Towards a Debian FAQ Index

2021-02-27 Thread Richard Owlett
at as: The Debian GNU/Linux FAQ www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/index.en.html PDF The Debian GNU/Linux FAQ www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/debian-faq.en.pdf FAQ - Debian Wiki wiki.debian.org/FAQ Debian -- Debian security FAQ www.debian.org/security/faq D

Re: Finding Debian FAQ pages

2021-02-25 Thread Richard Owlett
On 02/25/2021 03:59 AM, Darac Marjal wrote: On 25/02/2021 09:55, Richard Owlett wrote: My underlying problem is I lack of skill with search tools. To find any occurrence of "FAQ" in debian.org I can do https://html.duckduckgo.com/html?q=faq%20site%3Adebian.org But I want only those pages wi

Re: Finding Debian FAQ pages

2021-02-25 Thread Darac Marjal
On 25/02/2021 09:55, Richard Owlett wrote: > My underlying problem is I lack of skill with search tools. > > To find any occurrence of "FAQ" in debian.org I can do >> https://html.duckduckgo.com/html?q=faq%20site%3Adebian.org > > But I want only those pages with "FAQ" in the page title. How? This

Finding Debian FAQ pages

2021-02-25 Thread Richard Owlett
My underlying problem is I lack of skill with search tools. To find any occurrence of "FAQ" in debian.org I can do https://html.duckduckgo.com/html?q=faq%20site%3Adebian.org But I want only those pages with "FAQ" in the page title. How? TIA

Re: "termcap-compat" is still referenced in the Debian FAQ [SOLVED]

2013-06-28 Thread Joseph Lenox
debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/debian-faq.en.txt, 4.7). The package does not exist on Wheezy, nor apparently (according to the package history) since 2005. I'm unsure whether to file this as a bug against the FAQ or the fact that the package is missing. The former, I dare say. Bugreport

Re: "termcap-compat" is still referenced in the Debian FAQ

2013-06-28 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2013-06-28 21:24 +0200, Joseph Lenox wrote: > On 06/28/2013 11:04 AM, Sven Joachim wrote: >> On 2013-06-28 17:39 +0200, Joseph Lenox wrote: >> >>> Noticed that "termcap-compat" is referenced in one of the FAQ >>> questions on the website >>>

Re: "termcap-compat" is still referenced in the Debian FAQ

2013-06-28 Thread Joseph Lenox
On 06/28/2013 11:04 AM, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2013-06-28 17:39 +0200, Joseph Lenox wrote: Noticed that "termcap-compat" is referenced in one of the FAQ questions on the website (http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/debian-faq.en.txt, 4.7). The package does not exist on W

Re: "termcap-compat" is still referenced in the Debian FAQ

2013-06-28 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2013-06-28 17:39 +0200, Joseph Lenox wrote: > Noticed that "termcap-compat" is referenced in one of the FAQ > questions on the website > (http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/debian-faq.en.txt, > 4.7). The package does not exist on Wheezy, nor apparently (acco

"termcap-compat" is still referenced in the Debian FAQ

2013-06-28 Thread Joseph Lenox
Noticed that "termcap-compat" is referenced in one of the FAQ questions on the website (http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/debian-faq.en.txt, 4.7). The package does not exist on Wheezy, nor apparently (according to the package history) since 2005. I'm unsure whether to

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-13 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:49:12 +0100, Lisi wrote in message <201204111549.12321.lisi.re...@gmail.com>: > On Wednesday 04 April 2012 17:07:16 Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 11:28:59 +0100, Lisi wrote in message > > > > <201204041128.59935.lisi.re...@gmail.com>: > > > On Wednesday 04 Apri

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-11 Thread Lisi
On Wednesday 04 April 2012 17:07:16 Arnt Karlsen wrote: > On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 11:28:59 +0100, Lisi wrote in message > > <201204041128.59935.lisi.re...@gmail.com>: > > On Wednesday 04 April 2012 10:01:47 Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > Note that since Lenny, apt-get *installs* recommended packages by >

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-11 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 11:28:59 +0100, Lisi wrote in message <201204041128.59935.lisi.re...@gmail.com>: > On Wednesday 04 April 2012 10:01:47 Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > Note that since Lenny, apt-get *installs* recommended packages by > >     default. > > ...since Lenny, apt-get *has installed*.

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-07 Thread Chris Bannister
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 08:28:33PM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: > funny. Now if it was a picture of two hippos in a river... that would > make perfect sense. :-) What about the poor hippo who kept swimming in circles after they kicked him off the hippo campus? -- "Religion is excellent stuff for

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-07 Thread Lisi
On Saturday 07 April 2012 11:28:33 Scott Ferguson wrote: > On 07/04/12 19:54, Lisi wrote: > > On Saturday 07 April 2012 00:39:58 Scott Ferguson wrote: > >>> That is about spelling, not grammar. Since requires the perfect tense. > >>> It is quite simply wrong in English to say "since installs".

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-07 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 07/04/12 19:54, Lisi wrote: > On Saturday 07 April 2012 00:39:58 Scott Ferguson wrote: >>> That is about spelling, not grammar. Since requires the perfect tense. >>> It is quite simply wrong in English to say "since installs". Leave >>> out the words "since Lenny", and "installs" becomes c

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-07 Thread Lisi
On Saturday 07 April 2012 00:39:58 Scott Ferguson wrote: > > That is about spelling, not grammar.  Since requires the perfect tense. > > It is quite simply wrong in English to say "since installs".  Leave > > out the words "since Lenny", and "installs" becomes correct, but loses > > some of the

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-07 Thread Lisi
On Friday 06 April 2012 23:43:37 Chris Bannister wrote: > > > > One of the keys to "plain English" is brevity. ;-) > > > > > > http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=4904#comment-303296 > > > > That is about spelling, not grammar.  Since requires the perfect tense. > > It is > > It was supposed to be a

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-06 Thread Pierre Frenkiel
On Sat, 7 Apr 2012, Chris Bannister wrote: AIUI, no one knows *yet* whether aptitude or apt-get will be preferred for Wheezy until the usual testing takes place near the time of actual release. look at this (from the Debian Project News, 23 Jan 2012) http://www.perrier.eu.org/weblog/2012/

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-06 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 07/04/12 05:54, Lisi wrote: > On Friday 06 April 2012 20:34:28 Chris Bannister wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 11:38:29AM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: >>> On 04/04/12 07:46, Lisi wrote: On Tuesday 03 April 2012 22:35:00 Andrei POPESCU wrote: > Note that apt-get *installs* recommended

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-06 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 07/04/12 05:34, Chris Bannister wrote: > > http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=4904#comment-303296 > You shouldn't have eaten those mushrooms. Kind regards -- Iceweasel/Firefox/Chrome/Chromium/Iceape/IE extensions for finding answers to questions about Debian:- https://addons.mozilla.o

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-06 Thread Chris Bannister
On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 08:54:47PM +0100, Lisi wrote: > On Friday 06 April 2012 20:34:28 Chris Bannister wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 11:38:29AM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: > > > On 04/04/12 07:46, Lisi wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 03 April 2012 22:35:00 Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > >> Note tha

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-06 Thread Lisi
On Friday 06 April 2012 21:38:44 Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Vi, 06 apr 12, 20:54:47, Lisi wrote: > > That is about spelling, not grammar. Since requires the perfect tense. > > It is quite simply wrong in English to say "since installs". Leave > > out the words "since Lenny", and "installs" be

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-06 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Vi, 06 apr 12, 20:54:47, Lisi wrote: > > That is about spelling, not grammar. Since requires the perfect tense. It is > quite simply wrong in English to say "since installs". Leave out the > words "since Lenny", and "installs" becomes correct, but loses some of the > intended meaning.

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-06 Thread Chris Bannister
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:35:00AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Mi, 04 apr 12, 02:01:41, Chris Bannister wrote: > > > > For a start it is possibly all just hot air unless it is discussed on > > the debian-doc list and/or a patch submitted against the debian-faq > &g

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-06 Thread Lisi
On Friday 06 April 2012 20:34:28 Chris Bannister wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 11:38:29AM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: > > On 04/04/12 07:46, Lisi wrote: > > > On Tuesday 03 April 2012 22:35:00 Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > >> Note that apt-get *installs* recommended packages by default since > > >

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-06 Thread Chris Bannister
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 11:38:29AM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote: > On 04/04/12 07:46, Lisi wrote: > > On Tuesday 03 April 2012 22:35:00 Andrei POPESCU wrote: > >> Note that apt-get *installs* recommended packages by default since > >> Lenny and starting with Squeeze is the preferred program to

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-05 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Donnerstag, 5. April 2012 schrieb Lisi: > On Wednesday 04 April 2012 18:58:07 Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 4. April 2012 schrieb Lisi: > > > On Wednesday 04 April 2012 10:01:47 Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > > Note that since Lenny, apt-get *installs* recommended packages > > > > by

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-04 Thread Lisi
On Wednesday 04 April 2012 19:00:44 Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 4. April 2012 schrieb Lisi: > > On Wednesday 04 April 2012 12:14:55 Scott Ferguson wrote: > > > ... since Lenny, apt-get will continue to install recommended > > > packages by default. So I believe "has" is redundant, eve

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-04 Thread Lisi
On Wednesday 04 April 2012 18:58:07 Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 4. April 2012 schrieb Lisi: > > On Wednesday 04 April 2012 10:01:47 Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > >  Note that since Lenny, apt-get *installs* recommended packages by > > > > > >     default. > > > > ...since Lenny, apt-get *h

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-04 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Mittwoch, 4. April 2012 schrieb Lisi: > On Wednesday 04 April 2012 12:14:55 Scott Ferguson wrote: > > ... since Lenny, apt-get will continue to install recommended > > packages by default. So I believe "has" is redundant, even though > > it's correct. > > What is wrong with : > > Apt-get will

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-04 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Mittwoch, 4. April 2012 schrieb Lisi: > On Wednesday 04 April 2012 10:01:47 Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > Note that since Lenny, apt-get *installs* recommended packages by > > > > default. > > ...since Lenny, apt-get *has installed*.. Why? It still does. -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-04 Thread Lisi
On Wednesday 04 April 2012 12:14:55 Scott Ferguson wrote: > ... since Lenny, apt-get will continue to install recommended packages > by default.  So I believe "has" is redundant, even though it's correct. What is wrong with : Apt-get will continue to install recommended packages by default. Wh

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-04 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 04/04/12 20:28, Lisi wrote: > On Wednesday 04 April 2012 10:01:47 Andrei POPESCU wrote: >> Note that since Lenny, apt-get *installs* recommended packages by >> default. > > ...since Lenny, apt-get *has installed*.. > > ;-) > Lisi > > Even trickier - since Lenny developers have been

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-04 Thread Scott Ferguson
understood by most English speakers. I would insert a footnote explaining "recommended" and possibly the relevant stanza in apt.conf. > Beginning with the release of Squeeze, Some will have problems with the historical context - does that mean that on that day all Debian rele

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-04 Thread Lisi
On Wednesday 04 April 2012 10:01:47 Andrei POPESCU wrote: > Note that since Lenny, apt-get *installs* recommended packages by >     default. ...since Lenny, apt-get *has installed*.. ;-) Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-04 Thread Lisi
On Wednesday 04 April 2012 02:38:29 Scott Ferguson wrote: > 2. How I'd write it:- > Apt is the recommended program to perform system installation and major > system upgrades.[*3] > > 3. To avoid confusion people should read the fine Debian documentation > in their native language. :-) +1 Lisi

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-04 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Mi, 04 apr 12, 11:38:29, Scott Ferguson wrote: > My suggestions:- > > 1. rephrased for clarity, but hardly succint. > Note that since Lenny, apt-get installs recommended[*1] packages by default. > Beginning with the release of Squeeze[*2], apt is the recommended > program to perform system inst

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-03 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 04/04/12 07:46, Lisi wrote: > On Tuesday 03 April 2012 22:35:00 Andrei POPESCU wrote: >> Note that apt-get *installs* recommended packages by default since >> Lenny and starting with Squeeze is the preferred program to perform >> system installation and major system upgrades. > > Note

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-03 Thread Lisi
On Tuesday 03 April 2012 22:35:00 Andrei POPESCU wrote: > Note that apt-get *installs* recommended packages by default since >     Lenny and starting with Squeeze is the preferred program to perform >     system installation and major system upgrades. Note that apt-get *has installed* recommended

Re: debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-03 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Mi, 04 apr 12, 02:01:41, Chris Bannister wrote: > > For a start it is possibly all just hot air unless it is discussed on > the debian-doc list and/or a patch submitted against the debian-faq > package. I know that you are involved in translations and hence have > some influence

debian-faq (was ... Re: upgrade to Wheezy fails with aptitude)

2012-04-03 Thread Chris Bannister
system installation, and major system > upgrades to releases as of Squeeze. > > What do you think? For a start it is possibly all just hot air unless it is discussed on the debian-doc list and/or a patch submitted against the debian-faq package. I know that you are involved in tra

Re: should debian FAQ suggest "alpine" as an alternative to "pine"?

2009-08-22 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009, Chris Burkhardt wrote: > Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > currently perusing the FAQ, section 5.10 asks, "where is pine?" > > since alpine is apparently available for debian, shouldn't that > > section at least mention that alternative? i've used alpine as a > > drop-in replacem

Re: should debian FAQ suggest "alpine" as an alternative to "pine"?

2009-08-22 Thread Chris Burkhardt
ora for quite some time. Yes, I think that would be a good idea. >is there a better place to make that suggestion? >From FAQ Section 16.2 "Feedback": Comments and additions to this document are always welcome. Please send e-mail to doc-deb...@packages.debian.org, or submit a wi

should debian FAQ suggest "alpine" as an alternative to "pine"?

2009-08-22 Thread Robert P. J. Day
currently perusing the FAQ, section 5.10 asks, "where is pine?" since alpine is apparently available for debian, shouldn't that section at least mention that alternative? i've used alpine as a drop-in replacement for pine on fedora for quite some time. is there a better place to make that sugg

Re: Regarding new kind of debian FAQ concerning this list

2007-02-26 Thread Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
Deboo ^ wrote: > Is there someone who has taken the pain to write an FAQ of > problems/working solutions from this list? If yes, please give me the > link. If not, I think there should be such an FAQ too, other than the > debian faq. I can try and contribute. > > Regards, >

Re: Regarding new kind of debian FAQ concerning this list

2007-02-26 Thread Deboo ^
PROTECTED]> wrote: Deboo ^ wrote: > Is there someone who has taken the pain to write an FAQ of > problems/working solutions from this list? If yes, please give me the > link. If not, I think there should be such an FAQ too, other than the > debian faq. I can try and contribute. &

Re: Regarding new kind of debian FAQ concerning this list

2007-02-26 Thread Chris Lale
Deboo ^ wrote: Is there someone who has taken the pain to write an FAQ of problems/working solutions from this list? If yes, please give me the link. If not, I think there should be such an FAQ too, other than the debian faq. I can try and contribute. Some have ended up at NewbieDOC: http

Re: Regarding new kind of debian FAQ concerning this list

2007-02-26 Thread Michael Pobega
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 02:43:38PM +0530, Deboo ^ wrote: > Is there someone who has taken the pain to write an FAQ of problems/working > solutions from this list? If yes, please give me the link. If not, I think > there should be such an FAQ too, other than the debian faq. I ca

Regarding new kind of debian FAQ concerning this list

2007-02-26 Thread Deboo ^
Is there someone who has taken the pain to write an FAQ of problems/working solutions from this list? If yes, please give me the link. If not, I think there should be such an FAQ too, other than the debian faq. I can try and contribute. Regards, Deboo -- Please don't Cc: me, I'm sub

Re: SUGGESTION for Debian FAQ

2002-05-27 Thread Jamin W . Collins
On Tue, 28 May 2002 08:12:33 +0700 "Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim" wrote: > Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > > You should have contacted the FAQ authors with your suggestion, > > instead of spamming all of the lists that you thought were applicable. > > Me spamming? I take that as an insult. And what woul

Re: SUGGESTION for Debian FAQ

2002-05-27 Thread Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim
Matt Zimmerman wrote: > You should have contacted the FAQ authors with your suggestion, > instead of spamming all of the lists that you thought were applicable. Me spamming? I take that as an insult. You'd better fix your procmail filter, and I will fix mine. regrets, -- Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrah

Re: SUGGESTION for Debian FAQ

2002-05-22 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 06:01:35PM +0700, Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim wrote: > Thus, I have sent the suggestion to all related parties who could increase > that FAQ visibility. May I know how to notify them all otherwise? I > believe that there should be sufficient hints for finding the FAQ and > HOWT

Re: SUGGESTION for Debian FAQ

2002-05-22 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 06:01:35PM +0700, Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim wrote: > Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > Please do not cross-post to so many lists with general comments. > > Following up to debian-user. > > The issue was, that it is not so obvious to find the Debian

Re: SUGGESTION for Debian FAQ

2002-05-22 Thread Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim
Matt Zimmerman wrote: > Please do not cross-post to so many lists with general comments. > Following up to debian-user. The issue was, that it is not so obvious to find the Debian FAQ. Neither it is obvious that the FAQ is most likely available on the local disk (when installing the debi

Re: SUGGESTION for Debian FAQ

2002-05-17 Thread Matt Zimmerman
Please do not cross-post to so many lists with general comments. Following up to debian-user. On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 03:54:37PM +0700, Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim wrote: > BTW, I tried to find out (in FHS and Debian Policy) the > differences between /usr/doc/ and /usr/share/doc as well as > why s

SUGGESTION for Debian FAQ

2002-05-17 Thread Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim
To Whom It May Concern: I am writing in regard of "Debian FAQ" to the addresses that are mentioned in " function" of the debian-boot disk as well as suggested by the debian FAQ itself. My concern is that it is not so obvious to find the Debian FAQ, and therefore I would lik

Re: Idea: Master Debian FAQ (newbie-centric)

2000-11-06 Thread will trillich
Kenward Vaughan wrote: > There was a brief flurry of notes to one another, then nothing afterwards. the norm, sadly. maybe we can keep it going...? i've started http://newbiedoc.intranets.com/ for the purpose. > I have acquired a 486-66 at work to play with, and have already installed > Debia

Re: Idea: Master Debian FAQ (newbie-centric)

2000-11-06 Thread will trillich
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 02:22:35PM -0500, William Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > Each one of those topics probably has a handful of "how do I" associated with > it that a very new user would "typically" ask to this list. First off I'd > like > to ask if someone has already gathered a FAQ lik

debian FAQ

2000-11-03 Thread will trillich
nosing around, i found this debian faq, which i may have run into earlier, but now that i know as much as i do, i wish i'd seen it sooner! http://ftp.opensource.captech.com/debian/doc/FAQ/debian-faq.txt.gz it's also on most debian systems, i'd bet, under /usr/share/doc/debian/FA

Re: Idea: Master Debian FAQ (newbie-centric)

2000-10-24 Thread Kenward Vaughan
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 06:54:12PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > There is allready a lot of documentation around. Rewriting all of that > would be pointless. It might be a good idea to create a big FAQ-index. ... It might be if everyone walking into Linux (Debian, particularly :) spoke the lan

Re: Idea: Master Debian FAQ (newbie-centric)

2000-10-24 Thread capslock2000
There is allready a lot of documentation around. Rewriting all of that would be pointless. It might be a good idea to create a big FAQ-index. eg: Disks & Drives Q How do I read a file from my Windows partition? A Mount package, Windows-To-Linux HOWTO Q How do I access my ZIP drive? A Mount package

Re: Idea: Master Debian FAQ (newbie-centric)

2000-10-23 Thread Kristian Rink
On Sun, 22 Oct 2000 14:22:35 -0500 William Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If your interested in this project or have suggestions please feel free to > contact me on the list here or privately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] It would > be a shame to let all the talent that people on this list have stor

Re: Idea: Master Debian FAQ (newbie-centric)

2000-10-23 Thread will trillich
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 02:22:35PM -0500, William Jensen wrote: > As a newcomer to Debian I, like many since I've joined this list, ask typical > newbie questions about the some basic things. > Each one of those topics probably has a handful of "how do I" associated with > it that a very new use

Re: Master Debian FAQ (newbie-centric)

2000-10-23 Thread ColdWater
ustodio, L. C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "William Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2000 5:22 PM Subject: Idea: Master Debian FAQ (newbie-centric) > Greetings folks, > > As a newcomer to Debian I, like many since I'

Re: Idea: Master Debian FAQ (newbie-centric)

2000-10-23 Thread Anthony Campbell
On 23 Oct 2000, Bill Ramsey wrote: > I think an excellent format is what the Caldera users have done. They > have put together a "Step by Step" site which Caldera and others > mirror. > > http://linux.nf/stepbystep.htm > > It takes one or two dedicated people to hold it all together; and the > p

Re: Idea: Master Debian FAQ (newbie-centric)

2000-10-22 Thread ian mckerrow
I too would be interested in developing this. I know I can offer up a begining list of questions that don't apear to be answered in any one place with brevity and clarity. But the clarity I personally am looking for is one filtered through windows. I'm a crossdressing newbie. I'm fleeing the ap

Re: Idea: Master Debian FAQ (newbie-centric)

2000-10-22 Thread Bill Ramsey
I think an excellent format is what the Caldera users have done. They have put together a "Step by Step" site which Caldera and others mirror. http://linux.nf/stepbystep.htm It takes one or two dedicated people to hold it all together; and the participation of many, many people. Someone who is e

Re: Idea: Master Debian FAQ (newbie-centric)

2000-10-22 Thread Kenward Vaughan
Bill, Count me in on this. I'm another one of those people who's been at it for a while, but still feel very newbie-ish about (too) Many things. I'd love to put some time into helping the people who work so hard putting the system together. Whatever I can contribute to, I'll do... A thought

Re: Idea: Master Debian FAQ (newbie-centric)

2000-10-22 Thread Jonathan Eisenstein
I think this is a fantastic idea! I volunteer whatever I can to help out this cause. I think we should get a mailing list for this set up and start building it as soon as possible. > What I'm getting around to saying is how can we, the Debian > community, set up some newbie FAQ's that are tailored

Idea: Master Debian FAQ (newbie-centric)

2000-10-22 Thread William Jensen
Greetings folks, As a newcomer to Debian I, like many since I've joined this list, ask typical newbie questions about the some basic things. If we take a step back and look at the big picture there is a basic group of things new users want to get accomplished. For example most users want to send

Re: [Debian: Install] In relation to Debian FAQ 9.4

1999-08-08 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello, I was thinking, that there is a possibility that I do not must copy all splitted files to my harddrive and the unspülit them. Oh yes, some of the machines working stand allone without a network. Only the 'base', XFree86 and StarOffice. And then the Computers are without CD-Rom or ZIP-Dis

Re: [Debian: Install] In relation to Debian FAQ 9.4

1999-08-08 Thread Bill Leach
d of=/dev/fd0 if=[] Otherwise on a DOS box you need the "rawrite2.exe" program (read rawrite2.txt which should be with the program). The "canonical" location for all of these files (including rawrite) is debian/dists/slink/main/disks-i386/current/ On Sat, Aug 07, 1999 at 07:

Re: [Debian: Install] In relation to Debian FAQ 9.4

1999-08-07 Thread Mark Brown
On Sat, Aug 07, 1999 at 07:31:37PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote: > OK, I have splitted a package in smaler parts (dpkg-split) > and copied them to three Floppys. > Now I want to know, how to install this 3 Floppys on my machine. > What must I do with dpkg ??? > Must I copy the files first ont

[Debian: Install] In relation to Debian FAQ 9.4

1999-08-07 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello, I have a question in relation to the Debian FAQ: 9.4 How can I get/install the Debian from a set of floppy disks? I had read the complete FAQ but I do not find a answer. OK, I have splitted a package in smaler parts (dpkg-split) and copied them to three Floppys. Now I want to know

Debian FAQ (was Re: Separate list for newbies)

1999-05-19 Thread David B.Teague
On Wed, 19 May 1999 "David B.Teague" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > However, I still don't know where a Debian FAQ may be found! > Can one of you provide a pointer or a URL? Answering my own question, and noting "How to feel incredibly stupid" == Ask a ques

Debian Faq

1996-08-29 Thread Shaya Potter
I would first off like to say, that the new Debian Faq is great and has lots of usefull information. Now that I got that out of the way, here are the little nit pickings. It seems that it has not converted over to postscript gracefully. When I printed it out on my Laser Jet 4M plus, there

Announce: New Debian FAQ

1996-08-27 Thread Sven Rudolph
The new Debian FAQ is now at ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/doc/FAQ/ . It is also available in the current doc-debian package (doc-debian_1.0-4.deb) It is a major rewrite of the previous version. When you have a Debian-related question please try to find a corresponding answer in the FAQ first