Just to compare, when Red Hat released 9.0 maybe 2 years ago (9.2 is
current until 30 June) they disabled by default many older key-lengths and
algorithms in SSL that were known to be weak. This caused issues for
existing installations. You could either re-enable the weaker methods (easy
but a pain
On 01/06/2024 16:42, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version OpenSSH_6.7p1
Debian-5
(I wonder what the string "Debian-5" may mean. The Debian 12 machine has
debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_9.2p1 Debian-2+deb12u2
So "-5" is not the
e id_rsa key.
Indeed NEWS.Debian.gz links
PubkeyAcceptedAlgorithms +ssh-rsa
to RSA/SHA1.
This is the explanation why the message does not say that ssh-rsa is
disabled and why the web is so unclear about the ssh-rsa hash algorithm.
So the Debian 12 client really offered the RSA key but not in a way
On 01/06/2024 01:52, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
debug1: Offering public key:/home/.../.ssh/id_rsa RSA SHA256:...
[...]
The Debian 12 ssh client is obviously willing to try ssh-rsa.
My reading of /usr/share/doc/openssh-client/NEWS.Debian.gz is that
ssh-rsa means SHA1 while clients offers SHA256
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 7:08 PM Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>
> i still have network access to a Debian 8 system, to which i logged in
> from Debian 11 via ssh and a ssh-rsa key. After the upgrade to Debian 12
> ssh fails with this public key authentication.
> The probably relevant mess
"publickey".
and leads to a shell session on the Debian 8 machine.
So the mere message
debug1: Offering public key: /home/.../.ssh/id_rsa RSA SHA256:...
does not mean that RSA would be acceptable on the client side.
It would be nice if the refusal message would be somewhat clearer tha
On 31 May 2024 20:52 +0200, from scdbac...@gmx.net (Thomas Schmitt):
> The ssh-rsa key was generated by Debian 10. man ssh-keygen of buster
> says the default of option -b with RSA was 2048.
> (Does anybody know how to analyze a key file in regard to such
> parameters ?)
$ ssh-keygen -l -f $pubkey
Hi,
i still have network access to a Debian 8 system, to which i logged in
from Debian 11 via ssh and a ssh-rsa key. After the upgrade to Debian 12
ssh fails with this public key authentication.
The probably relevant messages from a run of ssh -vvv are:
debug1: Offering public key: /home
On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 10:22:56AM +0200, Mario Marietto wrote:
> ok. these works :
>
> debootstrap --foreign --arch=armhf jessie jessie-armhf
> http://archive.debian.org/debian
>
> debootstrap --foreign --arch=armhf strech strech-armhf
> http://archive.debian.org/debian
>
> but not this :
>
>
Hello,
El dom., 18 jun. 2023 10:23, Mario Marietto
escribió:
> ok. these works :
>
> debootstrap --foreign --arch=armhf jessie jessie-armhf
> http://archive.debian.org/debian
>
> debootstrap --foreign --arch=armhf strech strech-armhf
> http://archive.debian.org/debian
>
> but not this :
>
> root
ok. these works :
debootstrap --foreign --arch=armhf jessie jessie-armhf
http://archive.debian.org/debian
debootstrap --foreign --arch=armhf strech strech-armhf
http://archive.debian.org/debian
but not this :
root@marietto-Z87-HD3:/home/marietto/Scrivania/Chromebook/linux-distros#
debootstrap -
Can you elaborate the full command ? thanks.
On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 10:12 AM Javier Barroso
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> El dom., 18 jun. 2023 9:56, Mario Marietto
> escribió:
>
>> I'm running Ubuntu 14.04 and I would like to debootstrap debian jessie 8.
>> I've found this tutorial and I tried , but it
Hello,
El dom., 18 jun. 2023 9:56, Mario Marietto
escribió:
> I'm running Ubuntu 14.04 and I would like to debootstrap debian jessie 8.
> I've found this tutorial and I tried , but it didn't work :
>
> from here :
>
> https://blog.lazy-evaluation.net/posts/linux/debian-armhf-bootstrap.html
>
>
>
I'm running Ubuntu 14.04 and I would like to debootstrap debian jessie 8.
I've found this tutorial and I tried , but it didn't work :
from here :
https://blog.lazy-evaluation.net/posts/linux/debian-armhf-bootstrap.html
he says to do :
# debootstrap --foreign --arch=armhf jessie jessie-armhf
sons to do so.
I take that back, then :)
(now seriously: sorry for my sloppy reading)
> > If you need to install an older Debian, that's what the archives are
> > for [...]
> Yes, archive.debian.org is your friend here.
> I doubt you are doing anything useful with something
d play there).
I doubt you are doing anything useful with something like Debian 8 and 4
MB of RAM, I bet it was way older. The smallest system I'd ever use with
a post-2000 Linux had 32 MB of RAM and used Linux 2.4 even after way
newer kernels were released, for reasons.
You should som
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 08:13:56PM +0100, David wrote:
[...]
> The software I want to run is provided by Ubiquity as an NVR for their
> cameras, I have versions for Debian 7, 8 & 9.
I think the warnings from both Andys and hede are a bit too one-sided,
if well-meant.
If you need to install an o
On Thu, 2022-09-29 at 14:52 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 03:09:13PM +0100, David wrote:
> > I have loaded Debian 8 on to a 64 bit pc.
> >
> > Everything went well until I came to configure it, the local screen
> > is
> > blank, but if
Am 29.09.2022 18:02, schrieb Andy Smith:
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 03:43:32PM +0100, David wrote:
The reason for Debian 8 is the software I want to run on it.
This is a really bad idea. The whole thing is lacking security
fixes, so it will only continue to get worse.
If there was no
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 03:43:32PM +0100, David wrote:
> The reason for Debian 8 is the software I want to run on it.
This is a really bad idea. The whole thing is lacking security
fixes, so it will only continue to get worse.
If there was no way to make this software work on a
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 03:09:13PM +0100, David wrote:
> I have loaded Debian 8 on to a 64 bit pc.
>
> Everything went well until I came to configure it, the local screen is
> blank, but if I SSH into the box it works. But I can only logon as a
> user.
>
> I need to be abl
On Thu, 2022-09-29 at 10:22 -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2022-09-29 at 10:09, David wrote:
>
> > I have loaded Debian 8 on to a 64 bit pc.
>
> Why? The current release is Debian 11, and Debian 8 is old enough
> that
> I'd be surprised if it were getting any
On 2022-09-29 at 10:09, David wrote:
> I have loaded Debian 8 on to a 64 bit pc.
Why? The current release is Debian 11, and Debian 8 is old enough that
I'd be surprised if it were getting any support at all. Is there some
specific purpose for which you specifically need to instal
David writes:
> I have loaded Debian 8 on to a 64 bit pc.
>
> Everything went well until I came to configure it, the local screen is
> blank, but if I SSH into the box it works. But I can only logon as a
> user.
>
> I need to be able to logon as root to make changes. I&#x
On Thu 29 Sep 2022 at 15:09:13 (+0100), David wrote:
> I have loaded Debian 8 on to a 64 bit pc.
>
> Everything went well until I came to configure it, the local screen is
> blank, but if I SSH into the box it works. But I can only logon as a
> user.
>
> I need to be abl
I have loaded Debian 8 on to a 64 bit pc.
Everything went well until I came to configure it, the local screen is
blank, but if I SSH into the box it works. But I can only logon as a
user.
I need to be able to logon as root to make changes. I've tried sudu,
but as the sudo program has not
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020, 8:08 AM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 12:49:30PM +0800, zhang yang wrote:
> > IP_ dynaddr
> > To modify and save the prompt: "IP"_ dynaddr" E212: Can't open file for
> > writing“.
> > So I used Chmod 777 ip_ dynaddr authority, display error: Chmod: changing
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 12:49:30PM +0800, zhang yang wrote:
> IP_ dynaddr
> To modify and save the prompt: "IP"_ dynaddr" E212: Can't open file for
> writing“.
> So I used Chmod 777 ip_ dynaddr authority, display error: Chmod: changing
> permissions of 'IP_ dynaddr': Operation not permitted.
> I us
When I turn it on
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/networking/ip-sysctl.html I guess
it's IP_ Dynaddr - Boolean.
If set non-zero, enables support for dynamic addresses. If set to a
non-zero value larger than 1, a kernel log message will be printed when
dynamic address rewriting occurs.Default
zhang yang wrote:
> When I write a raw socket to send packets in Linux C, it shows:
> WARNNING:The current server does not support IP spoofing.
> How to set up debian8 system to use this function
1. Read
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/networking/ip-sysctl.html
2. Install a Debian 10 (sta
When I write a raw socket to send packets in Linux C, it shows:
WARNNING:The current server does not support IP spoofing.
How to set up debian8 system to use this function
On Wed 18 Nov 2020 at 13:03:13 (-0500), Michael Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 12:18:33PM -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
> > David Wright composed on 2020-11-18 09:46 (UTC-0600):
> >
> > > IIRC the Release Notes usually
> > > recommend upgrading the kernel (its minor version upgrade) early
> >
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 12:18:33PM -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
David Wright composed on 2020-11-18 09:46 (UTC-0600):
IIRC the Release Notes usually
recommend upgrading the kernel (its minor version upgrade) early
in the distribution upgrade process.
I don't recall ever seeing that. Curious.
Eve
David Wright composed on 2020-11-18 09:46 (UTC-0600):
> IIRC the Release Notes usually
> recommend upgrading the kernel (its minor version upgrade) early
> in the distribution upgrade process.
I don't recall ever seeing that. Curious.
Even though all my own installations are in multiboot, for Fed
On Mi, 18 nov 20, 09:46:04, David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 17 Nov 2020 at 17:43:43 (+0200), Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> > Depending on when in the release cycle the dist-upgrade is done the
> > newer kernel image may not even be available yet
>
> All the kernels listed above are available now. The O
On Tue 17 Nov 2020 at 17:43:43 (+0200), Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Ma, 17 nov 20, 09:24:05, David Wright wrote:
> > On Sun 15 Nov 2020 at 10:41:55 (+0200), Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > > On Sb, 14 nov 20, 16:36:03, Miroslav Skoric wrote:
> > > > On 11/13/20 9:29 PM, David Wright wrote:
> > > >
> > >
On Ma, 17 nov 20, 09:24:05, David Wright wrote:
> On Sun 15 Nov 2020 at 10:41:55 (+0200), Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Sb, 14 nov 20, 16:36:03, Miroslav Skoric wrote:
> > > On 11/13/20 9:29 PM, David Wright wrote:
> > >
> > > > I would have thought that Debian has made kernel testing just about as
On Sun 15 Nov 2020 at 10:41:55 (+0200), Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Sb, 14 nov 20, 16:36:03, Miroslav Skoric wrote:
> > On 11/13/20 9:29 PM, David Wright wrote:
> >
> > > I would have thought that Debian has made kernel testing just about as
> > > easy as they can since:
> > > jessie installs with
On Sb, 14 nov 20, 16:36:03, Miroslav Skoric wrote:
> On 11/13/20 9:29 PM, David Wright wrote:
>
> >
> > I would have thought that Debian has made kernel testing just about as
> > easy as they can since:
> > jessie installs with 3.16 but 4.9 is also available,
> > stretch installs with 4.9 but
Charles Curley writes:
> True. But it does require emacs. Which in the context of the OP's
> requirement, stands for "Eighty Megs And Constantly Swapping" :-)
It was "eight Megs and constantly swapping": eight Megs was huge on a
Vax.
In the 90s I ran text-mode Emacs on a 386 box with 16M with no
On Sat, 14 Nov 2020 14:41:40 -0600
John Hasler wrote:
> Charles Curley writes:
> >And has the further virtue of not requiring a GUI, only ncurses.
>
> Gnus doesn't even require ncurses.
True. But it does require emacs. Which in the context of the OP's
requirement, stands for "Eighty Megs And
Charles Curley writes:
>And has the further virtue of not requiring a GUI, only ncurses.
Gnus doesn't even require ncurses.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
Miroslav Skoric composed on 2020-11-14 17:02 (UTC+0100):
> I understood from this thread that after distro upgrade
> from 8 to 9 shall work in CLI, and then look for a simple window manager
> & light mail processor.
I can't imagine why it wouldn't work. Last night I performed a fresh
installat
On Sat, 14 Nov 2020 12:49:05 -0500
Dan Ritter wrote:
> In my opinion, mutt is the best mail user agent of all. It's
> also one of the most efficient.
And has the further virtue of not requiring a GUI, only ncurses.
--
Does anybody read signatures any more?
https://charlescurley.com
https://ch
Miroslav Skoric wrote:
> On 11/12/20 9:53 AM, Michael Lange wrote:
>
> In any case, I understood from this thread that after distro upgrade from 8
> to 9 shall work in CLI, and then look for a simple window manager & light
> mail processor.
In my opinion, mutt is the best mail user agent of all
On 11/13/20 3:52 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
Beware that LTS support for jessie ended in June 2020.
https://www.debian.org/releases/jessie/
That system should be upgraded to some release with security support as
soon as possible, especially since it's dealing with e-mail as far as I
understand
On 11/13/20 9:29 PM, David Wright wrote:
I would have thought that Debian has made kernel testing just about as
easy as they can since:
jessie installs with 3.16 but 4.9 is also available,
stretch installs with 4.9 but 4.19 is also available,
buster installs with 4.19
so there's full overla
On 11/12/20 9:53 AM, Michael Lange wrote:
A really good option in this field is IceWM. It has everything a typical
user needs out-of-the-box and is extremely lightweight (and themeable).
From my own experience I agree about that.
Still, the tricky part will be to choose other gui programs
> The problem is the same as the original post: something bad happens, swap
> gets used or over-used, and the machine locks.
AFAIK this is not a common problem. There's a known problem in ZFS that
exhibits this behavior, and IIRC there could be similar problems in the
past if you tried to swap ov
t; If you have an easy means to do that: Yes, I would highly recommend doing
> > > that.
> >
> > I'll consider that kind of test (if possible at all). Need to check what
> > (newer) kernels are available in Debian 8 repository. Cannot remember now
> > what
On 2020-11-13 17:09, Dan Ritter wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020, 9:20 AM Dan Ritter wrote:
Something ate it. Weird. d...@randomstring.org is correct.
was sent to d...@randomstring.org
--
Key ID4BFEBB31
Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> The problem is the same as the original post: something bad happens, swap
> gets used or over-used, and the machine locks. Without even a warning
> message. Linux always behaved that way. BSD-derived OS's running on the
> very same commodity Intel hardware dont have that
The problem is the same as the original post: something bad happens, swap
gets used or over-used, and the machine locks. Without even a warning
message. Linux always behaved that way. BSD-derived OS's running on the
very same commodity Intel hardware dont have that problem. Among my fellow
system a
The problem is the same as the original post: something bad happens, swap
gets used or over-used, and the machine locks. Without even a warning
message. BSD-derived OS's running on the very same commodity Intel hardware
dont have that problem. Why does linux?
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020, 9:20 AM Dan Ritt
Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> I guess Im not the only crank with antique hardware. One of my few unending
> beefs with the linux kernel is swap behavior. Everyone knows what it's for
> and how it "works". But even glancing thru the code doesn't explain its
> real-time run-time behavior. In contrast,
I guess Im not the only crank with antique hardware. One of my few unending
beefs with the linux kernel is swap behavior. Everyone knows what it's for
and how it "works". But even glancing thru the code doesn't explain its
real-time run-time behavior. In contrast, the last time I had swap issues
li
>
> I'll consider that kind of test (if possible at all). Need to check what
> (newer) kernels are available in Debian 8 repository. Cannot remember now
> what (if any) kernel change occurred when I upgraded 7 to 8.
Just for testing purposes you could try a jessie-backports k
> When it happens, I'll probably play the same 'upgrade game' with the next
> 'elderly' candidate (CPU Athlon XP 2500+ 1.84 GHz, 512 MB RAM). I purchased
> it some ten years ago as then second-hand, for some 70 US$, incl. CRT
> display, keyboard, mouse ... I have recently upgraded it from Deb 8 to
easy means to do that: Yes, I would highly recommend doing
that.
I'll consider that kind of test (if possible at all). Need to check what
(newer) kernels are available in Debian 8 repository. Cannot remember
now what (if any) kernel change occurred when I upgraded 7 to 8.
Misko
On 11/13/20 2:36 AM, Doug McGarrett wrote:
I have been only cursorily following here, since I don't use debian, but
I wonder if you might
consider upgrading your mother board to a new one the same size and
shape, with
a faster processor and probably more ram. Then the latest version of deb
wou
traditional window manager, not a desktop environment.
> At this stage (Debian 8) I do that in MATE + Thunderbird. It's slow but
> works. What is not known is whether that would work in Debian 9.
There's only one way to be sure. I have no idea how much memory
Thunderbird use
ght be workable at best (Mate, Xfce, ...)?
> As I said, for nothing much more than occasional Thunderbird, or any other
> compatible mail client that can use the CLI-based ham email server (FBB), to
> process pop3/smtp mails by using copy/paste by mouse click etc.
>
> At this s
On Jo, 12 nov 20, 15:07:48, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:40:50 +0100
> Miroslav Skoric wrote:
>
> > I have an old comp (CPU Pentium II Celeron 400 MHz, 224 MB RAM)
> > running ham radio server in Debian 8. It works well in CLI, but very
> > slow a
On 11/12/20 4:52 PM, Miroslav Skoric wrote:
On 11/11/20 7:42 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
I have an old comp (CPU Pentium II Celeron 400 MHz, 224 MB RAM) running
ham radio server in Debian 8. It works well in CLI, but very slow after
starting GUI. I wonder whether it would be worth to try (if
er (FBB), to process pop3/smtp mails by using
> copy/paste by mouse click etc.
>
> At this stage (Debian 8) I do that in MATE + Thunderbird. It's slow
> but works. What is not known is whether that would work in Debian 9.
Ah. Consider a non-GUI mail user agent (MUA). Pine and elm are
Felix Miata writes:
Miroslav Skoric composed on 2020-11-12 23:01 (UTC+0100):
> At this stage (Debian 8) I do that in MATE + Thunderbird. It's slow but
> works. What is not known is whether that would work in Debian 9.
Possibly you could boot live media 9 to find out, or if you
Miroslav Skoric writes:
On 11/11/20 7:09 PM, Linux-Fan wrote:
Pentium II is old indeed. Whenever using old processors, it is important to
test if the new kernel will still support them.
So maybe I shall try some newer kernel only?
If you have an easy means to do that: Yes, I would highly r
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:40:50 +0100
Miroslav Skoric wrote:
> I have an old comp (CPU Pentium II Celeron 400 MHz, 224 MB RAM)
> running ham radio server in Debian 8. It works well in CLI, but very
> slow after starting GUI. I wonder whether it would be worth to try
> (if possibl
Miroslav Skoric composed on 2020-11-12 23:01 (UTC+0100):
> At this stage (Debian 8) I do that in MATE + Thunderbird. It's slow but
> works. What is not known is whether that would work in Debian 9.
Possibly you could boot live media 9 to find out, or if you have enough disk
spac
On 11/11/20 7:42 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
I have an old comp (CPU Pentium II Celeron 400 MHz, 224 MB RAM) running
ham radio server in Debian 8. It works well in CLI, but very slow after
starting GUI. I wonder whether it would be worth to try (if possible at
all) to upgrade it to Debian 9. Any
On 11/11/20 9:43 PM, Charles Curley wrote:
I have an old comp (CPU Pentium II Celeron 400 MHz, 224 MB RAM)
running ham radio server in Debian 8. It works well in CLI, but very
slow after starting GUI. I wonder whether it would be worth to try
(if possible at all) to upgrade it to Debian 9
s terribly slow, but it is used only once in a while.
It's also worth noting that Debian 8->9 has a huge change to X and video
drivers. Lots of chipsets are supported *differently* in Debian 9 than
they were in previous versions. Whether that's good or bad will depend
on the chip
On 11/11/20 7:09 PM, Linux-Fan wrote:
Pentium II is old indeed. Whenever using old processors, it is important
to test if the new kernel will still support them.
So maybe I shall try some newer kernel only?
Hi,
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 23:36:07 -0300
riveravaldez wrote:
> On 11/11/20, Felix Miata wrote:
> > Charles Curley composed on 2020-11-11 13:43 (UTC-0700):
> >
> >> Also consider a lightweight desktop such as XFCE. But I would
> >> be surprised if that solution helped.
> >
> > Why do people keep c
On Thursday, November 12, 2020, 5:24:49 AM GMT+8, Felix Miata
wrote:
Celeron is a budget family of Intel processors, based upon Pentium II, III, 4
and
newer Pentium processors. Pentium II Celeron means a Celeron based upon the
Pentium II family, the oldest family of Celerons.
OP probably
On 11/11/20, Felix Miata wrote:
> Charles Curley composed on 2020-11-11 13:43 (UTC-0700):
>
>> Also consider a lightweight desktop such as XFCE. But I would
>> be surprised if that solution helped.
>
> Why do people keep claiming XFCE is a lightweight?
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrvJOXypAbk
Charles Curley composed on 2020-11-11 13:43 (UTC-0700):
> Also consider a lightweight desktop such as XFCE. But I would
> be surprised if that solution helped.
Why do people keep claiming XFCE is a lightweight?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrvJOXypAbk
--
Evolution as taught in public schools,
Long Wind composed on 2020-11-11 20:44 (UTC):
>On Thursday, November 12, 2020, 1:45:18 AM GMT+8, Miroslav Skoric wrote:
> I have an old comp (CPU Pentium II Celeron 400 MHz, 224 MB RAM) running...
>...PS: Pentium II and Celeron are two processors.
Celeron is a budget family of Intel proc
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:40:50 +0100
Miroslav Skoric wrote:
> I have an old comp (CPU Pentium II Celeron 400 MHz, 224 MB RAM)
> running ham radio server in Debian 8. It works well in CLI, but very
> slow after starting GUI. I wonder whether it would be worth to try
> (if possibl
Miroslav Skoric composed on 2020-11-11 17:40 (UTC+0100):
> I have an old comp (CPU Pentium II Celeron 400 MHz, 224 MB RAM) running
> ham radio server in Debian 8. It works well in CLI, but very slow after
> starting GUI. I wonder whether it would be worth to try (if possible at
Miroslav Skoric writes:
I have an old comp (CPU Pentium II Celeron 400 MHz, 224 MB RAM) running ham
radio server in Debian 8. It works well in CLI, but very slow after starting
GUI. I wonder whether it would be worth to try (if possible at all) to
upgrade it to Debian 9. Any experience
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 05:40:50PM +0100, Miroslav Skoric wrote:
> I have an old comp (CPU Pentium II Celeron 400 MHz, 224 MB RAM) running ham
> radio server in Debian 8. It works well in CLI, but very slow after starting
> GUI. I wonder whether it would be worth to try (if possible a
I have an old comp (CPU Pentium II Celeron 400 MHz, 224 MB RAM) running
ham radio server in Debian 8. It works well in CLI, but very slow after
starting GUI. I wonder whether it would be worth to try (if possible at
all) to upgrade it to Debian 9. Any experience with such old boxes?
Misko
I would like to say that Debian 8 was my bread and butter at work for most
of its supported lifetime. And my main home platform as well, along with
CentOS.
I think that everyone involved deserves the highest praise.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020, 11:17 PM Laura Arjona Reina wrote
The Debian Project https://www.debian.org/
Debian 8 Long Term Support reaching end-of-life pr...@debian.org
July 9th, 2020 https://www.debian.org/News/2020/20200709
Alejandro Guzman wrote:
> Hola! Ustedes podr?an confirmar la fecha de final soporte de Debian 8? En su
> wiki vemos distintas fechas.
>
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user-spanish/ exists, and
might be useful for you.
This page: https://wiki.debian.org/es/DebianReleases has the
d
wrote:
> Hola! Ustedes podrían confirmar la fecha de final soporte de Debian 8? En
> su wiki vemos distintas fechas.
>
>
>
> Gracias!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Guzmán Alejandro
>
> Tel.: (+5411) 4704-4075
>
>
>
> Coordina
Hola! Ustedes podrían confirmar la fecha de final soporte de Debian 8? En su
wiki vemos distintas fechas.
Gracias!
--
Guzmán Alejandro
Tel.: (+5411) 4704-4075
Coordinación de Infraestructura TI
Dirección de Infraestructura y Desarrollo
Educ.ar S.E. - http://www.educ.ar
Ministerio de
Hello,
I had recently a general protection fault on a Debian 8 server with
Xen (debian pacakge: 4.4.4lts4-0+deb8u1) on the vif50.1-q1-guest
kernel proces. I have copied the kernel log below in this mail for
reference. After this GPF the system was still responding but one domU
lost network
Hello,
this should do the job.
http://archive.debian.org/README
On 02.01.20 17:53, Hector Leon wrote:
> Good Morning;
>
>
>
> Is there a way to get a copy of Debian 8? Thank you !
>
>
>
>
>
> Very Respectfully;
>
>
>
> Hector M Leon
>
>
>
On 02/01/2020 16:53, Hector Leon wrote:
Good Morning;
Is there a way to get a copy of Debian 8? Thank you !
Very Respectfully;
Hector M Leon
http://archive.debian.org/ ?
--
Michael Howard
Hello,
this should do the job.
http://archive.debian.org/README
On 02.01.20 17:53, Hector Leon wrote:
> Good Morning;
>
>
>
> Is there a way to get a copy of Debian 8? Thank you !
>
>
>
>
>
> Very Respectfully;
>
>
>
> Hector M Leon
>
>
>
Hector Leon, 02.01.20, 17:53 CET:
> Is there a way to get a copy of Debian 8? Thank you !
http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/
--
Regards
mks
Good Morning;
Is there a way to get a copy of Debian 8? Thank you !
Very Respectfully;
Hector M Leon
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 08:59:16AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:14:22PM +0200, Steffen Dettmer wrote:
> > Not sure if on topic, but I what is needed to guess, it should run the
> > scripts in order of their rcX/Snn number? I though the difficulty
> > would be to use a
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:14:22PM +0200, Steffen Dettmer wrote:
[...]
> Not sure if on topic, but I what is needed to guess, it should run the
> scripts in order of their rcX/Snn number? I though the difficulty
> would be to use a suited nn number (and in fact, if my init.d script
> would get st
lab-runner.service".
>
Yes, it was. I patched the gitlab-runner script to set
DPKG_MAINTSCRIPT_PACKAGE,
and installed a gitlab-runner2 without that.
> > funny that it does not even tell WHICH file was not found and why it was
> > loaded anyway.
>
> Yeah, that'
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 9:32 PM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 09:26:57PM +0200, Steffen Dettmer wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 3:27 PM Greg Wooledge
> wrote:
> > > This is not correct. Debian's systemd will use init.d scripts in
> > > compatibility mode.
> >
> > Ahh, this s
systemd creates some "virtual unit" on the
> fly, who knows.
There is also a possible gitlab-runner@.service file to check, for the
indeed rather magic stuff from systemd.
Did you install gitlab as whole from packages or from source? Is the
gitlab-runner version compatible to
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 09:26:57PM +0200, Steffen Dettmer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 3:27 PM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > This is not correct. Debian's systemd will use init.d scripts in
> > compatibility mode.
>
> Ahh, this sounds good! But how to do that correctly?
wooledg:~$ systemctl stat
1 - 100 of 704 matches
Mail list logo
