up dev eno5np0`
>
> >
I did missed "LOWER_UP", then I noticed that `ifconfig` is used. More
on that later. Back to 'Subject: Re: Does the debian kernel sends the
gratuitous arp ?'
To me is the answer "Yes, Debian kernel sends gratuitous ARP when it
supposed to do". But we, this mailingl
Hi Geert,
>>> During `ip link set down dev eno5np0` and `ip link set up dev eno5np0`
> are NO IP-addresses involved.
This interface eno5np0 is configured with the ip addresses(10.45.10.4 ).
# ifconfig
eno5np0: flags=4163 mtu 1500
inet 10.45.10.4 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast
e tcpdump is not showing
> > > any Gratuitous ARP packets.
> >
> > Why should it? (Yes, that is a serious question.)
>
> As opening question for further discussion.
>
> Because I like the question
> Does the Debian kernel sends the gratuitous ARP ?
On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 4:58 AM Geert Stappers wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 08, 2023 at 11:21:10AM +0530, Balaji G wrote:
> > On Sat, 7 Oct 2023 at 02:50, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 2:04 PM Balaji G wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I am using "Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullse
p dev eno5np0
>
> link
As in "the link layer"
> > Captured all the packets via tcpdump & the tcpdump is not showing any
> > Gratuitous ARP packets.
>
> Why should it? (Yes, that is a serious question.)
As opening question for further discussion.
Beca
On Sun, Oct 08, 2023 at 11:21:10AM +0530, Balaji G wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Oct 2023 at 02:50, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 2:04 PM Balaji G wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am using "Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)" with kernel version 5.16.12.
> > > When i do a link up/down i don
Hi Jeff,
Do you mean this is a known issue & will be fixed in the future
releases ?
Thanks,
Balaji
On Sat, 7 Oct 2023 at 02:50, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 2:04 PM Balaji G wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I am using "Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)" with kernel versi
On Sat, Oct 7, 2023 at 1:38 AM wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 05:20:22PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 2:04 PM Balaji G wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > I am using "Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)" with kernel version
> > > 5.16.12.
> > > When i do a link up/down i d
On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 05:20:22PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 2:04 PM Balaji G wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I am using "Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)" with kernel version 5.16.12.
> > When i do a link up/down i don't see any Gratuitous ARP being sent.
> >
> > # echo 1 > /
On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 2:04 PM Balaji G wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I am using "Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)" with kernel version 5.16.12.
> When i do a link up/down i don't see any Gratuitous ARP being sent.
>
> # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eno5np0/arp_notify
> # ip link set down dev eno5np0
> #
On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 05:52:16PM +0530, Balaji G wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using "Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)" with kernel version 5.16.12.
> When i do a link up/down i don't see any Gratuitous ARP being sent.
ARP
> # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eno5np0/arp_notify
Probably transmitted
Hi,
I am using "Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)" with kernel version 5.16.12.
When i do a link up/down i don't see any Gratuitous ARP being sent.
# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eno5np0/arp_notify
# ip link set down dev eno5np0
# ip link set up dev eno5np0
Captured all the packets via tcpdu
On Sun, Oct 04, 2020 at 02:33:43AM +0200, Janis Hamme wrote:
> Am 04.10.20 um 00:35 schrieb deloptes:
> > cp /boot/config-..xxx .config
> > make .oldconfig
> > make -j`nproc` bindeb-pkg
>
> The oldconfig hassle is something that I'd rather like to avoid, there are a
> lot changes between
On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 at 11:34, Janis Hamme wrote:
> I think I found a proper way to do it. It turns out the buster-backports repo
> actually has the Debian sources for all kernel versions that were released
> in the past. Maybe the steps are useful for others as well:
Hi, thank you very much for s
Am 04.10.20 um 00:35 schrieb deloptes:
> cp /boot/config-..xxx .config
> make .oldconfig
> make -j`nproc` bindeb-pkg
>
> as mentioned in https://wiki.debian.org/BuildADebianKernelPackage
>
> After make .oldconfig you will be asked questions about new stuff.
The oldconfig hassle is somethin
s that
> probably won't apply properly to Vanilla 5.4.69)
Actually it is not a bad idea to use the debian kernel with the patches,
especially if you are on public network.
Hi,
I'd like to build the vanilla 5.4.69 LTS Kernel for one of my Debian
machines (Buster).
The easiest way seems to build the Kernel with the built in "make
deb-pkg" target. Since I do not really want to go through all the config
changes,
my plan was to get a 5.4 config for amd64 from
https://sa
Quoting Stefan Pietsch (2020-02-14 22:36:39)
> iwlwifi has a problem with the latest Debian unstable kernel package
> (5.4.0-4-amd64).
> The wifi interface is not usable.
>
> 5.4.0-3-amd64 works fine instead.
>
> Is anyone experiencing the same problem?
Best way to find out is to check if anyon
Hi list,
iwlwifi has a problem with the latest Debian unstable kernel package
(5.4.0-4-amd64).
The wifi interface is not usable.
5.4.0-3-amd64 works fine instead.
Is anyone experiencing the same problem?
##
dmesg at boot:
[ 10.318868] iwlwifi :03:00.0: enabling device (
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 08:01:16AM -0300, Keven Ware wrote:
> Hello, I have a question about Debian, Where Can I Find Your Generic Kernel
> Code? , I Wanted to Tune Debian Better For My Settings, I would be grateful
> if you can help me by telling me where to download the debian ker
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 08:01:16AM -0300, Keven Ware wrote:
>Hello, I have a question about Debian, Where Can I Find Your Generic
>Kernel Code? , I Wanted to Tune Debian Better For My Settings, I would be
>grateful if you can help me by telling me where to download t
Hello, I have a question about Debian, Where Can I Find Your Generic Kernel
Code? , I Wanted to Tune Debian Better For My Settings, I would be grateful
if you can help me by telling me where to download the debian kernel.
Sincerely,
Keven T.
On Mar 5, 2015 7:26 AM, wrote:
>
make deb-pkg replaces all this:
>
> Then I execute
> make
> to build the kernel, and
>
> sudo make modules_install
>
> dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -b -apowerpc
>
> but at these last step I get an error message:
> make[2]: Leaving directory
> `/home/csanyipal/BubbaKe
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 07:25:41 -0500 (EST), csanyi...@gmail.com wrote:
> ...
> I'm trying to recompile the installed kernel
> ...
http://users.wowway.com/~zlinuxman/Kernel.htm
It's not a brief outline. It will take a while to read. But it is thorough;
and if you follow the procedure carefully,
Hi,
I'm trying to recompile the installed kernel on my headless power PC
box. On this box I'm running Debian GNU/Linux Wheezy system.
uname -a
Linux b2 3.2.62-1 #1 Mon Aug 25 04:22:40 UTC 2014 ppc GNU/Linux
I have downloaded kernel source from here:
https://github.com/Excito/community-b3-kernel.
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Debian's linux-image-3.10-2-amd64 runs 4 degrees cooler than my own
> kernel. Same workload.
>
> Can anybody figure the specifics for that?
I had some same experience with custom 3.10 kernel which I build make
old_config
Had to update to y
| # CONFIG_POSIX_MQU
Hi,
Debian's linux-image-3.10-2-amd64 runs 4 degrees cooler than my own
kernel. Same workload.
Can anybody figure the specifics for that?
Here is a pastebin of a diff file that shows the 2 .configs side by
side. Left side is Debian's right side is mine. Debian's .config was
streamlined to f
On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 03:02:20 -0400 (EDT), Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 21:39:02 -0400 (EDT), Stephen Powell wrote:
>> Note that when building a headers package you must run the entire
>> make-kpkg command under fakeroot: you can't use the --rootcmd fakeroot
>> option in this case.
>
>
> On 1 October 2012 02:39, Stephen Powell wrote:
> > On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 18:17:36 -0400 (EDT), Xelsior wrote:
> >>
> > Note that when building a headers package you must run the entire
> > make-kpkg command under fakeroot: you can't use the --rootcmd fakeroot
> > option in this case.
I always ru
ween the versions
> "3.2.23-1a~test" and "3.2.23-1", but I could be wrong about that.
>
> I did start to apply the extra patches to the Debian kernel another
> way as test-patches is not recommended if you are making config
> changes (following
> http://kernel-hand
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 18:17:36 -0400 (EDT), Xelsior wrote:
>
> So, interesting document.
>
> I actually found an RT kernel in the repository ... the one linked
> from here - http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia#Realtime_kernel
>
> However that does not have the patches applied to usb/audio for
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 11:09:46 -0400 (EDT), Xelsior wrote:
> ...
> I did start to apply the extra patches to the Debian kernel another
> way as test-patches is not recommended if you are making config
> changes (following
> http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-common-ta
On 22/04/12 10:26 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Mi, 18 apr 12, 22:56:16, sarveshwar.ba...@emulex.com wrote:
I guess I have not understood the basics of versioning in debian
kernels. When you say 6.0.0 and 6.0.3 are outdated, does it mean
everyone using those kernels are expected to move to 6.0.
On Mi, 18 apr 12, 22:56:16, sarveshwar.ba...@emulex.com wrote:
>
> I guess I have not understood the basics of versioning in debian
> kernels. When you say 6.0.0 and 6.0.3 are outdated, does it mean
> everyone using those kernels are expected to move to 6.0.4?
You are using Debian version num
using those kernels
are expected to move to 6.0.4?
Thanks,
Sarvesh
-Original Message-
From: Bob Proulx [mailto:b...@proulx.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 10:01 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: How do Install debian kernel without updating to latest kernel
image
Richard Hector wrote:
> sarveshwar.ba...@emulex.com wrote:
> > I am trying to install different versions of Debian from Debian install
> > CDs. For example Debian 6.0.0, 6.0.3 and 6.0.4. After installing any of
> > CDs I see the debian_version is showing as 6.0.4.
> Isn't there an option, during t
On 19/04/12 15:27, sarveshwar.ba...@emulex.com wrote:
I am trying to install different versions of Debian from Debian install
CDs. For example Debian 6.0.0, 6.0.3 and 6.0.4. After installing any of
CDs I see the debian_version is showing as 6.0.4. The uname –a shows the
same after any of the inst
I am trying to install different versions of Debian from Debian install CDs.
For example Debian 6.0.0, 6.0.3 and 6.0.4. After installing any of CDs I see
the debian_version is showing as 6.0.4. The uname -a shows the same after any
of the installations. I want to install each of these versions a
On Mon, 2011-12-26 at 08:42 +0100, Ralf Madorf wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-26 at 08:39 +0100, Ralf Madorf wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-12-26 at 06:23 +0330, a dehqan wrote:
> > > [snip]
> > > Have told debian kernel , not upstream kernel , so my kernel source is
> > >
On Mon, 2011-12-26 at 08:39 +0100, Ralf Madorf wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-26 at 06:23 +0330, a dehqan wrote:
> > [snip]
> > Have told debian kernel , not upstream kernel , so my kernel source is
> > in /usr/src , do you mean they are the same in applying patch way ?
> >
On Mon, 2011-12-26 at 06:23 +0330, a dehqan wrote:
> [snip]
> Have told debian kernel , not upstream kernel , so my kernel source is
> in /usr/src , do you mean they are the same in applying patch way ?
>
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Ralf Madorf
> [snip]
In The Name Of Allah
Good day all ,
Have told debian kernel , not upstream kernel , so my kernel source is in
/usr/src , do you mean they are the same in applying patch way ?
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Ralf Madorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 23:38 +0330, a dehqan wrote:
> &g
On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 23:38 +0330, a dehqan wrote:
> In The name Of Allah
>
> Good day all ,
> How to apply grsec patch to debian kernel
> is it the same as applying patch to upstream kernel ?liek patch -p1
> http://www.crucialp.com/resources/tutorials/server-administratio
In The name Of Allah
Good day all ,
How to apply grsec patch to debian kernel
is it the same as applying patch to upstream kernel ?liek *patch -p1
Hi Debian users,
Upgrading from old stable (Lenny) to stable (Squeeze) broke X on my
machine. The problem centers around the video chip on the Asus M2A-VM
motherboard, and, perhaps the attached Samsung monitor attached.
I am not certain, but I believe this discussion at lkml.org pertains:
htt
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 17:13 +, Wolodja Wentland wrote:
> A quick look at the manpage reveals that you have to specify one of the
> supported commands. Let's try "list":
>
> $ apt-listbugs list apt/0.8.11.5
> serious bugs of apt (0.8.11.5 -> 0.8.11.5)
> #558784 - apt: re-adds removed keys
> S
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 16:40 +0100, dirkydirk wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 15:17 +, Wolodja Wentland wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 15:37 +0100, dirkydirk wrote:
> > Which version of libc-bin do you have installed (dpkg -l libc-bin). If you
> > have 2.11.2-12 you might have run into
[..
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 15:17 +, Wolodja Wentland wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 15:37 +0100, dirkydirk wrote:
>
> > I conclude then, there's an issue with the update script. (I'm running
> > Debian sid, btw.)
>
> An important piece of information. Which version of libc-bin do you have
> inst
Wolodja Wentland wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 15:37 +0100, dirkydirk wrote:
I conclude then, there's an issue with the update script. (I'm running
Debian sid, btw.)
An important piece of information. Which version of libc-bin do you have
installed (dpkg -l libc-bin). If you have 2.11.2-12 y
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:54 AM, dirkydirk wrote:
>
> I suspect the script that generates the ramdisc to be faulty. See my
> other reply here:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2011/02/msg02902.html
Have you tried running update-initramfs one kernel at a time rather
than "update-initramfs -k
Hmm, interestingly only swap and tmp were listed with an UUID. But alas,
it did not work out to list the other partitions with their UUID.
Should I mention that software raid and lvm is used?
KR, m
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 16:57 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Lu, 28 feb 11, 15:54:38, dirkydirk w
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 15:37 +0100, dirkydirk wrote:
> I conclude then, there's an issue with the update script. (I'm running
> Debian sid, btw.)
An important piece of information. Which version of libc-bin do you have
installed (dpkg -l libc-bin). If you have 2.11.2-12 you might have run into
[
On Lu, 28 feb 11, 15:54:38, dirkydirk wrote:
> It's grub2 and UUIDs are used; and grub finds the kernel and the ramdisc
> file. (If it would not find them, grub would show a different msg.
> Already encountered and solved that a while ago when grub had an issue
> with wanting "/boot" in the path ;)
It's grub2 and UUIDs are used; and grub finds the kernel and the ramdisc
file. (If it would not find them, grub would show a different msg.
Already encountered and solved that a while ago when grub had an issue
with wanting "/boot" in the path ;)
I suspect the script that generates the ramdisc to
Hi,
yes, there's init in it. But the directory structure of the ramdisc
looks quite different from a 2.6.31 ramdisc on another computer.
Unfortunately I did run update-initramfs -k all, and now even the 2.6.26
kernel refuses to boot. Same error.
>From the recent grml live-distro I copied kernel
On Lu, 28 feb 11, 13:09:20, dirkyd...@gmx.net wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> after updating my Debian box, it ceases to boot with above error. I
> use kernel 2.6.32. Booting older 2.6.28 seems to run the init process
> well (but has other issues).
>
> Somebody has an idea what went wrong?
I suspect prob
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/02/11 12:09, dirkyd...@gmx.net wrote:
> Hi all,
hi
> after updating my Debian box, it ceases to boot with above error. I use
> kernel 2.6.32. Booting older 2.6.28 seems to run the init process well (but
> has other issues).
>
> Somebody has
Hi all,
after updating my Debian box, it ceases to boot with above error. I use kernel
2.6.32. Booting older 2.6.28 seems to run the init process well (but has other
issues).
Somebody has an idea what went wrong?
KR, m
--
NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren und surfen!
let me know how to obtain Debian kernel for
ColdFire platform?
I saw your unanswered email on debian-68k around the same time that
there were some emails on that list remarking on show-stopper
problems with ColdFire.
Check the archives.
--
Dissent is patriotic, remember?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
> This list is likely the wrong place to ask. Ask here instead:
>
> debian-...@lists.debian.org
>
>
>
> Dear All
According to you , I asked it on the 68k list but no reply received till now
. Can you please let me know how to obtain Debian kernel for ColdFire
platform?
This list is likely the wrong place to ask. Ask here instead:
>
> debian-...@lists.debian.org
>
>
>
> Thank you very much for your comment. I forwarded my inquiry to the address
you mentioned.
hadi motamedi put forth on 5/23/2010 11:21 PM:
> Dear All
> Can you please let me know where can I find minimum size Debian kernel image
> for my virtual qemu ColdFire platform? I checked Debian site but I didn't
> find Motorola-based architecture kernel image.
> Thank you in a
Dear All
Can you please let me know where can I find minimum size Debian kernel image
for my virtual qemu ColdFire platform? I checked Debian site but I didn't
find Motorola-based architecture kernel image.
Thank you in advance
surreal wrote:
How many processors does Debian Kernel 2.6.26 (686) support? Whats the
maximum RAM supported without bigmem addon?
The second question: about 3.6 GB
The first question: Depends on whether you use a stock kernel or a
custom one. Stock is probably 16 cores. Theoretical max is
How many processors does Debian Kernel 2.6.26 (686) support? Whats the
maximum RAM supported without bigmem addon?
--
Harshad Joshi
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
Has anybody used mondoarchive with the latest 2.6.30 Debian kernel?
For me it fails with that he cannot figure out the filesystem that is
used for initrd.
That's because the phrase that mindi looks for in the krnel image to see
what fs initrd is usin
Hi,
Has anybody used mondoarchive with the latest 2.6.30 Debian kernel?
For me it fails with that he cannot figure out the filesystem that is
used for initrd.
Hugo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
27;t find it ... Your BIOS must be able to boot from such devices,
but if it does, it seems you could even use a card reader (with a card
inserted, of course) instead of a stick, and it doesn't matter if the
stick says that is supports booting or not. Unetbootin is awesome
... This one
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 11:05:01PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 04:11:35PM -0600, lee wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 10:51:56PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 03:00:41PM -0600, lee wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 05:56:25PM -020
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:27:11 -0700
Kelly Clowers wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 06:11, Celejar wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:55:30 +
> > j t wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've just done a fresh install of Lenny on my Thinkpad T21, which
> >> (according to lshw) contains a "Cirrus Logi
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 06:11, Celejar wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:55:30 +
> j t wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've just done a fresh install of Lenny on my Thinkpad T21, which
>> (according to lshw) contains a "Cirrus Logic CS 4614/22/24/30
>> CrystalClear SoundFusion Audio Accelerator" (pci id
j t wrote:
> I've just done a fresh install of Lenny on my Thinkpad T21, which
> (according to lshw) contains a "Cirrus Logic CS 4614/22/24/30
> CrystalClear SoundFusion Audio Accelerator" (pci id 1013:6003).
When you google "Cirrus Logic CS 4614", one of the first hits is
http://www.blog.tdobson
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:55:30 +
j t wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just done a fresh install of Lenny on my Thinkpad T21, which
> (according to lshw) contains a "Cirrus Logic CS 4614/22/24/30
> CrystalClear SoundFusion Audio Accelerator" (pci id 1013:6003).
>
> /proc/asound/cards shows no soundcards,
Hi,
I've just done a fresh install of Lenny on my Thinkpad T21, which
(according to lshw) contains a "Cirrus Logic CS 4614/22/24/30
CrystalClear SoundFusion Audio Accelerator" (pci id 1013:6003).
/proc/asound/cards shows no soundcards, and I assume this is because
there is no snd-cs46xx.ko module
On Saturday 03 January 2009 23:05:01 Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 04:11:35PM -0600, lee wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 10:51:56PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 03:00:41PM -0600, lee wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 05:56:25PM -0200, Ed
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 04:11:35PM -0600, lee wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 10:51:56PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 03:00:41PM -0600, lee wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 05:56:25PM -0200, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> > > > lee wrote:
> > > > > Well, how do yo
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 10:51:56PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 03:00:41PM -0600, lee wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 05:56:25PM -0200, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> > > lee wrote:
> > > > Well, how do you install on SATA disks when the installer can't access
> > > >
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 03:00:41PM -0600, lee wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 05:56:25PM -0200, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> > lee wrote:
> > > Well, how do you install on SATA disks when the installer can't access
> > > them? It still has the option to load more modules from a floppy disk,
> > >
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 05:56:25PM -0200, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> lee wrote:
> > Well, how do you install on SATA disks when the installer can't access
> > them? It still has the option to load more modules from a floppy disk,
> > but I haven't had a floppy disk drive for years ... With no sy
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 12:11:59PM +, Aneurin Price wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 6:58 AM, lee wrote:
> > Anyway, if it's a software problem, it's probably not the module for
> > the particular controller but something else. That people with all
> > kinds of different hardware have this pro
1 - 100 of 412 matches
Mail list logo
